Miyata 1000, Early vs Late 80's?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Michigan USA
Posts: 902
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes.
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 265 Post(s)
Liked 821 Times
in
396 Posts
Miyata 1000, Early vs Late 80's?
I've read that the later 80's Miyata 1000 are more desirable. Looks like groupset is a bit better.
Miyata experts, is a 1980 undesirable? I may look at one, would like to know more.
Thanks,
Dave
Miyata experts, is a 1980 undesirable? I may look at one, would like to know more.
Thanks,
Dave
#2
2-Wheeled Fool
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 2,486
Bikes: Surly Ogre, Brompton
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1385 Post(s)
Liked 677 Times
in
457 Posts
When I look at a bike, all I really see is the frame. I ask myself if the frame is worthy.
Are the later 80's frames still made in Japan?
Are the later 80's frames still made in Japan?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,501
Bikes: 1964 Huffy Sportsman, 1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport (3), 1982 Trek 412, 1983 Trek 700, 1989 Miyata 1000LT, 1991 Bianchi Boardwalk, plus others
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 577 Post(s)
Liked 686 Times
in
385 Posts
I just recently purchased an 89 so have a little insight on just that one. Others will say to purchase any that you see, and I agree. 1989 was I believe the first year for the freehub. It’s a 7 speed hyperglide with first gen 105 index shifters. Gears and shifting aren’t that important, but I believe the main advantage was that the axle on the freehub is stronger than a freewheel axle, thus better if one loads it up. I can’t claim anything either way, this is just what I have read. Axle spacing is 135mm. 89 was made in Japan.
One other thing is the 89 has the first gen 105 brake levers with return springs in the levers so that the canti springs can be Set lighter. I can say that I love the feel of these brakes. All will tell you to not pass on ANY 1000, as all are great, and changes can be made to them. From pictures, I think the earlier ones are prettier. Research may show you different brakes and braze-ons and such over the years.
One other thing is the 89 has the first gen 105 brake levers with return springs in the levers so that the canti springs can be Set lighter. I can say that I love the feel of these brakes. All will tell you to not pass on ANY 1000, as all are great, and changes can be made to them. From pictures, I think the earlier ones are prettier. Research may show you different brakes and braze-ons and such over the years.
Likes For sd5782:
#4
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,640
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2597 Post(s)
Liked 1,678 Times
in
926 Posts
You should totally check out the 'Show Your Miyata 1000' thread. https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...ta-1000-a.html That'll give you an idea of what the differences are- if not from "year to year" but the differences in an 1980 M1000 to a 1990 M1000LT.
As far as 'desirable' goes- it does sort of go along with what J.Higgins said- the frame. The tubing, the geometry, the construction, the braze ons... That's the stuff that no component change is going to get you. It also goes to what is desirable to you... a pristine time machine- or a base for a kickass bike.
IMO- The bikes start to get interesting around 1986. Not only does it have the full compliments of braze ons, but it also looks REALLY nice AND comes with a totally solid group.
Mine is a 1990 that I replaced a lot of the DX stuff with XT and XTR.
M1000LT by Dave The Golden Boy, on Flickr
As far as 'desirable' goes- it does sort of go along with what J.Higgins said- the frame. The tubing, the geometry, the construction, the braze ons... That's the stuff that no component change is going to get you. It also goes to what is desirable to you... a pristine time machine- or a base for a kickass bike.
IMO- The bikes start to get interesting around 1986. Not only does it have the full compliments of braze ons, but it also looks REALLY nice AND comes with a totally solid group.
Mine is a 1990 that I replaced a lot of the DX stuff with XT and XTR.
M1000LT by Dave The Golden Boy, on Flickr
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Likes For The Golden Boy:
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Michigan USA
Posts: 902
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes.
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 265 Post(s)
Liked 821 Times
in
396 Posts
Thanks, I feel like I have a better idea now.
Seems like an early one would have to be pretty cheap to be worth the upgrades on the drivetrain.
Seems like an early one would have to be pretty cheap to be worth the upgrades on the drivetrain.
#6
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,640
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2597 Post(s)
Liked 1,678 Times
in
926 Posts
The Splined Triple Butted tubing can be a big deal, if you're into that sort of thing. I think the STB tubing is what makes my M1000LT much more beefy than my other touring bikes. This is the bike I would choose to haul a load over the country.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Likes For The Golden Boy:
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Michigan USA
Posts: 902
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes.
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 265 Post(s)
Liked 821 Times
in
396 Posts
There's the 2nd bottle braze ons and mid-fork eyelets that are missing from the earlier ones. IMO- the bottle cage is a big deal, and the mid fork would be a big deal if you're actually touring on it.
The Splined Triple Butted tubing can be a big deal, if you're into that sort of thing. I think the STB tubing is what makes my M1000LT much more beefy than my other touring bikes. This is the bike I would choose to haul a load over the country.
The Splined Triple Butted tubing can be a big deal, if you're into that sort of thing. I think the STB tubing is what makes my M1000LT much more beefy than my other touring bikes. This is the bike I would choose to haul a load over the country.
I've been going through the "Show us your Miyata 1000" page, still working my way through it.
Dave
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,028
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 830 Post(s)
Liked 1,063 Times
in
512 Posts
Low rider pannier mounts on the fork didn’t start until mid 80s. I like touring bikes that have those and it would guide my decision when choosing between model years.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 774
Bikes: Raleigh Classic 15, 84; Miyata 912, 85; Miyata Ridge Runner SE, 85; Miyata 610, 86; Miyata 100M, 86; Miyata Valley Runner, 88; Miyata Triple Cross, 89; GT Karakoram, 90; Miyata Elevation 300, 91; Marinoni Touring, 95; Long Haul Trucker, 2013
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 157 Post(s)
Liked 131 Times
in
79 Posts
The splined tubing came in around 86 I think.
Likes For John Nolan:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 774
Bikes: Raleigh Classic 15, 84; Miyata 912, 85; Miyata Ridge Runner SE, 85; Miyata 610, 86; Miyata 100M, 86; Miyata Valley Runner, 88; Miyata Triple Cross, 89; GT Karakoram, 90; Miyata Elevation 300, 91; Marinoni Touring, 95; Long Haul Trucker, 2013
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 157 Post(s)
Liked 131 Times
in
79 Posts
Hmm...the 85 catalogue just says triple butted, and the sticker on my 86 610 says triple butted (but not splined), just like the catalogue. Guess you got lucky!
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 774
Bikes: Raleigh Classic 15, 84; Miyata 912, 85; Miyata Ridge Runner SE, 85; Miyata 610, 86; Miyata 100M, 86; Miyata Valley Runner, 88; Miyata Triple Cross, 89; GT Karakoram, 90; Miyata Elevation 300, 91; Marinoni Touring, 95; Long Haul Trucker, 2013
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 157 Post(s)
Liked 131 Times
in
79 Posts
I had to check profile to find out what year my 610 was.
Likes For rgvg:
#16
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,640
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2597 Post(s)
Liked 1,678 Times
in
926 Posts
there was a point after 1990 that they moved (some?) manufacturing to Taiwan. Miyata held out as long as they responsibly could.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Posts: 8,016
Bikes: A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.
Mentioned: 194 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1627 Post(s)
Liked 629 Times
in
355 Posts
Mine was an '81. It was a good bike; but not a great bike. I couldn't ride it anymore after doing series of side-by-side test rides vs my '88 Voyageur (swapping the wheel sets back and forth, so as to remove that big variable). The Schwinn was a better bike each time, so I didn't see the point of keeping the Miyata. Schwinn Columbus Tenax > whatever cro-moly Miyata was using in '81; just a bit livelier. Maybe I should have tried riding them both loaded, but I don't think either would compare favorably with my C-dale in that respect. The more modern Shimano running gear on the Schwinn Voyageur was part of the equation - pretty significant leap in technology between '81 Cyclone and '88 Deore. And the lovely, classic-looking Apex crank on the Miyata was a half-step setup, which I couldn't learn to love. Sure, I could have modernized and changed around a bunch of stuff, I guess...
Too many classic touring bikes in the stable, ugh; what's a guy to do?
Too many classic touring bikes in the stable, ugh; what's a guy to do?
__________________
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
Last edited by Lascauxcaveman; 08-04-20 at 12:55 AM.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,988
Bikes: ‘87 Marinoni SLX Sports Tourer, ‘79 Miyata 912 by Gugificazione
Mentioned: 166 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 500 Post(s)
Liked 464 Times
in
255 Posts
If the desire is for a “loaded tourer” with full panniers front and rear to camp your way across weeks of roads, then the 1000LT might be the better version with its longer chainstays, and, I suspect, beefier tubing. (And Tim ^^^ is correct about something like a fat-tubed Cannondale or Klein as the superior loaded tourer.)
But if you’re looking for something a bit sportier, the non-LT versions have a lot to offer. I had an afternoon of very pleasurable riding on RiddleOfSteel ’s former 1982 Miyata 1000 in comparison with my own Marinoni SLX Sports Tourer, discovering that they were remarkably similar in handling, climbing, descending, and generally spirited joy of riding. Not surprising when we compared frame geometry between them.
All 1000’s have cantilever brakes so fatter tires are easy, but those early ones feature narrow post spacing which can be a challenge. Search for ROS’s write up on his bike and how he resolved that. An advantage of those early ones: if they originally had 27” wheels, then there’s more room for fenders over 700C wheels.
Hopefully you’ve already looked through the Miyata catalogs at the geometry changes to that model over the years.
Drivetrain upgrades can be extremely rewarding IMHO. Just about any higher quality bike from those eras responds wonderfully to more modern components, if that’s what you’re after. (There’s this huge thread in C&V showing thousands of such conversions.) My own ‘79 Miyata 912 is now in its fourth major configuration - 8-speed Ergo shifting for the last two versions plus a full low trail rando front end now. Had another lovely ride on it today.
Last edited by Dfrost; 08-04-20 at 01:12 AM.