How to compare touring with riding?
#1
Bike touring webrarian
Thread Starter
How to compare touring with riding?
I am currently in Luxembourg and I met a gaggle of riders doing some fully supported riding in the Ardennes. The guy I was talking to said they did 120K the previous day in the mountains. I did about the same on a moderately loaded bike on a bike path (Vennbahn) with a mild upgrade.
I got to wonder how to compare the effort our rides. How does riding with, say, 25 pounds of gear on a relatively flat path compare to a lightweight bike ridden in the mountains the same distance?
I got to wonder how to compare the effort our rides. How does riding with, say, 25 pounds of gear on a relatively flat path compare to a lightweight bike ridden in the mountains the same distance?
#2
bicycle tourist
Musing a few thoughts:
It wouldn't surprise me if it is cyclist dependant. For me, a heavier rider, 25 pounds isn't as big a percentage of body weight as a lighter rider.
At the same time climbing, seems to slow me more than other riders, loaded or unloaded.
Grade also matters. A 4% grade is more than twice as hard as a 2% grade and a 8% grade more than twice as much as that. As a result, 1/2 day of flat plus 1/2 day of 4% seems harder than all day at 2%.
Perhaps one way to compare would be to convert into equivalent units for same rider, e.g. time spent or calories burned. Doing a Google search of "calories burned cycling uphill" gives some suggestions.
Overall, for me, for each hour cycling, I would guess it would be easier to add 25 pounds of gear and ride very gentle grades, than to lose the gear and climb over a lot of short steep hills.
It wouldn't surprise me if it is cyclist dependant. For me, a heavier rider, 25 pounds isn't as big a percentage of body weight as a lighter rider.
At the same time climbing, seems to slow me more than other riders, loaded or unloaded.
Grade also matters. A 4% grade is more than twice as hard as a 2% grade and a 8% grade more than twice as much as that. As a result, 1/2 day of flat plus 1/2 day of 4% seems harder than all day at 2%.
Perhaps one way to compare would be to convert into equivalent units for same rider, e.g. time spent or calories burned. Doing a Google search of "calories burned cycling uphill" gives some suggestions.
Overall, for me, for each hour cycling, I would guess it would be easier to add 25 pounds of gear and ride very gentle grades, than to lose the gear and climb over a lot of short steep hills.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
177 Posts
Effort in the mountains will be more variable with high output while climbing and nothing while descending. 120km with 2000-4000 can be a very hard day for competitive riders or a relatively easy day if they're just on a mellow chatty ride. Invariably some riders in a group like that will be competitive and push themselves to the limit on the hills. Others will take it easy and enjoy the scenery.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Golden, CO and Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,837
Bikes: 2012 Specialized Elite Disc, 1983 Trek 520
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 676 Post(s)
Liked 741 Times
in
430 Posts
You have to know the elevation gain to figure that out. Someone with the physics equations and some assumptions about rolling resistance could do some back-of-the-envelope calculations, but you'd need to know how many meters climbed.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,472 Times
in
2,079 Posts
Too many variables to do a comparison in general is my guess but not using the example the OP gives.
25 pounds of extra weight on a relatively flat course is very little extra work; riding in mountains is extra work.
25 pounds of extra weight on a relatively flat course is very little extra work; riding in mountains is extra work.
#6
Senior Member
Here's a good article:
How Much Does Bike and Gear Weight Actually Slow You Down? Part Two (Results) - CyclingAbout
Also check out the links in that article - ie, the author found bike calculator pretty accurate, and on flatish ground, and the aerodynamics of your touring panniers will have a greater speed/efficiency impact than the weight itself.
How Much Does Bike and Gear Weight Actually Slow You Down? Part Two (Results) - CyclingAbout
Also check out the links in that article - ie, the author found bike calculator pretty accurate, and on flatish ground, and the aerodynamics of your touring panniers will have a greater speed/efficiency impact than the weight itself.
#7
Banned
I am unhurried on my solo tours because I have my camping kit with me..
In the Ardennes in Belgium I found myself cycling down the Start-Finish of the Francorchamps race course.
I should have followed it around the 4 mile loop, since its just public road most of the year.
...
In the Ardennes in Belgium I found myself cycling down the Start-Finish of the Francorchamps race course.
I should have followed it around the 4 mile loop, since its just public road most of the year.
...
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times
in
707 Posts
I think a lot depends on the bike too.
A light road bike is going to ride faster with less effort than a more touring designed model.
I'm on the road right now and have been passed by a whole lot of roadies along the way and I'm not doddling either.
A light road bike is going to ride faster with less effort than a more touring designed model.
I'm on the road right now and have been passed by a whole lot of roadies along the way and I'm not doddling either.
#9
Banned.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ny
Posts: 1,764
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Lightly loaded bike I ride 80 miles in about 5 hours. Heavy loaded bike I ride 80 miles in 6 hours. It is still the same mileage on the same day so it matters little to me.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: QC Canada
Posts: 1,972
Bikes: Custom built LHT & Troll
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 846 Post(s)
Liked 149 Times
in
106 Posts
100 kms at 1% would take 5h15. If you add a 10kg penalty on the 1% incline, you are still a bit faster, with an expected time of 5h30.
Based on the estimates provided by https://bikecalculator.com/veloMetric.html
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207
Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times
in
51 Posts
From my limited experience, weight on flat ground slows me down, but not as much as you'd expect. Weight in hills slows me down more (albeit, from a dreadful pace to begin with). Navigating unfamiliar terrain and sightseeing slowed me down FAR more than weight.
I've got a couple relatively flat (rail trail, <2% grade) tracks I ride regularly. I can toss some bags on for shakedown, and not significantly change the time it takes me to complete them. In fact, last weekend I even set some 3rd place PRs on two Strava segments doing just that.
I've got a couple relatively flat (rail trail, <2% grade) tracks I ride regularly. I can toss some bags on for shakedown, and not significantly change the time it takes me to complete them. In fact, last weekend I even set some 3rd place PRs on two Strava segments doing just that.
Last edited by jefnvk; 05-21-17 at 08:07 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cthenn
Road Cycling
46
02-21-14 03:56 PM
hobkirk
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
12
06-14-10 02:53 PM