Vintage Wheel Build
#1
Rumblefish
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 687
Bikes: 1973 Crescent Pepita Single Speed,1978 Raleigh Competition G.S.,1976 Raleigh Super Course MKII,1970's Motobecane Super Touring Fixed Gear, 1980's Denti Road Tech Five,Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo,1973 Atala Giro,Cheap MTB Tandem,Schwinn World Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Vintage Wheel Build
I'm building my first set of wheels soon. I've been amassing all the pieces over time. Here's what I have: Dura Ace 7400 32 Hole Hubs(8 Speed Rear), Ambrosio Super Elite Clincher Rims, Park TS-2 Truing stand. A couple questions I have for the Gurus: I got these lengths using the spoke calculator provided by someone in this forum(sorry, I forgot the name, but thanks, well, thanks if it's correct)
Front- 302.5 Rear-L-301.35,R-299.82. Do these sound plausible and if so, can I just get all 301 to make them easier to keep track of? What DT spokes are the most correct for this era? And finally, I am considering buying a tensionometer, I assume I'll build more wheels in the future, will it make my life way easier? Thanks in advance. J
Front- 302.5 Rear-L-301.35,R-299.82. Do these sound plausible and if so, can I just get all 301 to make them easier to keep track of? What DT spokes are the most correct for this era? And finally, I am considering buying a tensionometer, I assume I'll build more wheels in the future, will it make my life way easier? Thanks in advance. J
#2
Rumblefish
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 687
Bikes: 1973 Crescent Pepita Single Speed,1978 Raleigh Competition G.S.,1976 Raleigh Super Course MKII,1970's Motobecane Super Touring Fixed Gear, 1980's Denti Road Tech Five,Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo,1973 Atala Giro,Cheap MTB Tandem,Schwinn World Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Oops, forgot to mention I'm doing 3 cross.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 12,057
Mentioned: 201 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3015 Post(s)
Liked 3,808 Times
in
1,411 Posts
SpoCalc is what I use for calculating length, works well.
The 301s should be fine. DT Swiss should be fine or, a little harder to find in the US but easy in the UK, ACI Alpina would be good for db spokes. As for the tensionometer, it is kind of a pricey checking tool. When tensioning spokes, it is easier and faster to pluck the spokes and listen to the tone they make. Obviously, they all should be the same (although the front will sound different from rear driveside which is different from rear non-driveside). If you need a baseline, use an already trued wheel as a reference.
Good luck, it is a bit maddening but fun the first couple of wheels.
The 301s should be fine. DT Swiss should be fine or, a little harder to find in the US but easy in the UK, ACI Alpina would be good for db spokes. As for the tensionometer, it is kind of a pricey checking tool. When tensioning spokes, it is easier and faster to pluck the spokes and listen to the tone they make. Obviously, they all should be the same (although the front will sound different from rear driveside which is different from rear non-driveside). If you need a baseline, use an already trued wheel as a reference.
Good luck, it is a bit maddening but fun the first couple of wheels.
#4
Rumblefish
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 687
Bikes: 1973 Crescent Pepita Single Speed,1978 Raleigh Competition G.S.,1976 Raleigh Super Course MKII,1970's Motobecane Super Touring Fixed Gear, 1980's Denti Road Tech Five,Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo,1973 Atala Giro,Cheap MTB Tandem,Schwinn World Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've been studying up for awhile. I'm competent enough to lace it, just seems like the rest is a feel thing. You can't really study that, hence the tensionometer. Maybe you're right, the tensionometer seems a bit obtrusive to the process...
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: sf
Posts: 539
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I like having a tension tool. I could probably grunt out a set of wheels without it, but it's nice knowing exactly how tight and even a wheel can be.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 12,057
Mentioned: 201 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3015 Post(s)
Liked 3,808 Times
in
1,411 Posts
I don't know about obtrusive, but they are expensive.
What it is good for is a check, to match a tone with a tension value. It can be easy to over or under tension, this takes out the guess work. Tone can vary by tension, spoke length and spoke type and for your first build, it can be frutrating. It can't hurt to borrow one.
What it is good for is a check, to match a tone with a tension value. It can be easy to over or under tension, this takes out the guess work. Tone can vary by tension, spoke length and spoke type and for your first build, it can be frutrating. It can't hurt to borrow one.
#7
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,926
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1492 Post(s)
Liked 1,096 Times
in
642 Posts
You can go with 301's for the front and non-drive-side, but I'd use 299 for the drive side. You won't get adequate tension using 301's on that side.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
#8
Great State of Varmint
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dante's Third Ring
Posts: 7,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
15 Posts
For $60ish for a Park Tension-meter, and you already shelled out $$$ for the TS-2, I suggest you get one. I build wheels. Have since '84. And I can't figure out any pitch when plucked. Maybe a course in music-theory instead? Nope - I suggest getting the meter.
#9
Rumblefish
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 687
Bikes: 1973 Crescent Pepita Single Speed,1978 Raleigh Competition G.S.,1976 Raleigh Super Course MKII,1970's Motobecane Super Touring Fixed Gear, 1980's Denti Road Tech Five,Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo,1973 Atala Giro,Cheap MTB Tandem,Schwinn World Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yeah, I am kinda tone deaf. I'm watching a couple on the Bay. I wish there was a mid range truing stand, but it seems to me that the budget models are just going to lead to an upgrade situation. I hate having to upgrade! Hence my love of vintage bikes, upgrading is frowned upon, I love it.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 13,954
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times
in
78 Posts
A thread rod or bolt reaches its maximum holding power once 3X its diamter has been engaged by the nut/nipple. 2.0mm spokes need 6mm of engagment to reach the maximum holding power....that doesnt mean 4mm of engagment is bad.
A standard 2.0mm DT spoke nipple has 6mm of engagement when the bottom of the nipple is even with the bottom of the threads. At this point the end of the spoke is ~1mm below the slot in the nipple.
#11
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,926
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1492 Post(s)
Liked 1,096 Times
in
642 Posts
??? Sure he will. 301's on both sides of the rear will be fine. The only difference will be the amount of thread engagement which has nothing to do with tension. There's nothing wrong with a spoke being 1mm below the nipple slot or 1mm above it. 'Spoc calcs' are designed so both sides end up with the spoke ends at the bottom of the nipple slot. Its more of an aesthetic thing than anything else.
A thread rod or bolt reaches its maximum holding power once 3X its diamter has been engaged by the nut/nipple. 2.0mm spokes need 6mm of engagment to reach the maximum holding power....that doesnt mean 4mm of engagment is bad.
A standard 2.0mm DT spoke nipple has 6mm of engagement when the bottom of the nipple is even with the bottom of the threads. At this point the end of the spoke is ~1mm below the slot in the nipple.
A thread rod or bolt reaches its maximum holding power once 3X its diamter has been engaged by the nut/nipple. 2.0mm spokes need 6mm of engagment to reach the maximum holding power....that doesnt mean 4mm of engagment is bad.
A standard 2.0mm DT spoke nipple has 6mm of engagement when the bottom of the nipple is even with the bottom of the threads. At this point the end of the spoke is ~1mm below the slot in the nipple.
Spoke measuring tools are your friend.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 152
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I recently read Jobst Brandt's book "The Bicycle Wheel". Based on his book, my impression was that a tensionometer is only useful if you're building multiple sets of wheels using the same components. Different spokes, rims, hubs, and lacing patterns require different amounts of tension so until you've built one wheel with that combination, you don't know what the ideal tension is.
If I recall correctly, he recommends slowly increasing spoke tension until the rim develops a large wave and is on the verge of taco'ing, then backing the tension off slightly. I think he said with modern rims, sometimes the nipples become difficult to tighten prior to this happening. In this case, you're probably at an acceptable tension and don't need to tighten the spokes any further.
I've built a couple of wheels now using this method and it seems to be working out fine so far.
If I recall correctly, he recommends slowly increasing spoke tension until the rim develops a large wave and is on the verge of taco'ing, then backing the tension off slightly. I think he said with modern rims, sometimes the nipples become difficult to tighten prior to this happening. In this case, you're probably at an acceptable tension and don't need to tighten the spokes any further.
I've built a couple of wheels now using this method and it seems to be working out fine so far.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 13,954
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times
in
78 Posts
I recently read Jobst Brandt's book "The Bicycle Wheel". Based on his book, my impression was that a tensionometer is only useful if you're building multiple sets of wheels using the same components. Different spokes, rims, hubs, and lacing patterns require different amounts of tension so until you've built one wheel with that combination, you don't know what the ideal tension is.
If I recall correctly, he recommends slowly increasing spoke tension until the rim develops a large wave and is on the verge of taco'ing, then backing the tension off slightly. I think he said with modern rims, sometimes the nipples become difficult to tighten prior to this happening. In this case, you're probably at an acceptable tension and don't need to tighten the spokes any further.
I've built a couple of wheels now using this method and it seems to be working out fine so far.
If I recall correctly, he recommends slowly increasing spoke tension until the rim develops a large wave and is on the verge of taco'ing, then backing the tension off slightly. I think he said with modern rims, sometimes the nipples become difficult to tighten prior to this happening. In this case, you're probably at an acceptable tension and don't need to tighten the spokes any further.
I've built a couple of wheels now using this method and it seems to be working out fine so far.
From there I'll repeat the process. 1 turn all the way around, set the true and dish. Repeat. As tension builds you may only need to do a half or quarter turn.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 13,954
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times
in
78 Posts
I guess that is only 1.2mm of difference, and the nipples wouldn't bottom out - but there may be a bit of poking up on some of them that might require a bit of filing at the end. Still, I'd go with 299's or 300's if they were available.
Spoke measuring tools are your friend.
Spoke measuring tools are your friend.
If I fully engage the nipple (bottm it out) the spoke end is 2mm beyond the bottom of the slot and peeking out of the top of the nipple. The peeking out is no problem if your using double eyleted/double walled rims. With a single walled rim it may or may be an issue in regards to poking a tube. It clear that 1mm too long is OK while 2 is borderline.
I only buy precut spokes because of the inconsistency of hand cur and threaded spokes. Cut me 36 spokes by hand and I'll gaurantee they vary by at least 1mm.
Jim 2,000+ wheel builds and counting.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,977
Bikes: Schwinn Paramount P15, Fisher Montare, Proteus, Rivendell Quickbeam
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Just get the 299's for the ds. It isn't that hard to keep track of different length spokes. You don't want to have to reorder spokes after you start your build just in case the 301's wind up being to long.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Collegeville, PA
Posts: 1,350
Bikes: Ruckelshaus Randonneur, Specialized Allez (early 90's, steel), Ruckelshaus Path Bomber currently being built
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'd go with 302's and 299's for the rear drive side.