Do Tour pros tend to ride lower saddle heights?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Do Tour pros tend to ride lower saddle heights?
With the Tour on TV again, my annual question is surfacing again, and this time thought I'd ask others: do the pro riders tend to have their saddles a touch lower than normal?
When I watch them, about 20 percent have a saddle height that I identify with. The rest seem like they are riding with their saddles about a cm or two below where I would put it.
Maybe I ride with my saddle a little higher than normal -- I think that's the obvious conclusion. But I've never asked. Any perspective very welcome.
When I watch them, about 20 percent have a saddle height that I identify with. The rest seem like they are riding with their saddles about a cm or two below where I would put it.
Maybe I ride with my saddle a little higher than normal -- I think that's the obvious conclusion. But I've never asked. Any perspective very welcome.
#2
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,986
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6193 Post(s)
Liked 4,809 Times
in
3,317 Posts
I notice that just like us amateurs and wanna-be's they have all sorts of personal preference going on.
Some have bikes that look like the size they must have rode when pre-teen. Some have oval-chainwheels, C. Froome being notable for using them. Some with wide handlebars others with narrow handlebars.
It'd be really interesting to know what size chainrings and cogs on the back they are running between each rider.
Some have bikes that look like the size they must have rode when pre-teen. Some have oval-chainwheels, C. Froome being notable for using them. Some with wide handlebars others with narrow handlebars.
It'd be really interesting to know what size chainrings and cogs on the back they are running between each rider.
Likes For Iride01:
Likes For woodcraft:
#4
Senior Member
Likes For popeye:
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Right. I guess what I'm wondering is, if there is a bias for amateurs to have their saddles higher than pros. Amateurs like me may have adopted their saddle height over the years to protect a knee. Pros may want to be a little lower for aerodynamic reasons, or to descend faster with more stability. Just wondering if anyone has any insights.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
I look at it that pros have plenty of leg strength, so favor better spin over maximum leverage.
IMO, too high of saddle is very common among road cyclists (as opposed to kids (BMX!) and folks JRA)
and reports of fitters setting them up that way are also common.
IMO, too high of saddle is very common among road cyclists (as opposed to kids (BMX!) and folks JRA)
and reports of fitters setting them up that way are also common.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,949
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3949 Post(s)
Liked 7,296 Times
in
2,946 Posts
Right. I guess what I'm wondering is, if there is a bias for amateurs to have their saddles higher than pros. Amateurs like me may have adopted their saddle height over the years to protect a knee. Pros may want to be a little lower for aerodynamic reasons, or to descend faster with more stability. Just wondering if anyone has any insights.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Maybe someone with fitting experience or knowledge of pro riders will chime in.
My observation is that about 75 percent of the pro field ride with a saddle height that is noticably lower than the remaining quarter of the peloton, based on leg angle at max extension. I happen to identify with the 25 percent, but you could take that entirely out of the question.
As I understand bike fit, higher saddle height, to a point, tends to protect the front of the knee, but put more strain on the back -- protecting kneecaps over hamstring tendons. Lower saddles tend to put more strain on the kneecaps, and may offer less leverage, but it puts the rider in a better position for handling and aerodynamics.
I'm just wondering if this is strategic and intentional, or just where personal preference and fit issues happen to be distributed.
My observation is that about 75 percent of the pro field ride with a saddle height that is noticably lower than the remaining quarter of the peloton, based on leg angle at max extension. I happen to identify with the 25 percent, but you could take that entirely out of the question.
As I understand bike fit, higher saddle height, to a point, tends to protect the front of the knee, but put more strain on the back -- protecting kneecaps over hamstring tendons. Lower saddles tend to put more strain on the kneecaps, and may offer less leverage, but it puts the rider in a better position for handling and aerodynamics.
I'm just wondering if this is strategic and intentional, or just where personal preference and fit issues happen to be distributed.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,905
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times
in
2,553 Posts
It's long been known that higher seats work better for short races and lower for long races. Track riders have ridden high saddles forever. The match sprinters and kilo riders the highest. Serious road riders a little lower. The Pro peloton takes this a step further. They ride races up to 160 miles (the Classics) and 2100 miles in 3 weeks. Say 20,000 miles/year. The European racing scene doesn't need studies to know this. They've been racing and riding those distances over 100 years. A large percentage of the coaches are ex-riders who were taught to lower their seats when they were aspiring racers by coaches that learned the same way.
I was taught the same. (Boston in the '70s had a "guru" who had raced in Europe, came back as captain of Boston's strongest club and shared what he had learned. This got passed on throughout the Boston racing scene as "the Allis way", A lot of good wisdom. Some of which got de-bunked with modern studies, then later crept back because it worked.) I use the simple test of being able to either straighten or bend my knee seated with the crank down in line with the seat tube, my heel on the pedal spindle and the bike indoors against a wall. Without rocking my hips and with bare feet.
An exercise that might convince people to ride lower seats - ride thousands of miles per year including hills on a fix gear. (Part of the Allis training regime. 2000 miles fixed by April.)
Ben
I was taught the same. (Boston in the '70s had a "guru" who had raced in Europe, came back as captain of Boston's strongest club and shared what he had learned. This got passed on throughout the Boston racing scene as "the Allis way", A lot of good wisdom. Some of which got de-bunked with modern studies, then later crept back because it worked.) I use the simple test of being able to either straighten or bend my knee seated with the crank down in line with the seat tube, my heel on the pedal spindle and the bike indoors against a wall. Without rocking my hips and with bare feet.
An exercise that might convince people to ride lower seats - ride thousands of miles per year including hills on a fix gear. (Part of the Allis training regime. 2000 miles fixed by April.)
Ben
Likes For 79pmooney:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 356
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 325 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times
in
72 Posts
My observation is that about 75 percent of the pro field ride with a saddle height that is noticably lower than the remaining quarter of the peloton, based on leg angle at max extension. I happen to identify with the 25 percent, but you could take that entirely out of the question.
Likes For BoraxKid:
#11
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,051
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22597 Post(s)
Liked 8,925 Times
in
4,158 Posts
I noticed the same thing. I used the Greg LeMond/Cyrille Guimard formula of 0.883 back in the 1980's and have stuck with that as it feels right for me, but maybe it yields a saddle height a cm or two too high compared to current thinking?
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
I don't notice any of these pros having high saddles. Do what works for you.
60 Cycles by Jean-Claude Labrecque - NFB
60 Cycles by Jean-Claude Labrecque - NFB
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,373
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2482 Post(s)
Liked 2,953 Times
in
1,678 Posts
When I set up a new bike for myself, I raise the saddle to a point somewhat higher than what I suspect to be right and then go out for a short ride, periodically soft-pedaling to check whether my feet are unweighting in my shoes at the bottom of the downstroke. I then adjust the saddle height down and repeat until I can feel the full weight of my foot on the pedal.
Likes For Trakhak:
#15
Senior Member
#16
Senior Member
My experience is that 85% of statistics in internet forums are made up on the spot to support a spurious argument. I think you have some internal bias going on, and you're probably just seeing things. There is no way you're getting the quality data needed to make your claims with any sort of statistical confidence. It sounds more like projection + selection bias.
Likes For asgelle:
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,373
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2482 Post(s)
Liked 2,953 Times
in
1,678 Posts
Very interesting. But Tour riders strive to achieve the best power/weight ratio, which probably occurs at the expense of losing some muscle mass. If the pros and the age-matched sedentary men were not also matched for weight, that study result might be misleading.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 356
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 325 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times
in
72 Posts
Since I don't have access to the necessary information, I will refrain from making any wild guesses or drawing any conclusions from dubious means.
#19
Senior Member
Here's a hint: What fraction of the children in the fifth grade are taller than average (median)?
Last edited by asgelle; 09-01-20 at 02:25 PM.
Likes For asgelle:
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 356
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 325 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times
in
72 Posts
Since the post I originally was replying to was about riders using "noticeably" [sic] lower saddles, I simply pointed out that the other commenter's conclusion was based on dubious means. I don't know why you chose to mis-read their post, and then tried to play pedantic word games here, but hey, thanks for the strawman.
Likes For BoraxKid:
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 786
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 338 Post(s)
Liked 408 Times
in
252 Posts
Read a study that the average knee angle was close to 34 degrees in the pro peloton, and you can planly see many have lower saddles than many amateurs. Sure, if you look at the bikes themselves, the saddles look high because the bikes are small with low handlebars, but with the rider on, no.
The pros are really being sensible with their fits here, really, they are expected to ride huge distances over the course of a grand tour.
If there's too much flex at the top of the pedal stroke and you get knee issues as a result, you can fix it with shorter cranks, too. You can find all sorts of crank lengths in the peloton.
The pros are really being sensible with their fits here, really, they are expected to ride huge distances over the course of a grand tour.
If there's too much flex at the top of the pedal stroke and you get knee issues as a result, you can fix it with shorter cranks, too. You can find all sorts of crank lengths in the peloton.
#22
Senior Member
Enough. Actually it is that simple. The first post said 75% or riders have their saddle lower than the other 25%. The truth of that is so obvious that it shouldn't have had to be said in the first place. Why you objected to it, is beyond me.
#23
Non omnino gravis
First: never look at a pro's bike for setup tips. They're a different species.
Second: if your knees, hips, and back are okay with it, your saddle height is probably fine. Could you put out more power with it adjusted differently? Maybe. Maybe not. I'm not you, I dunno.
Third: for every "hip rocker" I see out on the roads (saddle obviously too high) I see half a dozen "knees out" (saddle obviously too low.)
Second: if your knees, hips, and back are okay with it, your saddle height is probably fine. Could you put out more power with it adjusted differently? Maybe. Maybe not. I'm not you, I dunno.
Third: for every "hip rocker" I see out on the roads (saddle obviously too high) I see half a dozen "knees out" (saddle obviously too low.)
Likes For DrIsotope:
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 356
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 325 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times
in
72 Posts
My observation is that about 75 percent of the pro field ride with a saddle height that is noticably lower than the remaining quarter of the peloton...
#25
Senior Member
I didn't miss it, I ignored it. Since nowhere is the threshold for a noticeable difference defined, in this context it's a word without meaning. Given enough effort, any difference is measurable (noticeable). So yes, 75% will always be noticeably lower that the top 25%.