Reynolds decal on Raleigh Competition
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Earlville, IL
Posts: 660
Bikes: Some Schwinns, Raleighs, Centurions, Crescent, Bianchi
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 248 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
125 Posts
Reynolds decal on Raleigh Competition
I picked up a 71 Competition a few days ago and have it stripped for cleaning. This is a lagoon blue and white one like the Grand Sports.
The Reynolds 531 frame decal is pretty worn so I want to replace it but have not been able to find a version that's exactly like mine. Mine says Butted Tubes but replacements all say Butted Tubes Forks and Stays. Now, when I look closely at it, it clearly shows the Forks and Stays portion blacked out, and I've seen another 71, the lilac version, also blacked out. The forks have 531 decals so I'm wondering if possibly the stays were not 531 so Raleigh altered the decals? Has this been discussed before, and what do you think is going on with these 71 Competitions?
The Reynolds 531 frame decal is pretty worn so I want to replace it but have not been able to find a version that's exactly like mine. Mine says Butted Tubes but replacements all say Butted Tubes Forks and Stays. Now, when I look closely at it, it clearly shows the Forks and Stays portion blacked out, and I've seen another 71, the lilac version, also blacked out. The forks have 531 decals so I'm wondering if possibly the stays were not 531 so Raleigh altered the decals? Has this been discussed before, and what do you think is going on with these 71 Competitions?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 528
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 237 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 83 Times
in
64 Posts
It's a 531 throughout decal with the stays blacked out because that's probably how the bikes were specced at the time. 531 butted main tubes and forks, at least in the 1973 catalog.
#3
verktyg
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,030
Bikes: Current favorites: 1988 Peugeot Birraritz, 1984 Gitane Super Corsa, 1980s DeRosa, 1981 Bianchi Campione Del Mondo, 1992 Paramount OS, 1988 Colnago Technos, 1985 RalieghUSA SBDU Team Pro
Mentioned: 207 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1036 Post(s)
Liked 1,238 Times
in
654 Posts
The Reynolds 531 sticker on my 1971 Competition is damaged. Never noticed any difference. It's ALL Reynolds 531.
Maybe they were "redacted" on the sticker because the forks, seat and chain stays weren't butted???
Raleigh and Schwinn used these stickers for a while during the "Truth In Advertising" era.
Rest assured, your Competition is all Reynolds 531. Raleigh used those skinny Reynolds straight taper chain stays without wheel clearances pressed in on all of their better bikes in the early 70's.
1974 Raleigh International
1975 Raleigh Pro
1973 RRA Reynolds 531 sticker.
verktyg
Maybe they were "redacted" on the sticker because the forks, seat and chain stays weren't butted???
Raleigh and Schwinn used these stickers for a while during the "Truth In Advertising" era.
Rest assured, your Competition is all Reynolds 531. Raleigh used those skinny Reynolds straight taper chain stays without wheel clearances pressed in on all of their better bikes in the early 70's.
1974 Raleigh International
1975 Raleigh Pro
1973 RRA Reynolds 531 sticker.
verktyg
__________________
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
Last edited by verktyg; 12-15-19 at 02:55 AM.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 528
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 237 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 83 Times
in
64 Posts
531 stays generally weren't butted for this era, which is one reason why later 80's decals were changed to say "Fork Blades, Stays & Butted Frame Tubes." This is true even in the 70's. The 4-star style decal says "Fork Blades, Stays & Butted Frame Tubes," supposedly at the request of Schwinn for clarification, and the catalogs explicitly state that a 531 double butted throughout decal indicates plain gauge stays. "Butted frame tubes, butted steerer, taper-gauge fork blades, and plain gauge head tube and stays." However, as far as I'm aware, other similar models like the pro just used the plain diagonal decal. I don't think it's because the stays weren't butted, nor because the standard decal wasn't being used. I'm pretty sure I've seen pros of this era with unedited diagonal decals, and I remember seeing blacked out 531 diagonal decals on Raleighs before.
I don't see any compelling reason to discount both official Raleigh catalogs and the decal alterations just because of rapid taper stays. Maybe it used mixed stays, maybe Raleigh just ordered rapid taper stays from another company, or maybe due to vertical integration, they did get tubes from Reynolds, but it was a lower grade like Reynolds A/B. I can see a reason why Carlton might have reams of 531 diagonal decals lying around and not use the proper "butted frame tubes" decals. Certainly at their production volume they probably weren't handling box sets. I see considerably less reason to list some higher end models as 531 throughout and this model as 531 butted frame tubes, then modify the decal on top of that if it weren't so. At production volumes of Raleigh (the Carlton factory was making some ~75,000 frames per year (that's not including Nottingham or Ilkeston models), between deliberately underadvertising to create product differentiation, and pinching pennies lowering the spec, I'd lean towards taking Raleigh at face value. My guess is the stays probably aren't 531, unless they were somehow just downgraded for the 1973 model year.
I don't see any compelling reason to discount both official Raleigh catalogs and the decal alterations just because of rapid taper stays. Maybe it used mixed stays, maybe Raleigh just ordered rapid taper stays from another company, or maybe due to vertical integration, they did get tubes from Reynolds, but it was a lower grade like Reynolds A/B. I can see a reason why Carlton might have reams of 531 diagonal decals lying around and not use the proper "butted frame tubes" decals. Certainly at their production volume they probably weren't handling box sets. I see considerably less reason to list some higher end models as 531 throughout and this model as 531 butted frame tubes, then modify the decal on top of that if it weren't so. At production volumes of Raleigh (the Carlton factory was making some ~75,000 frames per year (that's not including Nottingham or Ilkeston models), between deliberately underadvertising to create product differentiation, and pinching pennies lowering the spec, I'd lean towards taking Raleigh at face value. My guess is the stays probably aren't 531, unless they were somehow just downgraded for the 1973 model year.
Last edited by Kuromori; 12-15-19 at 05:39 AM.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Alta California
Posts: 14,269
Mentioned: 415 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3813 Post(s)
Liked 3,345 Times
in
2,182 Posts
-----
The rapier pattern chainstays on my 1969-70 Competition are seamed.
-----
The rapier pattern chainstays on my 1969-70 Competition are seamed.
-----
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,831 Times
in
1,997 Posts
does the fork have or had a Reynolds transfer?
this is taxing my memory, but one of these came in for service (was too young to be hired at a shop when new, not that I did not try)
and we concluded that the rear stays were “cost savings” specified.
the diagonal 531 transfer was.... a cheat, as everyone assumed it was the full on tube set.
the later “starred” 531 transfer was understood to answer a legal complaint, or a threatened one was the story. It was CLOUDY on the typical transfer. At the shop I worked for we had a Reynolds cut-away set, chromed, and milled open to show the difference between straight ga Reynolds and the top tier 531. The forks and stays were “taper gauge” and Reynolds was quite proud of the process actually, as it produced a lighter set overall. Hard to describe without that show and tell kit. The potential customers who came in to “stump the expert” were humbled often. That was a class of customer who read the late Frank Berto articles without fail, and then ordered most stuff mail order.
this is taxing my memory, but one of these came in for service (was too young to be hired at a shop when new, not that I did not try)
and we concluded that the rear stays were “cost savings” specified.
the diagonal 531 transfer was.... a cheat, as everyone assumed it was the full on tube set.
the later “starred” 531 transfer was understood to answer a legal complaint, or a threatened one was the story. It was CLOUDY on the typical transfer. At the shop I worked for we had a Reynolds cut-away set, chromed, and milled open to show the difference between straight ga Reynolds and the top tier 531. The forks and stays were “taper gauge” and Reynolds was quite proud of the process actually, as it produced a lighter set overall. Hard to describe without that show and tell kit. The potential customers who came in to “stump the expert” were humbled often. That was a class of customer who read the late Frank Berto articles without fail, and then ordered most stuff mail order.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Earlville, IL
Posts: 660
Bikes: Some Schwinns, Raleighs, Centurions, Crescent, Bianchi
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 248 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
125 Posts
does the fork have or had a Reynolds transfer?
this is taxing my memory, but one of these came in for service (was too young to be hired at a shop when new, not that I did not try)
and we concluded that the rear stays were “cost savings” specified.
the diagonal 531 transfer was.... a cheat, as everyone assumed it was the full on tube set.
the later “starred” 531 transfer was understood to answer a legal complaint, or a threatened one was the story. It was CLOUDY on the typical transfer. At the shop I worked for we had a Reynolds cut-away set, chromed, and milled open to show the difference between straight ga Reynolds and the top tier 531. The forks and stays were “taper gauge” and Reynolds was quite proud of the process actually, as it produced a lighter set overall. Hard to describe without that show and tell kit. The potential customers who came in to “stump the expert” were humbled often. That was a class of customer who read the late Frank Berto articles without fail, and then ordered most stuff mail order.
this is taxing my memory, but one of these came in for service (was too young to be hired at a shop when new, not that I did not try)
and we concluded that the rear stays were “cost savings” specified.
the diagonal 531 transfer was.... a cheat, as everyone assumed it was the full on tube set.
the later “starred” 531 transfer was understood to answer a legal complaint, or a threatened one was the story. It was CLOUDY on the typical transfer. At the shop I worked for we had a Reynolds cut-away set, chromed, and milled open to show the difference between straight ga Reynolds and the top tier 531. The forks and stays were “taper gauge” and Reynolds was quite proud of the process actually, as it produced a lighter set overall. Hard to describe without that show and tell kit. The potential customers who came in to “stump the expert” were humbled often. That was a class of customer who read the late Frank Berto articles without fail, and then ordered most stuff mail order.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Earlville, IL
Posts: 660
Bikes: Some Schwinns, Raleighs, Centurions, Crescent, Bianchi
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 248 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
125 Posts
This is the transfer from my 73 Grand Sports. Completely different.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,831 Times
in
1,997 Posts
I did expect to see Reynolds fork transfers- up for debate- are the stays Reynolds of some type or subordinate tubing.
if you take the bottom bracket out and find a seam in the chain stay that is a definitive answer.
i checked the HLloyds site, and did not find the modified transfer you show, nor a descriptive fork transfer in English, there are two French versions, one with S R noted under... no idea on that.
if you take the bottom bracket out and find a seam in the chain stay that is a definitive answer.
i checked the HLloyds site, and did not find the modified transfer you show, nor a descriptive fork transfer in English, there are two French versions, one with S R noted under... no idea on that.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Earlville, IL
Posts: 660
Bikes: Some Schwinns, Raleighs, Centurions, Crescent, Bianchi
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 248 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
125 Posts
I did expect to see Reynolds fork transfers- up for debate- are the stays Reynolds of some type or subordinate tubing.
if you take the bottom bracket out and find a seam in the chain stay that is a definitive answer.
i checked the HLloyds site, and did not find the modified transfer you show, nor a descriptive fork transfer in English, there are two French versions, one with S R noted under... no idea on that.
if you take the bottom bracket out and find a seam in the chain stay that is a definitive answer.
i checked the HLloyds site, and did not find the modified transfer you show, nor a descriptive fork transfer in English, there are two French versions, one with S R noted under... no idea on that.
#11
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
-Kurt