Stranded vs solid dynamo cable
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: QC Canada
Posts: 1,962
Bikes: Custom built LHT & Troll
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 838 Post(s)
Liked 149 Times
in
106 Posts
Stranded vs solid dynamo cable
Had to rethread my (Shimano) dynamo connector today, and wondered why the charger has been fitted with a stranded (instead of solid) cable. Strands make it fairly delicate to insert the cable in the connector, more likely to have a stray strand short circuiting the connection, and more likely to disintegrate under physical stress.
The usual reason to use a stranded cable would be to avoid sectioning under repeated flexing, which is irrelevant (or so it seems) for a dynamo cable.
Am I missing something?
---
Had to rethread twice so far, both times after removing the front wheel while packing the bike for travel, in a hurry - I disconnect the cable from the hub, but probably forget about the dangling connector which ends up being squeezed between the tire (2") and the fork. I'll probably try to install a small rubber band to hold the connector out of harm's way. If anyone knows about "best practices", I am all ears.
The usual reason to use a stranded cable would be to avoid sectioning under repeated flexing, which is irrelevant (or so it seems) for a dynamo cable.
Am I missing something?
---
Had to rethread twice so far, both times after removing the front wheel while packing the bike for travel, in a hurry - I disconnect the cable from the hub, but probably forget about the dangling connector which ends up being squeezed between the tire (2") and the fork. I'll probably try to install a small rubber band to hold the connector out of harm's way. If anyone knows about "best practices", I am all ears.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094
Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Stranded cable is more flexible and easier to use. Solid core cable is a PITA.
Are you talking about the wires that you insert into the dynamo from your light?
Are you talking about the wires that you insert into the dynamo from your light?
#3
Señior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,749
Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
Solid is what you use if you need the wire to be stiff, and it's in an environment where there's no vibration or flexing. If there is flexing or vibration, a solid core wire will fracture quickly.
The more flexing, the finer you want the strands to be.
If you can make sure the wire isn't going to be subject to flexing at all, you might get away with using solid, but IMO there would have to be a good reason to do so.
The more flexing, the finer you want the strands to be.
If you can make sure the wire isn't going to be subject to flexing at all, you might get away with using solid, but IMO there would have to be a good reason to do so.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
#4
Junior Member
And from the electrical conductivity standpoint, stranded allows for better current transmission than solid wire as it has more surface area, and the electricity actually travels along on the surface of wire not through the inside of it.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,469
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1827 Post(s)
Liked 3,367 Times
in
1,573 Posts
but otherwise, the advice to use stranded wire is correct. It's better for vehicles, due to its greater resistance to fatigue failures caused by vibration.
Steve in Peoria