Matching up "sitz" bone measurements with saddle sizes
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Matching up "sitz" bone measurements with saddle sizes
How do you equate the sitx bone measurement with actual saddles widths?
I understand you are supposed to add perhaps 15-25mm to your measurement, but is that the actually total width then of the seat?
The reason I ask is that I plan to buy a saddle from some private party -- new or used -- and I mostly see total length and width of the saddle.
For example, I have a sitz bone width of 115mm. If I add a typical 20mm to that to get to 135, do I buy a saddle of that width or something wider?
Thanks.
I understand you are supposed to add perhaps 15-25mm to your measurement, but is that the actually total width then of the seat?
The reason I ask is that I plan to buy a saddle from some private party -- new or used -- and I mostly see total length and width of the saddle.
For example, I have a sitz bone width of 115mm. If I add a typical 20mm to that to get to 135, do I buy a saddle of that width or something wider?
Thanks.
#2
-------
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Tejas
Posts: 12,795
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9653 Post(s)
Liked 6,365 Times
in
3,505 Posts
Sit bones plus 10mm = total saddle width.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 2,397
Mentioned: 93 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1104 Post(s)
Liked 1,825 Times
in
878 Posts
It really depends on the shape of the saddle. Some XXX mm wide saddles may indeed provide that amount of sit space because it's relatively flat. Another saddle listed as the same XXX mm wide may have less room because they flair down on the sides.
So the answer in my opinion is "it depends". If it was easy, cyclists wouldn't have saddles lying around in boxes.
So the answer in my opinion is "it depends". If it was easy, cyclists wouldn't have saddles lying around in boxes.
__________________
Likes For nomadmax:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,851
Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 810 Times
in
471 Posts
Between my GF and myself..we've done quite a bit of saddle searching, and purchased many saddles for various bikes we own. In the end, the comfortable ones fall into the sit bone width + ~20mm = total width category.
#5
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,531
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3886 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
IME the discomfort from too narrow is much greater than from too wide. A lot depends on the shape of the saddle - whether it is more pear or T-shaped in plan view, i.e. how fast does it neck down?
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#6
Banned.
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 262
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 139 Post(s)
Liked 136 Times
in
72 Posts
I echo the sentiments of nomadmax and Carbonfiberboy... shape matters. Your riding position also matters. Generally speaking, your saddle width will be narrower as your riding position gets more aggressive and wider as your riding position becomes more upright.
My sit bones are approximately 10.5cm, so theoretically a saddle as narrow as ~125mm should fit me. However, in a "touring" position I've ridden a 155mm Ergon saddle that felt like my butt was going to swallow it (very uncomfortable to say the least) and I own a 157mm Gilles Berthoud Aravis that fits my booty like a glove (it's perfect). On a road bike with endurance geometry a saddle width of 146mm is excellent for me. Anything less than 140mm would likely start to become uncomfortable unless I was on an extremely agressive race bike.
At the end of the day, even if you know your sit bone width and can thus estimate proper saddle width for you, you still need to ride the saddle to know if it will work or not. Once you find that correct combination of width and shape it becomes much easier to experiment going forward.
My sit bones are approximately 10.5cm, so theoretically a saddle as narrow as ~125mm should fit me. However, in a "touring" position I've ridden a 155mm Ergon saddle that felt like my butt was going to swallow it (very uncomfortable to say the least) and I own a 157mm Gilles Berthoud Aravis that fits my booty like a glove (it's perfect). On a road bike with endurance geometry a saddle width of 146mm is excellent for me. Anything less than 140mm would likely start to become uncomfortable unless I was on an extremely agressive race bike.
At the end of the day, even if you know your sit bone width and can thus estimate proper saddle width for you, you still need to ride the saddle to know if it will work or not. Once you find that correct combination of width and shape it becomes much easier to experiment going forward.
Last edited by Cyclist0100; 11-28-20 at 12:37 PM.
Likes For Cyclist0100:
#7
Member
Thread Starter
Puttin' on the sitz
Thanks all. With this advice, I was able to buy from private party a 143 mm Cobb RANDEE that fits my sitz just right.
Likes For SkipII: