90's GT 26" MTB to 28" road bike conversion
#1
glorified 5954
Thread Starter
90's GT 26" MTB to 28" road bike conversion
Hello,
Looking at the geometry and how all this would work out. I decided to throw my road wheels on, and what do you know, it fits great.
I will do a disc conversion in some manner. I will pull it off even if I have to get an IS mount welded to the fork and some kind of adapter installed on the rear. Getting an original 395 ATC fork is impossible. Origin8 has one with a threadless 1 1/8 steerer tube which looks good, but I'd still have to get it stripped, polished and chromed again. So the extra costs will be about the same as staying with the original that I have.
I'm having trouble deciding between whether to go 26" road bike or 700c road bike. I will build the wheels up myself which will be either 559x35 or 622x35 both wearing some 1.35" (35mm) slicks (Kojak's). The rims will be tubeless and hookless regardless of BSD. For the 622 variant, I'll be using some 30mm deep XC mountain rims. Anyway, there's enough clearance for the 1.35" tires for the 700c setup.
What I'm wondering is if the 31cm BB height with the 700c set-up will be just too much. The 26" setup will be 6.3cm lower which would give a more aggressive road bike. Also to consider is the really long wheelbase which I think is about 1200mm. (20" 1995 GT Tempest)
I don't care about the wheel-size, but I want an aggressive road bike in the end, which I think leads me towards 26" wheels. The 700c looks better, but the higher COG will be a compromise.
Here's a pic of the original build:
Thanks for your input.
Looking at the geometry and how all this would work out. I decided to throw my road wheels on, and what do you know, it fits great.
I will do a disc conversion in some manner. I will pull it off even if I have to get an IS mount welded to the fork and some kind of adapter installed on the rear. Getting an original 395 ATC fork is impossible. Origin8 has one with a threadless 1 1/8 steerer tube which looks good, but I'd still have to get it stripped, polished and chromed again. So the extra costs will be about the same as staying with the original that I have.
I'm having trouble deciding between whether to go 26" road bike or 700c road bike. I will build the wheels up myself which will be either 559x35 or 622x35 both wearing some 1.35" (35mm) slicks (Kojak's). The rims will be tubeless and hookless regardless of BSD. For the 622 variant, I'll be using some 30mm deep XC mountain rims. Anyway, there's enough clearance for the 1.35" tires for the 700c setup.
What I'm wondering is if the 31cm BB height with the 700c set-up will be just too much. The 26" setup will be 6.3cm lower which would give a more aggressive road bike. Also to consider is the really long wheelbase which I think is about 1200mm. (20" 1995 GT Tempest)
I don't care about the wheel-size, but I want an aggressive road bike in the end, which I think leads me towards 26" wheels. The 700c looks better, but the higher COG will be a compromise.
Here's a pic of the original build:
Thanks for your input.
#2
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,524
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3660 Post(s)
Liked 5,407 Times
in
2,746 Posts
Cool looking bike. Get some nice 26" slicks https://www.renehersecycles.com/prod...tires/26-inch/ and do a drop bar conversion. There is lots of inspiration in C&V https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...nversions.html
Likes For shelbyfv:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,873
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1456 Post(s)
Liked 1,477 Times
in
867 Posts
This looks like a cool project. I'm curious about the "disc conversion" aspect. I was always under the impression that even if you could weld mounts onto a frame to accommodate discs, that because the frame wasn't designed to withstand brake force at those points, it was a bad idea? Just wondering if this holds true, or if you've done anything else to this frame/fork to make it work differently with discs?
As for wheel size, I'd definitely agree that 700c is a better choice if your end goal is to make this into an "aggressive road bike". The BB is going to be very high though.
As for wheel size, I'd definitely agree that 700c is a better choice if your end goal is to make this into an "aggressive road bike". The BB is going to be very high though.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,805
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
Aggressive road bike? Even with a 90’s mtb, I can’t imagine a HA over 71 degrees, before the larger wheels; less after.
You can make it a drop bar, but I doubt the handling will be close to a road bike.
John
You can make it a drop bar, but I doubt the handling will be close to a road bike.
John
#5
Senior Member
The 26" setup will be 6.3cm lower
but I want an aggressive road bike in the end
Likes For HTupolev:
#6
glorified 5954
Thread Starter
Cool looking bike. Get some nice 26" slicks https://www.renehersecycles.com/prod...tires/26-inch/ and do a drop bar conversion. There is lots of inspiration in C&V https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...nversions.html
This looks like a cool project. I'm curious about the "disc conversion" aspect. I was always under the impression that even if you could weld mounts onto a frame to accommodate discs, that because the frame wasn't designed to withstand brake force at those points, it was a bad idea? Just wondering if this holds true, or if you've done anything else to this frame/fork to make it work differently with discs?
As for wheel size, I'd definitely agree that 700c is a better choice if your end goal is to make this into an "aggressive road bike". The BB is going to be very high though.
As for wheel size, I'd definitely agree that 700c is a better choice if your end goal is to make this into an "aggressive road bike". The BB is going to be very high though.
#7
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,524
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3660 Post(s)
Liked 5,407 Times
in
2,746 Posts
I'd forget the discs if you hope for a fast bike. The frame and fork reinforcement needed plus the extra weight of the brakes will add a few pounds. Frankly I don't see a point in messing up a nice vintage MTB frame when there are plenty of road frames available.
Likes For shelbyfv:
#8
glorified 5954
Thread Starter
I had it finished, and will so do it again!
559-622= -63
Ahh, now I see...
-63/2=-3.15cm
Thanks.
If I did that, it wouldn't be nearly as fun, or special. I love this frame. It needs to be disc though and I built a carbon rigid last year as a replacement. Speaking of which, if I stick to 559 rims, I can always go back to a mountain setup without having to invest in new rims. Even more reason to stick with the 26" setup.
559-622= -63
Ahh, now I see...
-63/2=-3.15cm
Thanks.
If I did that, it wouldn't be nearly as fun, or special. I love this frame. It needs to be disc though and I built a carbon rigid last year as a replacement. Speaking of which, if I stick to 559 rims, I can always go back to a mountain setup without having to invest in new rims. Even more reason to stick with the 26" setup.
#9
glorified 5954
Thread Starter
You could very well be right. Lots of ppl convert these old GT's though. I guess we'll find out.
#10
glorified 5954
Thread Starter
I will also be removing the old v-brake bosses and re-polishing those areas. Should really help to clean the frame up. I know that any die-hard classic fan will recoil at the thought, but yeah, v-brakes just aren't my thing, even on my road bike (or caliper rather).
#11
Senior Member
How will it allow you to run better tires?
I'm confused at how the pieces of this build fit together. Like you're telling us that you're going to use tubeless hookless rims and fancy tires, but also say that you're running Kojaks, which are a fairly basic non-tubeless tire.
I'm confused at how the pieces of this build fit together. Like you're telling us that you're going to use tubeless hookless rims and fancy tires, but also say that you're running Kojaks, which are a fairly basic non-tubeless tire.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,805
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
I believe the HA was 71.5 on this one. Correct me if I'm wrong. Can't look it up as the documentation is on my other computer. So long both wheels are same diameter and fork ATC remains stock, HA does not change from stock.$
You could very well be right. Lots of ppl convert these old GT's though. I guess we'll find out.
You could very well be right. Lots of ppl convert these old GT's though. I guess we'll find out.
Good luck with it. I won’t be trading in my Cannondale Criterium for one.
John
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,873
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1456 Post(s)
Liked 1,477 Times
in
867 Posts
Thanks for the links. Definitely seen some cool bikes there. But no disc or 700c conversions, so I am maybe encroaching on some more rare ground with this project.
Well with these 90's GT Triple Triangle frames, there are a lot of ppl that have converted the rear brake with a simple brake adapter which you can see here. From what I hear, the rear drop out and seat-stays are girthy enough to handle the extra force. The front brake exerts more force onto the fork, so it is suggested to get a disc specific fork or to reinforce the fork with some added steel. This is also typically done for the rear brake conversions, but this frame is aluminum, so any after-market welding is a no-go. I looked extensively into that topic and what I heard from bike builders is that the aluminum warps slightly from the welding so you'd need to set it somehow to keep it in its stock form. After that you'd also have to heat treat the aluminum again. The bike builder with whom which I spoke, said that this kind of stuff can basically only be done by the original manufacturer. Heat treating can be done by anyone, but keeping the frame from warping, or setting it was the hard part as far as I understood.
Well with these 90's GT Triple Triangle frames, there are a lot of ppl that have converted the rear brake with a simple brake adapter which you can see here. From what I hear, the rear drop out and seat-stays are girthy enough to handle the extra force. The front brake exerts more force onto the fork, so it is suggested to get a disc specific fork or to reinforce the fork with some added steel. This is also typically done for the rear brake conversions, but this frame is aluminum, so any after-market welding is a no-go. I looked extensively into that topic and what I heard from bike builders is that the aluminum warps slightly from the welding so you'd need to set it somehow to keep it in its stock form. After that you'd also have to heat treat the aluminum again. The bike builder with whom which I spoke, said that this kind of stuff can basically only be done by the original manufacturer. Heat treating can be done by anyone, but keeping the frame from warping, or setting it was the hard part as far as I understood.
It's an awesome frame, good luck with the project. I'd love to see photos when it's done.
#14
glorified 5954
Thread Starter
How will it allow you to run better tires?
I'm confused at how the pieces of this build fit together. Like you're telling us that you're going to use tubeless hookless rims and fancy tires, but also say that you're running Kojaks, which are a fairly basic non-tubeless tire.
I'm confused at how the pieces of this build fit together. Like you're telling us that you're going to use tubeless hookless rims and fancy tires, but also say that you're running Kojaks, which are a fairly basic non-tubeless tire.
Any tire can be used as tubeless with tubeless sealant.
#15
I’m a little Surly
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near the district
Posts: 2,422
Bikes: Two Cross Checks, a Karate Monkey, a Disc Trucker, and a VO Randonneur
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 699 Post(s)
Liked 1,294 Times
in
647 Posts
Thanks for the links. Definitely seen some cool bikes there. But no disc or 700c conversions, so I am maybe encroaching on some more rare ground with this project.
Well with these 90's GT Triple Triangle frames, there are a lot of ppl that have converted the rear brake with a simple brake adapter which you can see here. From what I hear, the rear drop out and seat-stays are girthy enough to handle the extra force. The front brake exerts more force onto the fork, so it is suggested to get a disc specific fork or to reinforce the fork with some added steel. This is also typically done for the rear brake conversions, but this frame is aluminum, so any after-market welding is a no-go. I looked extensively into that topic and what I heard from bike builders is that the aluminum warps slightly from the welding so you'd need to set it somehow to keep it in its stock form. After that you'd also have to heat treat the aluminum again. The bike builder with whom which I spoke, said that this kind of stuff can basically only be done by the original manufacturer. Heat treating can be done by anyone, but keeping the frame from warping, or setting it was the hard part as far as I understood.
Well with these 90's GT Triple Triangle frames, there are a lot of ppl that have converted the rear brake with a simple brake adapter which you can see here. From what I hear, the rear drop out and seat-stays are girthy enough to handle the extra force. The front brake exerts more force onto the fork, so it is suggested to get a disc specific fork or to reinforce the fork with some added steel. This is also typically done for the rear brake conversions, but this frame is aluminum, so any after-market welding is a no-go. I looked extensively into that topic and what I heard from bike builders is that the aluminum warps slightly from the welding so you'd need to set it somehow to keep it in its stock form. After that you'd also have to heat treat the aluminum again. The bike builder with whom which I spoke, said that this kind of stuff can basically only be done by the original manufacturer. Heat treating can be done by anyone, but keeping the frame from warping, or setting it was the hard part as far as I understood.
#16
Senior Member
Well you're right in a way, I guess the tire isn't better. However, on a 30mm inner width rim, the pressure can be substantially reduced increasing comfort. Grip and rolling resistance will also get a boost by the contact patch shape change. This is really more for road bikes, where wider tires give a round contact patch instead of a long skinny one (skinny tires). There's a few advantages to running wider slicks on road bikes. I am pushing the envelope with the 35mm. I think current market is at 31mm which is most likely best. But that's also for 700c tires. Really curious to see how this ends up with the 559's.
Two days ago I rode 100 miles on it, mostly paved.
Any tire can be used as tubeless with tubeless sealant.
Because mountain bike tires are often very stiff, and because they're typically used tubelessly at extremely low pressures, "ghetto tubeless" setups on MTBs historically often worked out okay. But it was always sketchy, and road tires are a completely different game. A big part of why tubeless has seen slow adoption on road bikes is that the higher riding pressures combined with the suppleness of the tires means that there is a lot less safety margin to work with. Rims and tires need to be manufactured with much better precision, and the tires need very stiff beads that experience minimal elongation over their service life, so that they consistently form an exact snug fit on the rim's bead shoulder and cannot crawl anywhere.
Putting a non-tubeless road tire tubelessly on a hookless rim is an extremely bad idea.
#17
glorified 5954
Thread Starter
...and the tires need very stiff beads that experience minimal elongation over their service life, so that they consistently form an exact snug fit on the rim's bead shoulder and cannot crawl anywhere.
Putting a non-tubeless road tire tubelessly on a hookless rim is an extremely bad idea.
Putting a non-tubeless road tire tubelessly on a hookless rim is an extremely bad idea.
Depends on bead material which in this case is Kevlar. All good points though and will have to pay close attention. Also tire pressure will most likely be at minimum spec @ 55 psi.
Currently running my padrones at 63 on hookless but they have carbon bead. Ran some schwalbe thunder Burt's and also winter spike tires (schwalbe) on hookless no problem. Road hookless is like you say, another animal. Especially with what kind of riding I do.
Will have to keep a close eye and change plans if necessary. Not many 26" slicks out there.
#18
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,975
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 1,044 Times
in
667 Posts
The drop bars, even at 45cm, weren’t even close to wide enough and the handling was very sluggish compared to a road bike. Plus the brakes are much happier with MTB style levers.
Also, I’m developing a fondness for riding that bike in rather messy conditions, and wide bars with close grips are better so I can stay up and keep weight back.
Otto
#19
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,608
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10954 Post(s)
Liked 7,482 Times
in
4,184 Posts
Interesting conversion. Goofy high bottom bracket with 700c wheels, but you clearly know all the negatives going into the project so have a blast and enjoy the experience of tying something different.
#20
Drip, Drip.
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
Interesting enough, I've done something similar with a GT ZASKAR LE frame. I had a front rigid for with v brake for 700c rims so I tried out a basic 700x38 wheekset I had laying around. This frame is not designed for 700c wheels. You'll be best off sticking to 26" rims regardless what you intend doing.
I measured the bottom bracket height at roughly 285 with regular 26" trail tires. Using 700c wheels would raise the bb height by another cm or so. Unless you plan to use very long very cranks, you don't need such a high height for road use.
All in all, it would make a decent urban/road machine, but i would use the rim diameter which the frame was designed for.
I measured the bottom bracket height at roughly 285 with regular 26" trail tires. Using 700c wheels would raise the bb height by another cm or so. Unless you plan to use very long very cranks, you don't need such a high height for road use.
All in all, it would make a decent urban/road machine, but i would use the rim diameter which the frame was designed for.
#21
Senior Member
That wouldn't be similar at all. Having a 700c wheel just in front would change the geometry far more than front-and-rear, since you'd be slackening the bike's angles. And differences in the fork geometry would alter the situation as well.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,371
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2482 Post(s)
Liked 2,952 Times
in
1,677 Posts
Agreed. People planning such conversions often give short shrift to the single most significant indicator of how the converted bike will ride: the wheelbase. Swap out all the parts you want---you'll still end up with the antithesis of aggressiveness. Think 1960s Vistacruiser station wagon wallowing down the road.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,805
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
Agreed. People planning such conversions often give short shrift to the single most significant indicator of how the converted bike will ride: the wheelbase. Swap out all the parts you want---you'll still end up with the antithesis of aggressiveness. Think 1960s Vistacruiser station wagon wallowing down the road.
John
#24
Drip, Drip.
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
Even though the height was balanced fore and aft, I still preferred having even one 26" rim, whether it was on the front or rear. Still better than having two wheels of the wrong size.
#25
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,524
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3660 Post(s)
Liked 5,407 Times
in
2,746 Posts
Not to mention no brakes....