What happens with Garmin when using speed sensor and GPS?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Scotland
Posts: 501
Bikes: Way too many
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 831 Post(s)
Liked 584 Times
in
345 Posts
What happens with Garmin when using speed sensor and GPS?
I'm using a Garmin Forerunner 35 (pretty basic running watch but it does what I need), and a Garmin Speed Sensor 2 on my gravel bike.
When I run it on the turbo trainer with the GPS off, I get pretty reasonable figures for speed/distance. All good so far.
I left the GPS on for a trainer session (you configure it independently of the rides) and found that the speed sensor was showing 0 or near 0 for large chunks of the ride and assumed it was broken until it uploaded a scatter map to Strava.
It seemed that it was sometimes using the GPS speed (0) and sometimes the sensor speed (correct) but I can't see any particular pattern to it beyond it maybe relating to the points where the GPS thought I was moving.
Turning the GPS back off and the speed sensor is fine.
Does anyone know how the Garmin decides which one to use?
I want to start taking the bike back out on the roads, so should I be OK to go on the road with the GPS and speed sensor or should I take the speed sensor off? I'm aiming to use it outside at weekends and during the week on the trainer so I'm expecting it to change from indoor to outdoor and back most weeks which will be a bit of a pain with the sensor, and though I'm tempted to get another bike just for trainer use I can't really justify the space or money.
When I run it on the turbo trainer with the GPS off, I get pretty reasonable figures for speed/distance. All good so far.
I left the GPS on for a trainer session (you configure it independently of the rides) and found that the speed sensor was showing 0 or near 0 for large chunks of the ride and assumed it was broken until it uploaded a scatter map to Strava.
It seemed that it was sometimes using the GPS speed (0) and sometimes the sensor speed (correct) but I can't see any particular pattern to it beyond it maybe relating to the points where the GPS thought I was moving.
Turning the GPS back off and the speed sensor is fine.
Does anyone know how the Garmin decides which one to use?
I want to start taking the bike back out on the roads, so should I be OK to go on the road with the GPS and speed sensor or should I take the speed sensor off? I'm aiming to use it outside at weekends and during the week on the trainer so I'm expecting it to change from indoor to outdoor and back most weeks which will be a bit of a pain with the sensor, and though I'm tempted to get another bike just for trainer use I can't really justify the space or money.
#2
Enthusiastic Sufferer
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 229
Bikes: 2015 Specialized Roubaix, 2014 Salsa Fargo, 2013 Trek Remedy, 2014 Cannondale Synapse
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 124 Post(s)
Liked 311 Times
in
107 Posts
I'm using a Garmin Forerunner 35 (pretty basic running watch but it does what I need), and a Garmin Speed Sensor 2 on my gravel bike.
When I run it on the turbo trainer with the GPS off, I get pretty reasonable figures for speed/distance. All good so far.
I left the GPS on for a trainer session (you configure it independently of the rides) and found that the speed sensor was showing 0 or near 0 for large chunks of the ride and assumed it was broken until it uploaded a scatter map to Strava.
It seemed that it was sometimes using the GPS speed (0) and sometimes the sensor speed (correct) but I can't see any particular pattern to it beyond it maybe relating to the points where the GPS thought I was moving.
Turning the GPS back off and the speed sensor is fine.
Does anyone know how the Garmin decides which one to use?
I want to start taking the bike back out on the roads, so should I be OK to go on the road with the GPS and speed sensor or should I take the speed sensor off? I'm aiming to use it outside at weekends and during the week on the trainer so I'm expecting it to change from indoor to outdoor and back most weeks which will be a bit of a pain with the sensor, and though I'm tempted to get another bike just for trainer use I can't really justify the space or money.
When I run it on the turbo trainer with the GPS off, I get pretty reasonable figures for speed/distance. All good so far.
I left the GPS on for a trainer session (you configure it independently of the rides) and found that the speed sensor was showing 0 or near 0 for large chunks of the ride and assumed it was broken until it uploaded a scatter map to Strava.
It seemed that it was sometimes using the GPS speed (0) and sometimes the sensor speed (correct) but I can't see any particular pattern to it beyond it maybe relating to the points where the GPS thought I was moving.
Turning the GPS back off and the speed sensor is fine.
Does anyone know how the Garmin decides which one to use?
I want to start taking the bike back out on the roads, so should I be OK to go on the road with the GPS and speed sensor or should I take the speed sensor off? I'm aiming to use it outside at weekends and during the week on the trainer so I'm expecting it to change from indoor to outdoor and back most weeks which will be a bit of a pain with the sensor, and though I'm tempted to get another bike just for trainer use I can't really justify the space or money.
As for your actual question I can't help.. Is there an airplane mode / GPS off option for your watch?
Likes For SapInMyBlood:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: QC Canada
Posts: 1,950
Bikes: Custom built LHT & Troll
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 832 Post(s)
Liked 141 Times
in
100 Posts
(F5 + 2nd gen speed/cadence)
My experience is that the watch will display speed based on sensor data, whenever available. Noticeable at traffic lights - w/o sensor, you'll see speed going down while you're stopped, and pick up slowly when you resume riding. With a sensor, readings are properly (instantly) updating.
I've never noticed my watch using GPS data to calculate speed if my sensor is linked.
My experience is that the watch will display speed based on sensor data, whenever available. Noticeable at traffic lights - w/o sensor, you'll see speed going down while you're stopped, and pick up slowly when you resume riding. With a sensor, readings are properly (instantly) updating.
I've never noticed my watch using GPS data to calculate speed if my sensor is linked.
Likes For gauvins:
#4
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,811
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times
in
3,262 Posts
Garmin's do strange things when you use them while stationary. Most want the gps disabled when you do stationary stuff. As for wheel and cadence sensors on a stationary bike, I'd hate to begin to guess. When I participated on the Garmin Community Forums many years ago, use of a GPS and sensors on a stationary bike or trainer seemed to have a lot of people having unexpected results.
You might check with them, the forum is still fairly active......
https://forums.garmin.com/sports-fit...ng-multisport/
https://forums.garmin.com/sports-fitness/cycling/
You might check with them, the forum is still fairly active......
https://forums.garmin.com/sports-fit...ng-multisport/
https://forums.garmin.com/sports-fitness/cycling/
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Scotland
Posts: 501
Bikes: Way too many
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 831 Post(s)
Liked 584 Times
in
345 Posts
There's no control over the speed sensor though; it's either in range and spinning or it's not. So if I want to do a run without the speed sensor I need to take it off the bike.
#6
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,811
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times
in
3,262 Posts
With the less expensive Garmin's you'll have less features. Garmin Forerunners are first and foremost a running device. The higher up in the Forerunner price range you are willing to pay the more they'll have features for cycling and other things.
I'd think that like other Garmin Devices you can make profiles and associate particular sensors to that profie. So maybe try making a running profile, a stationary bike profile and a "I really am riding a bike" profile. Then if you make certain what profile is active when you are doing what ever, then you'll have better results.
I'd think that like other Garmin Devices you can make profiles and associate particular sensors to that profie. So maybe try making a running profile, a stationary bike profile and a "I really am riding a bike" profile. Then if you make certain what profile is active when you are doing what ever, then you'll have better results.
#7
Senior Member
By default, the Garmin will use GPS data to calibrate the speed sensor. The speed sensor is the primary source, but something like a 500m segment the GPS can get a really accurate measurement of the wheel roll-out.
If you're stationary and the GPS is enabled and locked, I could see that doing really strange things. I never had an issue with my 510, but it usually couldn't acquire satellites indoors.
If you're stationary and the GPS is enabled and locked, I could see that doing really strange things. I never had an issue with my 510, but it usually couldn't acquire satellites indoors.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Scotland
Posts: 501
Bikes: Way too many
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 831 Post(s)
Liked 584 Times
in
345 Posts
By default, the Garmin will use GPS data to calibrate the speed sensor. The speed sensor is the primary source, but something like a 500m segment the GPS can get a really accurate measurement of the wheel roll-out.
If you're stationary and the GPS is enabled and locked, I could see that doing really strange things. I never had an issue with my 510, but it usually couldn't acquire satellites indoors.
If you're stationary and the GPS is enabled and locked, I could see that doing really strange things. I never had an issue with my 510, but it usually couldn't acquire satellites indoors.
#9
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,811
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times
in
3,262 Posts
Speed on a stationary bike really has no meaning. It's not a good measure for whether you'll be able to keep up with anyone else doing real cycling. Nor is it a good comparison with other stationary cyclists as by itself, you don't know what resistance level they were at. Distance on a stationary bike is the next silly term I hear people comparing.
Power is about the only useful comparison. Next to that just time. IMO of course.
Power is about the only useful comparison. Next to that just time. IMO of course.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,022
Bikes: Blur / Ibis Hakka MX / team machince alr2 / topstone 1
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 424 Post(s)
Liked 272 Times
in
200 Posts
(F5 + 2nd gen speed/cadence)
My experience is that the watch will display speed based on sensor data, whenever available. Noticeable at traffic lights - w/o sensor, you'll see speed going down while you're stopped, and pick up slowly when you resume riding. With a sensor, readings are properly (instantly) updating.
I've never noticed my watch using GPS data to calculate speed if my sensor is linked.
My experience is that the watch will display speed based on sensor data, whenever available. Noticeable at traffic lights - w/o sensor, you'll see speed going down while you're stopped, and pick up slowly when you resume riding. With a sensor, readings are properly (instantly) updating.
I've never noticed my watch using GPS data to calculate speed if my sensor is linked.
I bought the speed sensor thinking it was going to be night and day different. At least for me it was not. I am sure it's more accurate and probably reacts faster but I come to full stop before my 1030+ ever says zero.
I know it's reading the sensor because I can lift on the front wheel and spin it the gps shows I am moving.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Scotland
Posts: 501
Bikes: Way too many
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 831 Post(s)
Liked 584 Times
in
345 Posts
Speed on a stationary bike really has no meaning. It's not a good measure for whether you'll be able to keep up with anyone else doing real cycling. Nor is it a good comparison with other stationary cyclists as by itself, you don't know what resistance level they were at. Distance on a stationary bike is the next silly term I hear people comparing.
Power is about the only useful comparison. Next to that just time. IMO of course.
Power is about the only useful comparison. Next to that just time. IMO of course.
As a comparison to anything but itself I agree it's kind of meaningless, but I'm wanting to try and get some meaningful metric from the static biking to try and track progress and push myself. So I've started logging the miles. Time, distance and average speed seem decent enough for that.
#12
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,811
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times
in
3,262 Posts
On my wife's stationary bike, it gives me a target HR when set up for my weight and other metrics. So if I cycle for a specific time to that target HR, then I think time will still win out. Or you can just set your own target HR. Personally for fat burning, I'd think high zone 2 or low zone 3 ideal. Even on a bike, if out to burn fat, staying below my LTHR seems to do the best. I don't seem as ravenous after the ride. If I allow myself to go hard, then I feel as if I just eat back those Calories I burned off.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Scotland
Posts: 501
Bikes: Way too many
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 831 Post(s)
Liked 584 Times
in
345 Posts
If you're avoiding the extremes (spinning in the lowest gear and grinding in the highest gear) then I think speed/mileage should be fairly accurate. My top gear is about 4.5 times faster than my bottom gear so it'd be really hard to use either at an overlapping "road" speed.
Heart rate may be the best to use, though.
Heart rate may be the best to use, though.
Last edited by Herzlos; 03-09-21 at 08:01 AM.
#14
mosquito rancher
Heart rate would be better, and for stationary-bike workouts where you aren't changing resistance very frequently (either through gearing or trainer setting), it's pretty good. If you are changing resistance frequently, it takes your heart rate a while to catch up with each change, so it's a less accurate reflection of your true effort.
Power is the gold standard according to current training philosophy, but you either need a power meter or a smart trainer to get that.
Power is the gold standard according to current training philosophy, but you either need a power meter or a smart trainer to get that.
__________________
Adam Rice
Adam Rice