School me on electronic shifters
#26
Junior Member
As someone who worked in biked shops for 12 years, I've ridden just about everything, except for Campy electronic. My last road bike had Ultegra 11 sp mechanical, and it shifted flawless. That being said, my next road and mountain bike will have SRAM wireless on them. Less maintenance, simple setup, and can almost be installed on any bike. With the new Shimano Di2, you still have a battery wired to a front and rear derailleur, so installation is a little bit more challenging.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,763
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1109 Post(s)
Liked 1,200 Times
in
760 Posts
I have Sram AXS 2X and it's really great. Especially the installation and the shifing design. Haven't used Shimano, but I imagine the actual shifting performance is similar. My wife especially loves the AXS, while I just like it a lot. Is it better than manual? yeah, maybe, but it's not like it's a night and day performance upgrade. I got it for our bikes just because - in our late 60s, it was either try it now, or never. No regrets, however...
Is it worth the cost difference? No. I easily afforded it, but if I couldn't, I wouldn't sacrifice anything for it. I'd get top end mechanical for fewer $ a;nd lighter weight.
I wouldn't have it for my one and only bike. Sure it's reliable and doesn't require much if any maintenance. But if something goes bad, parts generally aren't readily available and they're expensive. That would be fine at home especially if you had another bike to ride for however long it took to get parts. But, we do multi-month RV trips far away from home and used to take our electronic "best" bikes with us. But last year, I bought the least expensive Salsa gravel bikes from REI to keep on the RV (BTW, the perform perfectly and are fun to ride). Why? Because where we travel, we couldn't possibly get replacement parts, even batteries and chargers, easily or quickly. Whereas, with a fully mechanical bike - shifting and brakes - you could get adequate replacement and maintenance parts almost anywhere we travel. Everything from chains and cables, to inexpensive shifting or brake parts.
So if you have only one bike or do bike-critical long trips away from home, you might want to stick with high end mechanical. Since we have multiple bikes at home, it's great having one be electronic, and I'm glad we have them. Again, haven't had any problems and they've both worked perfectly with no post-installation (myself) adjustments needed. So pretty much carefree except for my concern about repair and replacement.
Is it worth the cost difference? No. I easily afforded it, but if I couldn't, I wouldn't sacrifice anything for it. I'd get top end mechanical for fewer $ a;nd lighter weight.
I wouldn't have it for my one and only bike. Sure it's reliable and doesn't require much if any maintenance. But if something goes bad, parts generally aren't readily available and they're expensive. That would be fine at home especially if you had another bike to ride for however long it took to get parts. But, we do multi-month RV trips far away from home and used to take our electronic "best" bikes with us. But last year, I bought the least expensive Salsa gravel bikes from REI to keep on the RV (BTW, the perform perfectly and are fun to ride). Why? Because where we travel, we couldn't possibly get replacement parts, even batteries and chargers, easily or quickly. Whereas, with a fully mechanical bike - shifting and brakes - you could get adequate replacement and maintenance parts almost anywhere we travel. Everything from chains and cables, to inexpensive shifting or brake parts.
So if you have only one bike or do bike-critical long trips away from home, you might want to stick with high end mechanical. Since we have multiple bikes at home, it's great having one be electronic, and I'm glad we have them. Again, haven't had any problems and they've both worked perfectly with no post-installation (myself) adjustments needed. So pretty much carefree except for my concern about repair and replacement.
Last edited by Camilo; 11-11-23 at 09:42 PM.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 453 Times
in
338 Posts
You won’t be faster though.
And I say this as someone who’s only driven EVs with no gearboxes at all for 9 years
#29
Full Member
For me Shimano Di2 is great if you are already a Shimano person, want the best battery life, and the best overall shifting and braking. SRAM AXS is great if you want lower price points, more gearing range, the ability to mix and match road/gravel/MTB, want hot swappable batteries, and want the ease of installation.
#30
Full Member
I have Sram AXS 2X and it's really great. Especially the installation and the shifing design. Haven't used Shimano, but I imagine the actual shifting performance is similar. My wife especially loves the AXS, while I just like it a lot. Is it better than manual? yeah, maybe, but it's not like it's a night and day performance upgrade. I got it for our bikes just because - in our late 60s, it was either try it now, or never. No regrets, however...
Is it worth the cost difference? No. I easily afforded it, but if I couldn't, I wouldn't sacrifice anything for it. I'd get top end mechanical for fewer $ a;nd lighter weight.
I wouldn't have it for my one and only bike. Sure it's reliable and doesn't require much if any maintenance. But if something goes bad, parts generally aren't readily available and they're expensive. That would be fine at home especially if you had another bike to ride for however long it took to get parts. But, we do multi-month RV trips far away from home and used to take our electronic "best" bikes with us. But last year, I bought the least expensive Salsa gravel bikes from REI to keep on the RV (BTW, the perform perfectly and are fun to ride). Why? Because where we travel, we couldn't possibly get replacement parts, even batteries and chargers, easily or quickly. Whereas, with a fully mechanical bike - shifting and brakes - you could get adequate replacement and maintenance parts almost anywhere we travel. Everything from chains and cables, to inexpensive shifting or brake parts.
So if you have only one bike or do bike-critical long trips away from home, you might want to stick with high end mechanical. Since we have multiple bikes at home, it's great having one be electronic, and I'm glad we have them. Again, haven't had any problems and they've both worked perfectly with no post-installation (myself) adjustments needed. So pretty much carefree except for my concern about repair and replacement.
Is it worth the cost difference? No. I easily afforded it, but if I couldn't, I wouldn't sacrifice anything for it. I'd get top end mechanical for fewer $ a;nd lighter weight.
I wouldn't have it for my one and only bike. Sure it's reliable and doesn't require much if any maintenance. But if something goes bad, parts generally aren't readily available and they're expensive. That would be fine at home especially if you had another bike to ride for however long it took to get parts. But, we do multi-month RV trips far away from home and used to take our electronic "best" bikes with us. But last year, I bought the least expensive Salsa gravel bikes from REI to keep on the RV (BTW, the perform perfectly and are fun to ride). Why? Because where we travel, we couldn't possibly get replacement parts, even batteries and chargers, easily or quickly. Whereas, with a fully mechanical bike - shifting and brakes - you could get adequate replacement and maintenance parts almost anywhere we travel. Everything from chains and cables, to inexpensive shifting or brake parts.
So if you have only one bike or do bike-critical long trips away from home, you might want to stick with high end mechanical. Since we have multiple bikes at home, it's great having one be electronic, and I'm glad we have them. Again, haven't had any problems and they've both worked perfectly with no post-installation (myself) adjustments needed. So pretty much carefree except for my concern about repair and replacement.
#31
Senior Member
Sram wireless is simply the best out there. Shimano sticks with wired front and rear derailleur and I really don't understand why when a full wireless system is so much better and I might say superior. The only flaw with Sram wireless is the brakes. I don't like having to use Dot fluid plus their brake system is a PIA to bleed. The Shimano brakes are superior in every respect and for that reason my choice is Shimano Di2.
However if it were possible to mix the two the best electronic drive train would be Sram shifting and Shimano disc brakes. If Sram were rim brake compatible, well that would simply be at the top of the electronic heap!
However if it were possible to mix the two the best electronic drive train would be Sram shifting and Shimano disc brakes. If Sram were rim brake compatible, well that would simply be at the top of the electronic heap!
#32
Senior Member
You can still buy sram red shifters that work with rim brakes or cable operated disc calipers. I had the force mechanical levers, but they have been discontinued. The latest bleeding edge calipers on force and red are easy to bleed. I don't have any complaints about DOT 5.1 fluid either. I have the bleed kit that sram sells. It works just fine.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4416 Post(s)
Liked 4,871 Times
in
3,015 Posts
SRAM appear to be more savvy with electronics/comms/software than Shimano. Fully wireless should be standard in the 2020s. It's one of the main advantages over cable shifting.
#34
Junior Member
AFAIK Shimano intentionally went with semi wireless because of battery size - the larger battery allows more powerful (ie faster-shifting) motors while maintaining reasonable battery life. There's a limit to how much battery you can hang onto a derailleur. Is the difference in shifting speed significant? Don't know, although I doubt if any SRAM user lost a race because their shifting was 0.1 sec slower than that of their Di2-using competitor. Still, I don't think Shimano's decision to go semi-wireless is because they couldn't hack full wireless. Bluetooth connectivity isn't rocket science - hell, if the Italians can do it...... (have driven enough Fiats to have realistic expectations of Italian electronics prowess )
Last edited by 13ollocks; 11-14-23 at 12:41 PM.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,885
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3242 Post(s)
Liked 2,087 Times
in
1,182 Posts
Story of something going bad. I have an AXS system on my FS, its a good system. Plus an XT 1X system on my HT and an Ultegra system on a road bike, that one for better then 6 years with zero issues. The XT system recently started having issues after 4 years of moderate use. The battery wasn't holding a charge and I assumed bad battery, as they are the most likely issues and after 4 years it's likely done, so I replaced the battery (this is all documented on the Di2 Parasitic Drain post here). Replaced the battery, updated the system via the E-Tube software, fast drain continued. Took to a local shop, their diagnostic software identified a bad shifter. It would shift but if plugged would killed the battery in about 2-3 days. They quoted me a price of $160, which wasn't terrible, some online shops had the Di2 XT shifter at $185. Then I checked Cambia, they had it at $111, with a one time 20% off discount, so now $91. Ordered. So lesson learned is yes parts fail, sometimes they are expensive, but always shop around, you may find it at considerable discount.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4416 Post(s)
Liked 4,871 Times
in
3,015 Posts
AFAIK Shimano intentionally went with semi wireless because of battery size - the larger battery allows more powerful (ie faster-shifting) motors while maintaining reasonable battery life. There's a limit to how much battery you can hang onto a derailleur. Is the difference in shifting speed significant? Don't know, although I doubt if any SRAM user lost a race because their shifting was 0.1 sec slower than that of their Di2-using competitor. Still, I don't think Shimano's decision to go semi-wireless is because they couldn't hack full wireless. Bluetooth connectivity isn't rocket science - hell, if the Italians can do it...... (have driven enough Fiats to have realistic expectations of Italian electronics prowess )
Likes For PeteHski:
#37
Junior Member
This is correct. I believe its a 128 bit program that always choses a different code each time it's used so there's not accidental pairing with the same bike next to yours. SRAM made install and use just about dummy proof.
#38
Senior Member
I use well tuned SRAM systems, both electronic and mechanical. There is no real difference in shifting quality: almost 100% crisp shifting with both. Electronic requires less finger power to shift and 2 synchronized ways for front and rear (not huge advantages), at the expense of keeping an eye on charging the batteries of the derailleurs and changing the batteries of the shifter.
Both are very good, but there is a question mark for mechanical shifting: for how long will SRAM / Shimano will sell spare parts?
Both are very good, but there is a question mark for mechanical shifting: for how long will SRAM / Shimano will sell spare parts?
#39
Junior Member
campagnolo wireless shifting is Bluetooth-based, according to campagnolo. SRAM may not use BT, but it certainly appears to be adequate for the purpose.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4416 Post(s)
Liked 4,871 Times
in
3,015 Posts
That's a good point. Maybe BT is fine, but SRAM must have had a good reason to develop their own network. Electronics is not really my field, but I don't like the Shimano wired solution. It seems unnecessary and makes installation/maintenance much harder work. I fully expect Shimano to go wireless sooner or later. I think it is almost inevitable.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Los Alamitos, Calif.
Posts: 2,475
Bikes: Canyon Endurace
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1041 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times
in
541 Posts
I love my Ultegra 12sp Di2. My Canyon Endurace came with it installed/setup and they must have gotten it right at the factory because it shifts beautifully, I've never touched it. After about 1000 miles it's still shifting flawlessly. I guess you can call me a Di2 fanboy.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,885
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3242 Post(s)
Liked 2,087 Times
in
1,182 Posts
That's a good point. Maybe BT is fine, but SRAM must have had a good reason to develop their own network. Electronics is not really my field, but I don't like the Shimano wired solution. It seems unnecessary and makes installation/maintenance much harder work. I fully expect Shimano to go wireless sooner or later. I think it is almost inevitable.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4416 Post(s)
Liked 4,871 Times
in
3,015 Posts
Having a single very large (ish) battery for 2 shifters is a good alternative to 2 smaller batteries that would need charging more frequently. With the Shimano system, once installed (and sometimes that’s done on a new bike), you don’t ever deal with the internal wiring). Yes a SRAM system is easier to install if you are doing the work, but I’ve installed 2 Di2 systems and it’s never difficult. Shimano got smart making the road shifters wireless, but in use, both systems work well and are pretty much maintaince free.
Likes For PeteHski:
#44
Junior Member
That's a good point. Maybe BT is fine, but SRAM must have had a good reason to develop their own network. Electronics is not really my field, but I don't like the Shimano wired solution. It seems unnecessary and makes installation/maintenance much harder work. I fully expect Shimano to go wireless sooner or later. I think it is almost inevitable.
#45
Senior Member
I switched from rim brake to disc brake over 3 years ago. No regrets. The biggest improvement is being able to have 28-35mm tubeless tires on wider 25mm IW hookless rims that need far less pressure. It makes a big improvement in the ride. Right now I'm using 28mm front and 30mm rear with 55 psi in both, on 3 bikes.
I used Campy for 25 years, but switched to SRAM AXS in 2020. It shifts every bit as well and it's far less trouble compared to internally routed cables.
I used Campy for 25 years, but switched to SRAM AXS in 2020. It shifts every bit as well and it's far less trouble compared to internally routed cables.
#46
Pedalin' Erry Day
This is not a common opinion, but I actually quite like Shimano's half wireless setup. It's only at the shifters where I see wireless mattering at all and the wired bits are going to be all internal in most frames anyways. That said, I'm plotting my next build and actually planning to run fully wired 12sp Di2. Since there's no more A-junction to worry about, all it takes is 2 extra wires and they'll only have to be routed once. That seems like a good tradeoff to me for never having to worry about coin cell batteries and having the same exceptionally long battery life as 11sp setups do.
#47
Full Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Albuquerque NM USA
Posts: 492
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 222 Post(s)
Liked 304 Times
in
194 Posts
This is not a common opinion, but I actually quite like Shimano's half wireless setup. It's only at the shifters where I see wireless mattering at all and the wired bits are going to be all internal in most frames anyways. That said, I'm plotting my next build and actually planning to run fully wired 12sp Di2. Since there's no more A-junction to worry about, all it takes is 2 extra wires and they'll only have to be routed once. That seems like a good tradeoff to me for never having to worry about coin cell batteries and having the same exceptionally long battery life as 11sp setups do.
I certainly like the Ultegra Di2 I have on my road bike. While it has wireless shifters, I like that I don't need to keep two separate derailleur batteries charged up. I'm not saying that makes it better than a fully wireless system. Just that it is a positive in the wired system's favor.
In the end, I'm going to chose the product I want to ride and use regularly, and don't put much weight on whether it takes a few hours more to install it.
#48
Senior Member
Having two batteries is nothing to complain about if you have two chargers. A full charge only takes an hour. I always carry a spare, so I'll never be without power. On a hilly 46 mile ride with over 3500 feet of climbing, I made 12 FD shifts and 450 RD shifts. My usual summer week is three 52 mile rides. I recharge every week, just to be safe.
#49
Junior Member
No one comments much about the downsides of electronic shifting. When things break, which happens. The down time for simple things that would not happen on a mechanical system. Then there is high cost of systems (and spares, cables, etc), compatibility, proprietary parts and firmware, no component level repairability (no right to repair), battery shelf life, etc... $$$$ Which leads to what made this all possible, cyclists willful acceptance of the planned obsolescence model, and the consumerism mindset. Got to get a new bike as it will make me faster! The marketing man said so!
So now we have throw away electronics and bikes, frames with proprietary parts. One of my bikes have C-Record from 1993. Still shifts like day one. The best part is that till this day, I can tune it and get every part (NOS/used) to maintain or rebuild it. Get an electronic groupset today, out of warrantied parts are just binned. Go buy it again, rinse and repeat.
Likes For eriku16:
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4416 Post(s)
Liked 4,871 Times
in
3,015 Posts
How do you feel about disc brakes, wider tubeless tyres and CF frames?