Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

'[New Mexico] House passes legislation to enhance bicycle safety'

Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

'[New Mexico] House passes legislation to enhance bicycle safety'

Old 04-04-19, 10:41 AM
  #51  
livedarklions
Tragically Ignorant
 
livedarklions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613

Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,095 Times in 5,053 Posts
Originally Posted by mr_bill
The legislature has adjourned "sine die." So it is not now in session.

In New Mexico, all bills sent after noon on March 16 that aren't acted on by the governor's office are pocket vetoed.

Since the regular session has already terminated "sine die" - a special session would have to be called to attempt to override any veto. Unusual feature of New Mexico, if no special session is called, they can override when the next regular session opens, EVEN if an election has intervened.

In the unlikely event that the constitutional officers of the executive branch of New Mexico went on vacation between March 16 and April 5, everything would be pocket vetoed.

-mr. bill

That sine die is weird. Thanks!

Back when the pocket veto used to occur at the federal level (they now keep a pro forma session going to prevent it), there was (and is) no constitutional procedure for override.
livedarklions is offline  
Old 04-08-19, 08:49 PM
  #52  
mr_bill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times in 443 Posts
Veto message

-mr. bill
mr_bill is offline  
Old 04-09-19, 04:37 AM
  #53  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,479

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7648 Post(s)
Liked 3,464 Times in 1,830 Posts
Well stated, Gov. Grisham.
Maelochs is offline  
Old 04-09-19, 08:38 AM
  #54  
GamblerGORD53
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elevation 666m Edmonton Canada
Posts: 2,472

Bikes: 2013 Custom SA5w / Rohloff Tourster

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1233 Post(s)
Liked 317 Times in 244 Posts
The part about 5 feet is the STUPID part, not the mandatory BL part. The LAB will NEVER be satisfied with ANYTHING.
Cyclists are prima donnas********** Nobody needs an airport runway to ride a fricking bicycle. LOL Get SERIOUS
Share the damn roads and MUPs, whatever.....
YUP, Making UNREASONABLE demands will have unreasonable consequences. for SURE.

Last edited by GamblerGORD53; 04-09-19 at 08:43 AM.
GamblerGORD53 is offline  
Old 04-09-19, 09:09 AM
  #55  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,479

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7648 Post(s)
Liked 3,464 Times in 1,830 Posts
If some posters (not Specifically @GamblerGORD53) had bothered to read the Governor's statement, those posters would have seen that the Governor was very much in favor of the five-foot rule but saw that the MUP law would have been difficult to enforce as it was too loosely worded.

For those who actually read before posting ... assuming anyone does.
Maelochs is offline  
Old 04-10-19, 09:49 AM
  #56  
livedarklions
Tragically Ignorant
 
livedarklions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613

Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,095 Times in 5,053 Posts
I really don't care about the 5 foot rule, I think it's pretty unrealistic, but would really hate the MUP rule. Doesn't sound like they had the votes to get the 5 foot rule passed without the MUP rule, so this might be the end of it for a while.
livedarklions is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
themp
General Cycling Discussion
127
04-08-19 06:38 PM
ModeratedUser
Advocacy & Safety
33
10-09-15 07:56 AM
storckm
Advocacy & Safety
40
06-03-12 08:08 AM
leob1
Advocacy & Safety
19
10-25-11 02:36 PM
Gear853
Commuting
2
11-17-10 02:29 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.