Settle an argument?
#51
Senior Member
My friend contends that a 180 lb rider on a 20 lb bike is the same as a 185 lb rider on a 15 lb bike and I say not even close, 5 lbs of rider weight is far less significant than 5 lbs of bike weight. I also contend that a 16.5 lb bike with 1500 gram wheelset is going to be an advantage over a 15.5 lb bike with 1750 gram wheelset.
#52
Senior Member
#53
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
I've not heard this term and I'm sincerely curious, so I must ask. Are you calling the OP (or someone else in the thread) "home slice" or is this a term for something else? Either way, I don't judge.
#54
Newbie racer
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,406
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1575 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times
in
974 Posts
LOL. No particular BF member or person at all. Just referring to a fictional "Joe Q Public". Homeslice being a term I learned growing up for someone that's an acquaintance, maybe closer, that's your buddy and you're just sitting around shooting the breeze together. Synonym "buddy".
Kind of like "hey buddy, be careful with that blow torch". Would be "Hey homeslice, watch the torch."
I've usually heard it used when you're trying to get someone's attention but not do so in an overly confrontational way.
On the bike weight thing:
I want someone who desires a 3lb lighter bike to by all means buy it and enjoy it and allow us to check out how nice it is, with pics. I just hate people being disappointed from misinformation.
People hear things like, "an ounce on the wheels is blah blah on the frame". Or "a pound of bike is worth several pounds of body". People take that stuff as gospel and then extrapolate it out.
We had a guy at work training for a hilly fondo hear this kind of thing and went out and bought a really light and super nice bike. He wasn't really pleased whatsoever with it, as it wasn't "that much faster". Like, dude was pissed and genuinely upset. We even tried to cajole him that he was still doing well and to just enjoy the nice purchase. He wasn't having it. He thought it was a POS.
Difference was, when I bought about $1500 more bike than I needed or deserved (it was a $2000 bike).....I knew I was just some weak riding average joe. I liked the color scheme, it looked freaking cool, and the components felt really nice and it seemed to test-ride fine also.
I like hearing about people happy with their bike, and happy on their bike. Not angry that the 3 lbs less didn't change the world.
#55
Cycleway town
It matters not whether the difference is significant, it is a matter of direction. It's often easier to work these things out as being case A or B by comparing an amplified version - In case A you have a 50kg rider and 40kg bike. In case B you have an 85kg rider and a 5kg bike. You then decide who has the easiest ride. If you arrive at case B in the extreme, then chances are it's going to be case B in the lesser extreme scenario. Of course, it may not always be that simple..
#56
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
It matters not whether the difference is significant, it is a matter of direction. It's often easier to work these things out as being case A or B by comparing an amplified version - In case A you have a 50kg rider and 40kg bike. In case B you have an 85kg rider and a 5kg bike. You then decide who has the easiest ride. If you arrive at case B in the extreme, then chances are it's going to be case B in the lesser extreme scenario. Of course, it may not always be that simple..
#57
Señor Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,066
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
215 Posts
All other things being equal (AOTBE), if you are spinning smoothly then there is no difference. If you stand up and rock the bike side to side, as one does, then a lighter bike would be better than a lighter body. The actual amount of energy spent may not change a great deal, but you will feel the difference and the psychological effect will be greater.
As for rotating weight (AOTBE), lighter wheels/tires will accellerate with less effort, but when going at a steady speed, a change in rotating weight has identical effect as static weight.
When climbing while seated, rotating weight also counts for exactly the same as static body or bike weight.
When cruising on flat ground at a steady speed, a change in weight (body, bike, or wheels) makes zero difference (AOTBE).
As for rotating weight (AOTBE), lighter wheels/tires will accellerate with less effort, but when going at a steady speed, a change in rotating weight has identical effect as static weight.
When climbing while seated, rotating weight also counts for exactly the same as static body or bike weight.
When cruising on flat ground at a steady speed, a change in weight (body, bike, or wheels) makes zero difference (AOTBE).
#58
Senior Member
#59
Cycleway town
That's not helpful at all. Assuming that the riders are approximately the same size (or this is now an aero question instead of a weight one), you now have a rider who's probably well below average in strength operating a bike made out of lead. At least when the riders were closer to each other in weight and size, there was some question as to differences in fitness levels. By going to extremes, I either have to assume that one of the riders is very heavy for his size or very light, both of which possibilities will affect the rider's ability. If anything, you've just demonstrated that we don't have enough information to answer the question--we need to know what kind of extra weight the heavier rider is carrying because leg muscle might improve performance.
#60
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
#61
Senior Member
#62
Senior Member
What a spectacular example this absurd thread is of people's ability to argue about anything, as if it matters.
No, posting on an internet forum isn't a way to "settle an argument." But it can be an excellent way to start a meaningless argument among people who like to argue about silly things.
No, posting on an internet forum isn't a way to "settle an argument." But it can be an excellent way to start a meaningless argument among people who like to argue about silly things.
#63
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
u
Right. The point is that the rider isn't just payload, he's the motor. It isn't just a matter of weight and resistance, it's also the ratio of power to weight that will determine speed. If you do like Mikey did and make the ratio of bike weight to rider weight radically different, it's pretty much impossible to believe that the ratio of power to weight is equal. He actually obscured the gross vehicle weight question by changing it to a puny rider pushing an absurdly heavy bike.
Right. The point is that the rider isn't just payload, he's the motor. It isn't just a matter of weight and resistance, it's also the ratio of power to weight that will determine speed. If you do like Mikey did and make the ratio of bike weight to rider weight radically different, it's pretty much impossible to believe that the ratio of power to weight is equal. He actually obscured the gross vehicle weight question by changing it to a puny rider pushing an absurdly heavy bike.
#64
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
What a spectacular example this absurd thread is of people's ability to argue about anything, as if it matters.
No, posting on an internet forum isn't a way to "settle an argument." But it can be an excellent way to start a meaningless argument among people who like to argue about silly things.
No, posting on an internet forum isn't a way to "settle an argument." But it can be an excellent way to start a meaningless argument among people who like to argue about silly things.
#65
Senior Member
Well played, sir! You have perfectly executed the internet forum equivalent of "But the emails," ignoring the substance of my post and making a personal attack.
I must have confused you with someone else when I said I like your posts, since I haven't seen one post that meets that description in the last couple of weeks.
But carry on with your silly arguing; you'll always have people happy to engage you. But I'll be ignoring you from now on.
I must have confused you with someone else when I said I like your posts, since I haven't seen one post that meets that description in the last couple of weeks.
But carry on with your silly arguing; you'll always have people happy to engage you. But I'll be ignoring you from now on.
#66
Senior Member
u
Right. The point is that the rider isn't just payload, he's the motor. It isn't just a matter of weight and resistance, it's also the ratio of power to weight that will determine speed. If you do like Mikey did and make the ratio of bike weight to rider weight radically different, it's pretty much impossible to believe that the ratio of power to weight is equal. He actually obscured the gross vehicle weight question by changing it to a puny rider pushing an absurdly heavy bike.
Right. The point is that the rider isn't just payload, he's the motor. It isn't just a matter of weight and resistance, it's also the ratio of power to weight that will determine speed. If you do like Mikey did and make the ratio of bike weight to rider weight radically different, it's pretty much impossible to believe that the ratio of power to weight is equal. He actually obscured the gross vehicle weight question by changing it to a puny rider pushing an absurdly heavy bike.
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Whatever additional impact there is from rotating weight, on the wheels rather than frame, it is vastly over-rated. The situations where it would be actually an advantage may, in fact, outweigh having to overcome the slightly greater inertia from the rotation. I might prefer 500 gram lighter wheels, but only to save 500 grams of weight.
Bike vs body, no difference except in how the bike handles.
Bike vs body, no difference except in how the bike handles.
#68
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Well played, sir! You have perfectly executed the internet forum equivalent of "But the emails," ignoring the substance of my post and making a personal attack.
I must have confused you with someone else when I said I like your posts, since I haven't seen one post that meets that description in the last couple of weeks.
But carry on with your silly arguing; you'll always have people happy to engage you. But I'll be ignoring you from now on.
I must have confused you with someone else when I said I like your posts, since I haven't seen one post that meets that description in the last couple of weeks.
But carry on with your silly arguing; you'll always have people happy to engage you. But I'll be ignoring you from now on.
Substance?
#69
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 7,085
Bikes: Cervelo Prodigy
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 478 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 87 Times
in
67 Posts
My friend contends that a 180 lb rider on a 20 lb bike is the same as a 185 lb rider on a 15 lb bike and I say not even close, 5 lbs of rider weight is far less significant than 5 lbs of bike weight. I also contend that a 16.5 lb bike with 1500 gram wheelset is going to be an advantage over a 15.5 lb bike with 1750 gram wheelset.
The rebuttal requires great physics skill. Perhaps neither of you have it and that's why you're here.
#70
Banned.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 3,061
Bikes: Homebuilt steel
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2193 Post(s)
Liked 425 Times
in
337 Posts
The wheel question is more difficult to answer. Light wheels are an advantage when accelerating the bike because there is less inertia. Once up to speed the difference is a wash, or maybe in favor of the heavy wheels since they will hold speed better.
#72
Senior Member
I'm not trying to convince anyone, but I'll take the lighter bike.
#73
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
#74
Senior Member
I moved into to Pro XC class at 148 lbs, and I was finishing nearly last every race. I put on 5 lbs. of muscle, and started riding farther and faster than I had ever done before.....and on the same 19lb. bike. So if you can lose fat and not muscle, that's great. If you're losing weight through muscle loss, I'd have to reiterate, I'll take the lighter bike.
#75
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I moved into to Pro XC class at 148 lbs, and I was finishing nearly last every race. I put on 5 lbs. of muscle, and started riding farther and faster than I had ever done before.....and on the same 19lb. bike. So if you can lose fat and not muscle, that's great. If you're losing weight through muscle loss, I'd have to reiterate, I'll take the lighter bike.
I don't know how tall you are, but it sounds like you probably couldn't lose weight without losing muscle power.
Is upper body strength a bigger advantage in xc than other races? I actually got faster last year losing upper body muscle, and since I don't race, I've decided that's not worth it to me this year.