Search
Notices
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets HRM, GPS, MP3, HID. Whether it's got an acronym or not, here's where you'll find discussions on all sorts of tools, toys and gadgets.

BT/ANT+ chest strap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-23-19, 11:15 PM
  #1  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
BT/ANT+ chest strap

Assuming you have a Garmin that can read either, is there any reason to prefer one over the other?

I'm asking because I killed mine, bought a dual band replacement, and every time I used it, it prefers to connect over BT.

Last edited by Seattle Forrest; 07-24-19 at 12:21 AM.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 07-23-19, 11:29 PM
  #2  
caloso
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
I got one to act as a bridge transmitter for Zwift, but if your device can read either I guess it doesn’t matter?
caloso is offline  
Old 07-24-19, 12:24 AM
  #3  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
I would think they're both data transport protocols, and should be identical. (I only care about the quality of the data.) But every time I assume anything, I wind up wrong. So I'm hoping nobody replies with a horror story.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 07-24-19, 04:43 AM
  #4  
jadocs
Senior Member
 
jadocs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 2,190

Bikes: Ti, Mn Cr Ni Mo Nb, Al, C

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 942 Post(s)
Liked 526 Times in 349 Posts
So I don’t know the answer, but ANT allows multiple connections at the same time. BT only allows you to have a single connection. As far as connection reliability, I don’t think there is a difference, but I could be wrong.
jadocs is offline  
Old 07-24-19, 06:45 AM
  #5  
John_V 
Senior Member
 
John_V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 5,585

Bikes: 2017 Colnago C-RS, 2012 Colnago Ace, 2010 Giant Cypress hybrid

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 408 Post(s)
Liked 122 Times in 85 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
Assuming you have a Garmin that can read either, is there any reason to prefer one over the other?

I'm asking because I killed mine, bought a dual band replacement, and every time I used it, it prefers to connect over BT.
I had the same issue with my Bolt. I solved the problem by pairing the sensors to my phone, using BT, before pairing the sensors to the Bolt, using Ant+. I've had the Bolt for a little over two years now and the connections haven't changed. I know you use a Fenix so I'm not sure how or if that will work for you.
__________________
HCFR Cycling Team
Ride Safe ... Ride Hard ... Ride Daily

2017 Colnago C-RS
2012 Colnago Ace
2010 Giant Cypress
John_V is offline  
Old 07-24-19, 11:53 AM
  #6  
Metaluna
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,221

Bikes: Niner RLT 9 RDO, Gunnar Sport, Soma Saga, Workswell WCBR-146

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 19 Times in 19 Posts
Another area where there might be a reason to prefer one over the other would be power consumption, however I don't know if there's a significant difference between BTLE and ANT+ (probably depends on the specific chips used on each end of the connection).
Metaluna is offline  
Old 07-24-19, 12:03 PM
  #7  
caloso
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
Originally Posted by jadocs
So I don’t know the answer, but ANT allows multiple connections at the same time. BT only allows you to have a single connection. As far as connection reliability, I don’t think there is a difference, but I could be wrong.
Yes, because I've been running Zwift through the Apple TV app (BT) I couldn't simultaneously use the Kinetic app (also BT). However, I could connect to my Garmin. But as far as reliability, I have not noticed any difference.
caloso is offline  
Old 07-24-19, 01:39 PM
  #8  
ksryder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 2,537

Bikes: yes

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1281 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times in 329 Posts
I think ANT allegedly uses less power than BT but in real world applications the difference is de minimus.
ksryder is offline  
Old 07-24-19, 02:08 PM
  #9  
TimothyH
- Soli Deo Gloria -
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779

Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix

Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times in 469 Posts
Originally Posted by ksryder
I think ANT allegedly uses less power than BT but in real world applications the difference is de minimus.
And BT is supposed to have better bandwidth and bigger payload but I wonder how much data a heart rate sensor really pushes.

Its all seems like marketecture.
TimothyH is offline  
Old 07-24-19, 04:27 PM
  #10  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by John_V
I had the same issue with my Bolt. I solved the problem by pairing the sensors to my phone, using BT, before pairing the sensors to the Bolt, using Ant+. I've had the Bolt for a little over two years now and the connections haven't changed. I know you use a Fenix so I'm not sure how or if that will work for you.
What a simple, elegant solution. Thanks!

Interesting that your Bolt also prefers BT.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 08-02-19, 09:12 PM
  #11  
RGMN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 567
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 241 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times in 153 Posts
One advantage of BLE over ANT+ is you can get low battery warnings with BLE if your head unit supports it. Both my Wahoo Speed/Cadence sensor and the TICKR have given me low battery warns on the Garmin 130. It won't do that with ANT+.
RGMN is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dvai
Road Cycling
12
10-21-18 04:56 AM
Ironump
General Cycling Discussion
8
12-31-17 07:38 AM
DaveLeeNC
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
2
01-16-16 08:37 AM
BigC_82
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
7
11-17-15 10:46 AM
DaveLeeNC
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
8
11-13-15 12:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.