Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Professional Cycling For the Fans
Reload this Page >

Drones Replacing Helicopters ?

Search
Notices
Professional Cycling For the Fans Follow the Tour de France,the Giro de Italia, the Spring Classics, or other professional cycling races? Here's your home...

Drones Replacing Helicopters ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-24, 02:00 PM
  #1  
Homebrew01
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Homebrew01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,843

Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times in 612 Posts
Drones Replacing Helicopters ?

I wonder if pro races will use drones with HD cameras instead of helicopters. Imagine how much $ the race organizers would save. They could have dozens of drones along the course like a relay team, taking over when the previous one has low battery.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.

FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Homebrew01 is offline  
Old 03-24-24, 04:04 PM
  #2  
slcbob
bored of "Senior Member"
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: MD / metro DC
Posts: 2,883

Bikes: Cross-Check/Nexus commuter. Several others for various forms of play.

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 642 Post(s)
Liked 593 Times in 453 Posts
The devil is in the details. And air space safety regulations. And live feed capability. And dwell time. And pilot location. And...

https://www.triathlete.com/culture/n...-anytime-soon/

Something like CX is a sweet spot for them, compared to a road race or even a crit. But they got a little close to the action in recent UCI events and are now regulated further away.

As much as I like some of the coverage that's possible, I almost got hit by a drone on course at a local race and appreciate the spectrum of concerns.
slcbob is offline  
Old 03-24-24, 04:50 PM
  #3  
rm -rf
don't try this at home.
 
rm -rf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,940
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 974 Post(s)
Liked 512 Times in 352 Posts
Ha, follow the riders right through the tunnels or under the tree canopy over the roads!

Yeah, the drones could cause injuries if they get out of control. Can it work with good safety?
Hmm, which is more dangerous: drones or the many motorcycle shooting videos?
rm -rf is offline  
Old 03-24-24, 04:54 PM
  #4  
rm -rf
don't try this at home.
 
rm -rf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,940
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 974 Post(s)
Liked 512 Times in 352 Posts
Drones are definitely fast enough. This one has hit 400 kph, almost 250 mph. Streamlined, with the nose pointed straight ahead.

Following F1 around a lap:

Design and testing:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szxRORFl_lc#t=10m18s
rm -rf is offline  
Likes For rm -rf:
Old 03-28-24, 09:10 AM
  #5  
Iride01 
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,992

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6196 Post(s)
Liked 4,810 Times in 3,318 Posts
Safety of the riders and crowds are paramount. But, yes, we've already been seeing drone coverage for various segments of the big pro tours and grand tours like the TdF for years now. Helicopters won't go away for quite awhile, IMO.

I don't know if it's still a problem, but even back prior to 2018 we had some cyclist getting hit by drones in some of the lesser pro races that don't get much coverage by TV. And those were tiny drones. The newer bigger camera platforms probably will pack more of a wallop.
Iride01 is offline  
Old 03-28-24, 10:09 AM
  #6  
slcbob
bored of "Senior Member"
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: MD / metro DC
Posts: 2,883

Bikes: Cross-Check/Nexus commuter. Several others for various forms of play.

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 642 Post(s)
Liked 593 Times in 453 Posts
BTW, I heard come commentary on GCN+ last year about the helicopter camera operators, the cost of camera pod, etc. It was interesting and I did a little poking around. Spoke with some drone folks, event organizers, and some forestry / mining helicopter services operators I knew from a prior life (not race video though) to get a sense of the easy and hard issues.

It's easy to fall in love with the HD quality of small drones. And image stabilization is decent.

Amplifying my earlier drive-by comment, my sense of the key obstacle is that miniaturization hasn't caught up to the point where a high quality gimbal and optics plus the communications gear to live stream 4k+ images out is light and efficient enough to be carried by small drone. So we're talking about one or more of the following compromises until there is some more leap ahead technology: big air ship, ridiculously small service time, non-live coverage (e.g. land and download).

While helicopter time isn't cheap, each drone operator is a pilot so it's not like you're getting them for pennies on a dollar. The costs of a LOT of them to cover time and distance, plus their very high end commercial drones, plus the compromises, plus the uncertainties and liabilities all add up. And helicopters start to look relatively less expensive.

There are situations where those bits of friction are far more tolerable. In UCI road racing, not so much. At least not for the main, live feeds. Complementary coverage, sure! Like a closed circuit, or a special area, or non-live. But even just moving around on the ground in the midst of all the road closures is a big ask. The notion of just hot swapping the drones and keeping anywhere close to line of sight for the operator is very naive.

Here's an article on the TdF helicopter team.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2019/07...our-de-france/

I think some of the smaller races are a bit less integrated than that company and the point guy tends to be the camera pod owner / operator. The helicopter itself is more of a commodity. But it is still a VERY small market of highly specialized service operators.
slcbob is offline  
Old 03-29-24, 07:27 PM
  #7  
Chicago Al 
Senior Member
 
Chicago Al's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago, the leafy NW side
Posts: 2,479

Bikes: 1974 Motobecane Grand Record, 1987 Miyata Pro, 1988 Bob Jackson Lady Mixte (wife's), others in the family

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Liked 155 Times in 79 Posts
SLCBob nails it above, and that arstechnica article is great, but I will add my $.02 anyway. I'm a recently retired cinematographer, not on broadcast sports events, mostly commercials, movies, TV, etc, but the same principles apply. And I use to do the occasional helicopter shoot using the standard gear: a Tyler mount on a Bell Jet Ranger with the right door taken off.

Drone tech has come a long way, but there are significant limitations on the kind of movements they can do and the kind of payload a drone can carry. Drone cameras used to be fixed, aimed in one direction, meaning that the drone itself had to pivot side to side or up and down to pan and tilt. While there are now tiny remote heads that allow more adjustment, they are nowhere near as controllable or smooth as the remote heads used on today's helicopter mounts, so drones still mostly shoot in one direction: forward. Drones are also limited in the weight of lenses that they can carry--glass is HEAVY--,while helo cameras have very long ratio zoom lenses, allowing them to get those spectacular wide angles showing the whole landscape, but then zoom way in.
Basically: a drone is great for things like following a cyclist or team on a time trial, getting in much closer than a helo can, with a wide lens, and giving you a real visceral sense of being there.
But a helicopter setup like HdF has, with the cameras isolated in amazingly stablized rigs, powerful zoom lenses and pinpoint pan/tilt/roll control, as well as a very maneuverable helo and excellent pilot and camera operator, elaborate, choreographed shots are possible.
I have been amazed at some of the things I've seen: camera inches from the ground, shooting the peloton from the side, through grass waving in the foreground, then the camera lifts and zooms wide, while the helo tracks around behind the cyclists, then clear to the other side of them. Only a small bit of that would have been possible in one shot, just a few years ago.
I used to love doing complex dolly shots; in these days where everything is handhheld/steadi/gimbal that's kinda gone away, but these helo shots in bike racing are kind of in the same family It almost makes me wish I was still working and was there executing those shots. Almost.


__________________
I never think I have hit hard, unless it rebounds.

- Dr Samuel Johnson

Last edited by Chicago Al; 03-29-24 at 08:22 PM.
Chicago Al is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.