I keep breaking chainstays
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 59
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I keep breaking chainstays
First one was a 40 year old Schwinn Continental. I somehow managed to snap the steel beast's right chainstay near the rear wheel hub. I rode this bike as a commuter for many years, in conditions ranging from snowing at 10F to rainy at 100F. I had an experienced welder friend weld it back on and it has held well for 5 years since.
Second break was just recently on my aluminum Diamondback Podium 3. I snapped the right chainstay near the bottom bracket, at the weld. Since this is an aluminum bike, I've read it cannot be fixed safely unless a reinforcement pipe is somehow put in place, making it prohibitively expensive given a new frame might be the same cost or cheaper.
Possibly the chainstays are breaking due to a combo of my weight, riding style, weather conditions, and usage:
1. I'm a clydesdale at 220 lbs.
2. I lean more towards mashing at ~75 RPM, and I like off-the-saddle riding and hill repeats.
3. I ride year-round assuming no heavy rain or snow. Living near Chicago, the streets are salted so I don't know if that had a role in the chainstays breaking.
4. On the aluminum bike, I would often do hill repeats with my toddler in the carrier behind me, along with plenty of flat riding. This carrier attaches to the rear wheel hub.
So, some questions:
-Am I being too hard on the bikes, or am I just trying to justify what is actually a coincidence/random? After also breaking spokes, rims, chains, and pedals, I am starting to think maybe it's something I am doing.
-Are those carriers known to cause issues with frames breaking?
-Assuming proper welding technique, there's nothing dangerous about riding a welded steel frame, right? I'm actually thinking about pulling the carrier with this bike now.
Thanks!
Second break was just recently on my aluminum Diamondback Podium 3. I snapped the right chainstay near the bottom bracket, at the weld. Since this is an aluminum bike, I've read it cannot be fixed safely unless a reinforcement pipe is somehow put in place, making it prohibitively expensive given a new frame might be the same cost or cheaper.
Possibly the chainstays are breaking due to a combo of my weight, riding style, weather conditions, and usage:
1. I'm a clydesdale at 220 lbs.
2. I lean more towards mashing at ~75 RPM, and I like off-the-saddle riding and hill repeats.
3. I ride year-round assuming no heavy rain or snow. Living near Chicago, the streets are salted so I don't know if that had a role in the chainstays breaking.
4. On the aluminum bike, I would often do hill repeats with my toddler in the carrier behind me, along with plenty of flat riding. This carrier attaches to the rear wheel hub.
So, some questions:
-Am I being too hard on the bikes, or am I just trying to justify what is actually a coincidence/random? After also breaking spokes, rims, chains, and pedals, I am starting to think maybe it's something I am doing.
-Are those carriers known to cause issues with frames breaking?
-Assuming proper welding technique, there's nothing dangerous about riding a welded steel frame, right? I'm actually thinking about pulling the carrier with this bike now.
Thanks!
#2
Calamari Marionette Ph.D
Prior to the breaks, did you notice any rust or slow cracking and decay? Or were they just sudden and immediate total failures?
Maybe you are just too damn stong and should force yourself to adopt a higher cadence style.
Maybe you are just too damn stong and should force yourself to adopt a higher cadence style.
#3
Senior Member
Where to start, a 40 yr old cheap bike and a new aluminum cheap bike. Try a Surly something, start there. I weigh more than you. I find stuff breaks as well. Rims, BB's and frames as well. Try a good steel frame and/or a 29er hardtail. I have a Surly 1x1, a crosscheck and a karate monkey. All have take loads of used and abuse and has fared well.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 59
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The aluminum definitely made a noise and was sudden, but the derailleur slamming to the small sprocket when the shifter cable snapped (due to the chainstay snapping) was probably part of it. There is no rust or anything on this bike. Just a clean break through the weld area.
My knees would prefer a higher cadence style as well I'm sure. It just feels so uncomfortable.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 59
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Where to start, a 40 yr old cheap bike and a new aluminum cheap bike. Try a Surly something, start there. I weigh more than you. I find stuff breaks as well. Rims, BB's and frames as well. Try a good steel frame and/or a 29er hardtail. I have a Surly 1x1, a crosscheck and a karate monkey. All have take loads of used and abuse and has fared well.
The aluminum frame was replaced free under warranty with a carbon fiber. Haha, probably not what you'd recommend, but I didn't really have a choice and it was free.
I wouldn't classify either as cheap, but certainly far from the best. The Continentals have a reputation for being durable due to the all-steel frame (I obviously can't attest to that however). Keep in mind this is the Chicago-Schwinn, not the Chinese Walmart bikes you see today. The Diamondback is a $1200 Raleigh frame with ultegra/105 groupset.
That being said, they are entry-level bikes (not mid to high level), so you could be right about my problem being the bikes themselves.
#6
we be rollin'
Touring frames can be strong. I can't remember which company sells "replacement" frames. But I think it was a name like Trek. The Trek 520 is well known.
#7
Banned
Yea Trek has no time limit on their frames to the original owner .. hang on to the receipt and any Trek dealer
will run the replacement process for you.
may be a labor charge to move all the parts over.. thats a LBS Manager's choice..
will run the replacement process for you.
may be a labor charge to move all the parts over.. thats a LBS Manager's choice..
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 59
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I got charged $200 for my LBS to swap components though. Kinda steep, but the bike shop spotted me a handlebar plug before a triathlon to avoid disqualification, so I felt like I owed them (I'm sure that was their intent too; well-played LBS). I would be surprised if you DIDN'T get charged unless labor was built-in to the warranty.
#9
Banned
Its all relative .. Compare with replacing the engine or transmission in your car. and It seems cheap
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,960
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5912 Post(s)
Liked 2,781 Times
in
1,553 Posts
Sorry to be so blunt, but nothing lasts forever.
Frames flex in use, and eventually will fail. When companies offer lifetime guaranties they're just playing the odds.
Add to that, heavy riders and steep terrain mean higher stresses and flex, therefore faster failure.
Chainstays are especially prone to failure from hard climbing. Changing chain tension, flexes the rear triangle to the right, flexing the right stay into an S bend. Steep hills usually mean the rider is using a small chainring, giving him greater leverage to tension the chain more. A heavy rider climbing steep hills with a 24t granny is the triple whammy, and it's only a matter of time.
Of course bikes could be built stronger, but we're in a sport where weight is a premium. They don't build sports cars the same way Ford builds F-100 pickups, likewise bikes are built to a purpose.
The bright side to all this is that companies do offer those lifetime frame warranties, and most or all don't have rider weight exclusions. So heavier riders with below average frame life are covered.
The other bright side is that chainstay failures are very unlikely to cause injury (though I'd keep bus or cab fare with me at all times).
Frames flex in use, and eventually will fail. When companies offer lifetime guaranties they're just playing the odds.
Add to that, heavy riders and steep terrain mean higher stresses and flex, therefore faster failure.
Chainstays are especially prone to failure from hard climbing. Changing chain tension, flexes the rear triangle to the right, flexing the right stay into an S bend. Steep hills usually mean the rider is using a small chainring, giving him greater leverage to tension the chain more. A heavy rider climbing steep hills with a 24t granny is the triple whammy, and it's only a matter of time.
Of course bikes could be built stronger, but we're in a sport where weight is a premium. They don't build sports cars the same way Ford builds F-100 pickups, likewise bikes are built to a purpose.
The bright side to all this is that companies do offer those lifetime frame warranties, and most or all don't have rider weight exclusions. So heavier riders with below average frame life are covered.
The other bright side is that chainstay failures are very unlikely to cause injury (though I'd keep bus or cab fare with me at all times).
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
Last edited by FBinNY; 05-12-14 at 07:42 PM.
#11
Constant tinkerer
Your weight and riding style pretty much define why you're breaking chainstays. Still, I'm impressed you managed to break a Continental. Unless it was rust related.
I would seriously try to spin more. It does feel uncomfortable at first but once you get used to it you'll never go back. Your knees will thank you and you'll get a better cardio workout. A knee injury forced me to spin. I'm glad it did.
Or just keep buying bikes with lifetime frame warranties and cash in on something that almost no one else ever does.
Ford hasn't built an F-100 since 1983 They still make the F-150 of course.
I would seriously try to spin more. It does feel uncomfortable at first but once you get used to it you'll never go back. Your knees will thank you and you'll get a better cardio workout. A knee injury forced me to spin. I'm glad it did.
Or just keep buying bikes with lifetime frame warranties and cash in on something that almost no one else ever does.
Ford hasn't built an F-100 since 1983 They still make the F-150 of course.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,960
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5912 Post(s)
Liked 2,781 Times
in
1,553 Posts
That's about the last time I rode in or even looked at a pickup. It's amazing I still remember that Ford calls their pickups F-xxx.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 59
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There's minimal rusting however. I broke this commuter when my extent of bike mechanic knowledge was making sure the tubes were inflated and chain was lubed. I do remember it acting wobbly for a little while, but I was always in a rush to get where I needed to go and kept putting off looking at it. Then all of a sudden it was unridable, and that's when I noticed the chainstay had snapped. I wish I knew what was happening before that. Nowadays, I love working on bikes and would have jumped at the challenge.
The Diamondback broke literally pulling out of my driveway, but it took me about an 1/8th of a mile to realize what had happened.
I agree. What do you currently spin at? Any good approaches to ease the transition?
#14
Constant tinkerer
You can try a fixed gear where the gear ratio is low enough that you have to spin more than you push. It will be especially effective when riding downhill. Make sure it has a front brake of course.
#15
Banned
I could resell my Custom built Touring bike frame and fork you wont break it's chainstays the builder and I made it up from his cargo bike
frame materials .. loop stays of 3/4" .049 wall 4130 steel tube form the chainstays, seat and top tubes ..
frame materials .. loop stays of 3/4" .049 wall 4130 steel tube form the chainstays, seat and top tubes ..
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 59
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the suggestion. I don't have a single speed, so I could just try to stick to one sprocket lower than I usually ride.
#18
Senior Member
Hello fellow bike wrecker/clydesdale! Thanks for the reply.
The aluminum frame was replaced free under warranty with a carbon fiber. Haha, probably not what you'd recommend, but I didn't really have a choice and it was free.
I wouldn't classify either as cheap, but certainly far from the best. The Continentals have a reputation for being durable due to the all-steel frame (I obviously can't attest to that however). Keep in mind this is the Chicago-Schwinn, not the Chinese Walmart bikes you see today. The Diamondback is a $1200 Raleigh frame with ultegra/105 groupset.
That being said, they are entry-level bikes (not mid to high level), so you could be right about my problem being the bikes themselves.
The aluminum frame was replaced free under warranty with a carbon fiber. Haha, probably not what you'd recommend, but I didn't really have a choice and it was free.
I wouldn't classify either as cheap, but certainly far from the best. The Continentals have a reputation for being durable due to the all-steel frame (I obviously can't attest to that however). Keep in mind this is the Chicago-Schwinn, not the Chinese Walmart bikes you see today. The Diamondback is a $1200 Raleigh frame with ultegra/105 groupset.
That being said, they are entry-level bikes (not mid to high level), so you could be right about my problem being the bikes themselves.
My name is Mike, and I am an Uber Clyde (265) and I wreck stuff too...
40 years is pretty durable!
That had a good run. Please note that the chainstay is now heat stressed (happens on all welds, but re-welds, well...)
Comfortable? You're worried about comfortable doing hill repeats as a clyde, WHILE TOWING!!!!
Dude you rock!
p.s.
I built up a Disc Trucker with "wheels for the apocalypse" and inadvertently took it airborne while loaded with a pack... I was sure something would break... But was lucky. So I'll second that steel is rather durable.
#19
Senior Member
Aluminum is probably the most likely material to fail under the conditions you're talking about. Large strong rider + trailer = lots of force and frame flex. Aluminum also suffers from metal fatigue if its repeatedly flexed, meaning it will eventually break. Carbon fiber and steel both have an elastic limit, where they can repeatedly flex without any damage.
The average rider won't usually stress a frame enough to fracture it, but it sounds like you're riding harder than average especially including the trailer. The new carbon fiber frame will probably be fine. The trailer will likely break either frame eventually, but you can hope that your toddler out grows the trailer before that happens. A steel "touring" frame would be designed to handle much larger loads, but I wouldn't worry about until you break your current steel frame again.
The average rider won't usually stress a frame enough to fracture it, but it sounds like you're riding harder than average especially including the trailer. The new carbon fiber frame will probably be fine. The trailer will likely break either frame eventually, but you can hope that your toddler out grows the trailer before that happens. A steel "touring" frame would be designed to handle much larger loads, but I wouldn't worry about until you break your current steel frame again.
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 59
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Haha, thanks. I like the pain hills provide . My legs just don't want to spin at 80+ RPM. They'd rather lean towards mashing. When I go off-the-saddle, I am probably rocking a cadence of about 40-50 RPM. Fortunately I can't go off-saddle when towing otherwise the carrier swings around with every pedal stroke.
#21
Señor Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,066
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 293 Times
in
216 Posts
a lot of information in this thread
is not information but poorly formed opnions
first
steel is just as likely to break if it is used outside its intended design
and most lightweight steel frames probably have tighter design conditions than cheap aluminum
robust steel like a surly will probably last a lifetime
but lighter stuff like surlys sister brand salsa probably less so
but in my experience
well made aluminum frames have as good or better service life than steel
the main point i think needs to be clarified is gsa103s comment about fatigue limits
called elastic limits in his post
yes steel has a fatigue limit
which is the amount of stress that the metal can withstand repeatedly without suffering a fatigue failure
this only means that if the stress in the material is below a certain threshold it will not suffer fatigue failure
and this threshold is often incorrectly given as the elastic limit
which is the point at which the metal permanently deforms
or bends
but actually
the fatigue limit is generally much lower than the elastic limit
meaning the bike can still suffer fatigue failure without showing any signs of damage
as for aluminum
no there is no fatigue limit
or threshold of stress below which it will last forever
but if the stresses are relatively low
when considering
use and or abuse
design
and construction
the frame can last billions of cycles
or hundreds of thousands of kms
before failure
also
when comparing inexpensive steel to inexpensive aluminum
the aluminum will generally have a higher strength to weight ratio
so the bike can be significantly lighter and stronger than an inexpensive steel frame
lastly
aluminum frames are built with fat tubes to avoid flex and reduce internal stresses in the material
to keep the frame lasting a long time
while lightweight high end steel is built with thin wall skinny tubes
as the added strength can tolerate higher stress and more flex
but this makes them less ideal for bigger and stronger riders
of course
all these comments are generalizations
as there are steel and aluminum and carbon frames that are more than strong enough
and ones that are comparatively feeble
so as always
and especially for clydes
buyer beware
is not information but poorly formed opnions
first
steel is just as likely to break if it is used outside its intended design
and most lightweight steel frames probably have tighter design conditions than cheap aluminum
robust steel like a surly will probably last a lifetime
but lighter stuff like surlys sister brand salsa probably less so
but in my experience
well made aluminum frames have as good or better service life than steel
the main point i think needs to be clarified is gsa103s comment about fatigue limits
called elastic limits in his post
yes steel has a fatigue limit
which is the amount of stress that the metal can withstand repeatedly without suffering a fatigue failure
this only means that if the stress in the material is below a certain threshold it will not suffer fatigue failure
and this threshold is often incorrectly given as the elastic limit
which is the point at which the metal permanently deforms
or bends
but actually
the fatigue limit is generally much lower than the elastic limit
meaning the bike can still suffer fatigue failure without showing any signs of damage
as for aluminum
no there is no fatigue limit
or threshold of stress below which it will last forever
but if the stresses are relatively low
when considering
use and or abuse
design
and construction
the frame can last billions of cycles
or hundreds of thousands of kms
before failure
also
when comparing inexpensive steel to inexpensive aluminum
the aluminum will generally have a higher strength to weight ratio
so the bike can be significantly lighter and stronger than an inexpensive steel frame
lastly
aluminum frames are built with fat tubes to avoid flex and reduce internal stresses in the material
to keep the frame lasting a long time
while lightweight high end steel is built with thin wall skinny tubes
as the added strength can tolerate higher stress and more flex
but this makes them less ideal for bigger and stronger riders
of course
all these comments are generalizations
as there are steel and aluminum and carbon frames that are more than strong enough
and ones that are comparatively feeble
so as always
and especially for clydes
buyer beware
#22
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 59
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Aluminum is probably the most likely material to fail under the conditions you're talking about. Large strong rider + trailer = lots of force and frame flex. Aluminum also suffers from metal fatigue if its repeatedly flexed, meaning it will eventually break. Carbon fiber and steel both have an elastic limit, where they can repeatedly flex without any damage.
The average rider won't usually stress a frame enough to fracture it, but it sounds like you're riding harder than average especially including the trailer. The new carbon fiber frame will probably be fine. The trailer will likely break either frame eventually, but you can hope that your toddler out grows the trailer before that happens. A steel "touring" frame would be designed to handle much larger loads, but I wouldn't worry about until you break your current steel frame again.
The average rider won't usually stress a frame enough to fracture it, but it sounds like you're riding harder than average especially including the trailer. The new carbon fiber frame will probably be fine. The trailer will likely break either frame eventually, but you can hope that your toddler out grows the trailer before that happens. A steel "touring" frame would be designed to handle much larger loads, but I wouldn't worry about until you break your current steel frame again.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,553
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1533 Post(s)
Liked 724 Times
in
515 Posts
Haha, thanks. I like the pain hills provide . My legs just don't want to spin at 80+ RPM. They'd rather lean towards mashing. When I go off-the-saddle, I am probably rocking a cadence of about 40-50 RPM. Fortunately I can't go off-saddle when towing otherwise the carrier swings around with every pedal stroke.
Obviously the bigger guys are going to move slower, but AFAIK there's no reason you couldn't be quite happy at say, 75-80rpm.
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 59
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Judging from the sound of this, I should ask if you've ever minded your pedal stroke for a couple of months or so... it takes concentrated practice to build the muscle memory necessary to turn stomping into a nice smooth spin, which uses less effort once you have the muscle memory.
Obviously the bigger guys are going to move slower, but AFAIK there's no reason you couldn't be quite happy at say, 75-80rpm.
Obviously the bigger guys are going to move slower, but AFAIK there's no reason you couldn't be quite happy at say, 75-80rpm.
I think the off-the-saddle riding is the trouble area. I've been trying to spin up hills more often. That's kind of a bummer though because I love "dancing on the pedals" as Phil Liggett would say. Granted, there's not much grace to my 220 lbs frame mashing the pedals, but fortunately I don't ever see myself cycling so the illusion is easily maintained . Unfortunately for my bikes (and knees), my lungs and legs can go off-saddle for quite some time without having to stop.
I can't see "spinning" when off-the-saddle. What's an acceptable cadence when going off-saddle, or is that not really monitored?
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 142
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm curious as well what cadence one would want to strive for off-saddle. I'm looking at ANT+ Cadence/Speed sensors for my Garmin so I can track where I am and work on improving.