Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Tighter Gearing on an 8 speed drivetrain, what a joy!

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Tighter Gearing on an 8 speed drivetrain, what a joy!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-13, 06:43 PM
  #1  
Beneficial Ear
Car Free
Thread Starter
 
Beneficial Ear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 165

Bikes: caad8, Trek 1000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Tighter Gearing on an 8 speed drivetrain, what a joy!

From
11,13,15,17,20,23,26,30
to
12,13,14,15,17,19,21,23

I have 50/34 up front. Also swapped the chain to a Sram PC-890 (cassete PG-850).

That the 20/17/15 combo made it a real PITA to get going, it was either spin like crazy for a second before the shift or lug the engine after... I'd like a 16 in there, but the 19/17 shift is WAY easier than 20/17 shift and since its consistent spacing to the next gear it feels a little easier to "groove" up to speed... and where I used to really hate going past that 15 gear because the jump to 13 typically caused me to fall out of my optimal cadence range and end up working extremely hard to barely accelerate, then once I was up to speed I was that much more fatigued... the 15/14 combo is amazing! I've never gotten up to and held 25mph so "easily". I thought the wind was helping me, but it was much lighter than I thought and then on the way back I was hitting the same speeds with just a bit more effort - the tighter gearing made life so so so much easier to accelerate into the wind so I could just focus on getting into a good position/rhythm.

The new cassette is also in the area of 150g lighter (chain is almost the same), enough for me to feel the difference in weight distribution when I carry the bike up the stairs. I'm not sure how much this plays into things but I know it doesn't hurt!

Considering swapping to a 52/39 crank thats 175mm (have 170mm now)... I think the 39/23 will be plenty for a flatlander and the bit more top speed + longer cranks (to match my relatively long legs) should make it so I have a satisfactory drivetrain to swap into a larger/stiffer frame than my current 54cm steel. Then lighter weight/more aero wheels... all the while never losing focus on the engine...
This seems like a never ending process?
Beneficial Ear is offline  
Old 03-06-13, 07:01 PM
  #2  
Homebrew01
Super Moderator
 
Homebrew01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,843

Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times in 612 Posts
Having the right gearing makes all the difference.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.

FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Homebrew01 is offline  
Old 03-06-13, 07:38 PM
  #3  
datlas 
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,049

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22596 Post(s)
Liked 8,925 Times in 4,158 Posts
I love love LOVE tight gearing.

Currently running 39/53 with 12-13-14-15-16-17-18-19-21-23.

It's perfect except when the grade exceeds 15% or so.
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is offline  
Old 03-06-13, 07:47 PM
  #4  
Beneficial Ear
Car Free
Thread Starter
 
Beneficial Ear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 165

Bikes: caad8, Trek 1000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by datlas
I love love LOVE tight gearing.

Currently running 39/53 with 12-13-14-15-16-17-18-19-21-23.

It's perfect except when the grade exceeds 15% or so.
Wow that has to be awesome! Gotta be good to have such small jumps in cadence for each gear change. I can see the 16 and the 19 making the difference in some conditions. Have you ever wished you had an 11 back there?
Beneficial Ear is offline  
Old 03-06-13, 07:49 PM
  #5  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times in 1,579 Posts
Before you get too excited about the weight savings, remember that the 175mm standard crank might cancel out some of that. Tighter gearing can be nice, though.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 03-06-13, 08:18 PM
  #6  
BoSoxYacht
Banned
 
BoSoxYacht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: take your time, enjoy the scenery, it will be there when you get to it
Posts: 7,281

Bikes: 07 IRO BFGB fixed-gear, 07 Pedal Force RS

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Beneficial Ear
Wow that has to be awesome! Gotta be good to have such small jumps in cadence for each gear change. I can see the 16 and the 19 making the difference in some conditions. Have you ever wished you had an 11 back there?
This is the setup I'm using now, and I never miss the 11t.

After I hit 40mph, I rarely keep pedaling.
BoSoxYacht is offline  
Old 03-06-13, 08:43 PM
  #7  
Beneficial Ear
Car Free
Thread Starter
 
Beneficial Ear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 165

Bikes: caad8, Trek 1000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BoSoxYacht
This is the setup I'm using now, and I never miss the 11t.

After I hit 40mph, I rarely keep pedaling.
Thats what it seemed like watching the pros go at it on a nice decent... I've read that in the 40mph range is when aerodynamics are so important that someone in any position they can pedal in will get dropped by someone who is in a super aero duck thats impossible to pedal in... and I don't know how often a race holds 40+mph on a flat??

Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
Before you get too excited about the weight savings, remember that the 175mm standard crank might cancel out some of that. Tighter gearing can be nice, though.
Upon closer inspection it looks like 110rpm for 36mph in a 50/12 gear... I can hold 110 cadence for an hour and 120 for at least a few mins... a 52 chainring gets me to 105 for the same speed, and a 53 is just a small change. When I start getting into races that hold 32mph+ for any period of time maybe it'll be worth it, but I bet I should just stick with what I have and get everything running in top condition (including the engine) before making it slightly easier to get to a currently unachievable on a flat without major wind help speed.

I can probably just grab some longer cranks before I bother with everything else, but I'm not really "unhappy" now... its just like with lightweight/aero wheels - I'm just not sure what I'm missing
Beneficial Ear is offline  
Old 03-06-13, 08:58 PM
  #8  
E.S.
just ride
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: North Idaho
Posts: 485

Bikes: '15 Scott Speedster 20

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Beneficial Ear
From
11,13,15,17,20,23,26,30
to
12,13,14,15,17,19,21,23
Nice choice. Us amateurs really don't need the 11 cog in most road riding, except if you really need to be able to fly down the descents, but I found that I after spinning out of 50-12 I might as well just tuck and coast.

My experience is similar to yours. I had a 9spd 12-25 (12,13,14,15,17,19,21,23,25) with 50/39/30 triple. Very low gearing for the hills but sucked on the flats when I wanted slight changes in effort. My new bike has a 50/34 double and would have come with a 10spd 11-28 but I opted to swap to a 12-23.

Now I get: 12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,21,23. And I'm loving it. Haven't taken this setup on any serious climbs yet, although I'm sure that if I keep losing weight and improving my technique it won't be so hard. I don't miss the triple because 1) my 50 chainring is better centered with the mid/mid-low range of the cassette so it is smoother, and 2) I can only remember a couple times where I NEEDED the 30 chainring, and I wasn't as experienced or fit as I am now. The 39-25 was apx equal to my 34-23.

I would go with a 12-25, 12-26, or 12-27 to get slightly lower gearing but now I see that the 16 and 18 cogs really are awesome, and you lose one, or both on anything lower/fewer gears than a 12-23.

Last edited by E.S.; 03-06-13 at 09:11 PM.
E.S. is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lokesh
Road Cycling
15
03-27-13 06:56 AM
cwcaesar
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
98
08-08-12 08:49 AM
paverman4u
Bicycle Mechanics
8
08-30-10 02:08 PM
abdon
Bicycle Mechanics
12
07-27-10 09:24 AM
collegeboymike
Road Cycling
50
05-09-10 04:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.