Low Budget Mountain Bike Options
#76
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,598
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2964 Post(s)
Liked 1,163 Times
in
760 Posts
Suspension...both forks and shocks are lighter than they used to be. Some suspension may be heavier than years past for downhill/enduro riding, but that's because the older stuff that was lighter flexed too much.
No it's not. Thru-axles are better than quick release axles, Clutched derailleurs. 1x - eliminates need for front derailleur and shifter. Narrow/Wide Chainrings. We have better bearings (cartridge vs.loose ball bearing used in older bikes), more compliant and adjustable suspension and suspension linkage, dropper posts, high engagement hubs, boost spacing that allowes wider tires and the list goes on and on...
Disposable based on what? What makes them more disposable than ever? Please show the facts.
All I can do here is LOL.
What Kapusta said.
"Better engineered parts" is too vague to mean anything.
Today's MTBs seem more disposable than ever, so I hope you didn't mean longevity.
And I have yet to find any system that shifts as quickly or cleanly as my old 8-speed stuff.
Geometry LOL. The very first clunkers had huge wheelbases and slack angles. Then MTBs got "short and steep." Guess what is in style now? It's the same thing with wheel sizes. When "29er" came out bigger wheels rolled over obstacles and carried speed better. Now "27.5" wheels are better because they're more maneuverable and accelerate quicker. Just like, wait for it...26" wheels. I wonder what idea they'll recycle next? The point is that no style of MTB is best for everyone, and I think it's a disservice to stick everyone on a full-suspension 29er monster truck when they might actually be a lot happier on an old hardtail (I am, having owned and ridden plenty of monster trucks.)
Last edited by prj71; 02-19-21 at 04:52 PM.
#77
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,598
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2964 Post(s)
Liked 1,163 Times
in
760 Posts
Did it disinterest you?
I would argue setting the entry bar at $1000+ would cause more to be disinterested.
You say the positive experience of one over the other is determinant but I would say the price, without being able to measure it against any positive experience, would be more of a barrier.
How much to do that? No thanks.
I would argue setting the entry bar at $1000+ would cause more to be disinterested.
You say the positive experience of one over the other is determinant but I would say the price, without being able to measure it against any positive experience, would be more of a barrier.
How much to do that? No thanks.
#78
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,313 Times
in
706 Posts
What if they can't afford a new modern higher end bike? Your advice is "don't bother"? My advice would be there are other options.
#79
DomoNishiki
The meme is a rip on those that think they can get into this hobby and expect to only have to spend $500-$1000 with the expectation that they are going to have good top quality equipment.
Can be applied to many hobbies actually such as photography, fly fishing, camping, skiing etc
My girlfriend has about $5000 invested in photography equipment. I have over $16k invested in a six bikes and over $3k invested in fly fishing equipment between rods, reels, waders and other miscellaneous items.
Hobbies with good equipment don't come cheap.
Can be applied to many hobbies actually such as photography, fly fishing, camping, skiing etc
My girlfriend has about $5000 invested in photography equipment. I have over $16k invested in a six bikes and over $3k invested in fly fishing equipment between rods, reels, waders and other miscellaneous items.
Hobbies with good equipment don't come cheap.
When I did triathlons my Univega kept me going WELL ahead of the pack. Never placed first mind you but third was good enough (in team trials). In most competitions it's rarely the equipment that wins you but the rider and his level of skill, passion and will.
So one CAN get into this hobby on the cheap but their enthusiasm and experience may be less than fun in doing so.
#80
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,389
Bikes: Too many to list
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1764 Post(s)
Liked 1,119 Times
in
743 Posts
I’m surprised this thread is still going. An argument has been made that newer suspension, different geometry, and one by drivetrainst I pushed mountain biking out of the realm of affordability. It’s always been an expensive hobby and there are not very many new bikes out there at all if any that tick all the boxes of what would satisfy a long-term enthusiast for less than $2000
It’s always been that way. When I started in 1989 my bike cost $400 new and it was a budget oriented beginner model. Today a new trek marlin is in the five or $600 range it has 29 inch wheels and front suspension. The &2-300 $ difference is likely far less than the inflation rate has been for the last 31 years
That will buy you a machine that will get you on the mountain, just like my $400 Bridgestone did for me back then. And if you decide that you prefer road riding or riding bike paths and don’t want to pursue harder trails, Then a bike like that can be a fine companion for years.
I started racing on my $400 Bridgestone and honestly it did not take long before I had replaced and upgraded nearly everything, because racing is hard on equipment. I still have the frame set somewhere and may refurbish it for fun, But my point is everything I’ve ridden since then has been higher end stuff but I made a significant time investment on my $400 bike to determine that this was something worthwhile for me
but
It’s always been that way. When I started in 1989 my bike cost $400 new and it was a budget oriented beginner model. Today a new trek marlin is in the five or $600 range it has 29 inch wheels and front suspension. The &2-300 $ difference is likely far less than the inflation rate has been for the last 31 years
That will buy you a machine that will get you on the mountain, just like my $400 Bridgestone did for me back then. And if you decide that you prefer road riding or riding bike paths and don’t want to pursue harder trails, Then a bike like that can be a fine companion for years.
I started racing on my $400 Bridgestone and honestly it did not take long before I had replaced and upgraded nearly everything, because racing is hard on equipment. I still have the frame set somewhere and may refurbish it for fun, But my point is everything I’ve ridden since then has been higher end stuff but I made a significant time investment on my $400 bike to determine that this was something worthwhile for me
but
Last edited by DMC707; 02-20-21 at 11:32 AM.
Likes For DMC707:
#81
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,313 Times
in
706 Posts
Nice Bridgestone!
Except for the fact that the above is a fairly collectible Bridgestone, which would fetch some bigger bucks, a similar, but less assuming brand bike could be had for $100 - $200 (pre covid pricing) in my region. These I buy quite often for various bike projects because the components are decent, the CrMo frames are strong, and parts are cheap.
84 Maruishi MT-5. First gen 5 speed mtb.
84 Diamondback Ridge Runner
92 KHS Montana Comp.
89-90 Nishiki Barbarian. second tier e stay design.
Next on the bench (after my current project) 85 Norco Sasquatch. First Gen for this company which is local to me.
Except for the fact that the above is a fairly collectible Bridgestone, which would fetch some bigger bucks, a similar, but less assuming brand bike could be had for $100 - $200 (pre covid pricing) in my region. These I buy quite often for various bike projects because the components are decent, the CrMo frames are strong, and parts are cheap.
84 Maruishi MT-5. First gen 5 speed mtb.
84 Diamondback Ridge Runner
92 KHS Montana Comp.
89-90 Nishiki Barbarian. second tier e stay design.
Next on the bench (after my current project) 85 Norco Sasquatch. First Gen for this company which is local to me.
#82
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,389
Bikes: Too many to list
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1764 Post(s)
Liked 1,119 Times
in
743 Posts
Nice Bridgestone!
Except for the fact that the above is a fairly collectible Bridgestone, which would fetch some bigger bucks, a similar, but less assuming brand bike could be had for $100 - $200 (pre covid pricing) in my region.
89-90 Nishiki Barbarian. second tier e stay design.
Next on the bench (after my current project) 85 Norco Sasquatch. First Gen for this company which is local to me.
Except for the fact that the above is a fairly collectible Bridgestone, which would fetch some bigger bucks, a similar, but less assuming brand bike could be had for $100 - $200 (pre covid pricing) in my region.
89-90 Nishiki Barbarian. second tier e stay design.
Next on the bench (after my current project) 85 Norco Sasquatch. First Gen for this company which is local to me.
Lol - as a young man, i didnt know anything about Bridgestones other than thats what my local dealer sold a bunch of. I mistakenly thought riding a tire manufacturers bike was pretty lame and ireally wanted one of the Nishiki Aliens with the Bontrager design switchblade front fork
it wasnt until years later that i found out that Bridgestone bikes were a thing due to Grant Peterson and i began to appreciate them — a fact that saved that old frameset from the landfill years ago.
I was a motocross kid and my mindset was to push the limits of everything in those days —. In retrospect, im impressed that Bridgestone specced out their budget bike well enough to survive a “worst nightmare” customer like me.
#83
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,598
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2964 Post(s)
Liked 1,163 Times
in
760 Posts
Good Podcast...
https://www.pinkbike.com/news/the-pi...t-preview.html
https://www.pinkbike.com/news/the-pi...expensive.html
And a related article...
https://www.pinkbike.com/news/welcom...ield-trip.html
https://www.pinkbike.com/news/the-pi...t-preview.html
https://www.pinkbike.com/news/the-pi...expensive.html
And a related article...
https://www.pinkbike.com/news/welcom...ield-trip.html
#84
Constant tinkerer
#85
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,598
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2964 Post(s)
Liked 1,163 Times
in
760 Posts
You are really hung up on the weight thing aren't you? And most of us aren't stuck in 1995 riding 26" wheeled hard tail bikes.
It’s an easy marketing differentiator that appeals to buyers, but it's not relevant to performance. Weight should not be a rider’s primary focus in purchasing a bike. In the end...It's the motor not the bike that matters in a race or long ride event.
It’s an easy marketing differentiator that appeals to buyers, but it's not relevant to performance. Weight should not be a rider’s primary focus in purchasing a bike. In the end...It's the motor not the bike that matters in a race or long ride event.
#86
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,187
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2749 Post(s)
Liked 2,516 Times
in
1,422 Posts