Need a triple for my vintage Nishiki
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Need a triple for my vintage Nishiki
Hi all,
Last year I restored my mid 80's Nishiki Custom Sport and in order to make it suitable for my purposes
I want to go from a double to a triple crankset (preferably with a 48 or lower top ring). Do I need to go vintage for this? How can I be sure
that the chain line will be correct? The vintage double Sakae that I put on during the restoration does not have
a optimal chain line and would need ring spacers for the small ring to function well, right now it is gear skipping due
to too much chain angle (when in the lower gears). The original cranks had more dish than the Sakae which corrects
the chain line without spacers.
Thanks,
Patrick
Last year I restored my mid 80's Nishiki Custom Sport and in order to make it suitable for my purposes
I want to go from a double to a triple crankset (preferably with a 48 or lower top ring). Do I need to go vintage for this? How can I be sure
that the chain line will be correct? The vintage double Sakae that I put on during the restoration does not have
a optimal chain line and would need ring spacers for the small ring to function well, right now it is gear skipping due
to too much chain angle (when in the lower gears). The original cranks had more dish than the Sakae which corrects
the chain line without spacers.
Thanks,
Patrick
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,505
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5877 Post(s)
Liked 3,445 Times
in
2,066 Posts
I wouldn’t overthink this. I’d pick up a 110/74 bcd triple and a sealed square taper bottom bracket with the right length spindle. There were plenty of those made BITD. You can put up a WTB triple crank and BB in the C V for sale forum. You will find something
#3
Phyllo-buster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,829
Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic
Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2287 Post(s)
Liked 2,028 Times
in
1,244 Posts
Vintage would be the best and cheapest option assuming you're running a 6/7/8 rear cassette. How long do you like your cranks?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 3,437
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1124 Post(s)
Liked 1,704 Times
in
941 Posts
Do you have a picture of your original cranks? Is the double you installed to "far out"? If your original crank is the forgemeld type 2x you may be able to put a SR Sakae 3x without further expense.
#5
Member
Thread Starter
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Michigan USA
Posts: 902
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes.
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 264 Post(s)
Liked 820 Times
in
396 Posts
If you are currently running a short cage RD, you will probably need to fix that too.
#7
Member
Thread Starter
Thanks,
Patrick
#8
Member
Thread Starter
Patrick
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,755
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3190 Post(s)
Liked 2,460 Times
in
1,489 Posts
First off, check the Sakae SX to see if it is the 110 version with the holes drilled for a 74BCD 3rd ring. If so, get the 110 rings and a 74 ring in the size you want. You will need a BB spindle that is either 121.5 or 122.5 or the sealed version equal. I'm going from memory there, so check it first. You will also need some spacers and bolts for attaching the 3rd ring. Here is the backside of a 110/74 Sakae SX with triple holes. I think the spindles for a 68 width BB are 3S(121.5) and 3T(122.5). Here is Sheldon's BB database. It will help some.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/bbsize.html
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/bbsize.html
Last edited by seypat; 04-14-21 at 09:10 AM.
#10
Phyllo-buster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,829
Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic
Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2287 Post(s)
Liked 2,028 Times
in
1,244 Posts
You might get lucky with your spindle since triples usually require longer lengths. There are many cranks available in your chainring range but many are Biopace and range between 165 and 175.
bikemig was suggesting you place a WTB (wanted to buy) ad in the sales thread. You need only to take a very cheap membership and get rewarded with inexpensive parts.
bikemig was suggesting you place a WTB (wanted to buy) ad in the sales thread. You need only to take a very cheap membership and get rewarded with inexpensive parts.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,755
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3190 Post(s)
Liked 2,460 Times
in
1,489 Posts
If you are looking on the Bay, some 110 models of Sakae(SR), Sugino and Takagi came as doubles with the 74 holes drilled for a triple. Type in 110 crank and look at the back of the crank to see if it has the 74 holes like the Sakae SX I listed above. I know the following cranks all had 110/74 triple options.
Sakae SX, CR
Sugino VT, AT
Shimano FC-6206 and other models
Takagi AID and other models
Sakae SX, CR
Sugino VT, AT
Shimano FC-6206 and other models
Takagi AID and other models
#12
Drip, Drip.
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
I've come across some shimano biopace triples with either 26/36/46 or 28/38/48. Would work fantastic under a variety of riding conditions.
I would suspect the skipping to be caused by other factors such as bent pulleys or derailleur hangar, not a bent chainline.
it can be difficult to get the chainline right when you need to use a spindle which physically leaves the smallest ring with enough room to clear the chainstay. Maybe a double would be a better bet. You could maybe try to adjust the dish on your rear rim. Then you may also be left with the front derailleur not reaching far enough to clear the largest ring.
If you do make it work reasonably well, its a nice setup, because you can comfortably run a super close ratio road cassette in the back yet still have the hill climbing abilities you require.
I'm a big fan of the biopace chainrings on shimanos triple cranks, because the elliptical shape of the ring goes from an aggressive profile designed for climbing efficiency, to less aggressive in the middle ring for flat surface cruising, and then a more subtle feeling in the outermost "sprinting" ring to help you spin quickly. It works very well.
I would suspect the skipping to be caused by other factors such as bent pulleys or derailleur hangar, not a bent chainline.
it can be difficult to get the chainline right when you need to use a spindle which physically leaves the smallest ring with enough room to clear the chainstay. Maybe a double would be a better bet. You could maybe try to adjust the dish on your rear rim. Then you may also be left with the front derailleur not reaching far enough to clear the largest ring.
If you do make it work reasonably well, its a nice setup, because you can comfortably run a super close ratio road cassette in the back yet still have the hill climbing abilities you require.
I'm a big fan of the biopace chainrings on shimanos triple cranks, because the elliptical shape of the ring goes from an aggressive profile designed for climbing efficiency, to less aggressive in the middle ring for flat surface cruising, and then a more subtle feeling in the outermost "sprinting" ring to help you spin quickly. It works very well.
#13
Member
Thread Starter
I took a couple pics, maybe this shows the extent of the issue. hard to photograph. The second shot is most accurate to how far off the line is.
Patrick
Patrick
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,291
Bikes: '82 Univega Competizione, '72 Motobecane Grand Record, '83 Mercian KOM Touring, '85 Univega Alpina Uno, '76 Eisentraut Limited
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,204 Times
in
700 Posts
Saint Sheldon's chainline reference is here: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/chainline.html
Does your current setup measure 43.5mm from the midpoint between the two front rings to the middle of the bottom bracket shell?
Going to a triple would mean you need to measure 45mm between the middle chainring to the middle of the bottom bracket shell, and to get the bottom bracket that works with your selected crank to achieve this.
My guess is that when you swapped from the original BB to the sealed unit you have now, you went from an asymmetrical spindle (longer on the drive side) to a symmetrical, and that brought the crankset inboard a little bit. Again, just a guess.
Does your current setup measure 43.5mm from the midpoint between the two front rings to the middle of the bottom bracket shell?
Going to a triple would mean you need to measure 45mm between the middle chainring to the middle of the bottom bracket shell, and to get the bottom bracket that works with your selected crank to achieve this.
My guess is that when you swapped from the original BB to the sealed unit you have now, you went from an asymmetrical spindle (longer on the drive side) to a symmetrical, and that brought the crankset inboard a little bit. Again, just a guess.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,755
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3190 Post(s)
Liked 2,460 Times
in
1,489 Posts
According to Velobase, the Sakae SX as a double requires a 117 BB spindle. Find the Sugino model(if you can) on Velobase and see what the BB spindle length was. I'm guessing the current BB spindle is too wide.
VeloBase.com - Component: Sakae/Ringyo (SR) SX
VeloBase.com - Component: Sakae/Ringyo (SR) SX
#16
Member
Thread Starter
According to Velobase, the Sakae SX as a double requires a 117 BB spindle. Find the Sugino model(if you can) on Velobase and see what the BB spindle length was. I'm guessing the current BB spindle is too wide.
VeloBase.com - Component: Sakae/Ringyo (SR) SX
VeloBase.com - Component: Sakae/Ringyo (SR) SX
Thanks,
Patrick
#17
Member
Thread Starter
Saint Sheldon's chainline reference is here: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/chainline.html
Does your current setup measure 43.5mm from the midpoint between the two front rings to the middle of the bottom bracket shell?
Going to a triple would mean you need to measure 45mm between the middle chainring to the middle of the bottom bracket shell, and to get the bottom bracket that works with your selected crank to achieve this.
My guess is that when you swapped from the original BB to the sealed unit you have now, you went from an asymmetrical spindle (longer on the drive side) to a symmetrical, and that brought the crankset inboard a little bit. Again, just a guess.
Does your current setup measure 43.5mm from the midpoint between the two front rings to the middle of the bottom bracket shell?
Going to a triple would mean you need to measure 45mm between the middle chainring to the middle of the bottom bracket shell, and to get the bottom bracket that works with your selected crank to achieve this.
My guess is that when you swapped from the original BB to the sealed unit you have now, you went from an asymmetrical spindle (longer on the drive side) to a symmetrical, and that brought the crankset inboard a little bit. Again, just a guess.
Patrick
#18
Phyllo-buster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,829
Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic
Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2287 Post(s)
Liked 2,028 Times
in
1,244 Posts
Since you're replacing the crank, there's no need to worry about chain line now. The gap between the chain stay and your crank arm suggests the spindle is too long. When I mount a triple, I try to get the small ring tucked in towards the BB fixed cup as far possible without risking the teeth gouging the frame under flex. That should take care of chainline.
#19
Member
Thread Starter
Saint Sheldon's chainline reference is here: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/chainline.html
Does your current setup measure 43.5mm from the midpoint between the two front rings to the middle of the bottom bracket shell?
Going to a triple would mean you need to measure 45mm between the middle chainring to the middle of the bottom bracket shell, and to get the bottom bracket that works with your selected crank to achieve this.
My guess is that when you swapped from the original BB to the sealed unit you have now, you went from an asymmetrical spindle (longer on the drive side) to a symmetrical, and that brought the crankset inboard a little bit. Again, just a guess.
Does your current setup measure 43.5mm from the midpoint between the two front rings to the middle of the bottom bracket shell?
Going to a triple would mean you need to measure 45mm between the middle chainring to the middle of the bottom bracket shell, and to get the bottom bracket that works with your selected crank to achieve this.
My guess is that when you swapped from the original BB to the sealed unit you have now, you went from an asymmetrical spindle (longer on the drive side) to a symmetrical, and that brought the crankset inboard a little bit. Again, just a guess.
Thanks,
Patrick
#20
Member
Thread Starter
Since you're replacing the crank, there's no need to worry about chain line now. The gap between the chain stay and your crank arm suggests the spindle is too long. When I mount a triple, I try to get the small ring tucked in towards the BB fixed cup as far possible without risking the teeth gouging the frame under flex. That should take care of chainline.
Patrick
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,755
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3190 Post(s)
Liked 2,460 Times
in
1,489 Posts
The Takagi AID and Sugino AT take 3U spindles. I have Sakae X-1 that takes a 127. My advice is to see what cranks you can get. Type into a search engine the correct spindle length for a given crank and you will get an answer. See if that spindle length is available, then go from there. For instance, I like threaded spindles that accept crank bolts instead of crank nuts. I can use allen headed crank bolts with them. It's hard to find 3U spindles that take bolts instead of nuts. The nutted ones are easy to find. For that reason I shy away from cranks that use a 3U spindle. Also, there are 2 types of 124/124.5 spindles. One of them is not long enough on the drive side.
Last edited by seypat; 04-14-21 at 10:59 AM.
#22
Member
Thread Starter
It depends on which crank you end up getting. I have many triples. Look at Sheldon's database I included in a post above. Most of the triples I have take a 3S or 3T spindle.
The Takagi AID and Sugino AT take 3U spindles. I have Sakae X-1 that takes a 127. My advice is to see what cranks you can get. Type into a search engine the correct spindle length for a given crank and you will get an answer. See if that spindle length is available, then go from there. For instance, I like threaded spindles that accept crank bolts instead of crank nuts. I can use allen headed crank bolts with them. It's hard to find 3U spindles that take bolts instead of nuts. The nutted ones are easy to find. For that reason I shy away from cranks that use a 3U spindle.
The Takagi AID and Sugino AT take 3U spindles. I have Sakae X-1 that takes a 127. My advice is to see what cranks you can get. Type into a search engine the correct spindle length for a given crank and you will get an answer. See if that spindle length is available, then go from there. For instance, I like threaded spindles that accept crank bolts instead of crank nuts. I can use allen headed crank bolts with them. It's hard to find 3U spindles that take bolts instead of nuts. The nutted ones are easy to find. For that reason I shy away from cranks that use a 3U spindle.
Patrick
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,291
Bikes: '82 Univega Competizione, '72 Motobecane Grand Record, '83 Mercian KOM Touring, '85 Univega Alpina Uno, '76 Eisentraut Limited
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,204 Times
in
700 Posts
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,755
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3190 Post(s)
Liked 2,460 Times
in
1,489 Posts
First off, check the Sakae SX to see if it is the 110 version with the holes drilled for a 74BCD 3rd ring. If so, get the 110 rings and a 74 ring in the size you want. You will need a BB spindle that is either 121.5 or 122.5 or the sealed version equal. I'm going from memory there, so check it first. You will also need some spacers and bolts for attaching the 3rd ring. Here is the backside of a 110/74 Sakae SX with triple holes. I think the spindles for a 68 width BB are 3S(121.5) and 3T(122.5). Here is Sheldon's BB database. It will help some.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/bbsize.html
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/bbsize.html
#25
Member
Thread Starter
So, lets look at this Sakae SX example again. Velobase says the double spindle length is 117. Add 5ish mm for the spacer and 122. As a triple it would not work on your current spindle. If you purchased it you would need to get the right size spindle. So, make sure you can get a correct spindle before getting the crank.
I'm not out any money re: the Sakae as it came from a donor bike. If I go for the Albion crankset they supply the necessary info re: the correct spindle width, this may be my best bet.
Thanks,
Patrick