Hit-and-run driver gets his come-uppance
#51
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,304
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times
in
372 Posts
I am hardly a vehicular cyclist, I only take the full lane in situations when there is no room to safely pass within the lane, but I am surprised by all of the bad driver apologists in this thread. Maybe he could have been a little closer to the center of the lane, but all the other drivers managed to pass him just fine. Then I realized this was moved from the roadie forum
I can't believe the crap the cyclist is getting here.
He had the absolute right to take the lane, given that if the cyclist is as far right as practical, there's not room for a car to pass in the lane and comply with the 4 foot law. And its certainly not unreasonable in those traffic conditions, with an open lane to his left.
And as for the decision to not use the sidewalk, given that the bridge is marked as a shared lane, and the speed limit is 35mph, riding in the road was not an unreasonable decision. It may even have been illegal for him to have ridden on the sidewalk.
Personally, looking at the scene, I might have considered riding slowly on the sidewalk, or if I road the bridge I would have hauled ass. However, I don't crticize the cyclist for riding where he did in a perfectly legal fashion.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#52
Descends like a rock
Yeah, I wouldn't like that bridge, but taking the lane and hauling ass is the best option IMO. Riding all the way to the right is inviting getting pushed into the wall by a close pass.
#53
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
+1.
I can't believe the crap the cyclist is getting here.
He had the absolute right to take the lane, given that if the cyclist is as far right as practical, there's not room for a car to pass in the lane and comply with the 4 foot law. And its certainly not unreasonable in those traffic conditions, with an open lane to his left.
And as for the decision to not use the sidewalk, given that the bridge is marked as a shared lane, and the speed limit is 35mph, riding in the road was not an unreasonable decision. It may even have been illegal for him to have ridden on the sidewalk.
Personally, looking at the scene, I might have considered riding slowly on the sidewalk, or if I road the bridge I would have hauled ass. However, I don't crticize the cyclist for riding where he did in a perfectly legal fashion.
I can't believe the crap the cyclist is getting here.
He had the absolute right to take the lane, given that if the cyclist is as far right as practical, there's not room for a car to pass in the lane and comply with the 4 foot law. And its certainly not unreasonable in those traffic conditions, with an open lane to his left.
And as for the decision to not use the sidewalk, given that the bridge is marked as a shared lane, and the speed limit is 35mph, riding in the road was not an unreasonable decision. It may even have been illegal for him to have ridden on the sidewalk.
Personally, looking at the scene, I might have considered riding slowly on the sidewalk, or if I road the bridge I would have hauled ass. However, I don't crticize the cyclist for riding where he did in a perfectly legal fashion.
What should happen is based on this incident and the video, is that police need to start ticketing motorists who speed across the bridge. They can do so by setting up a radar speed gun on the bridge itself and then pulling over drivers after they leave the bridge.
#54
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
I'd go several miles out of my way to find a better bridge. But if there wasn't one, I'd take the lane, too, and cross as quickly as possible. Er, since this came outta the 41, I'd drope the hamer and dial it up to 400 wats.
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Springfield, IL
Posts: 50
Bikes: 03 GT Avalance 3.0, junk walmart Next chopper, hand made 9' long chop, tall bike, and several piles of parts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Kudos. +100
What should happen is based on this incident and the video, is that police need to start ticketing motorists who speed across the bridge. They can do so by setting up a radar speed gun on the bridge itself and then pulling over drivers after they leave the bridge.
What should happen is based on this incident and the video, is that police need to start ticketing motorists who speed across the bridge. They can do so by setting up a radar speed gun on the bridge itself and then pulling over drivers after they leave the bridge.
+1 more. the cyclist breaking the law so that ignorant distracted motorist don't isnt the answer. I'd like to buy that bus driver a beer btw.
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 4,665
Bikes: 2012 Trek Madone 6.2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#58
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
The thing is there are bridges like this everywhere... built primarily for motor traffic, with nothing in the design for pedestrians or cyclists. This bridge had barriers for peds, but often such bridges accommodate only motorists.
#59
Banned.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 6,434
Bikes: '09 Felt F55, '84 Masi Cran Criterium, (2)'86 Schwinn Pelotons, '86 Look Equippe Hinault, '09 Globe Live 3 (dogtaxi), '94 Greg Lemond, '99 GT Pulse Kinesis
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 389 Post(s)
Liked 270 Times
in
153 Posts
#60
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Monterey Bay area, California
Posts: 523
Bikes: Terratrike Tour, recumbent tadpole tricycle.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
2 Posts
I hope someone sent this video to Ray Lahood, Sec. of Transportation. If this is the best bridge for a cyclist to cross there needs to be some speed limit enforcement and bike sharrows, at the very least.
__________________
What do you call a cyclist who sells potpourri on the road? A pedaling petal-peddler.
What do you call a cyclist who sells potpourri on the road? A pedaling petal-peddler.
Likes For fly:yes/land:no:
#62
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Burnaby, BC
Posts: 4,144
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Despite your claims the video shows otherwise.
No less than 4 cars and a friggin bus are on the bridge while he is. In fact i thought he was goibg to get clipped by the first passing truck. Even when cars pass, its obvious it is so dangerous that its luck that the car behind has enough time to slow before killing hom.
At least during the time the vid was shot that is a horrible road for cyclists and you are asking to be hit by riding on it then.
No less than 4 cars and a friggin bus are on the bridge while he is. In fact i thought he was goibg to get clipped by the first passing truck. Even when cars pass, its obvious it is so dangerous that its luck that the car behind has enough time to slow before killing hom.
At least during the time the vid was shot that is a horrible road for cyclists and you are asking to be hit by riding on it then.
The cyclist was 100% in the right, legally and practically. If you can't understand that, you shouldn't be driving or cycling.
#63
Banned.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 6,434
Bikes: '09 Felt F55, '84 Masi Cran Criterium, (2)'86 Schwinn Pelotons, '86 Look Equippe Hinault, '09 Globe Live 3 (dogtaxi), '94 Greg Lemond, '99 GT Pulse Kinesis
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 389 Post(s)
Liked 270 Times
in
153 Posts
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 464
Bikes: Sun EZ-Speedster SX, Volae Expedition
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
At the minimum, if you are dead set on crossing that bridge with that kind of traffic (which I acknowledge may happen once in awhile, for example, if you get lost and it's the only way back, or you end up taking longer than you thought and end up getting caught in rush hour), you should exercise the judgment to either wait until the traffic is clear before booking it across to make as big a gap between you and the next car as possible, or suck up your pride and walk/roll the bike slowly on the separate MUP.
#65
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,399
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,699 Times
in
2,519 Posts
simply put, if you ride closer to the right, people will try to squeeze by and endanger you more. They need to slow down the traffic on that bridge. I don't really believe most of the people here would walk their bikes across that bridge. It's a long bridge, and there is really no other choice for crossing that river.
I think the days of making every road look like a freeway are over, but they really screwed up with the design of this bridge. It suggests that going fast is ok. It's not, and there is no reason to go fast. You get on the other side of the bridge and get to wait at traffic lights every block.
I think the days of making every road look like a freeway are over, but they really screwed up with the design of this bridge. It suggests that going fast is ok. It's not, and there is no reason to go fast. You get on the other side of the bridge and get to wait at traffic lights every block.
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 464
Bikes: Sun EZ-Speedster SX, Volae Expedition
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
No shoulder, and high odds of the driver getting himself , the cyclist, and other drivers injured by parking a car in the only open lane of a 35mph roadway, especially if he jumps out of his car and starts mucking around in the road after the clip.
Also, was the driver speeding?
#68
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: PDX!
Posts: 281
Bikes: Custom Single, factory fixed, Cannondale RT2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
this bridge connects two surface streets with low speed limits. You have to ride across a bridge somewhere and this is the best one. There is no reason to speed across the bridge, and the cars speeding across it are doing so illegally. I ride across this bridge fairly often. I can't believe the "giving us a bad name" nonsense. There is no good reason for this bridge to even be 4 lane, and it's purpose could be met with only one travel lane each way. It's not like this is taking massive traffic volumes. People are just idiots when they get behind the wheel, if there is open road they want to go fast. Why aren't the speeding reckless motorists giving motorists a bad name?
#69
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
#70
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Burnaby, BC
Posts: 4,144
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
It's nothing to do with respect. There are certain laws you need to know to operate a vehicle safely, and certain skills you need to have. That's it.
#71
Elitest Murray Owner
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,657
Bikes: 1972 Columbia Tourist Expert III, Columbia Roadster
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
I don't really understand how this is confusing for people. I thought it was common knowledge that if you rear end somebody you're at fault automatically (excepting some situations like the vehicle in front of you not having its lights on at night).
#72
abandoning
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,068
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
hmmm... you may be right. i was looking at the google maps sat. image: link and zoom. but, in the google street view, i don't see the sharrows, granted it is from the other side of the road. but, i also don't see the sharrows in the bing sat. images.
#73
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
hmmm... you may be right. i was looking at the google maps sat. image: link and zoom. but, in the google street view, i don't see the sharrows, granted it is from the other side of the road. but, i also don't see the sharrows in the bing sat. images.
#74
Commander, UFO Bike
#75
Señior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,749
Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
Far right as possible doesn't mean the cyclist has to endanger his life.
The cyclist was doing absolutely the right thing in this situation.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.