Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Ever replace a bike due to mileage/use?

Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Ever replace a bike due to mileage/use?

Old 07-09-19, 12:28 PM
  #26  
ksryder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 2,537

Bikes: yes

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1281 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times in 329 Posts
Originally Posted by billyymc
I've found it to be an excellent bike. I've put a decent amount of miles on it, ridden everything from gravel to 200 mile one day rides on it and it's never been anything but great for me. I find it rock solid descending, like it's on rails but my borther has ridden it and felt it was a little unstable descending so who knows.

Disc brakes would be a great reason to upgrade - I ride a lot of hills, and sometimes in rain
I mean, my handling skills are crap so that probably plays into it.
ksryder is offline  
Old 07-09-19, 12:55 PM
  #27  
wipekitty
vespertine member
 
wipekitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Land of Angora, Turkey
Posts: 2,476

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 687 Post(s)
Liked 220 Times in 163 Posts
Originally Posted by fietsbob
Also known as the Ship of Theseus .. Paradoxical question ..
This puzzle is part of the reason why I will never have the funds to replace a bicycle simply because it is old.

I've certainly 'retired' bicycle frames due to structural issues, rust in bad places, and so forth. In my local cycling community, what usually happens is somebody buys a bike, rides the snot out of it, upgrades, and sells the old bike to somebody who proceeds to ride the snot out of it. Racers are the exception as they tend to destroy their stuff.
wipekitty is offline  
Old 07-09-19, 01:13 PM
  #28  
billyymc
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,365
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 286 Post(s)
Liked 125 Times in 58 Posts
So it seems like based on the mileage alone there isn't really any reason to be concerned about the possibility of frame failure being significantly higher than when the bike was new. That's pretty much where my head was at, but was curious how others would feel.

But - having had the bike 10 years I do sort of have an urge for a change or an upgrade. I have a friend who wants to road ride a bit (we MTB together) - he's a lot lighter than me but about the same height. If I do go ahead and upgrade I'd probably just give the Tricross to him so it doesn't sit in a corner.
billyymc is offline  
Old 07-09-19, 01:16 PM
  #29  
billyymc
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,365
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 286 Post(s)
Liked 125 Times in 58 Posts
Originally Posted by Koyote
Honestly, with all of the kvetching on these forums about frames breaking, you would think that it’s a common experience. But I don’t think so. I personally know only one rider who has experienced this, and it was on a relatively new aluminum frame that obviously was not manufactured properly.
Good point Koyote. If I stuck to smoother less hilly terrain I wouldn't have even thought about it. There's almost no ride I do where I'm not descending a number of hills at 45+ mph, so I was thinking more in terms of consequences of a frame/fork failure and not in terms of probability of one happening.
billyymc is offline  
Old 07-09-19, 01:36 PM
  #30  
jimincalif
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Meridian, ID
Posts: 2,333

Bikes: '96 Trek 850, '08 Specialized Roubaix Comp, '18 Niner RLT RDO

Mentioned: 56 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 569 Post(s)
Liked 123 Times in 83 Posts
I have 2008 Specialized Roubaix Comp Compact (carbon) with about 31,000 miles that I've put on it since buying used in 2013. I have no idea the mileage from the prior owner. I was about 218# when I bought it, I'm down around 204# now. Prior owner was probably about 160#. I've replaced the wheels, front derailleur, saddle, seatpost and crankset (along with normal wear items). I just recently inspected the frame and fork carefully both visually with a bright light and running my hands over it, so far so good.

The carbon seatpost did break right at the clamp - but the clamp slot was lined up with the seat tube slot instead of being 180 degrees out, so I figure that was user error.
jimincalif is offline  
Old 07-09-19, 01:55 PM
  #31  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,832
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6929 Post(s)
Liked 10,931 Times in 4,668 Posts
Originally Posted by billyymc
Good point Koyote. If I stuck to smoother less hilly terrain I wouldn't have even thought about it. There's almost no ride I do where I'm not descending a number of hills at 45+ mph, so I was thinking more in terms of consequences of a frame/fork failure and not in terms of probability of one happening.
I would think the most likely point of failure would be a carbon fiber steerer tube, if your bike has that. Might be a good idea to pull the fork each year and have a look at it… Or have a shop do it. Any other problems should be easily spotted when cleaning and maintaining your bike.

Carbon fiber is probably damaged 10x as often through over-torquing bolts than through crashes or normal wear and tear. If you have a good torque wrench you’ll probably have no issues.
Koyote is online now  
Old 07-09-19, 02:24 PM
  #32  
cyccommute 
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,335

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6192 Post(s)
Liked 4,192 Times in 2,352 Posts
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
Ok so for all intents and purposes, as I said ,there is little warning before failure. If 'most people don't know how to listen to the warnings', then its effectively like there aren't warnings for the users.

This could get fun- we are talking materials an semantics...a two for Tuesday for ya!
Aluminum breakage...frames, components, wheels, etc....creak and groan before breakage. This is because the material cracks and tears rather than fractures. Most people who broken an aluminum frame...or crank or wheel or whatever... have heard those sounds and have probably ignored them. I certainly have and I’ve broken a lot of aluminum (two frames, a crank arm and lots of rims). Only afterwards did the sounds they made prior to breakage make sense. However, at no point did the material just ‘break into pieces’. The fracture is a slow process.

I haven’t broken any carbon fiber (yet) including a 12 year old carbon fork on my commuter bike that has 25,000 miles on it. But carbon fiber shouldn’t break in any manner that is all that different from aluminum. It will crack but the crack shouldn’t propagate rapidly due to the nature of the material. Carbon fiber is a cloth that laid up with different layers of material running in different directions. Cracks won’t propagate because the fiber stops the propagation.

Compare that with steel. I’ve broken two steel frames (one of them multiple times), pedal axles, hub axles, fork steer tubes and more spokes than I can shake a stick at. The fork steer tube was the only one that didn’t do what most people seem to think carbon and aluminum do. It didn’t just break into two pieces but elongated slightly which messed up the steering. All of them other breakages have just snapped in two like aluminum is supposed to break. One of the frames even broke at the dropout when an axle broke. Neither breakage was preceded by any kind of evidence that it would break. Spokes just go “ping!” and they are broken. The pedal axle was attached to the crank on minute and wasn’t the next. Hub axles (all of them freewheel hubs) often break and you don’t even realize it until you happen to take the rear wheel off and find two pieces of axle when there should only be one.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  
Old 07-09-19, 02:35 PM
  #33  
cyccommute 
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,335

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6192 Post(s)
Liked 4,192 Times in 2,352 Posts
Originally Posted by Koyote
Honestly, with all of the kvetching on these forums about frames breaking, you would think that it’s a common experience. But I don’t think so. I personally know only one rider who has experienced this, and it was on a relatively new aluminum frame that obviously was not manufactured properly… And the crack developed slowly, gave plenty of warning, there was no catastrophic failure resulting in a crash. He just returned the bike and the manufacturer provided a new frame.

By the same token, I ran a bike rental program that included about 50 relatively low priced bikes with aluminum frames. Given the bikes’ MSRP, I would guess that each frame was manufactured at a cost well under $50. And the people to whom we rented them (for nine months at a time - a school year), beat the hell out of them. Never saw a single problem with any of the frames in six years.
I would agree. The frames I’ve broken (two steel and two aluminum) were fairly long ago. The steel mountain bike was an early mountain bike and probably under-designed for the task at hand. I was even told by the sales rep that it was good that I had replaced mine because they were breaking often. He didn’t offer to cover the cost of the replacement nor did they cover the broken frame (cracked at the bottom bracket bridge), however. Nor did I even ask when the dropout broke since I’d already had the frame repaired.

The other steel one was another mountain(ish) bike...a Specialized Rock Combo...which may not have been up to the punishment but at least Specialized gave me a new frame.

One of the aluminum bikes was a Specialized Stumpjumper Pro with an M2 boron/aluminum frame. Most of those are gone since the boron/aluminum composite was too brittle. Again, replaced without question.

The other aluminum bike was one that I was using a seatpost with a huge setback. It just leveraged the frame too much and cracked it right at the top tube weld.

But I haven’t broken another frame since about 2000 and don’t expect to. The metallurgy on metal frames is a lot better as is the quality control.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  
Old 07-10-19, 05:13 PM
  #34  
Litespud
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683

Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 797 Times in 446 Posts
Originally Posted by billyymc
Ha..yeah that went over my head!

Maybe a better question would be - how many people would have (more than mild) reservations about riding a 12 year old bike with 24,000 miles on it, regularly hitting 45+mph on descents?
I have a 20 year old bike with >50,000 miles on it. I garage doored it ~6 years ago, which prompted replacement of the carbon fork. Wheels are ~15 years old. Fastest descent IIRC was ~48 mph, and I would have no hesitation repeating it if I could find an adequate hill
Litespud is offline  
Old 07-10-19, 06:04 PM
  #35  
Daniel4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,501

Bikes: Sekine 1979 ten speed racer

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1480 Post(s)
Liked 639 Times in 437 Posts
I think I changed my bearings quite a bit. I'm still riding my 40 year old bike.
Daniel4 is offline  
Old 07-10-19, 07:17 PM
  #36  
Camilo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,760
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1109 Post(s)
Liked 1,200 Times in 760 Posts
Originally Posted by 79pmooney
...That is exactly why all my bikes (and forks) will be steel or titanium. Far less likelihood of the sudden failure common to both carbon fiber and aluminum. ...

Ben
Common? Seriously, you think that aluminum or carbonfiber frames fail commonly? No frame material fails commonly. Frame failures are very rare, no matter what the material. By the way, I'm not claiming any material is superior to any other. I have aluminum, titanium, carbonfiber and steel and am happy and confident in durability for all of them.
Camilo is offline  
Likes For Camilo:
Old 07-10-19, 07:25 PM
  #37  
dahoneezz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 336
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Riding mountain bikes, I think you'll break all kinds of stuff and all types of materials. Steel, carbon fiber, aluminium, bones. I'am too old for that shiet.
dahoneezz is offline  
Old 07-10-19, 07:47 PM
  #38  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,603

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10944 Post(s)
Liked 7,469 Times in 4,179 Posts
Originally Posted by Camilo
Common? Seriously, you think that aluminum or carbonfiber frames fail commonly? No frame material fails commonly. Frame failures are very rare, no matter what the material. By the way, I'm not claiming any material is superior to any other. I have aluminum, titanium, carbonfiber and steel and am happy and confident in durability for all of them.
That isn't what he said.
He said that the common way in which those frame materials fail is sudden in nature(versus slowly).
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 07-10-19, 07:52 PM
  #39  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,603

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10944 Post(s)
Liked 7,469 Times in 4,179 Posts
Originally Posted by cyccommute
Aluminum breakage...frames, components, wheels, etc....creak and groan before breakage. This is because the material cracks and tears rather than fractures. Most people who broken an aluminum frame...or crank or wheel or whatever... have heard those sounds and have probably ignored them. I certainly have and I’ve broken a lot of aluminum (two frames, a crank arm and lots of rims). Only afterwards did the sounds they made prior to breakage make sense. However, at no point did the material just ‘break into pieces’. The fracture is a slow process.

I haven’t broken any carbon fiber (yet) including a 12 year old carbon fork on my commuter bike that has 25,000 miles on it. But carbon fiber shouldn’t break in any manner that is all that different from aluminum. It will crack but the crack shouldn’t propagate rapidly due to the nature of the material. Carbon fiber is a cloth that laid up with different layers of material running in different directions. Cracks won’t propagate because the fiber stops the propagation.

Compare that with steel. I’ve broken two steel frames (one of them multiple times), pedal axles, hub axles, fork steer tubes and more spokes than I can shake a stick at. The fork steer tube was the only one that didn’t do what most people seem to think carbon and aluminum do. It didn’t just break into two pieces but elongated slightly which messed up the steering. All of them other breakages have just snapped in two like aluminum is supposed to break. One of the frames even broke at the dropout when an axle broke. Neither breakage was preceded by any kind of evidence that it would break. Spokes just go “ping!” and they are broken. The pedal axle was attached to the crank on minute and wasn’t the next. Hub axles (all of them freewheel hubs) often break and you don’t even realize it until you happen to take the rear wheel off and find two pieces of axle when there should only be one.
Ok, so rambling about steel components breaking has 0 to do with the discussion. Steel spokes breaking isn't applicable here. Steel freewheel hubs breaking isn't applicable here.
Similarly, if anyone rambled on about aluminum handlebars or trims breaking- that wouldn't be applicable here.

Components breaking is not the same as frames breaking and does not reveal anything as it pertains to frame material reliability


As for your steel frames breaking- blah blah, yadda yadda we get it. You view steel as inferior.
I don't view it as inferior or superior to other materials- I view it as perfectly good for specific situations, just like the other materials.

Once again- if nobody can tell a frame is breaking until it suddenly fails, then for all intents and purposes that frame is one which fails suddenly.
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 07-10-19, 10:02 PM
  #40  
cyccommute 
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,335

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6192 Post(s)
Liked 4,192 Times in 2,352 Posts
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
Ok, so rambling about steel components breaking has 0 to do with the discussion. Steel spokes breaking isn't applicable here. Steel freewheel hubs breaking isn't applicable here.
Similarly, if anyone rambled on about aluminum handlebars or trims breaking- that wouldn't be applicable here.

Components breaking is not the same as frames breaking and does not reveal anything as it pertains to frame material reliability


As for your steel frames breaking- blah blah, yadda yadda we get it. You view steel as inferior.
I don't view it as inferior or superior to other materials- I view it as perfectly good for specific situations, just like the other materials.

Once again- if nobody can tell a frame is breaking until it suddenly fails, then for all intents and purposes that frame is one which fails suddenly.
The reason I brought up how components break is because it is indicative of how the various materials fail. I don’t see steel as being inferior but I do see it as being something that breaks in ways that people don’t understand...the same way that they don’t understand how aluminum or carbon breaks. Aluminum and carbon don’t “fail suddenly”. Steel does.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  
Old 07-11-19, 08:07 AM
  #41  
Litespud
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683

Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 797 Times in 446 Posts
Originally Posted by Camilo
Common? Seriously, you think that aluminum or carbonfiber frames fail commonly? No frame material fails commonly. Frame failures are very rare, no matter what the material. By the way, I'm not claiming any material is superior to any other. I have aluminum, titanium, carbonfiber and steel and am happy and confident in durability for all of them.
"common" to two or more things is that it is a characteristic shared by those things - like when things have a characteristic in common - in this context, sudden failure, as opposed to slow failure, is a characteristic shared by CF and Al - it doesn't pertain to frequency, prevalence, etc
Litespud is offline  
Old 07-11-19, 08:17 AM
  #42  
base2 
I am potato.
 
base2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,104

Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆

Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1782 Post(s)
Liked 1,620 Times in 926 Posts
I retired a 1992 Trek T-50 Tandem.

20190319_163928 by Richard Mozzarella, on Flickr
base2 is offline  
Old 07-11-19, 05:21 PM
  #43  
Digger Goreman
Quidam Bike Super Hero
 
Digger Goreman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Stone Mountain, GA (Metro Atlanta, East)
Posts: 1,135

Bikes: 1995 Trek 800 Sport, aka, "CamelTrek"

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 331 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times in 282 Posts
Bought my 1995 Trek 800 Sport at a GoodWill in Dec. 2013. No telling how many miles were on it. Four to Five Thousand miles later... no intention to retire it. Someone said this model is built like a tank, in other words, just right for me!
Digger Goreman is offline  
Old 07-12-19, 03:32 PM
  #44  
Digger Goreman
Quidam Bike Super Hero
 
Digger Goreman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Stone Mountain, GA (Metro Atlanta, East)
Posts: 1,135

Bikes: 1995 Trek 800 Sport, aka, "CamelTrek"

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 331 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times in 282 Posts
Annnnnddd, the Frankentrek rolls on! Last night someone on Craigslist posted a newish shimano altus (yes, I know it is low end) crankset and front derailleur for 20 usd. LBS is taking care of the details

Last edited by Digger Goreman; 07-12-19 at 03:33 PM. Reason: syntax
Digger Goreman is offline  
Old 07-19-19, 11:59 PM
  #45  
Camilo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,760
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1109 Post(s)
Liked 1,200 Times in 760 Posts
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
That isn't what he said.
He said that the common way in which those frame materials fail is sudden in nature(versus slowly).
Originally Posted by Litespud
"common" to two or more things is that it is a characteristic shared by those things - like when things have a characteristic in common - in this context, sudden failure, as opposed to slow failure, is a characteristic shared by CF and Al - it doesn't pertain to frequency, prevalence, etc
Thanks for the clarification. I obviously misunderstood the statement. I thought he was saying that sudden failure happens commonly to aluminum and carbon fiber frames. Now I understand what he was saying and can't disagree or agree because I've never had a failure of either frame material so don't know if it happens suddenly without warning and is indeed common to those two materials.
Camilo is offline  
Old 07-20-19, 08:18 AM
  #46  
cyccommute 
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,335

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6192 Post(s)
Liked 4,192 Times in 2,352 Posts
Originally Posted by Camilo
Thanks for the clarification. I obviously misunderstood the statement. I thought he was saying that sudden failure happens commonly to aluminum and carbon fiber frames. Now I understand what he was saying and can't disagree or agree because I've never had a failure of either frame material so don't know if it happens suddenly without warning and is indeed common to those two materials.
It bears stating again: Aluminum does not “fail suddenly”. On the other hand, steel does. I’ve broken both...twice.

Although I haven’t broken anything that is carbon fiber, I would say that given the way in which carbon fiber is used, it would be difficult for the material to propagate a crack across the various layers of fabric. It would tear rather than fracture and a tear is a much slower failure.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  
Old 07-21-19, 02:52 PM
  #47  
Arthur Peabody
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 588
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 250 Post(s)
Liked 110 Times in 66 Posts
No. I've always ridden my bikes until I broke the frames. My current frame, an Alú bought from Nashbar 20+ years ago for $200, has >100K miles on it. I've replaced everything else but the handlebar, its stem, and the seat post - and the Blackburn, all inherited from the previous frame. (bent by an angry would-be thief)
Arthur Peabody is offline  
Old 07-21-19, 05:01 PM
  #48  
Chatwithyou
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have many times.
Chatwithyou is offline  
Old 07-28-19, 08:41 PM
  #49  
billyymc
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,365
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 286 Post(s)
Liked 125 Times in 58 Posts
So the result of today's ride (mostly paved road with a couple gravel stretches, one which was a seasonal use forest road):



That makes five rear wheels I've gone through on this bike in 24,000 miles. I should have put some wider tires on for today, but didn't realize just how rough the one road was until I was on it. I had 700x38 GP 4 Seasons at about 90 psi - that couldn't have helped. These wheels (Campy Zonda) have about 8-9 k miles on them I think.
billyymc is offline  
Old 07-29-19, 09:28 PM
  #50  
cyccommute 
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,335

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6192 Post(s)
Liked 4,192 Times in 2,352 Posts
Originally Posted by billyymc
So the result of today's ride (mostly paved road with a couple gravel stretches, one which was a seasonal use forest road):



That makes five rear wheels I've gone through on this bike in 24,000 miles. I should have put some wider tires on for today, but didn't realize just how rough the one road was until I was on it. I had 700x38 GP 4 Seasons at about 90 psi - that couldn't have helped. These wheels (Campy Zonda) have about 8-9 k miles on them I think.
For theses wheels, your problem isn’t related to tires or inflation. It’s related to low spoke count concentrating too much stress in one area. More spokes would spread the load around more evenly.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.