road double to triple crankset - things to consider
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 80
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
road double to triple crankset - things to consider
Hi,
I picked up a vintage chromoly frame. The previous owner rested the wheel-less frame on the floor, so the existing 52/40 crankset was bent out of shape. I have an existing 48/38/28 crankset I want to use on the bike, but what else would I need to change?
I've determined the existing Shimano double front derailleur won't work - it actually can shift to all three gears, but there is chain rubbing when I'm on the smallest front and rear gears because the chain is so low. I can't move the derailleur any lower or it won't clear all three gears when shifting. So I'm guessing I'll need a triple front derailleur.
But, I'm using the existing Shimano friction stem shifters. Will that have enough "pull" for a triple derailleur?
Are there other things to consider?
I picked up a vintage chromoly frame. The previous owner rested the wheel-less frame on the floor, so the existing 52/40 crankset was bent out of shape. I have an existing 48/38/28 crankset I want to use on the bike, but what else would I need to change?
I've determined the existing Shimano double front derailleur won't work - it actually can shift to all three gears, but there is chain rubbing when I'm on the smallest front and rear gears because the chain is so low. I can't move the derailleur any lower or it won't clear all three gears when shifting. So I'm guessing I'll need a triple front derailleur.
But, I'm using the existing Shimano friction stem shifters. Will that have enough "pull" for a triple derailleur?
Are there other things to consider?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
You will probably need a new bottom bracket to match the triple crank.
Your shifters should allow shifting to all three chainrings with either a double or triple front derailleur.
Your current front derailleur should work ok with the new crank. The problem you report with the chain hitting the tail off the derailleur is common in small-small but there is absolutely no reason to ever use those gears so the "problem" is easily solved by avoiding it.
Your shifters should allow shifting to all three chainrings with either a double or triple front derailleur.
Your current front derailleur should work ok with the new crank. The problem you report with the chain hitting the tail off the derailleur is common in small-small but there is absolutely no reason to ever use those gears so the "problem" is easily solved by avoiding it.
#3
Insane Bicycle Mechanic
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: other Vancouver
Posts: 9,843
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 809 Post(s)
Liked 712 Times
in
380 Posts
You will probably need a new bottom bracket to match the triple crank.
Your shifters should allow shifting to all three chainrings with either a double or triple front derailleur.
Your current front derailleur should work ok with the new crank. The problem you report with the chain hitting the tail off the derailleur is common in small-small but there is absolutely no reason to ever use those gears so the "problem" is easily solved by avoiding it.
Your shifters should allow shifting to all three chainrings with either a double or triple front derailleur.
Your current front derailleur should work ok with the new crank. The problem you report with the chain hitting the tail off the derailleur is common in small-small but there is absolutely no reason to ever use those gears so the "problem" is easily solved by avoiding it.
__________________
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 80
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the responses. Very Interesting. So derailleur rub won't necessarily be solved with a triple derailleur. It's ones of those "you have to live with it" things. Hmm...
I hadn't considered changing the bottom bracket. The "chainline" measurement (center of tube to middle chain ring) is about 50mm, but I can still shift to the largest gear. Is a smaller chainline measurement meant to improve efficiency and reduce wear by having a relatively straight chain?
I hadn't considered changing the bottom bracket. The "chainline" measurement (center of tube to middle chain ring) is about 50mm, but I can still shift to the largest gear. Is a smaller chainline measurement meant to improve efficiency and reduce wear by having a relatively straight chain?
#5
Insane Bicycle Mechanic
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: other Vancouver
Posts: 9,843
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 809 Post(s)
Liked 712 Times
in
380 Posts
Thanks for the responses. Very Interesting. So derailleur rub won't necessarily be solved with a triple derailleur. It's ones of those "you have to live with it" things. Hmm...
I hadn't considered changing the bottom bracket. The "chainline" measurement (center of tube to middle chain ring) is about 50mm, but I can still shift to the largest gear. Is a smaller chainline measurement meant to improve efficiency and reduce wear by having a relatively straight chain?
I hadn't considered changing the bottom bracket. The "chainline" measurement (center of tube to middle chain ring) is about 50mm, but I can still shift to the largest gear. Is a smaller chainline measurement meant to improve efficiency and reduce wear by having a relatively straight chain?
__________________
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
#6
Oldtimer
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Foothills of the Catskills in New York
Posts: 221
Bikes: 1972 Raleigh LTD, 1985 Cannondale SR300 (2), 1986 ROSS Eurotour, 1991 Giant Sedona MTB, 1992 Trek Antelope MTB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I went through this recently with an '85 Cannondale SR300.
Initially I was using the original 6 sp. double derailer with a used Campy 9 sp. triple and 7 speed freewheel, with a long-cage rear derailer. It worked as long as I slightly over-shifted up off the granny then quickly brought it back slightly to the middle.
It only took accidentally shifting to the granny, then not being able to get off it on a medium hill once, to make me buy a triple derailer. I got an inexpensive Shimano Sora and have had no trouble with it.
Initially I was using the original 6 sp. double derailer with a used Campy 9 sp. triple and 7 speed freewheel, with a long-cage rear derailer. It worked as long as I slightly over-shifted up off the granny then quickly brought it back slightly to the middle.
It only took accidentally shifting to the granny, then not being able to get off it on a medium hill once, to make me buy a triple derailer. I got an inexpensive Shimano Sora and have had no trouble with it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
grudgemonkey
Bicycle Mechanics
13
05-03-20 07:02 PM
channelz28
Bicycle Mechanics
8
06-22-12 08:39 PM