CycloComputer magnet/sensor placement?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA USA
Posts: 186
Bikes: not worth mentioning
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
CycloComputer magnet/sensor placement?
I assume that the goal is to place the magnet/sensor as close to the rim as possible so that it can correctly get your mileage (assuming one inputted the correct tire size of course) w/o it hitting the brakes?
Am I right?
Am I right?
#2
enginerd
Doesn't really matter. One revolution is one revolution, whether at the rim or near the hub. You are correct that inputting correct tire size is important.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 1,020
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,152
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Wrong.
The sensor is a dumb switch that closes a contact when the magnet passes through it, it conveys no intelligent information other than counts how many turns the wheel does in an interval.
Then the puter says, Avr Speed = count x magic number stored by yr calibration.
The sensor is a dumb switch that closes a contact when the magnet passes through it, it conveys no intelligent information other than counts how many turns the wheel does in an interval.
Then the puter says, Avr Speed = count x magic number stored by yr calibration.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 195
Bikes: Surly. 4 of them.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Wouldn't it make more sense to put the sensor close to the hub than on the outside? The farther away from the hub you get, the more torque the moving sensor will have, and the more out-of-balance the wheel will be.
#6
Cries on hills
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Central NH
Posts: 1,088
Bikes: 2007 Trek Pilot 1.2, 1969 Raleigh Sprite 5
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Perhaps. But the sensor is usually such a small weight, and one is usually not going that fast. Put it where it works best and the wires reach.
#7
Hanging On
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 872
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The only valid argument for placing the magnet (and sensor) closer to the hub is that the linear speed of the magnet relative to the sensor is lower so that there is less chance that a revolution will be missed (not counted). There has been one actual instance in my experience where moving the magnet and sensor closer to the hub made a difference in the reliability of a cycling computer, so I do this now routinely. The magnet is so light in comparison to, say, a valve stem, that the actual placement probably won't make a detectable difference in how the wheel rolls.
-soma5
-soma5
#8
Senior Member
It's hard to notice it until you get on rollers - then everything is obvious. The other time you notice it is when you're descending really fast - 50+ mph.
Having said that my magnet is smack in the middle of the spoke.
When I was a bit more concerned about such things I used to get slim flexible magnets and tape them to the side of the aero rims (TriSpoke or Rev-X) to keep things aero and light.
cdr
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Al
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,152
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My 10 years old Avocet magnet is a RING mounted on the hub, nothing unsightly. Don't tell me Avocet got this thing patented and nobody else can use it.
Guessing some ppl would mount the thing up on top to avoid running a long wire.
Guessing some ppl would mount the thing up on top to avoid running a long wire.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 1,143
Bikes: '07 Giant OCR3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There's allot of considerations when placing a magnet/sensor on a wheel. But the short answer is: Adjust it for best performance.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Joking aside, I've seen this done. I saw a reproduction "Penny-farthing" (highwheel) bike with a huge front wheel that was too large for the cyclometer's calibration numbers. The owner had put two magnets on the wheel and set the calibration number for half of the real value.
#15
Keep on climbing
Not saying I believe that theory... Just pointing out that it has been said. Personally, I subscribe to the theory that getting the magic tire circumference number correct is far more important then magnet placement.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,152
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Gaseous Cloud around Uranus
Posts: 3,741
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
7 Posts
I know I've had computers that didn't like the sensor out to far.It went by the pickup too fast and I had to move inward.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: A Latvian in Seattle
Posts: 1,020
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I suspect that the sensor is just a simple magnetic reed switch -- and thus either completely on or completely off, with no intermediate states and no worries about spike "size" as in KF's post.
#19
'Mizer Cats are INSANE
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 808
Bikes: C-dale T800
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have seen it argued on these forums that it is better to put the magnet close to the rim in order to produce a higher "spike" on the sensor. i.e., they were claiming that with the sensor close to the hub, it could still faintly detect the magnet at 180 degrees away and thus the "low point" reading to the "high point" reading won't be as great, and thus the sensor might not count some revolutions.
Not saying I believe that theory... Just pointing out that it has been said. Personally, I subscribe to the theory that getting the magic tire circumference number correct is far more important then magnet placement.
Not saying I believe that theory... Just pointing out that it has been said. Personally, I subscribe to the theory that getting the magic tire circumference number correct is far more important then magnet placement.
I just looked at all my rides, on each one I've got the sensor mounted about 5-6 inches up from the bottom of the fork. No real reason I suppose, just where I thought to put it.
M58