27.5 vs 29 which and why
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NWNJ
Posts: 3,704
Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 722 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times
in
226 Posts
27.5 vs 29 which and why
in market for new bike always had 26 mtb tried buddies FS 29er and was very impressed i remember the 27.5 birth years ago liked the idea but never able to ride one.
live in nwnj very technical trails .
All things being equal which size is the way to go?
live in nwnj very technical trails .
All things being equal which size is the way to go?
#2
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
All things are never equal.
How tall you are and whether you're gong to run plus-size tires makes a difference.
I'm 5'10" and I run 27.5 X 2.8". It's dreamy.
If I was going to run 2.4" tires, I'd go 29er, but plus-size tires on 29er rims make any bike feel gigantic to me. If I was a tall fellow, I might feel differently.
All that said, I can't imagine not running plus-size, so it's 27.5" for me.
How tall you are and whether you're gong to run plus-size tires makes a difference.
I'm 5'10" and I run 27.5 X 2.8". It's dreamy.
If I was going to run 2.4" tires, I'd go 29er, but plus-size tires on 29er rims make any bike feel gigantic to me. If I was a tall fellow, I might feel differently.
All that said, I can't imagine not running plus-size, so it's 27.5" for me.
Last edited by Rolla; 04-20-21 at 08:12 PM.
Likes For Rolla:
#3
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,458
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4330 Post(s)
Liked 3,951 Times
in
2,641 Posts
It depends on your trails and riding style and such. I am currently running 650B on my hardtail but have plans for 29ers in the near future just to try them out. The 650bs roll fine on the trails around me but I don't know that one is better. I think people are passionate about what they have but I don't know if one is better though it might be better for certain trails You could run a mullet set up 650b at the rear and 29er at the front!
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NWNJ
Posts: 3,704
Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 722 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times
in
226 Posts
All things are never equal.
How tall you are and whether you're gong to run plus-size tires makes a difference.
I'm 5'10" and I run 27.5 X 2.8". It's dreamy.
If I was going to run 2.4" tires, I'd go 29er, but plus-size tires on 29er rims make any bike feel gigantic to me. If I was a tall fellow, I might feel differently.
All that said, I can't imagine not running plus-size, so it's 27.5" for me.
How tall you are and whether you're gong to run plus-size tires makes a difference.
I'm 5'10" and I run 27.5 X 2.8". It's dreamy.
If I was going to run 2.4" tires, I'd go 29er, but plus-size tires on 29er rims make any bike feel gigantic to me. If I was a tall fellow, I might feel differently.
All that said, I can't imagine not running plus-size, so it's 27.5" for me.
#5
With a mighty wind
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,575
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1084 Post(s)
Liked 854 Times
in
483 Posts
I mountain biked a ton in the 90s then not again until last year. I got a 29er and it was an absolute revelation compared to what I was used to.
The larger wheel do occasionally have problems with low speed obstacles I can't get around but can't quite roll over. I occasionally have some trouble whipping the bike around super tight corners too. I have found it to be better 95 percent of the time and only occasionally would a 26" hold a debatable advantage.
I wonder if the 27.5 just splits the difference?
How about a bike that can handle either and just get two wheelsets?
The larger wheel do occasionally have problems with low speed obstacles I can't get around but can't quite roll over. I occasionally have some trouble whipping the bike around super tight corners too. I have found it to be better 95 percent of the time and only occasionally would a 26" hold a debatable advantage.
I wonder if the 27.5 just splits the difference?
How about a bike that can handle either and just get two wheelsets?
Likes For rosefarts:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,857
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3221 Post(s)
Liked 2,043 Times
in
1,169 Posts
I mountain biked a ton in the 90s then not again until last year. I got a 29er and it was an absolute revelation compared to what I was used to.
The larger wheel do occasionally have problems with low speed obstacles I can't get around but can't quite roll over. I occasionally have some trouble whipping the bike around super tight corners too. I have found it to be better 95 percent of the time and only occasionally would a 26" hold a debatable advantage.
I wonder if the 27.5 just splits the difference?
How about a bike that can handle either and just get two wheelsets?
The larger wheel do occasionally have problems with low speed obstacles I can't get around but can't quite roll over. I occasionally have some trouble whipping the bike around super tight corners too. I have found it to be better 95 percent of the time and only occasionally would a 26" hold a debatable advantage.
I wonder if the 27.5 just splits the difference?
How about a bike that can handle either and just get two wheelsets?
#7
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
Yeah, I love the advantages of 29" wheels and tires -- great rollover, great traction, and they hold momentum well -- but the 27.5" size has been a revelation. They have 90% of the 29er advantages, but they accelerate faster and don't make me feel like I'm steering an ocean liner. We have lots of tight, woodsy singletrack around here, and smaller wheels make the bike feel more "flickable."
Likes For Rolla:
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NWNJ
Posts: 3,704
Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 722 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times
in
226 Posts
Yeah, I love the advantages of 29" wheels and tires -- great rollover, great traction, and they hold momentum well -- but the 27.5" size has been a revelation. They have 90% of the 29er advantages, but they accelerate faster and don't make me feel like I'm steering an ocean liner. We have lots of tight, woodsy singletrack around here, and smaller wheels make the bike feel more "flickable."
29 er seems great for fire roads double track stuff but
i live in techical single track land.
#9
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
I've seen guys rail in very tight singletrack on their 29ers, so the shortcoming is most likely my own skills. But I've always thought that 29ers were best suited for six-footers and taller people; I like sitting "in" the bike, and big wheels put me more "on" it. And with the advent of plus-size tires (which I'm 100% sold on), the differences are more evident. 29+ is just too much wheel for me, but 27.5+ is Goldilocks.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NWNJ
Posts: 3,704
Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 722 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times
in
226 Posts
I've seen guys rail in very tight singletrack on their 29ers, so the shortcoming is most likely my own skills. But I've always thought that 29ers were best suited for six-footers and taller people; I like sitting "in" the bike, and big wheels put me more "on" it. And with the advent of plus-size tires (which I'm 100% sold on), the differences are more evident. 29+ is just too much wheel for me, but 27.5+ is Goldilocks.
27.5 maybe the golden goose.
Likes For thehammerdog:
#12
Senior Member
I'm one of those people that really doesn't care. I've had everything but + bikes and liked them all, currently have two 27.5ers one a FS and one a HT. If I were buying a HT today I'd go 29er. If I were buying a FS with some travel 130mm or more I'd go 27.5er while I"d go 29er if I wanted more of a XC full squish bike.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,618
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2973 Post(s)
Liked 1,178 Times
in
769 Posts
I notice the manufacturers are starting to slowly elminate 27.5 from their line up.
Specialized eliminated 27.5 from their full suspension bikes for the 2021 line up as did Scott and Cannondale.
Specialized eliminated 27.5 from their full suspension bikes for the 2021 line up as did Scott and Cannondale.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,393
Bikes: Too many to list
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1765 Post(s)
Liked 1,123 Times
in
746 Posts
Dont make the mistake of spending large coin on the next 26'er as far as obsolescese
i dont think 29" wheels are going anywhere
(Im 5'8" == i got used to mine in short order
#15
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,102 Times
in
1,366 Posts
I liked my 27.5 bike. The current crop of 29ers has a LOT of stack especially as the travel gets longer.
But I can see the writing on the wall.
But I can see the writing on the wall.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
Likes For Darth Lefty:
#16
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
I keep hearing about the death of 27.5, but there seems to be plenty of 2021 models: Santa Cruz Nomad; Trek Remedy, Roscoe, and Session; Kona Process and Big Honzo; Polygon Vander; Giant Stance, Trance, Fathom, and Yukon; Pivot Mach 5.5, Mach 6, and Switchblade; Ibis Mojo; Mondraker Summum; Surly Karate Monkey; Niner Rip; Diamondback Release; Marin Riftzone, etc.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,393
Bikes: Too many to list
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1765 Post(s)
Liked 1,123 Times
in
746 Posts
I keep hearing about the death of 27.5, but there seems to be plenty of 2021 models: Santa Cruz Nomad; Trek Remedy, Roscoe, and Session; Kona Process and Big Honzo; Polygon Vander; Giant Stance, Trance, Fathom, and Yukon; Pivot Mach 5.5, Mach 6, and Switchblade; Ibis Mojo; Mondraker Summum; Surly Karate Monkey; Niner Rip; Diamondback Release; Marin Riftzone, etc.
Not playing devils advocate, just saw this response and do not actually know the answer as i am killing time at work -- but of the bikes you mentioned, how many are 27.5" + (plus format 27'ers) as opposed to just 27" ? Asking because i noited the Trek offerings. Roscoe is a "plus" sized bike and the Session is a DH bike
DH technology moved a bit slower than trailbike sizes the last go around it seemed
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,618
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2973 Post(s)
Liked 1,178 Times
in
769 Posts
I keep hearing about the death of 27.5, but there seems to be plenty of 2021 models: Santa Cruz Nomad; Trek Remedy, Roscoe, and Session; Kona Process and Big Honzo; Polygon Vander; Giant Stance, Trance, Fathom, and Yukon; Pivot Mach 5.5, Mach 6, and Switchblade; Ibis Mojo; Mondraker Summum; Surly Karate Monkey; Niner Rip; Diamondback Release; Marin Riftzone, etc.
With that said 27.5 tires and wheels will be around for a while but the amount of product options available at a good price point for 27.5 will decline.
#19
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
Not playing devils advocate, just saw this response and do not actually know the answer as i am killing time at work -- but of the bikes you mentioned, how many are 27.5" + (plus format 27'ers) as opposed to just 27" ? Asking because i noited the Trek offerings. Roscoe is a "plus" sized bike and the Session is a DH bike
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,598
Bikes: 06 Lemond Reno, 98 GT Timberline mtn.bike
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 426 Post(s)
Liked 695 Times
in
434 Posts
To use an extreme example: ever seen a monster truck roll over vehicles? Those huge tires can go right over them. Picture trying to do that with your family vehicle. Of course, the difference between a 26-27.5-29 inch tire isn't that drastic, but you get the idea. Which will work for you? Guess a lot depends on how well the bike is designed for the wheel size it's using. And the height and proportions or the rider will enter into whether the rider feels secure and confident on the bike. We used to ride mainly mtn.bikes, with 26" tires. I have a feeling my petite wife, who was a very good off-road rider at one time, would not feel confident on a 29" tired bike. Possible she might, but our ancient 26" are still going fine, and don't get used nearly as often now.
#21
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,102 Times
in
1,366 Posts
I keep hearing about the death of 27.5, but there seems to be plenty of 2021 models: Santa Cruz Nomad; Trek Remedy, Roscoe, and Session; Kona Process and Big Honzo; Polygon Vander; Giant Stance, Trance, Fathom, and Yukon; Pivot Mach 5.5, Mach 6, and Switchblade; Ibis Mojo; Mondraker Summum; Surly Karate Monkey; Niner Rip; Diamondback Release; Marin Riftzone, etc.
There is still a subclass of current 27.5 bikes that is intended to be more nimble than the equivalent travel 29er, but they are not the flagship. The Mojo and 5010 are the poster children.
Last edited by Darth Lefty; 04-25-21 at 11:26 PM.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Eastern VA
Posts: 1,717
Bikes: 2022 Fuel EX 8, 2021 Domane SL6, Black Beta (Nashbar frame), 2004 Trek 1000C for the trainer
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 266 Post(s)
Liked 447 Times
in
266 Posts
Good thread here. I’ve got a Frankenstein 26er hard tail. I’ve only road 26ers
off road. Time for a new mountain bike. Want a full suspension but need to settle on suspension travel and wheel side. COVID has delayed the search trying to get test rides or find a rental. Anyway I’m beginning to think a 27+ with spare 29 wheels is the way. I managed to squeeze a 2.6 on the front and 2.4 on the rear of my 26er. I like the ride, float on soft stuff and traction for rough off road.
off road. Time for a new mountain bike. Want a full suspension but need to settle on suspension travel and wheel side. COVID has delayed the search trying to get test rides or find a rental. Anyway I’m beginning to think a 27+ with spare 29 wheels is the way. I managed to squeeze a 2.6 on the front and 2.4 on the rear of my 26er. I like the ride, float on soft stuff and traction for rough off road.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paradise, TX
Posts: 2,087
Bikes: Soma Pescadero, Surly Pugsley, Salsa Fargo, Schwinn Klunker, Gravity SS 27.5, Monocog 29er
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 186 Post(s)
Liked 234 Times
in
166 Posts
Wheel diameter doesn't matter much, I have them all. Frame geometry effects the feel much more. Wider tires are better until they get too wide and heavy. Your local terrain will de life what you prefer.
#25
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
When i wanted to get back into MTB a few years ago, I was dead set on 29er. I had never ridden it before but decided that's what I wanted to do. I settled on what I decided was a 'decent' 29er and loved riding it. I'm not a huge dude but the road riding on the way to trails, and then my favorite escarpment trails were all fun to ride, I just thought maybe I needed a slightly less aggressive tread because of the amount of road biking I was doing. Bike was eventually stolen, and when I eventually replaced it I wasn't willing to spend the same money and landed on what I consider a 'mediocre' replacement, but now 27.5. I was a little wary about moving down in size, but wasn't hung up on it. So far I must say it rides quite nice, and does seem to accelerate easier in some conditions. Again, I wonder if this is the ideal rubber, but the size seems to be good, and overall probably more appropriate for my riding.