Secondhand bike with chipped carbon frame - SuperX -
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Secondhand bike with chipped carbon frame - SuperX -
Good morning,
I have a question about a secondhand bike I just purchased online from a shop. It's a carbon fibre frame - Cannondale SuperX - and it has been used for the past season of cx riding (the owner of the shop said for about 10h of racing..it was not the main bike of the rider) - The deal was very good, almost 45% off from the original price but as soon as I received the bike I was a bit astonished by the chips on the frame (not advertised on the ad and by phone) - everythng else, brakes, gear are in very good condtions, and the shop owner kept saying that no falls happened to the bike - I am not too picky and not really fuzzed about scratches but when you spend 2000£ on a bike - even if used - still you want to be sure that everthing is ok. When I enquired the seller he told me that the chips (seatstays and fork) come from carrying the bikes on planes (on soft boxes) for international races, still I have some doubts that such scratches can be done "only" by transport - also I am a bit scared that if the bike had poor maintenance - having been raced - it could show problems at the bb30..but so far looks good. A carbon expert checked the bike and said that the damages are not structural - I have two options: send the bike back with a full refund or have a repaint job done by the shop for an additional 200£ - yeah, they are not willing to cover the expenses. I attach some pics of the damages. Thanks a lot for your opinion.
I have a question about a secondhand bike I just purchased online from a shop. It's a carbon fibre frame - Cannondale SuperX - and it has been used for the past season of cx riding (the owner of the shop said for about 10h of racing..it was not the main bike of the rider) - The deal was very good, almost 45% off from the original price but as soon as I received the bike I was a bit astonished by the chips on the frame (not advertised on the ad and by phone) - everythng else, brakes, gear are in very good condtions, and the shop owner kept saying that no falls happened to the bike - I am not too picky and not really fuzzed about scratches but when you spend 2000£ on a bike - even if used - still you want to be sure that everthing is ok. When I enquired the seller he told me that the chips (seatstays and fork) come from carrying the bikes on planes (on soft boxes) for international races, still I have some doubts that such scratches can be done "only" by transport - also I am a bit scared that if the bike had poor maintenance - having been raced - it could show problems at the bb30..but so far looks good. A carbon expert checked the bike and said that the damages are not structural - I have two options: send the bike back with a full refund or have a repaint job done by the shop for an additional 200£ - yeah, they are not willing to cover the expenses. I attach some pics of the damages. Thanks a lot for your opinion.
#2
Full Member
I would go for the full refund. If you wanna make absolutely sure it‘s not a £2000 deathtrap you‘ll have to x-ray the frame. Guess that‘s more than £200.
Likes For Kovkov:
Likes For nomadmax:
#4
Mother Nature's Son
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sussex County, Delaware
Posts: 3,118
Bikes: 2014 Orbea Avant MD30, 2004 Airborne Zeppelin TI, 2003 Lemond Poprad, 2001 Lemond Tourmalet, 2014? Soma Smoothie
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 853 Post(s)
Liked 1,436 Times
in
818 Posts
Refund!
Likes For delbiker1:
#5
Senior Member
That's a lot of scratches and bumps for a bike that was 'never crashed'. I'd go for a refund myself. 45% off list is not a great deal on a used bike if you ask me. When I'm spending that kind of money, in either dollars or pounds, I want something pretty much perfect. I have a 38 year old bike that I rode a lot that has less marks than that (until my son started using it ) It doesn't look like it was cared for.
Likes For zacster:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Well, 10 hours of cyclocross racing has got to cause a bunch of scratches and chips so that's not surprising. What is surprising is that you paid 55% of full price for it. I would either return it for a full refund or ask for a significant price reduction.
Likes For HillRider:
#7
Señor Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,066
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
215 Posts
Most of those do just look like chips in the paint, but a couple looked deeper - specifically some of the marks on the seatstays. I wouldn't want to ride that bike.
Likes For Wilfred Laurier:
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Thanks a lot for all your replies - I really appreciate. Now I'm more and more convinced that I should return it - even if it was (for my needs) the perfect bike with a 2x chainring and beautiful paint color ^_^ - Not to mention that the bike came also with a bent spoke (pretty loose)... easy to fix and cheap but a clear sign of low care..
Likes For Markus_79:
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
I had the same impression about the ones on the seatstays - and to be honest I cannot believe that they come just from the handling during the transport..
#10
Junior Member
Thread Starter
That's a lot of scratches and bumps for a bike that was 'never crashed'. I'd go for a refund myself. 45% off list is not a great deal on a used bike if you ask me. When I'm spending that kind of money, in either dollars or pounds, I want something pretty much perfect. I have a 38 year old bike that I rode a lot that has less marks than that (until my son started using it ) It doesn't look like it was cared for.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
"no crashes" and cyclocross racing is an oxymoron.
I would put some nail polish on those dings and ride on,
if the price is right for the bike.
I would put some nail polish on those dings and ride on,
if the price is right for the bike.
Likes For woodcraft:
#12
Senior Member
I should add that I bought a used frame about 15 years ago, a Kuota Kredo to replace the Kouta I'd crashed, and that frame didn't have a scratch on it. The shop said it was used for a season of racing but looked like it maybe had been used 2 or 3 times at most. It was also deeply discounted, less than half of the new price. It was perfect for this hard recreational rider. I'm still riding it.
Likes For zacster:
#13
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Yes, I agree.. but it looks like - considering also others opinions on the thread - that the price is a bit steep for the bike's conditions...and in terms of reselling value I'm going to loose - if I decide to sell it - quite a lot of money I guess.
#14
Junior Member
Thread Starter
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18375 Post(s)
Liked 4,510 Times
in
3,352 Posts
A lot of those look like superficial paint chips from mishandling. Bike rack, hauling around, etc. But, it is hard to tell.
There is a "coin test". Dropping a coin across the tube, if the pitch changes, make sure it can be explained such as reinforcement for a brake bridge. Symmetrical on both sides? It may not be 100% accurate, but should help a bit with peace of mind.
You might also do the coin test on the fork. In many cases, the fork crown is made of solid aluminum, and would be more resilient to small chips.
Hard to say. Coming from a "bike shop", I'd be pretty upset with that amount of undisclosed damage. But, I might go ahead and ride the bike myself.
I'm not sure about used value. Some bikes like cyclocross bikes may hold their value some. But, don't go by the MSRP, but go by a portion of the lowest price you can find on the internet for a similar NEW bike. Then knock some off for the frame (for being USED). And a bit more for being ABUSED.
Try BicycleBlueBook (in their lowest condition category).
How are the components? Rear Derailleur?
Likes For CliffordK:
Likes For Wilfred Laurier:
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,977
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1638 Post(s)
Liked 741 Times
in
495 Posts
I believe the chips don't affect the structural integrity of the frame but, there should have been full disclosure up front. You should have had an opportunity to make the decision before laying out the $$$.
__________________
nine mile skid on a ten mile ride
nine mile skid on a ten mile ride
Likes For 02Giant:
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,067
Bikes: 84 Pinarello Trevisio, 86 Guerciotti SLX, 96 Specialized Stumpjumper, 2010 Surly Cross Check, 88 Centurion Prestige, 73 Raleigh Sports, GT Force, Bridgestone MB4
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 278 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times
in
56 Posts
A chipped up and possibly delaminated CF frame is dangerous potentially and worse than a dented steel frame in value reduction. Not to mention the difficulty of knowing the true extent of the damage.
Likes For Loose Chain:
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Bloomington, IN
Posts: 2,949
Bikes: Paramount, Faggin, Ochsner, Ciocc, Basso
Mentioned: 117 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1303 Post(s)
Liked 1,911 Times
in
1,141 Posts
So folks,
If you were buying a used Indy car that hit the wall would you be concerned about the frame? Bikes are just like Indy cars as being made from CF, and any chips dents and gouges are suspect. think before jumping in. Smiles, MH
If you were buying a used Indy car that hit the wall would you be concerned about the frame? Bikes are just like Indy cars as being made from CF, and any chips dents and gouges are suspect. think before jumping in. Smiles, MH
Likes For Mad Honk:
Likes For redlude97:
#21
Junior Member
Thread Starter
It was my first reaction - but the fact that the damages has not been described upfront (jsut very generic description) and the potential loss in reselling value are two things that I don't really like. And also the fact that I'm not 100% sure of the origin of those marks and chips. Why would ever say that it has happened only during the transport? In any case it's an awesome bike really sad to let it go.
#22
Junior Member
Thread Starter
The problem is that there is a lot of fear of carbon fiber. It is quite strong, and will take some amount of stretching and bending, and return back to the original shape. However, it doesn't do well with certain crush and impact types of damage (which can happen in a wreck, or even simply falling over in a bike rack).
A lot of those look like superficial paint chips from mishandling. Bike rack, hauling around, etc. But, it is hard to tell.
There is a "coin test". Dropping a coin across the tube, if the pitch changes, make sure it can be explained such as reinforcement for a brake bridge. Symmetrical on both sides? It may not be 100% accurate, but should help a bit with peace of mind.
You might also do the coin test on the fork. In many cases, the fork crown is made of solid aluminum, and would be more resilient to small chips.
Hard to say. Coming from a "bike shop", I'd be pretty upset with that amount of undisclosed damage. But, I might go ahead and ride the bike myself.
I'm not sure about used value. Some bikes like cyclocross bikes may hold their value some. But, don't go by the MSRP, but go by a portion of the lowest price you can find on the internet for a similar NEW bike. Then knock some off for the frame (for being USED). And a bit more for being ABUSED.
Try BicycleBlueBook (in their lowest condition category).
How are the components? Rear Derailleur?
A lot of those look like superficial paint chips from mishandling. Bike rack, hauling around, etc. But, it is hard to tell.
There is a "coin test". Dropping a coin across the tube, if the pitch changes, make sure it can be explained such as reinforcement for a brake bridge. Symmetrical on both sides? It may not be 100% accurate, but should help a bit with peace of mind.
You might also do the coin test on the fork. In many cases, the fork crown is made of solid aluminum, and would be more resilient to small chips.
Hard to say. Coming from a "bike shop", I'd be pretty upset with that amount of undisclosed damage. But, I might go ahead and ride the bike myself.
I'm not sure about used value. Some bikes like cyclocross bikes may hold their value some. But, don't go by the MSRP, but go by a portion of the lowest price you can find on the internet for a similar NEW bike. Then knock some off for the frame (for being USED). And a bit more for being ABUSED.
Try BicycleBlueBook (in their lowest condition category).
How are the components? Rear Derailleur?
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Bloomington, IN
Posts: 2,949
Bikes: Paramount, Faggin, Ochsner, Ciocc, Basso
Mentioned: 117 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1303 Post(s)
Liked 1,911 Times
in
1,141 Posts
I'm gonna reply one more time on this one. First off $2k euro's is sky high for a bike like this. Are those brakes hydraulic? etc. on the questions. But I'm not convinced that it is a good buy. Racing for me has always worked this way: I buy it and the sponsors pay for it. I race it and at the end of the season I sell it for whatever I can get for it. Stock cars work this way bikes work this way and Indy car is just a bit different, but still the race machines are worn out after a season of racing. I suspect this is one of those bikes. If you pay more than half price for it you are being taken advantage of as it has already been paid for by a sponsor. And it is worn out as a racing machine. If you even think of racing it I would be suspicious about your intentions. JMHO, MH
Likes For Mad Honk:
#24
Junior Member
Thread Starter
I'm gonna reply one more time on this one. First off $2k euro's is sky high for a bike like this. Are those brakes hydraulic? etc. on the questions. But I'm not convinced that it is a good buy. Racing for me has always worked this way: I buy it and the sponsors pay for it. I race it and at the end of the season I sell it for whatever I can get for it. Stock cars work this way bikes work this way and Indy car is just a bit different, but still the race machines are worn out after a season of racing. I suspect this is one of those bikes. If you pay more than half price for it you are being taken advantage of as it has already been paid for by a sponsor. And it is worn out as a racing machine. If you even think of racing it I would be suspicious about your intentions. JMHO, MH