1x Gearing: I hate when the facts get in the way of a good project
#1
Chases Dogs for Sport
Thread Starter
1x Gearing: I hate when the facts get in the way of a good project
Due to circumstances of my own inadvertent making, I find myself with an extra OPEN U.P. frameset. (Long story. Don't ask.) I actually figured it was a good thing. I would build it up with a 1x setup and an 11-46 cassette and make it my dedicated "climbing / mountain" gravel bike. I have had a 1x 11-42 setup in the past and it was a great climber. But then, I went to Sheldon Brown's gear calculator and compared my proposed 11-46 setup to my current 2x setup. It's 46-30 up front and 11-34 in back. What did I find?
If I go to a 40T 1x chainring, I sacrifice 4 mph of top end (at 90 rpm) and end up with essentially the same low gear I have now. (Not good.) If I go to a 38T chainring, I lose 5 mph up top and get an incredibly tiny benefit -- probably not enough benefit to really notice it in the heat of battle. In other words, if I do what I was thinking of doing, my "climbing" bike wouldn't be any faster going up, but would be a lot slower on the flats / descents.
I hate when the facts get in the way of a perfectly good project.
If I go to a 40T 1x chainring, I sacrifice 4 mph of top end (at 90 rpm) and end up with essentially the same low gear I have now. (Not good.) If I go to a 38T chainring, I lose 5 mph up top and get an incredibly tiny benefit -- probably not enough benefit to really notice it in the heat of battle. In other words, if I do what I was thinking of doing, my "climbing" bike wouldn't be any faster going up, but would be a lot slower on the flats / descents.
I hate when the facts get in the way of a perfectly good project.
#2
With a mighty wind
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,595
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 862 Times
in
490 Posts
I don't know how fast you are but have you tried 40x11? I have.
It forces me to tuck on big hills and leaves me a little light with a big tail wind. I climb with 40x42 and have never wanted more (less) on gravel. On mountain bike terrain, I would use lower gears if I had them. I have 700x38 tires. This gearing would be pretty useless on 650.
Colorado rider here, I have always considered the Rockies sufficiently steep.
If I went 1x on a big budget bike, I'd fit a 10t into the mix. A 10-46 1x12 with a 42 chainring would give me a better low end and high end than I have now with very similar gaps (current bike is 10sp).
I suppose this all changes if you're very fast or ride with a lot of baggage.
It forces me to tuck on big hills and leaves me a little light with a big tail wind. I climb with 40x42 and have never wanted more (less) on gravel. On mountain bike terrain, I would use lower gears if I had them. I have 700x38 tires. This gearing would be pretty useless on 650.
Colorado rider here, I have always considered the Rockies sufficiently steep.
If I went 1x on a big budget bike, I'd fit a 10t into the mix. A 10-46 1x12 with a 42 chainring would give me a better low end and high end than I have now with very similar gaps (current bike is 10sp).
I suppose this all changes if you're very fast or ride with a lot of baggage.
#3
Chases Dogs for Sport
Thread Starter
#5
Chases Dogs for Sport
Thread Starter
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,077
Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times
in
972 Posts
Get a Rotor 1x13 groupset with 10-52 cassette. Problem solved for only $2800.
https://www.bikeradar.com/reviews/co...oupset-review/
https://www.bikeradar.com/reviews/co...oupset-review/
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 7,828
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1873 Post(s)
Liked 692 Times
in
468 Posts
Sorry, this was the piece I picked up on.
Sram has a 10-50 (12s) cassette that would help out quite a bit paired with a 38 or 40T chainring. And Sunrace makes an 11s 11-50 cassette.
Sram has a 10-50 (12s) cassette that would help out quite a bit paired with a 38 or 40T chainring. And Sunrace makes an 11s 11-50 cassette.
__________________
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
#8
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,616
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10966 Post(s)
Liked 7,493 Times
in
4,189 Posts
Yeah- 2x adventure cranks with a reasonable sized cassette provide wider range, provide the same bailout ratio, and are often cheaper than 1x.
Obviously it always depends on the specific gearing, but the above seems to play out quite frequently.
Obviously it always depends on the specific gearing, but the above seems to play out quite frequently.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,077
Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times
in
972 Posts
40-11 ≈ 101 gear inches
36-10 ≈ 100 gear inches
https://www.gear-calculator.com/?GR=...&DV=gearInches
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 7,828
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1873 Post(s)
Liked 692 Times
in
468 Posts
It's looking more and more like the 10t cog is the answer Get that XD driver wheelset dusted off.
__________________
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,885
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3242 Post(s)
Liked 2,088 Times
in
1,182 Posts
I'm amused reading a bunch of posts giving advice as to how to make a 1X system "better". Easiest answer is 2 chainrings. Not hard to figure that sometimes a 2X crank just gives you what you need.
#15
nothing to see here
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Antioch, CA
Posts: 564
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 218 Post(s)
Liked 145 Times
in
78 Posts
Depends on your point of view. I see nothing wrong with a 1x. No need to make it "better." This may come as a shock, but people have different ideas on what works best for them.
#16
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,105 Times
in
1,369 Posts
You must be terribly disappointed
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,885
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3242 Post(s)
Liked 2,088 Times
in
1,182 Posts
I have 1x on a new hard tail purchased last winter. It’s perfect for how I ride, gives me the range for my local conditions and I fully understand the use and value when there’s a lot of quick up and downs and not much time to decide what ring plus what cog. Really works well. Not the same for the way I (and seemingly the OP) set up and use a gravel and I find it amusing that folks try to change what he’s obviously decided,
#18
Senior Member
Dave
#19
nothing to see here
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Antioch, CA
Posts: 564
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 218 Post(s)
Liked 145 Times
in
78 Posts
My comment was in context of what the OP’s goals are and the suggestions received.
I have 1x on a new hard tail purchased last winter. It’s perfect for how I ride, gives me the range for my local conditions and I fully understand the use and value when there’s a lot of quick up and downs and not much time to decide what ring plus what cog. Really works well. Not the same for the way I (and seemingly the OP) set up and use a gravel and I find it amusing that folks try to change what he’s obviously decided,
I have 1x on a new hard tail purchased last winter. It’s perfect for how I ride, gives me the range for my local conditions and I fully understand the use and value when there’s a lot of quick up and downs and not much time to decide what ring plus what cog. Really works well. Not the same for the way I (and seemingly the OP) set up and use a gravel and I find it amusing that folks try to change what he’s obviously decided,
The idea that a 1x system will provide the same range as a 2x has been debated and debunked many times over. No surprise there. Seems like the preferred gravel set up right now is a sub compact chain set and a 10-42 or 11-40 cassette. Smaller jumps compared to a 1x but a much wider range gearing than standard road gearing options.
So why even bother with a 1x system? Just depends on how you want to ride it. It has its place, but that isn't on a "do everything" type bike.
#21
Newbie racer
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,406
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1575 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times
in
974 Posts
I race cross and dabble with workouts on our gravel loop locally. I run a 40t up front and a 12-32 in the back for 1x. For me, it's simply the fact I can run a chain keeper on the front ring and chain and not worry about whatever really bumpy mess I'm doing.
I haven't tried bigger than 32, but need to so I can turn some of those gravel rides into true Z2 workouts. Right now a few of the short hills require a spirited hit up them in the 40/32 to get up them. 1:1 would ensure I keep it more mellow.
In those instances I don't care too much about top end. I'm a spinner, so 100 to 110rpm to me for short times ain't nothing.
Either way.......ditch the 11t cog and gain one back somewhere else. If your biggest cogs are 32, 34, etc.....you shouldn't be too concerned with having an 11t also.
I haven't tried bigger than 32, but need to so I can turn some of those gravel rides into true Z2 workouts. Right now a few of the short hills require a spirited hit up them in the 40/32 to get up them. 1:1 would ensure I keep it more mellow.
In those instances I don't care too much about top end. I'm a spinner, so 100 to 110rpm to me for short times ain't nothing.
Either way.......ditch the 11t cog and gain one back somewhere else. If your biggest cogs are 32, 34, etc.....you shouldn't be too concerned with having an 11t also.
#22
With a mighty wind
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,595
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 862 Times
in
490 Posts
Mr Sheep
I have 2 cassettes for mine. An 11-42 and 12-36. The wider range one is on my gravel wheels and gets used accordingly. The 12-36 is exclusively for casual road riding almost always towing a kid in a Burley.
I've dabbled with switching cassettes around and for the majority of my gravel rides, I can't live without the 11t. It's a rare gravel ride that I don't use both the 11t and 42t. It sounds like the OP has much steeper but shorter hills than me.
Without looking at the calculation, from experience, 40x11 is good for 27-29mph without bouncing. I'd hate for the OP to build a bike that would run out of gearing every time he bumps into an intermediate club ride.
40x11 is pretty much the limit, and like I said before, 40x10 or 42x10 would be even better.
10-46 is readily available, would solve all his problems, would allow a chain keeper, eliminate a front D, avoid cross chain for ideal gears, and put a mint on his pillow.
I have 2 cassettes for mine. An 11-42 and 12-36. The wider range one is on my gravel wheels and gets used accordingly. The 12-36 is exclusively for casual road riding almost always towing a kid in a Burley.
I've dabbled with switching cassettes around and for the majority of my gravel rides, I can't live without the 11t. It's a rare gravel ride that I don't use both the 11t and 42t. It sounds like the OP has much steeper but shorter hills than me.
Without looking at the calculation, from experience, 40x11 is good for 27-29mph without bouncing. I'd hate for the OP to build a bike that would run out of gearing every time he bumps into an intermediate club ride.
40x11 is pretty much the limit, and like I said before, 40x10 or 42x10 would be even better.
10-46 is readily available, would solve all his problems, would allow a chain keeper, eliminate a front D, avoid cross chain for ideal gears, and put a mint on his pillow.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 7,828
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1873 Post(s)
Liked 692 Times
in
468 Posts
Mr Sheep
I have 2 cassettes for mine. An 11-42 and 12-36. The wider range one is on my gravel wheels and gets used accordingly. The 12-36 is exclusively for casual road riding almost always towing a kid in a Burley.
I've dabbled with switching cassettes around and for the majority of my gravel rides, I can't live without the 11t. It's a rare gravel ride that I don't use both the 11t and 42t. It sounds like the OP has much steeper but shorter hills than me.
Without looking at the calculation, from experience, 40x11 is good for 27-29mph without bouncing. I'd hate for the OP to build a bike that would run out of gearing every time he bumps into an intermediate club ride.
40x11 is pretty much the limit, and like I said before, 40x10 or 42x10 would be even better.
10-46 is readily available, would solve all his problems, would allow a chain keeper, eliminate a front D, avoid cross chain for ideal gears, and put a mint on his pillow.
I have 2 cassettes for mine. An 11-42 and 12-36. The wider range one is on my gravel wheels and gets used accordingly. The 12-36 is exclusively for casual road riding almost always towing a kid in a Burley.
I've dabbled with switching cassettes around and for the majority of my gravel rides, I can't live without the 11t. It's a rare gravel ride that I don't use both the 11t and 42t. It sounds like the OP has much steeper but shorter hills than me.
Without looking at the calculation, from experience, 40x11 is good for 27-29mph without bouncing. I'd hate for the OP to build a bike that would run out of gearing every time he bumps into an intermediate club ride.
40x11 is pretty much the limit, and like I said before, 40x10 or 42x10 would be even better.
10-46 is readily available, would solve all his problems, would allow a chain keeper, eliminate a front D, avoid cross chain for ideal gears, and put a mint on his pillow.
__________________
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
#24
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,399
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,699 Times
in
2,519 Posts
I have a 42-11 on my gravel bike an it's plenty of gear for me. I was looking at 1x again recently and realized that an 11-46 cassette with a 42 or 40 would probably work fine for most of my gravel riding. I only rarely use big gears on gravel, too steep. And if I'm with a group, I can spin for 5 miles it takes on pavement to get to the gravel.
I was looking at getting another 42/28 crank for my gravel bike and was a little disappointed with this answer
I was looking at getting another 42/28 crank for my gravel bike and was a little disappointed with this answer
#25
Senior Member
I wouldn’t go that far. Sure it could have a place there. It just depends on your wants and priorities. I’m a cross racer who occasionally dabbles in gravel racing. Both of my cyclocross bikes these days are 1x10. When I decided on a whim this summer to race the Overland, I kept the 42 tooth chainring up front and swapped out the 12-30 cassette for an 11-36. And that actually worked fine. For climbing, I was actually better off than the two previous times I’d done this event with a double, with a 38x25 and then a 38x30 low gear (I do NOT recommend the former, by the way). I wouldn’t climb up on a soap box and declare that 42x11-36 is all anyone should ever want for a mountainous gravel event or even that it would be what I would choose if I were building a bike for gravel from the ground up. I don’t even think a “do-everything” bike is actually really possible anymore these days, or if it is it’s not a good idea. But in that spirit, wouldn’t you expect a do-everything bike to do some things better and some things a bit worse? It turns out my 1x bikes can race cross or they can race gravel. They’re a bit better at the former than the latter. It’s all very conditional, I happen to care more about cyclocross capability and I’m fortunate to be fit enough that 42x36 is an acceptable low gear. But bikes are very individual. It’s hard to categorically rule anything out.