Gear inch question
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Gear inch question
My bike currently has a 50-39-30 front ring set, ans an 11-36 sprocket set. Using those numbers, I get a gear inch low of 22.6
If I were to change to a 26 tooth low gear on the front, that would result in a gear inch of 18.1
Is that really a significant difference? Or perhaps my question might be rephrased as, how low a tooth count would I need on a front ring to make a significant difference?
If I were to change to a 26 tooth low gear on the front, that would result in a gear inch of 18.1
Is that really a significant difference? Or perhaps my question might be rephrased as, how low a tooth count would I need on a front ring to make a significant difference?
#2
Full Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Springdale, Arkansas
Posts: 318
Bikes: 2021 Trek Domane SLR7 Project One 62cm- 2010 Specialized Allez 61cm
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 118 Post(s)
Liked 88 Times
in
44 Posts
At 26-36 I get gear inches of 19.5 if I did the calculation correctly. I get rollout of 61.26 inches at 26 versus 70.69 inches at 30.
Gear ratio is .72 at 26 versus .83 at 30. At a cadence of 80 I get a speed of 4.64mph at 26 versus 5.35mph at 30.
Somebody please check the calclations.
I don't know if that's significant or not. It's about a 13% reduction in gear ratio and gear inches.
Glenn
Gear ratio is .72 at 26 versus .83 at 30. At a cadence of 80 I get a speed of 4.64mph at 26 versus 5.35mph at 30.
Somebody please check the calclations.
I don't know if that's significant or not. It's about a 13% reduction in gear ratio and gear inches.
Glenn
#4
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,971
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 644 Post(s)
Liked 1,044 Times
in
667 Posts
My bike currently has a 50-39-30 front ring set, ans an 11-36 sprocket set. Using those numbers, I get a gear inch low of 22.6
If I were to change to a 26 tooth low gear on the front, that would result in a gear inch of 18.1
Is that really a significant difference? Or perhaps my question might be rephrased as, how low a tooth count would I need on a front ring to make a significant difference?
If I were to change to a 26 tooth low gear on the front, that would result in a gear inch of 18.1
Is that really a significant difference? Or perhaps my question might be rephrased as, how low a tooth count would I need on a front ring to make a significant difference?
Otto
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 356
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 325 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times
in
72 Posts
My bike currently has a 50-39-30 front ring set, ans an 11-36 sprocket set. Using those numbers, I get a gear inch low of 22.6
If I were to change to a 26 tooth low gear on the front, that would result in a gear inch of 18.1
Is that really a significant difference? Or perhaps my question might be rephrased as, how low a tooth count would I need on a front ring to make a significant difference?
If I were to change to a 26 tooth low gear on the front, that would result in a gear inch of 18.1
Is that really a significant difference? Or perhaps my question might be rephrased as, how low a tooth count would I need on a front ring to make a significant difference?
Bicycle Gear Calculator
That page will show you how each combination moves when you change chainrings. But it seems your question is more about how the different gear combinations will feel. I think a difference of 4 gear inches will feel significantly easier to pedal, but you might only need it for very steep climbs or for loaded climbing on long grades.
You're also going to have less redundancy in your gears if you only change the 30t to a 26t. On your current setup, your middle ring only has 3 gears above your small ring. If you reduce the size of your small ring, you will have 4 gears above your small ring when you are in the middle ring. That said, you have a lot of redundant gears already in your drivetrain. It probably makes sense to space out your chainrings more to get the most out of your cassette. I would consider a 24t small ring, a 36t middle ring, and keep the 50t big ring. Here's a link to what that would look like versus your current setup:
Bicycle Gear Calculator
Good luck!
Edit: I just realized my suggested setup require a derailleur capacity of 51. That might be hard to setup.
Last edited by BoraxKid; 09-04-20 at 12:31 PM.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sin City, Nevada
Posts: 2,884
Bikes: Catrike 700, Greenspeed GTO trike, , Linear LWB recumbent, Haluzak Horizon SWB recumbent, Balance 450 MTB, Cannondale SM800 Beast of the East
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 522 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 227 Times
in
179 Posts
One thing to remember is that each derailleur was designed to have a range of gears it will traverse. If you know the brand and model number of the derailleur you can usually find what that range is. It is the # of teeth on the large chainring minus the # of teeth on the small chainring. If you exceed this value with your new setup, the derailleur will not work correctly.
Likes For VegasTriker:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,891
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4790 Post(s)
Liked 3,918 Times
in
2,548 Posts
It's the same difference as dropping your highest gear, the 11 to a 13. Quite real. (Or moving your 36 rear up to a 42.) SO, yes, the 30 to 26 front IS significant.
Ben
Ben
Likes For 79pmooney:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,801
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
Not having a lot of redundancy is good unless you can ride in the 39t most of the time with the 50t on flats and downhill and 30t/26t for hard climbing.
With a triple redundancy isn’t that important to me as the middle is more all purpose and inner and outer only use part of the cassette. It depends on how much chainring shifting you like to do to find the optimum ratio.
John
With a triple redundancy isn’t that important to me as the middle is more all purpose and inner and outer only use part of the cassette. It depends on how much chainring shifting you like to do to find the optimum ratio.
John
Likes For 70sSanO:
#9
aka Phil Jungels
13% is significant, and you will notice it!
Likes For Wanderer:
#10
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,095 Times
in
5,053 Posts
Just keep the 30 ring and remove 4 teeth from it. That's how it works, right?
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 356
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 325 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times
in
72 Posts
There some skip-tooth chain rings out there, as well as some non-standard chains and cogs, but generally speaking, chain ring teeth and chains conform to an expected standard size.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,481
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7649 Post(s)
Liked 3,465 Times
in
1,831 Posts
While @BoraxKid's suggestion might be physically impossible, it has merit as an idea.
As many others have said, yes, dropping to a 26 up front will be a noticeable change. I would call it a significant a opposed to an incremental change.
I agree with @70sSanO that redundancy is not a terrible thing, and in fact is inevitable in almost any multi-ring set-up unless a person designs specifically to eliminate at, beyond other considerations. The keys for me are useable ranges---progressions of gears on the cassette where I can ride without needing a front shift. Nothing is worse than being halfway up a tough climb and realizing you need to drop to the lowest ring---the momentum loss isn't fatal but it can be painful. Similarly I don't like to be riding rollers and constantly shifting between rings to get both good climbing and good descending speed.
Going to the smaller chain ring will be noticeable, and if you want, look at getting a smaller middle ring but do pay attention to derailleur capacity (which you can find online I am sure.)
Keep us posted.
As many others have said, yes, dropping to a 26 up front will be a noticeable change. I would call it a significant a opposed to an incremental change.
I agree with @70sSanO that redundancy is not a terrible thing, and in fact is inevitable in almost any multi-ring set-up unless a person designs specifically to eliminate at, beyond other considerations. The keys for me are useable ranges---progressions of gears on the cassette where I can ride without needing a front shift. Nothing is worse than being halfway up a tough climb and realizing you need to drop to the lowest ring---the momentum loss isn't fatal but it can be painful. Similarly I don't like to be riding rollers and constantly shifting between rings to get both good climbing and good descending speed.
Going to the smaller chain ring will be noticeable, and if you want, look at getting a smaller middle ring but do pay attention to derailleur capacity (which you can find online I am sure.)
Keep us posted.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 356
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 325 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times
in
72 Posts
While @BoraxKid's suggestion might be physically impossible, it has merit as an idea.
And not to be too pedantic, but my idea is only impossible with stock parts (the largest capacity rear derailleur I could find was 47t). I bet some bored engineer or mechanic could find a way to tease an extra 4t of capacity from a long-cage derailleur.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,895
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2599 Post(s)
Liked 1,924 Times
in
1,208 Posts
Back to the original question: yes, it'll make a difference on steep hills (>12%, perhaps), or if you're touring with a load. In other words, if you run out of gears with the setup you've got, that change will give you about 1.5 extra low gears, and that's often significant.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hacienda Hgts
Posts: 2,101
Bikes: 1999 Schwinn Peloton Ultegra 10, Kestrel RT-1000 Ultegra, Trek Marlin 6 Deore 29'er
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 822 Post(s)
Liked 1,955 Times
in
941 Posts
My bike currently has a 50-39-30 front ring set, ans an 11-36 sprocket set. Using those numbers, I get a gear inch low of 22.6
If I were to change to a 26 tooth low gear on the front, that would result in a gear inch of 18.1
Is that really a significant difference? Or perhaps my question might be rephrased as, how low a tooth count would I need on a front ring to make a significant difference?
If I were to change to a 26 tooth low gear on the front, that would result in a gear inch of 18.1
Is that really a significant difference? Or perhaps my question might be rephrased as, how low a tooth count would I need on a front ring to make a significant difference?
#16
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,342
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6200 Post(s)
Liked 4,201 Times
in
2,357 Posts
My bike currently has a 50-39-30 front ring set, ans an 11-36 sprocket set. Using those numbers, I get a gear inch low of 22.6
If I were to change to a 26 tooth low gear on the front, that would result in a gear inch of 18.1
Is that really a significant difference? Or perhaps my question might be rephrased as, how low a tooth count would I need on a front ring to make a significant difference?
If I were to change to a 26 tooth low gear on the front, that would result in a gear inch of 18.1
Is that really a significant difference? Or perhaps my question might be rephrased as, how low a tooth count would I need on a front ring to make a significant difference?
This gear calculator is very powerful in that it allows you to easily compare two systems. You can even change the cassette between systems if you like. I’d suggest playing around with the calculator with other cranks. For example a 48/38/22 would give a very good low and it’s not that much different from what you have now. I doubt you’d have to do much to make the derailer work. I’m running a 46/36/20 crank on one of my bikes with a road front derailer. I don’t have any shifting issues.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
One fat guy on a Surly LHT, self sufficient camping mostly, with a once a week motel.
BTW, 62 years old.
Likes For kombiguy:
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
The problem is that it appears to get that small ring on the Surly, I'd have to change the bottom bracket and cranks. It may have to wait until I'm done with my trip. Thanks to all who gave me the low down!
#19
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,095 Times
in
5,053 Posts
No, that is not how that works at all. To make a difference in the gear size, you have to actually change the diameter of the chain ring, which will necessitate changing the number of teeth to maintain compatibility with the chain. Since chain links and chain ring teeth are pretty much standardized, most people simply refer to the chain rings by the number of teeth on them, and it is assumed that there are no missing teeth on the chain ring.
There some skip-tooth chain rings out there, as well as some non-standard chains and cogs, but generally speaking, chain ring teeth and chains conform to an expected standard size.
There some skip-tooth chain rings out there, as well as some non-standard chains and cogs, but generally speaking, chain ring teeth and chains conform to an expected standard size.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 782
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 226 Post(s)
Liked 45 Times
in
32 Posts
You are going to want that 26 tooth chain ring around Birmingham and Branson. Very steep hills in those areas. 18 gear inches is what you want for all that weight. I can speak from experience. Good luck. The difference between 21 g.i. and 18 g.i. is significant.
#21
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2761 Post(s)
Liked 2,534 Times
in
1,433 Posts
No, that is not how that works at all. To make a difference in the gear size, you have to actually change the diameter of the chain ring, which will necessitate changing the number of teeth to maintain compatibility with the chain. Since chain links and chain ring teeth are pretty much standardized, most people simply refer to the chain rings by the number of teeth on them, and it is assumed that there are no missing teeth on the chain ring.
There some skip-tooth chain rings out there, as well as some non-standard chains and cogs, but generally speaking, chain ring teeth and chains conform to an expected standard size.
There some skip-tooth chain rings out there, as well as some non-standard chains and cogs, but generally speaking, chain ring teeth and chains conform to an expected standard size.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,379
Bikes: 1982 Bianchi Sport SX, Rayleigh Tamland 1, Rans V-Rex recumbent, Fuji MTB, 80's Cannondale MTB with BBSHD ebike motor
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 667 Post(s)
Liked 529 Times
in
355 Posts
How are you guys calculating gear inches without knowing the tire size?
Simple answer is ride your bike fully loaded. if you ever find yourself trying to shift into a lower gear that isn't there, than consider swapping out rings.
Simple answer is ride your bike fully loaded. if you ever find yourself trying to shift into a lower gear that isn't there, than consider swapping out rings.
#23
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,342
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6200 Post(s)
Liked 4,201 Times
in
2,357 Posts
By making some assumptions. A 50/39/30 crank isn’t usually found on mountain bikes so that means 700c tires. Touring is usually 32mm to 37mm. If you did the calculations with a 23mm tire, the gearing isn’t going to be radically different. The gear calculator makes it easy to change the wheel parameters.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,379
Bikes: 1982 Bianchi Sport SX, Rayleigh Tamland 1, Rans V-Rex recumbent, Fuji MTB, 80's Cannondale MTB with BBSHD ebike motor
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 667 Post(s)
Liked 529 Times
in
355 Posts
And by my guess different people are making different assumptions leading to arguments about different numbers
Gear inches can be hard to translate into real world. One way around that is to keep an excel spreadsheet with all of your bikes in it. Most people know what gears they like to ride on each of their bikes and which ones they never use. When it comes time to upgrade gearing the spread sheet helps you select the best set of rings.
Gear inches can be hard to translate into real world. One way around that is to keep an excel spreadsheet with all of your bikes in it. Most people know what gears they like to ride on each of their bikes and which ones they never use. When it comes time to upgrade gearing the spread sheet helps you select the best set of rings.
#25
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,342
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6200 Post(s)
Liked 4,201 Times
in
2,357 Posts
Arguments about gearing are also usually of the “no one needs gears that low” nature. I’m a firm believer in having the lowest gears I can engineer with the equipment I have. If that means modifying the crank or adding a derailer extender, I’m willing to go that far. I’ve never found myself saying “my gear is too low”.
Gear inches can be hard to translate into real world. One way around that is to keep an excel spreadsheet with all of your bikes in it. Most people know what gears they like to ride on each of their bikes and which ones they never use. When it comes time to upgrade gearing the spread sheet helps you select the best set of rings.
One of the things I do is to provide a link to gear-calculator.com whenever I post about gearing on here so that people can look at what their gearing is. If I made an incorrect assumption, it’s easily corrected in the calculator. But, honestly, I only use the gear-calculator for planning gearing. I don’t use it while I ride nor is there any need to do so.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Last edited by cyccommute; 09-06-20 at 09:43 AM.
Likes For cyccommute: