Hybrid comparison
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hybrid comparison
Good morning.
I am considering investing in a Hybrid and have potentially narrowed my selection down to two models, a Giant Rapid 0 and a Boardman Hybrid Bike Pro. Can anyone share their strengths and weaknesses of these two to help in my comparison. Also, should I be considering any other model? I am prepared to spend at the level of the two aforementioned.
With regards to usage, I am a 57yo male with fairly limited cycling experience and anticipate that I will be on road 90% of the time with the remainder on established rural pathways. My wife has a Giant Thrive 0 and cycling is something we are looking to share.
Thanks in advance.
I am considering investing in a Hybrid and have potentially narrowed my selection down to two models, a Giant Rapid 0 and a Boardman Hybrid Bike Pro. Can anyone share their strengths and weaknesses of these two to help in my comparison. Also, should I be considering any other model? I am prepared to spend at the level of the two aforementioned.
With regards to usage, I am a 57yo male with fairly limited cycling experience and anticipate that I will be on road 90% of the time with the remainder on established rural pathways. My wife has a Giant Thrive 0 and cycling is something we are looking to share.
Thanks in advance.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 766
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Just about everything about the two bikes is similar, but the drivetrains are significantly different. The Giant has a more conventional front and rear derailleur set-up, while the Boardman has just a rear derailleur. So the Boardman's drivetrain is simpler and lighter. As much as I like Shimano, the SRAM system on the Boardman is IMO more attractive in terms of ease of use. But fit and ride trumps everything; go with whichever feels better to you. As for other bikes, just about every manufacturer will offer something similar, but looking at more can just cause confusion to the process of selecting a bike.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
Same shop or different shops?
There's much bigger differences between bike shops than there is between bike brands. Without even looking at the bikes, I'd shop around for a shop first. When I found the one with personnel that seemed genuinely interested in me I'd buy whichever one they carried.
There's much bigger differences between bike shops than there is between bike brands. Without even looking at the bikes, I'd shop around for a shop first. When I found the one with personnel that seemed genuinely interested in me I'd buy whichever one they carried.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319
Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times
in
146 Posts
Just about everything about the two bikes is similar, but the drivetrains are significantly different. The Giant has a more conventional front and rear derailleur set-up, while the Boardman has just a rear derailleur. So the Boardman's drivetrain is simpler and lighter. As much as I like Shimano, the SRAM system on the Boardman is IMO more attractive in terms of ease of use. But fit and ride trumps everything; go with whichever feels better to you. As for other bikes, just about every manufacturer will offer something similar, but looking at more can just cause confusion to the process of selecting a bike.
On the other hand, if you are looking for tightly spaced gears for fast club rides, the Giant might be the better choice. If you are not, IMO, the 50 tooth big chainring is probably too big for most of the riding you will do.
But either one should be fine, either stock or with slight mods to the gearing.
Last edited by MRT2; 05-17-16 at 07:35 AM.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 55
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Are there any major differences between SRAM and Shimano derailleurs? I am currently shopping for a Hybrid as well and the two bikes I am looking at have those different derailleurs.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,494
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7653 Post(s)
Liked 3,480 Times
in
1,837 Posts
As far as I have ever heard, Sram and Shimano are equivalent. Some people prefer one, some the other, but as far as I can tell, they are both pretty much the same .... one group at a given level will do everything that the same level group from the other manufacturer will do. Personal preferences aside (because these are often based on other-than-rational causes) I have never seen any comparison which measures any significant differences .....
I am a Shimano fan, but if I saw the perfect bike and it came with Sram, I would buy it without hesitation.
I am a Shimano fan, but if I saw the perfect bike and it came with Sram, I would buy it without hesitation.
Last edited by Maelochs; 05-17-16 at 09:28 AM.
#8
Senior Member
I would recommend buying a bike with the best fitting frame & highest quality wheelset possible. Components are the last thing to consider. Even inexpensive components are very reliable these days. Expensive components can jack up the price through the roof & don't really improve ride quality that much.
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I agree. How familiar are you with shifting? The ultra wide 10 - 42 cassette on the Boardman looks really attractive to the novice and actually offers a significantly lower climbing gear than the Giant with its road compact double. (Actually, I think 10 - 42 is a little too wide, and as a novice I doubt you will use to the two tallest gears on the Boardman much, which is why I think something like 11 - 42 or even 12 - 42 would be better for the average non racing cyclist.)
On the other hand, if you are looking for tightly spaced gears for fast club rides, the Giant might be the better choice. If you are not, IMO, the 50 tooth big chainring is probably too big for most of the riding you will do.
But either one should be fine, either stock or with slight mods to the gearing.
On the other hand, if you are looking for tightly spaced gears for fast club rides, the Giant might be the better choice. If you are not, IMO, the 50 tooth big chainring is probably too big for most of the riding you will do.
But either one should be fine, either stock or with slight mods to the gearing.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319
Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times
in
146 Posts
On the Boardman, the big gear of 44 x 10 = 118.8 gear inches. 44 x 11 = 108 gear inches, 44 x 12 = 99 gear inches? What does this mean? Just for comparison's sake, I ran my own touring triple through the gear inch calculator and found that my largest gear 48 x 12 = 108 gear inches, or identical to your 44 x 11. And my smallest gear, 26 x 27 = 25.9 gear inches compared to the Boardman's smallest gear 44 x 42 = 28.4 gear inches, or almost as low as my triple! A 1 x 11 has the same gear range as a 3 x 9, but with a lot less shifting between chainrings.
BikeCalc.com - Bicycle Gear Inches Chart
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 766
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
To keep things simple, if you pedaled a 42 x 10 gear at 90 rpm, you'd be going nearly 30 mph ... that's as fast as professional cyclists. A 42 x 11 at the same cadence would still be roughly 27 mph; you won't be able to pedal that fast for long or without help in the form of a good tailwind or downhill.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319
Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times
in
146 Posts
I would add that my issue with the Giant's gearing, (particularly since the bike is advertised as a commuter for riding around London, of all places) is, the 3 biggest gears, 50 x 11, 50 x 12, and 50 x 13 are almost unusable in an urban environment. To use 50 x 11 and 50 x 12 at 90 rpm would mean traveling over 30 mph. At least to my middle aged brain, this doesn't seem terribly realistic in a congested urban area.
This is partly what I meant when I suggested the 44 tooth single chainring on the Boardman made more sense for an urban hybrid.
This is partly what I meant when I suggested the 44 tooth single chainring on the Boardman made more sense for an urban hybrid.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319
Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times
in
146 Posts
Just to avoid confusion, the small cog is high gear, so a 10 tooth cog would be a higher gear than an 11 tooth cog.
To keep things simple, if you pedaled a 42 x 10 gear at 90 rpm, you'd be going nearly 30 mph ... that's as fast as professional cyclists. A 42 x 11 at the same cadence would still be roughly 27 mph; you won't be able to pedal that fast for long or without help in the form of a good tailwind or downhill.
To keep things simple, if you pedaled a 42 x 10 gear at 90 rpm, you'd be going nearly 30 mph ... that's as fast as professional cyclists. A 42 x 11 at the same cadence would still be roughly 27 mph; you won't be able to pedal that fast for long or without help in the form of a good tailwind or downhill.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Northern San Diego
Posts: 1,726
Bikes: mid 1980s De Rosa SL, 1985 Tommasini Super Prestige all Campy SR, 1992 Paramount PDG Series 7, 1997 Lemond Zurich, 1998 Trek Y-foil, 2006 Schwinn Super Sport GS, 2006 Specialized Hardrock Sport
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 59 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I wasn't aware that Giant had developed a bike exclusively for getting around London. Most manufactureres - and I assume Giant is amongst them, develop bikes, especially their hybrid bikes, for riding in a wider variety of conditions that are normally found in a huge city like London. I would agree that the 11T cog is probably relatively useless for most purposes, but the others are not, if the owner/rider ever takes it outside of the confines of a city, and rides in the countryside, particularly on a downhill.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319
Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times
in
146 Posts
I wasn't aware that Giant had developed a bike exclusively for getting around London. Most manufactureres - and I assume Giant is amongst them, develop bikes, especially their hybrid bikes, for riding in a wider variety of conditions that are normally found in a huge city like London. I would agree that the 11T cog is probably relatively useless for most purposes, but the others are not, if the owner/rider ever takes it outside of the confines of a city, and rides in the countryside, particularly on a downhill.
It is a dumb thing the bike companies do where they gear their higher end hybrids more like road bikes. FWIW, the gearing on the cheaper Rapid 1 and Rapid 2 might be better suited to what OP is looking to do.
The only time I find myself using my biggest gear of 48 x 12, which is significantly smaller than 50 x 11 is on rollers where upon cresting the hill, I try to get a head of steam up so the momentum will take me up the next hill. And even there, for the most part, I could easily live with 100 gear inches as a largest gear if I had to. A lot of this depends on the age, fitness and experience of the rider. I am 50, have been riding over 20 years, and am moderately fit (more fit than many 50 year olds, but probably not as fit as a 20 year old cyclist). OP is 57, limited cycling experience, and looking to get started.
Last edited by MRT2; 05-17-16 at 01:16 PM.
#18
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Bigger chainring = taller gear. The opposite is true of cogs on a cassette. More teeth = easier gear.
On the Boardman, the big gear of 44 x 10 = 118.8 gear inches. 44 x 11 = 108 gear inches, 44 x 12 = 99 gear inches? What does this mean? Just for comparison's sake, I ran my own touring triple through the gear inch calculator and found that my largest gear 48 x 12 = 108 gear inches, or identical to your 44 x 11. And my smallest gear, 26 x 27 = 25.9 gear inches compared to the Boardman's smallest gear 44 x 42 = 28.4 gear inches, or almost as low as my triple! A 1 x 11 has the same gear range as a 3 x 9, but with a lot less shifting between chainrings.
BikeCalc.com - Bicycle Gear Inches Chart
On the Boardman, the big gear of 44 x 10 = 118.8 gear inches. 44 x 11 = 108 gear inches, 44 x 12 = 99 gear inches? What does this mean? Just for comparison's sake, I ran my own touring triple through the gear inch calculator and found that my largest gear 48 x 12 = 108 gear inches, or identical to your 44 x 11. And my smallest gear, 26 x 27 = 25.9 gear inches compared to the Boardman's smallest gear 44 x 42 = 28.4 gear inches, or almost as low as my triple! A 1 x 11 has the same gear range as a 3 x 9, but with a lot less shifting between chainrings.
BikeCalc.com - Bicycle Gear Inches Chart
My Dad used to ride a bike that, at one stage had NO gears! He then slapped a Sturmey Archer three shift system on it.
#19
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I found something on the Giant UK website on the Giant Rapid 0. https://www.giant-bicycles.com/en-gb...0/22034/83621/
It is a dumb thing the bike companies do where they gear their higher end hybrids more like road bikes. FWIW, the gearing on the cheaper Rapid 1 and Rapid 2 might be better suited to what OP is looking to do.
The only time I find myself using my biggest gear of 48 x 12, which is significantly smaller than 50 x 11 is on rollers where upon cresting the hill, I try to get a head of steam up so the momentum will take me up the next hill. And even there, for the most part, I could easily live with 100 gear inches as a largest gear if I had to. A lot of this depends on the age, fitness and experience of the rider. I am 50, have been riding over 20 years, and am moderately fit (more fit than many 50 year olds, but probably not as fit as a 20 year old cyclist). OP is 57, limited cycling experience, and looking to get started.
It is a dumb thing the bike companies do where they gear their higher end hybrids more like road bikes. FWIW, the gearing on the cheaper Rapid 1 and Rapid 2 might be better suited to what OP is looking to do.
The only time I find myself using my biggest gear of 48 x 12, which is significantly smaller than 50 x 11 is on rollers where upon cresting the hill, I try to get a head of steam up so the momentum will take me up the next hill. And even there, for the most part, I could easily live with 100 gear inches as a largest gear if I had to. A lot of this depends on the age, fitness and experience of the rider. I am 50, have been riding over 20 years, and am moderately fit (more fit than many 50 year olds, but probably not as fit as a 20 year old cyclist). OP is 57, limited cycling experience, and looking to get started.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319
Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times
in
146 Posts
Have you test ridden the two bikes yet? A test ride should be more than just a quick spin around the parking lot. Somewhere between 10 and 20 minutes on varied terrain, if the bike shop is willing to indulge you.
#22
Banned
Components are replaceable so you dont have to keep any bike as Is. change bits to suit your preferences .
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 766
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Yup, more than enough gears. What you might want to consider more is if the style of bike is even right for you. Have you ridden either of these, or have you only chosen them based on price, specs, and/or visual appeal? There is nothing wrong with either bike in the abstract sense, but for a beginner they might be "too much." They are on the aggressive side, with lower handlebars, skinnier seat ... closer to sports car than four door sedan in ride and handling.
#24
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yup, more than enough gears. What you might want to consider more is if the style of bike is even right for you. Have you ridden either of these, or have you only chosen them based on price, specs, and/or visual appeal? There is nothing wrong with either bike in the abstract sense, but for a beginner they might be "too much." They are on the aggressive side, with lower handlebars, skinnier seat ... closer to sports car than four door sedan in ride and handling.
As regards the Boardman, the nearest Halfords store do not seem to offer the facility of ride 'before you buy' and, as they seem to have sole stockist status (maybe even own Boardman), I am not sure how I can get round this.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319
Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times
in
146 Posts
I have only managed to ride the basic Rapid model (Rapid 0) as the local stockist out here in the sticks doesn't have the full range. The gearing set up did not seem very smooth on this. Prior to buying her bike, my wife did ride the Thrive 2 and had similar findings. She then rode a Whyte with apparently the same gearing set up as the Thrive 0 and found this much better. After much discussion with the accommodating salesman, we went for a Thrive 0 on the basis that he would take it back if she did not like it when it arrived.
As regards the Boardman, the nearest Halfords store do not seem to offer the facility of ride 'before you buy' and, as they seem to have sole stockist status (maybe even own Boardman), I am not sure how I can get round this.
As regards the Boardman, the nearest Halfords store do not seem to offer the facility of ride 'before you buy' and, as they seem to have sole stockist status (maybe even own Boardman), I am not sure how I can get round this.