Steel is Real.. Explain?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Steel is Real.. Explain?
Ok I keep hearing and seeing quotes about "Steel is Real".
What is with the fascination? I am assuming it is related to steel framed bikes.. but why is this the thing now?
Im not mocking steel bikes.. they are robust.. very rugged.. But aren't they a bit heavy too?
With everyone trying to be light and go carbon.. Im seeing so much "Steel is Real"
What is with the fascination? I am assuming it is related to steel framed bikes.. but why is this the thing now?
Im not mocking steel bikes.. they are robust.. very rugged.. But aren't they a bit heavy too?
With everyone trying to be light and go carbon.. Im seeing so much "Steel is Real"
#2
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 358
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times
in
54 Posts
Ok I keep hearing and seeing quotes about "Steel is Real".
What is with the fascination? I am assuming it is related to steel framed bikes.. but why is this the thing now?
Im not mocking steel bikes.. they are robust.. very rugged.. But aren't they a bit heavy too?
With everyone trying to be light and go carbon.. Im seeing so much "Steel is Real"
What is with the fascination? I am assuming it is related to steel framed bikes.. but why is this the thing now?
Im not mocking steel bikes.. they are robust.. very rugged.. But aren't they a bit heavy too?
With everyone trying to be light and go carbon.. Im seeing so much "Steel is Real"
But idk, Kret
Likes For krecik:
Likes For Gconan:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,256
Bikes: Bianchi Ti Megatube; Colnago Competition; Planet-X EC-130E; Klein Pulse; Amp Research B4; Litespeed Catalyst; Trek Y11
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 596 Post(s)
Liked 478 Times
in
258 Posts
If you're used to one type of frame material that isn't steel, or never had a steel bike (e.g. only aluminum or carbon bikes), then you should be pleasantly surprised by the different riding characteristics of steel.
Sure it's a little heavier. But let's stop taking ourselves too seriously. Unless you're doing the Giro, who are you fooling? "Steel is real" is not a dig on new designs ... but there was little wrong with bike design prior to carbon and aluminum (and titanium, though I do like my titanium bikes).
Sure it's a little heavier. But let's stop taking ourselves too seriously. Unless you're doing the Giro, who are you fooling? "Steel is real" is not a dig on new designs ... but there was little wrong with bike design prior to carbon and aluminum (and titanium, though I do like my titanium bikes).
Likes For ridelikeaturtle:
#5
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
Ok I keep hearing and seeing quotes about "Steel is Real".
What is with the fascination? I am assuming it is related to steel framed bikes.. but why is this the thing now?
Im not mocking steel bikes.. they are robust.. very rugged.. But aren't they a bit heavy too?
With everyone trying to be light and go carbon.. Im seeing so much "Steel is Real"
What is with the fascination? I am assuming it is related to steel framed bikes.. but why is this the thing now?
Im not mocking steel bikes.. they are robust.. very rugged.. But aren't they a bit heavy too?
With everyone trying to be light and go carbon.. Im seeing so much "Steel is Real"
If you do a Google search on "steel is real" quote, the first result up is dated 2005.
Plus of course, bicycles have been built out of steel since ... well ... pretty much the beginning. Seriously, read some history!
https://gearpatrol.com/2015/05/20/wh...s-still-great/
And steel doesn't have to be heavy.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Likes For Machka:
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
It's just something I have been hearing recently..
I had owned bikes years ago.. But had not ridden in 20yrs until 2017 when I bought my aluminum bike and kept seeing everything being
Aluminum, Carbon or Titanium.. And sure Surly made steel bikes but so many bikes were not..
But now I am seeing many more steel bikes being made and new manufacturers using steel.
Nothing wrong with steel, I know.. and any bike I owned growing up including my first mountain bike in the 90's was steel.
I just have not ridden a steel bike in all of those years so I forget what a steel bike even feels like and how they would compare..
Does a steel bike feel sluggish in comparison..
Read history? lol.. I know.. Steel was how bikes were made since they were first built.. I get it. I know its not 'NEW'
I meant it as I am noticing a resurgence in Steel bike popularity and wondered what sparked it. Nostalgia? Steel Durability?
I had owned bikes years ago.. But had not ridden in 20yrs until 2017 when I bought my aluminum bike and kept seeing everything being
Aluminum, Carbon or Titanium.. And sure Surly made steel bikes but so many bikes were not..
But now I am seeing many more steel bikes being made and new manufacturers using steel.
Nothing wrong with steel, I know.. and any bike I owned growing up including my first mountain bike in the 90's was steel.
I just have not ridden a steel bike in all of those years so I forget what a steel bike even feels like and how they would compare..
Does a steel bike feel sluggish in comparison..
Read history? lol.. I know.. Steel was how bikes were made since they were first built.. I get it. I know its not 'NEW'
I meant it as I am noticing a resurgence in Steel bike popularity and wondered what sparked it. Nostalgia? Steel Durability?
#7
Senior Member
Its just choices for people as each bike frame material feels different to ride on and some like the feel of a steel bike. One thing I have found with my new bike with carbon forks is it feels more 'skittish' going down hill compared to my old bike with steel forks which felt rock solid
Likes For John Young:
#8
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
I've been riding steel bicycles since I started cycling ... 1971.
I bought an aluminum bicycle in 2000 and traded it in on another in 2002. I still have that bicycle, but it is my trainer bike. Aluminum is just not good for long distances!
I bought a titanium bicycle in 2010, when my steel bicycle was stolen. Fortunately my steel bicycle came back to me. Now my titanium is one of a set of steel bicycles I ride.
None of my bicycles are Surly.
I bought an aluminum bicycle in 2000 and traded it in on another in 2002. I still have that bicycle, but it is my trainer bike. Aluminum is just not good for long distances!
I bought a titanium bicycle in 2010, when my steel bicycle was stolen. Fortunately my steel bicycle came back to me. Now my titanium is one of a set of steel bicycles I ride.
None of my bicycles are Surly.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Likes For Machka:
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,256
Bikes: Bianchi Ti Megatube; Colnago Competition; Planet-X EC-130E; Klein Pulse; Amp Research B4; Litespeed Catalyst; Trek Y11
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 596 Post(s)
Liked 478 Times
in
258 Posts
My steel '97 Colnago is quite light, and it's not their top-grade steel frame by about two or three levels - you can get a steel frame that's just as light as anything else (within a certain budget of course), but also softens rough roads and makes long sportives more forgiving on your body.
Another "bonus" is maintenance and longevity, you don't have to worry so much about transporting on a rack, press-fit bottom brackets, or overtightening a seatpost binder bolt and cracking something.
Another "bonus" is maintenance and longevity, you don't have to worry so much about transporting on a rack, press-fit bottom brackets, or overtightening a seatpost binder bolt and cracking something.
Likes For ridelikeaturtle:
#10
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,845
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2134 Post(s)
Liked 1,643 Times
in
825 Posts
It means that bikes shouldn't be made out of fishing poles.
Likes For Paul Barnard:
#13
Senior Member
If you ever looked at entry level or slightly higher aluminium or carbon frames, and have been riding steel, the first major letdown is the weight. Steel frames with modern components do not take much to get 20lbs or even less. And then there is the ride. Steel is a comfy ride, more so than aluminium and even carbon. Add in there that steel can be repaired, unlike carbon and al (for the most part). Some even prefer the flex which steel has (a whole new thread of controversy as to whether it hurts or has zero effect).
Likes For FlMTNdude:
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,212
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18397 Post(s)
Liked 15,485 Times
in
7,316 Posts
Because they rhyme. Try that with carbon, aluminum or ti.
Likes For indyfabz:
#15
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2761 Post(s)
Liked 2,534 Times
in
1,433 Posts
It rhymes better than “steel is sexy”
I have never drooled over a CF or Al road or hardtail MTB frame.
I don’t know about road bikes, but in the mountain bike world, “steel is real” has been a saying since at least the late 90s. Maybe longer. I assume it became a thing not long after aluminum bikes frames dominated the market. It (steel) has steadily become more popular I would say since the mid 00s. When i was looking for a steel hardtail frame in 2006 there were plenty of options out there.
I have never drooled over a CF or Al road or hardtail MTB frame.
I don’t know about road bikes, but in the mountain bike world, “steel is real” has been a saying since at least the late 90s. Maybe longer. I assume it became a thing not long after aluminum bikes frames dominated the market. It (steel) has steadily become more popular I would say since the mid 00s. When i was looking for a steel hardtail frame in 2006 there were plenty of options out there.
Likes For Kapusta:
#16
Senior Member
It is my understanding, and I may be wrong, that steel is much more resilient. Each bump, drop, rough road, etc. causes the frame to flex. Steel can supposedly be subjected to an infinite amount of minor flexes while other materials will eventually fail under the same conditions. Does this matter to the average person when it comes to frame materials? Probably not. I own three bikes. All three are aluminum frames. Forks on these three bikes are carbon, suspension, & steel. Supposedly, the repeated flexing failure concern requires aluminum forks to be super stiff, which leads to a harsh ride.
Likes For medic75:
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,839
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6934 Post(s)
Liked 10,938 Times
in
4,673 Posts
I've got steel-framed bikes, and I've got a cf-framed bike. They all ride nicely - smooth, stiff enough, etc. The steel frames are slightly heavier, but not enough to make much difference.
As a trade-off for the weight, steel offers a few advantages over cf, such as easier repairability, much easier customization (I think only a few companies offer custom cf frames, and they're expensive), etc. And, to me, a nice steel frame is prettier.
As far as the people who are paranoid about cf's fragility: I've got an 11-year old cf-framed bike that I have ridden as hard as any, and crashed once or twice. No problems.
As a trade-off for the weight, steel offers a few advantages over cf, such as easier repairability, much easier customization (I think only a few companies offer custom cf frames, and they're expensive), etc. And, to me, a nice steel frame is prettier.
As far as the people who are paranoid about cf's fragility: I've got an 11-year old cf-framed bike that I have ridden as hard as any, and crashed once or twice. No problems.
Likes For Koyote:
#18
• —
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 12,213
Bikes: Shmikes
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10147 Post(s)
Liked 5,840 Times
in
3,144 Posts
It means that if someone bops you enthusiastically across the occiput with a piece of SL tubing, the probability you'll get your bell rung greatly outweighs that of witnessing an apparent pantomime.
Likes For MoAlpha:
#19
Senior Member
I was surprised by how light modern steel bikes can be. This Holdsworth Strada 953 weighs in at 7.6kg and sure looks pretty in polished stainless steel. Whether it will outlast heavier designs I can't say, of course.
My 1993 Witcomb 653 bike comes in at around 9.8kg. It's a nice bike and I won't be getting rid of it any time soon - in fact I want to refurbish it all - but for a daily commute I prefer my CF bike. Each to their own.
My 1993 Witcomb 653 bike comes in at around 9.8kg. It's a nice bike and I won't be getting rid of it any time soon - in fact I want to refurbish it all - but for a daily commute I prefer my CF bike. Each to their own.
Likes For jgwilliams:
Likes For johnnyace:
#21
Sophomore Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,531
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1628 Post(s)
Liked 1,057 Times
in
631 Posts
Steel doesn't beat you up on long rides the way stiffer aluminum and CF frames do. Anytime I'm on my bike more that 3 hours or so, I prefer a steel frame, for comfort.
Performance-wise, I will concede that steel is not quite as fast. If I accelerate from a dead stop on my CF bike, I can get up to speed several seconds faster, and with fewer pedal strokes than on any of my steel bikes. This is not insignificant in a competitive situation, but I don't race, and if given a choice still prefer the comfort of steel on many (but not all) of my rides.
Performance-wise, I will concede that steel is not quite as fast. If I accelerate from a dead stop on my CF bike, I can get up to speed several seconds faster, and with fewer pedal strokes than on any of my steel bikes. This is not insignificant in a competitive situation, but I don't race, and if given a choice still prefer the comfort of steel on many (but not all) of my rides.
Likes For Lemond1985:
#22
Senior Member
I prefer a very rigid frame as the foundation and get my compliance and comfort for the long haul from other things like tire choice and pressure. No real preference on the frame material as long as there are no noodles and minimal flex.
Likes For u235:
#24
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,095 Times
in
5,053 Posts
I have 2 aluminum bikes and a steel bike. I have ridden multiple centuries on each of them. To be honest with you, I don't notice that much of a difference between how they ride, but I suspect people vary in how sensitive they are to certain vibrations, flexing, etc. For me, tires are a much bigger factor in comfort over long rides than frame material. I fully admit that I have never ridden a CF bike for any distance whatsoever, so I have no opinion on how they ride.
With the kind of riding I do, marginal differences in the weight of the frame just really don't make big differences in overall speed--it's probably the least important factor for me, as the equipment I need to make my bike self-sustaining over a long ride probably negates any chance that the percentage difference in gross vehicle weight is even going to be noticeable.
Some of this is just esthetics--steel bikes, in my opinion, look better with the thinner tubes that the material allows. To me, many of the CF and AL forms just look bulbous in a way that I don't appreciate.
With the kind of riding I do, marginal differences in the weight of the frame just really don't make big differences in overall speed--it's probably the least important factor for me, as the equipment I need to make my bike self-sustaining over a long ride probably negates any chance that the percentage difference in gross vehicle weight is even going to be noticeable.
Some of this is just esthetics--steel bikes, in my opinion, look better with the thinner tubes that the material allows. To me, many of the CF and AL forms just look bulbous in a way that I don't appreciate.
Likes For livedarklions:
#25
Full Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Lafayette, Indiana
Posts: 462
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 207 Post(s)
Liked 108 Times
in
58 Posts
Well, when I was a kid in the 70s most of what I owned was plastic, even the airguns at the time were getting into plastic stocks. All very prone to break and fail. But our bikes were all steel and rubber and would last forever. Thus, "steel is real". For those of us who never stopped riding, the connection with steel was never broken.
Likes For 55murray: