How far off are wrist HRMs?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sunny so. cal.
Posts: 904
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 136 Post(s)
Liked 57 Times
in
31 Posts
How far off are wrist HRMs?
I know that chest straps are the most accurate. Have any of you compared what a wrist one (Apple watch in particular) records vs what a chest one (connected to a Wahoo or Garmin) does? Thanks!
#2
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,985
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6193 Post(s)
Liked 4,808 Times
in
3,316 Posts
Well if we knew how far off they were we could just add that correction back into the math and it'd be perfect.
It's probably not accuracy. When in the conditions they are able to read properly, they are likely as accurate as anything else for fitness use. It's more how often will a chest strap not be in proper conditions to read properly vs a wrist worn monitor.
It's probably not accuracy. When in the conditions they are able to read properly, they are likely as accurate as anything else for fitness use. It's more how often will a chest strap not be in proper conditions to read properly vs a wrist worn monitor.
Likes For Iride01:
#3
Senior Member
For various reasons I've recorded a handful of rides recently with both my Garmin Fenix 5 watch (has wrist HRM built in) and my Garmin Edge 500 (and, since yesterday, Garmin Edge 530) with a HRM strap. On these rides my avg HR recorded by both methods has either been the same or maybe off by 1 or 2 bpm. Which, for me, is more than good enough.
#4
Non omnino gravis
For fitness purposes, any name-brand HRM will perform adequately. Accuracy/precision will be (mostly) the same for most all of them-- shopping is done based on things like cost, battery life, convenience, etc.
I wear an Apple Watch all the time, and it is my only tracker for runs/walks/hikes, only using a chest strap / computer combo for bike rides. It works perfectly well, and is perhaps more useful as it can
show HR trends over full days, providing a better picture of how tired/rested I am.
I wear an Apple Watch all the time, and it is my only tracker for runs/walks/hikes, only using a chest strap / computer combo for bike rides. It works perfectly well, and is perhaps more useful as it can
show HR trends over full days, providing a better picture of how tired/rested I am.
#5
Senior Member
For fitness purposes, any name-brand HRM will perform adequately. Accuracy/precision will be (mostly) the same for most all of them-- shopping is done based on things like cost, battery life, convenience, etc.
I wear an Apple Watch all the time, and it is my only tracker for runs/walks/hikes, only using a chest strap / computer combo for bike rides. It works perfectly well, and is perhaps more useful as it can
show HR trends over full days, providing a better picture of how tired/rested I am.
I wear an Apple Watch all the time, and it is my only tracker for runs/walks/hikes, only using a chest strap / computer combo for bike rides. It works perfectly well, and is perhaps more useful as it can
show HR trends over full days, providing a better picture of how tired/rested I am.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
My Fitbit is more accurate than the inexpensive I've had, when I've calibrated against other equipment. It's probably off my 2 or 3 beats per minute,
#7
Blazer of saddles, trails
I have found the wrist-based HRM on my Garmin 6 to be disappointingly inaccurate, with its inaccuracy growing with intensity. Everyday non-workout tracking is fine, easy Z2 ride is off by a couple of beats. By zone 3 it reads at least ten bpm off and seems to lag by a couple of seconds. When sprinting it is wildly off. As in I have never been able to get the watch to read above 140ish bpm even when killing myself and hitting max HR (180ish). I find it to be worse when running than cycling, but still would not rely on it for riding.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 567
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 241 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
153 Posts
I have found the wrist-based HRM on my Garmin 6 to be disappointingly inaccurate, with its inaccuracy growing with intensity. Everyday non-workout tracking is fine, easy Z2 ride is off by a couple of beats. By zone 3 it reads at least ten bpm off and seems to lag by a couple of seconds. When sprinting it is wildly off. As in I have never been able to get the watch to read above 140ish bpm even when killing myself and hitting max HR (180ish). I find it to be worse when running than cycling, but still would not rely on it for riding.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
For fitness purposes, any name-brand HRM will perform adequately. Accuracy/precision will be (mostly) the same for most all of them-- shopping is done based on things like cost, battery life, convenience, etc.
I wear an Apple Watch all the time, and it is my only tracker for runs/walks/hikes, only using a chest strap / computer combo for bike rides. It works perfectly well, and is perhaps more useful as it can
show HR trends over full days, providing a better picture of how tired/rested I am.
I wear an Apple Watch all the time, and it is my only tracker for runs/walks/hikes, only using a chest strap / computer combo for bike rides. It works perfectly well, and is perhaps more useful as it can
show HR trends over full days, providing a better picture of how tired/rested I am.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,993
Bikes: Argon 18 Gallium, BH G7, Rocky Mountain Instinct C70
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Liked 512 Times
in
306 Posts
When I was in spin class - back when classes were still happening - I noticed that my wHRM was way off. We'd be finishing up a hard set and cooling down. I'd look at my heart rate and it was off the chart! I know the number was wrong because I was doing an easy pedal, not breathing hard, and the number on the watch was much much too high. For a while I figured the watch was picking up the heart rate of someone else around me.
Going forward I think I am going to use my chest HRM with my Garmin watch (Forerunner 235) in spin class for a more accurate reading.
Going forward I think I am going to use my chest HRM with my Garmin watch (Forerunner 235) in spin class for a more accurate reading.
#11
Junior Member
The Apple watch is considered to be very accurate and is used in FDA Stanford heart studies. My Apple watch diagnosed mu AFIB and it was confirmed by my cardiologist. It is within 1 tp 2 beats of my Tickr on a NordkTrac treadmill.
__________________
2011 Trek Madone 5.2 WSD
2009 Trek 2.1 WSD
2011 Trek Madone 5.2 WSD
2009 Trek 2.1 WSD
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Land of Enchantment
Posts: 468
Bikes: Domane SLR7 Project One
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 152 Post(s)
Liked 173 Times
in
105 Posts
The HRM on my Fenix 3 is erratic at best. Sometimes it was be pretty close and other times it was widely off. It was always slower to react than the chest strap. Also very sensitive to position on my wrist. I ended up never using it and always using my Garmin chest strap which has been bulletproof. When I bought the Fenix 3 there was the option to get the same watch without the HRM. Wish I would have saved the money and gone with the reg. model since other than that it has been a solid purchase. Maybe the newer models are better.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
177 Posts
The HR on my Fenix 5 provides a general indicator of HR but it's far from accurate when HR is changing. For example I sometimes do some repeats on a set of stairs to the beach (50m elevation). The watch seems to lag the actual HR by a significant amount. If I want to look at my HR when I'm sitting around the wrist is fine but for monitoring or recording workouts I find it useless.
#14
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,985
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6193 Post(s)
Liked 4,808 Times
in
3,316 Posts
I personally can't imagine any so bad they can't be used.
When you are looking at your data, you should be able to tell when it's correct and when not. So use that subset of correct data to let you know what you were doing at a particular part of your workout/ride.
If you are only going by workout/ride totals, then you really aren't analyzing your data. About the only thing useful for the entire workout/ride is time and maybe watts.
If your device is that crappy with data, maybe you are wearing it wrong. Many of your wrist worn devices can also be paired with a 50 dollar chest strap too. So you don't necessarily have to shell out more big bucks. But then again, some have issues with chest straps too. Some people have issues with everything electronic.
When you are looking at your data, you should be able to tell when it's correct and when not. So use that subset of correct data to let you know what you were doing at a particular part of your workout/ride.
If you are only going by workout/ride totals, then you really aren't analyzing your data. About the only thing useful for the entire workout/ride is time and maybe watts.
If your device is that crappy with data, maybe you are wearing it wrong. Many of your wrist worn devices can also be paired with a 50 dollar chest strap too. So you don't necessarily have to shell out more big bucks. But then again, some have issues with chest straps too. Some people have issues with everything electronic.
#15
Senior Member
I've found my wrist based HR to be within 1-2 bpm of my chest strap. The biggest issue with wrist based vs strap is there can be a lag when you start doing harder intervals. There have also been times when my wrist based HR will spike for no apparent reason. It really depends on the model of watch. My Polar m430 is IMHO perfect, while my Polar Vantage M can be somewhat suspect at times which is why I'll generally use it with a chest strap