Litespeed Classic '97 Eyelets
#1
//
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 766
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
Litespeed Classic '97 Eyelets
First off, dunno if this is the right forum for this question, but let's see if y'all can help me out. I've been wanting a Ti frame for so long and it finally just happened! Yay Litespeed Classic!!!
So now I'm thinking I want to run some errands and pick up groceries on this one and maybe I should fit it out with a Tubus Fly or Airy rack. I'm looking at these dropouts and they have two holes that look almost but maybe slightly larger than the standard size of eyelets (see photo). But they are smooth not tapped. Would this be a safe rack attachment point or should I leave them be and go with a QR adapter? If I Try and attach the rack in one of these holes should I try and tap it or find a bolt that can fit the clearance between the frame and cassette?
So now I'm thinking I want to run some errands and pick up groceries on this one and maybe I should fit it out with a Tubus Fly or Airy rack. I'm looking at these dropouts and they have two holes that look almost but maybe slightly larger than the standard size of eyelets (see photo). But they are smooth not tapped. Would this be a safe rack attachment point or should I leave them be and go with a QR adapter? If I Try and attach the rack in one of these holes should I try and tap it or find a bolt that can fit the clearance between the frame and cassette?
#2
Somewhat slow older guy
Nice Classic! I've got a '96 Catalyst, no such holes in the dropouts. I'd doubt that you'll be able to tap that Ti, but smarter folks than me will soon ad on here.
#3
//
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 766
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
Thanks! On closer inspection the holes are not only lacking threads but seem ever so slightly oblong. Less risky to just use the QR adapter that Tubus sells, I suppose.
#4
Junior Member
Beautiful bike, but I question whether it is a Classic. I have a '97 Classic which I bought new, (still have it), and it doesn't look like mine for a few reasons. First , the seat post treatment looks nothing like mine. On mine the seat stays attach higher up with less seat post showing above the junction. The decals appear to be pre-1997. That is not proof positive of year of manufacture (you can buy any year's decals from Litespeed. Mine are from the '98 year). I don't think LS offered that finish that year. Lastly, mine doesn't have eyelets of any kind.
Please don't misunderstand me; I'm not trying to be a buzzkill. What you have should be a fine riding machine. I truly enjoy mine. I have seen LS catalogs online. Track em down and check the pics. At the end of the day, I could be wrong. But I don't think I am in this case.
Enjoy the ride!
Please don't misunderstand me; I'm not trying to be a buzzkill. What you have should be a fine riding machine. I truly enjoy mine. I have seen LS catalogs online. Track em down and check the pics. At the end of the day, I could be wrong. But I don't think I am in this case.
Enjoy the ride!
#5
//
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 766
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
Beautiful bike, but I question whether it is a Classic. I have a '97 Classic which I bought new, (still have it), and it doesn't look like mine for a few reasons. First , the seat post treatment looks nothing like mine. On mine the seat stays attach higher up with less seat post showing above the junction. The decals appear to be pre-1997. That is not proof positive of year of manufacture (you can buy any year's decals from Litespeed. Mine are from the '98 year). I don't think LS offered that finish that year. Lastly, mine doesn't have eyelets of any kind.
Please don't misunderstand me; I'm not trying to be a buzzkill. What you have should be a fine riding machine. I truly enjoy mine. I have seen LS catalogs online. Track em down and check the pics. At the end of the day, I could be wrong. But I don't think I am in this case.
Enjoy the ride!
Please don't misunderstand me; I'm not trying to be a buzzkill. What you have should be a fine riding machine. I truly enjoy mine. I have seen LS catalogs online. Track em down and check the pics. At the end of the day, I could be wrong. But I don't think I am in this case.
Enjoy the ride!
Last edited by ephemeralskin; 09-02-19 at 10:21 PM.
#6
Not lost wanderer.
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lititz, Pa
Posts: 3,328
Bikes: In USA; 73 Raleigh Super Course dingle speed, 72 Raleigh Gran Sport SS, 72 Geoffry Butler, 81 Centurion Pro-Tour, 74 Gugie Grandier Sportier
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 885 Post(s)
Liked 990 Times
in
522 Posts
Really nice bike, drooling.
Just looking at the bike, I would rotate the bars up so they are relatively flat giving you a better position on the hoods and flat part leading out to the hoods. As it is resting on the reaching part will be hard and this give you more hand positions. See below
this will give you approximately 5 hand placements as seen below
Just looking at the bike, I would rotate the bars up so they are relatively flat giving you a better position on the hoods and flat part leading out to the hoods. As it is resting on the reaching part will be hard and this give you more hand positions. See below
this will give you approximately 5 hand placements as seen below
__________________
Cambodia bikes, Bridgestone SRAM 2 speed, 2012 Fuji Stratos...
Cambodia bikes, Bridgestone SRAM 2 speed, 2012 Fuji Stratos...
Last edited by bwilli88; 09-02-19 at 10:31 PM.
#7
//
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 766
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
I googled drilling and tapping titanium and it basically says just use proper technique (carbide metal drill and cooling fluid). I could prop the frame up and use a drill press. Hmmm, probably y'all in the vintage forum don't want me modifying it. Is this a bad idea though??
#8
Not lost wanderer.
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lititz, Pa
Posts: 3,328
Bikes: In USA; 73 Raleigh Super Course dingle speed, 72 Raleigh Gran Sport SS, 72 Geoffry Butler, 81 Centurion Pro-Tour, 74 Gugie Grandier Sportier
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 885 Post(s)
Liked 990 Times
in
522 Posts
It is your bike, mod away. Just read up on drilling and working titanium.
__________________
Cambodia bikes, Bridgestone SRAM 2 speed, 2012 Fuji Stratos...
Cambodia bikes, Bridgestone SRAM 2 speed, 2012 Fuji Stratos...
#9
//
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 766
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
The seller has an ebay listing that is still up atm, but I found the bike locally on CL and got it for a lot less. You can peep all the details here-
https://www.ebay.com/itm/1997-57cm-L...AAAOSwyjNdO01E
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 2,435
Bikes: Drysdale/Gitane/Zeus/Masi/Falcon/Palo Alto/Raleigh/Legnano
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 983 Post(s)
Liked 632 Times
in
403 Posts
I guess rivnuts wouldn't work?
__________________
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,701
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1136 Post(s)
Liked 650 Times
in
336 Posts
Personally I would not drill and tap the frame. Although it might work, you are risking weakening the dropouts. P-clamps or the QR adapter you mentioned are plenty strong for carrying a small load. If you are planning on carrying a lot of weight on the back you need to use a different bike for that. The goal of this bike was light weight tubing so using it for a large amount of groceries or touring is not a good idea. It is just not the right tool for the job. Which might give you an excuse to find a different bike with rack eyelets
By the way, yes, those are early 90s decals. Very similar to a '93 Tachyon I once had.
By the way, yes, those are early 90s decals. Very similar to a '93 Tachyon I once had.
Likes For TenGrainBread:
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 2,841
Bikes: 2009 Handsome Devil, 1987 Trek 520 Cirrus, 1978 Motobecane Grand Touring, 1987 Nishiki Cresta GT, 1989 Specialized Allez Former bikes; 1986 Miyata Trail Runner, 1979 Miyata 912, 2011 VO Rando, 1999 Cannondale R800, 1986 Schwinn Passage
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 796 Post(s)
Liked 522 Times
in
367 Posts
First off nice find OP, maybe I am missing something, it is your bike to do with as you will - but why turn a TI road racing machine into your errand runner when there are probably hundreds of cheap steel vintage road and mtb in your area that would do the job and have loads of braze-ons? If you do want the fastest and most TI errand runner on your block then maybe a Nitto rack with p-clamps or a Topeak beam rack ? YMMV
#13
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,409 Times
in
909 Posts
My '96 Classic has eyelets piggybacked on the rear dropouts and also up near the brake bridge.They are tapped.
Obviously for a rack, as there are no eyelets on the carbon fork for fenders, and I'm not sure of the clearance.
Not sure why I'd put a rack on it, but as I've not ridden it yet, never saying never.
I'm not a fan of the color scheme, with the decals and the yellow on the fork.
My endgame will be a black Ritchey fork and black decals, if any at all, and 6800.
Just like most of the other Ti bikes out there, I guess. They do tend to all look alike.
I would not drill and tap your frame holes. Even a pop rivet seems a better idea.
I'd find a bolt that went through and through with a lock washer and nut on the inside.
Easy on, easy off.
Obviously for a rack, as there are no eyelets on the carbon fork for fenders, and I'm not sure of the clearance.
Not sure why I'd put a rack on it, but as I've not ridden it yet, never saying never.
I'm not a fan of the color scheme, with the decals and the yellow on the fork.
My endgame will be a black Ritchey fork and black decals, if any at all, and 6800.
Just like most of the other Ti bikes out there, I guess. They do tend to all look alike.
I would not drill and tap your frame holes. Even a pop rivet seems a better idea.
I'd find a bolt that went through and through with a lock washer and nut on the inside.
Easy on, easy off.
Last edited by RobbieTunes; 09-03-19 at 11:10 AM.
Likes For RobbieTunes:
#14
//
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 766
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
Hey y'all, my bad it took me this long to get around to posting an updated photo. Here it is with my own seat and pedals, plus the new rack, water bottle cage, lights and cell phone mount. The bike is perfect in so many ways, except still feeling kinda cramped. I keep wanting to slide further back on the saddle. Should I get a setback seatpost before a longer stem? I might end up trying both or trading someone for a bigger frame if possible.
I hadn't ever heard of these but this is pretty much exactly what I ended up finding, while rummaging through the various fastener drawers at the hardware store. They are called Brad Hole Tee Nuts and I still had to very slightly enlarge the holes in the frame, but this turned out to be easily managed with just a handheld drill and everything worked out great! Also, the main reason something like this is necessary is there is zero clearance for a bolt head or a regular washer/nut, since it would hit the teeth on the first cog.
I mean, how would anyone not want to have the fastest TI errand runner? Also I live 15 miles out in the country, so running errands is at minimum a 30 mile ride.
I guess rivnuts wouldn't work?
First off nice find OP, maybe I am missing something, it is your bike to do with as you will - but why turn a TI road racing machine into your errand runner when there are probably hundreds of cheap steel vintage road and mtb in your area that would do the job and have loads of braze-ons? If you do want the fastest and most TI errand runner on your block then maybe a Nitto rack with p-clamps or a Topeak beam rack ? YMMV
Last edited by ephemeralskin; 01-26-20 at 01:06 PM.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Southeast TX
Posts: 614
Bikes: Several
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 207 Post(s)
Liked 1,042 Times
in
322 Posts
Your saddle appears to be tilted down slightly, which may be causing you to slide forward. I'd suggest leveling the saddle and see if it helps. If that's not the case, take your bike that fits the best and try matching the dimensions of its saddle location.
#16
//
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 766
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
I think I sorted it out! I just remembered I have a little Campy post that is the exact right fit! I also tipped the nose up a bit and that feels better too.
Last edited by ephemeralskin; 01-26-20 at 05:19 PM.
#17
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Burnaby, British Columbia
Posts: 167
Bikes: 1984 & 1990 Marinoni Specials - 1990 Bianchi Sika - 1993 Cannondale M800 - 1996 GT Zaskar - 1993 Kona Kilauea - 1987 Ritchey Ascent - 1996 Rocky Mountain Vertex - 2008 Kona Dogma - 1976 Schwinn Suburban - 1994 Kuwahara Makai
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times
in
58 Posts
Great setback post choice, vintage C-Record is one of the best looking posts created (IMHO), are you within the max height line?
#18
//
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 766
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
Agreed, love this post. The max line is not showing, but it is close and the end of the seatpost does not go past the bottom of the top tube. I think it is about 7/8 of the way there. Is this ok? I suppose the extended seat tube does something to support it and I tend to ride light.
#19
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,409 Times
in
909 Posts
Agreed, love this post. The max line is not showing, but it is close and the end of the seatpost does not go past the bottom of the top tube. I think it is about 7/8 of the way there. Is this ok? I suppose the extended seat tube does something to support it and I tend to ride light.
Threaded seat stay eyelets
Threaded rear eyelets
Pretty sure it's a '96
Last edited by RobbieTunes; 01-28-20 at 09:55 PM.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Medford MA
Posts: 2,089
Bikes: Ron Cooper touring, 1959 Jack Taylor 650b ladyback touring tandem, Vitus 979, Joe Bell painted Claud Butler Dalesman, Colin Laing curved tube tandem, heavily-Dilberted 1982 Trek 6xx, René Herse tandem
Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 964 Post(s)
Liked 1,451 Times
in
723 Posts
I hadn't ever heard of these but this is pretty much exactly what I ended up finding, while rummaging through the various fastener drawers at the hardware store. They are called Brad Hole Tee Nuts and I still had to very slightly enlarge the holes in the frame, but this turned out to be easily managed with just a handheld drill and everything worked out great! Also, the main reason something like this is necessary is there is zero clearance for a bolt head or a regular washer/nut, since it would hit the teeth on the first cog.
I mean, how would anyone not want to have the fastest TI errand runner? Also I live 15 miles out in the country, so running errands is at minimum a 30 mile ride.
I mean, how would anyone not want to have the fastest TI errand runner? Also I live 15 miles out in the country, so running errands is at minimum a 30 mile ride.
Your solution is less invasive. But those drops are massive, so I don't think there'd be much danger of them breaking, unless you took out a huge chunk.
And yeah, I get it. I have a friend who commutes on a similar old Litespeed, even in winter salt. He swears by it. Fenders next?!
__________________
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
Last edited by scarlson; 01-28-20 at 11:02 PM.
#21
//
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 766
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
I mean, you are right the seatpost should ideally extend further and that the rule of thumb is at minimum past the top tube. But as far as what can I get away with under normal use, idk the seat clamp is holding it pretty solid. I wanna say it is probably fine. Looking at a Kestrel 200 there is a lot less support on those frames, I'm not sure this is comparable. It is a shame these vintage aero posts don't come in a 250mm length. Is there anything out there that is similar? I guess a Thomson or a generic Ti post is my best replacement. I don't really trust the no-name carbon posts and also aesthetics.
#22
Senior Member
I would side with Robbie on the seatpost, if we are voting. Much better situation with another inch or two. Will it be ok? I don’t know for sure but if it were my bike, I would always worry about it, and what fun is that?
Nice solution with the t-nuts. For the record, they are a very different fastener than a rivnut, which draws in on itself like a wall anchor to make a permanent attachment point.
Nice bike and one heck of a grocery getter.
Nice solution with the t-nuts. For the record, they are a very different fastener than a rivnut, which draws in on itself like a wall anchor to make a permanent attachment point.
Nice bike and one heck of a grocery getter.
Likes For ephemeralskin:
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kalash74
Classic & Vintage
36
02-26-17 05:35 PM
PaddleNPedal
Classic & Vintage
18
02-25-13 02:17 PM