Chains that work well with old 5 speed freewheels.
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094
Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Chains that work well with old 5 speed freewheels.
We've run into a consistent problem with old 10 speed bikes at our local coop. The bikes come in with rusted to crap chains and we have to replace them. Unfortunately, the new chains (even 5,6,7 speed ones) simply don't work. They slip and they don't shift well, even when the freewheel/chainrings aren't worn. The ones we use are the Z50 chains.
Does anybody know a good source for the old style of "10 speed" chain? Or, do you know how to make the old 10 speeds work with modern chains? This isn't just on one bike. It's not just with one freewheel, this is with many bikes over many months. All of the old 10 speed (and 12 speed) bikes have this problem when you replace the chain.
And yes, I understand that a worn chain leads to a worn cog which will skip with a new chain. I promise all of these cogs aren't worn.
Does anybody know a good source for the old style of "10 speed" chain? Or, do you know how to make the old 10 speeds work with modern chains? This isn't just on one bike. It's not just with one freewheel, this is with many bikes over many months. All of the old 10 speed (and 12 speed) bikes have this problem when you replace the chain.
And yes, I understand that a worn chain leads to a worn cog which will skip with a new chain. I promise all of these cogs aren't worn.
#3
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,843
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times
in
612 Posts
Maybe you're spoiled with modern drivetrains, and the old clunkers you're fixing just can't be any better ??
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094
Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
No not at all! These bikes ride great when you have a decent OLD chain on there. When you put a modern chain on them they're practically unridable. The chain will jump in the smaller cogs generally and often it'll get stuck between cogs/chainrings.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,319
Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1438 Post(s)
Liked 1,092 Times
in
723 Posts
New chains will often not work well on worn cogs; if this is the problem I do not think any new chain will work well.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times
in
2,079 Posts
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 555
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
8 Posts
I've encountered the same problem using new freewheels and chains. My solution has been to buy NOS freewheels and chains. That's a good solution for me because I'm in my mid 70's. It's likely I'll run out before the supply of NOS does.
Here's my take on what's happening.
First, all the "new" freewheels are hyperglide or ultraglide compatible. That means their cogs have shifting gates to make shifting easier. The new chains are designed to work with hyperglide and ultraglide. Their side profiles are slightly different to catch the cog's gates.
This works fine for an indexed shifter. It's a disaster for a friction shifter.
An indexed shifter places the derailleur in the same lateral position for each cog to a very tight tolerance. If the derailleur is off that lateral position, the cog gates will catch and try to initiate a shift. That's the reason for the fine cable adjustment and the necessity for making certain the hanger is also aligned to a tight tolerance.
A friction shifter depends on a large tolerance of the derailleur's lateral position to stay in gear. The reason a large tolerance is necessary is because the friction shifter cannot repeat the derailleur lateral position with any degree of repeatibility. The friction shifting technique is to overshift and then correct. The overshift forces the derailleur into another cog. Overshifting is necessary because the chain won't otherwise derail. The correction gets the derailleur lateral position into the wide range necessary to keep the derailleur in the new gear.
These two philosophies are contradictory. The only way I see out of this predicament is to figure out a way to loosen the tolerance required to keep the derailleur in gear. One possibility is the lateral float on the upper jockey wheel. There is no float for derailleurs designed for friction shifters. I'd try swapping out top jockey wheels to test the hypothesis. If there's any merit, I see the least expensive solution for a bike coop would be to get slightly longer bushings for the top jockey wheel.
Here's my take on what's happening.
First, all the "new" freewheels are hyperglide or ultraglide compatible. That means their cogs have shifting gates to make shifting easier. The new chains are designed to work with hyperglide and ultraglide. Their side profiles are slightly different to catch the cog's gates.
This works fine for an indexed shifter. It's a disaster for a friction shifter.
An indexed shifter places the derailleur in the same lateral position for each cog to a very tight tolerance. If the derailleur is off that lateral position, the cog gates will catch and try to initiate a shift. That's the reason for the fine cable adjustment and the necessity for making certain the hanger is also aligned to a tight tolerance.
A friction shifter depends on a large tolerance of the derailleur's lateral position to stay in gear. The reason a large tolerance is necessary is because the friction shifter cannot repeat the derailleur lateral position with any degree of repeatibility. The friction shifting technique is to overshift and then correct. The overshift forces the derailleur into another cog. Overshifting is necessary because the chain won't otherwise derail. The correction gets the derailleur lateral position into the wide range necessary to keep the derailleur in the new gear.
These two philosophies are contradictory. The only way I see out of this predicament is to figure out a way to loosen the tolerance required to keep the derailleur in gear. One possibility is the lateral float on the upper jockey wheel. There is no float for derailleurs designed for friction shifters. I'd try swapping out top jockey wheels to test the hypothesis. If there's any merit, I see the least expensive solution for a bike coop would be to get slightly longer bushings for the top jockey wheel.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1,109
Bikes: s-1
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 221 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#10
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26425 Post(s)
Liked 10,381 Times
in
7,209 Posts
KMC X8.93 Chains w/ Missing Link, Bag of 5, 6-8 Speed, Silver/Gray
...these work very well for me on every 5, 6, 7, or 8 cluster I've ever tried one on. Assuming it's not worn out. They work better on ramped cogs, but they still seem to do OK (about as well as you can expect) on the straight toothed ones.
You do have to cut the chain length correctly on your first try. If you make it too short, you need extra quick links to rejoin some links.
...these work very well for me on every 5, 6, 7, or 8 cluster I've ever tried one on. Assuming it's not worn out. They work better on ramped cogs, but they still seem to do OK (about as well as you can expect) on the straight toothed ones.
You do have to cut the chain length correctly on your first try. If you make it too short, you need extra quick links to rejoin some links.
#11
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26425 Post(s)
Liked 10,381 Times
in
7,209 Posts
I've encountered the same problem using new freewheels and chains. My solution has been to buy NOS freewheels and chains. That's a good solution for me because I'm in my mid 70's. It's likely I'll run out before the supply of NOS does.
Here's my take on what's happening.
First, all the "new" freewheels are hyperglide or ultraglide compatible. That means their cogs have shifting gates to make shifting easier. The new chains are designed to work with hyperglide and ultraglide. Their side profiles are slightly different to catch the cog's gates.
This works fine for an indexed shifter. It's a disaster for a friction shifter.
An indexed shifter places the derailleur in the same lateral position for each cog to a very tight tolerance. If the derailleur is off that lateral position, the cog gates will catch and try to initiate a shift. That's the reason for the fine cable adjustment and the necessity for making certain the hanger is also aligned to a tight tolerance.
A friction shifter depends on a large tolerance of the derailleur's lateral position to stay in gear. The reason a large tolerance is necessary is because the friction shifter cannot repeat the derailleur lateral position with any degree of repeatibility. The friction shifting technique is to overshift and then correct. The overshift forces the derailleur into another cog. Overshifting is necessary because the chain won't otherwise derail. The correction gets the derailleur lateral position into the wide range necessary to keep the derailleur in the new gear.
These two philosophies are contradictory. The only way I see out of this predicament is to figure out a way to loosen the tolerance required to keep the derailleur in gear. One possibility is the lateral float on the upper jockey wheel. There is no float for derailleurs designed for friction shifters. I'd try swapping out top jockey wheels to test the hypothesis. If there's any merit, I see the least expensive solution for a bike coop would be to get slightly longer bushings for the top jockey wheel.
Here's my take on what's happening.
First, all the "new" freewheels are hyperglide or ultraglide compatible. That means their cogs have shifting gates to make shifting easier. The new chains are designed to work with hyperglide and ultraglide. Their side profiles are slightly different to catch the cog's gates.
This works fine for an indexed shifter. It's a disaster for a friction shifter.
An indexed shifter places the derailleur in the same lateral position for each cog to a very tight tolerance. If the derailleur is off that lateral position, the cog gates will catch and try to initiate a shift. That's the reason for the fine cable adjustment and the necessity for making certain the hanger is also aligned to a tight tolerance.
A friction shifter depends on a large tolerance of the derailleur's lateral position to stay in gear. The reason a large tolerance is necessary is because the friction shifter cannot repeat the derailleur lateral position with any degree of repeatibility. The friction shifting technique is to overshift and then correct. The overshift forces the derailleur into another cog. Overshifting is necessary because the chain won't otherwise derail. The correction gets the derailleur lateral position into the wide range necessary to keep the derailleur in the new gear.
These two philosophies are contradictory. The only way I see out of this predicament is to figure out a way to loosen the tolerance required to keep the derailleur in gear. One possibility is the lateral float on the upper jockey wheel. There is no float for derailleurs designed for friction shifters. I'd try swapping out top jockey wheels to test the hypothesis. If there's any merit, I see the least expensive solution for a bike coop would be to get slightly longer bushings for the top jockey wheel.
#12
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
+2. My favored SRAM PC-850s work great on 5-speed freewheels. I'd be suspicious of any drivetrain parts that come to me with a rusted chain.