Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Professional Cycling For the Fans
Reload this Page >

Lance and the TDF climbers

Search
Notices
Professional Cycling For the Fans Follow the Tour de France,the Giro de Italia, the Spring Classics, or other professional cycling races? Here's your home...

Lance and the TDF climbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-02-19, 02:14 PM
  #26  
Doge
Senior Member
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times in 253 Posts
Originally Posted by BengalCat
Armstrong at 165 pounds was among the heaviest of the great climbers. Weight is very important, of course. But more accurately it is mostly about the power to weight ratio and sustainable power which is why the preceding is the most common trait among the great TdF winners or those that win and or come close to winning. Those skinny little guys that excel as climbers lack the other traits. So it is the former that wins the Tour and not the latter, or not very often.

For reference, Armstrong won Alpe d’Huez twice. Once as a time trial and once as the finishing climb at the end of a long stage. On the time trial, he fluctuated between 475 and 500 watts. On the climb as the end of the stage, he was only 24 seconds slower up the climb than he was on the TT.
So I am NOT a Lance hater and do enjoy his opinions and podcasts. But I typically discount his stats. In his own book he described being dropped until he doped. So, like others at his time - inc Eddy, performances were PED aided and not really valid for comparison.
Doge is offline  
Old 08-02-19, 03:50 PM
  #27  
BengalCat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Brentwood WLA
Posts: 326

Bikes: 50/34, 11-40, 11 Speed

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 142 Post(s)
Liked 73 Times in 52 Posts
Originally Posted by Doge
So I am NOT a Lance hater and do enjoy his opinions and podcasts. But I typically discount his stats. In his own book he described being dropped until he doped. So, like others at his time - inc Eddy, performances were PED aided and not really valid for comparison.
A reasonable position in a specific context. However, since all most everyone doped from 1991 and all of his TdF rivals from 1999 to 2005 also did, then I take it you do not consider their stats valid either?

You should acknowledge that regarding Armstrong starting to dope after he got dropped, that the reason he got dropped was people that were dropping him on stages or overtaking him on TT were doping.

To win the TdF you have to be an all-around high-level pro and be able to be highly competitive in the mountain stages. It all comes down to that it takes on average about 6.3 watts per kilo in the power to weight ratio over the course of the TdF plus a high lactate threshold to win. (The last trait is IMO the main physical feature that made Armstrong more successful than his EPO doped rivals.)

From stats as of 2004:


BengalCat is offline  
Old 08-02-19, 04:40 PM
  #28  
Doge
Senior Member
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times in 253 Posts
Originally Posted by BengalCat
... I take it you do not consider their stats valid either?
...
Correct. His relative winning ability is valid, just not the power when trying to compare to what a person can do.

I prefer to look at what the best can do within the confines of the sport rules. So what a recumbent can do, or bike or position that is not allowed are not valid for comparison.
Doge is offline  
Old 08-02-19, 09:42 PM
  #29  
Doge
Senior Member
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times in 253 Posts
Originally Posted by BengalCat
it takes on average about 6.3 watts per kilo in the power to weight ratio over the course of the TdF ...
That is about 1 hour power. Much of the race (the stuff we don't watch) they tool along a cycling group ride speed. I think closer to 2-3 w/kg.
Doge is offline  
Old 08-02-19, 10:56 PM
  #30  
BengalCat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Brentwood WLA
Posts: 326

Bikes: 50/34, 11-40, 11 Speed

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 142 Post(s)
Liked 73 Times in 52 Posts
Originally Posted by Doge
That is about 1 hour power. Much of the race (the stuff we don't watch) they tool along a cycling group ride speed. I think closer to 2-3 w/kg.
Sorry, I wasn't clearer in my post. I meant 6.3 watts per kilo on the final climb in the mountain stages.
BengalCat is offline  
Old 08-02-19, 11:31 PM
  #31  
gregf83 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by Doge
That is about 1 hour power. Much of the race (the stuff we don't watch) they tool along a cycling group ride speed. I think closer to 2-3 w/kg.
Unless you’re Thomas De Gendt and decide to win a stage by averaging 4.5W/kg for 5+ hrs.
gregf83 is offline  
Old 08-03-19, 11:08 PM
  #32  
Doge
Senior Member
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times in 253 Posts
Wiggo made a statement he needed to hold 485 for an hour for his worlds ITT. I am not aware of the actual data being public.
He was legally PED aided. I think he was quite light then, but not going to look it up now.
Doge is offline  
Old 08-03-19, 11:31 PM
  #33  
BengalCat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Brentwood WLA
Posts: 326

Bikes: 50/34, 11-40, 11 Speed

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 142 Post(s)
Liked 73 Times in 52 Posts
Originally Posted by Doge
Wiggo made a statement he needed to hold 485 for an hour for his worlds ITT. I am not aware of the actual data being public.
He was legally PED aided. I think he was quite light then, but not going to look it up now.
Seems a bit high to me. I guess unless there is official or verified data somewhere we will never know.


British cyclist Bradley Wiggins, who, in 2015, pedaled 54.526 kilometers (33.881 miles) to set the current men's record, is estimated to have averaged 440 watts.


https://www.wired.com/story/cycling-...le/?verso=true






BengalCat is offline  
Old 08-04-19, 09:51 AM
  #34  
Doge
Senior Member
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times in 253 Posts
I don't believe he has ever posted power. I expect the track number is calculated.

As to the OP - I think Egan is every bit as good as what we have seen at climbing. I still like the climbers that can also win the ITT - in theory, without PEDs. Those guys were thicker.
Doge is offline  
Old 08-06-19, 05:49 AM
  #35  
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,296

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1442 Post(s)
Liked 711 Times in 365 Posts
Originally Posted by Lemond1985
When the race is designed to let a climber win, the winner and the main contenders all look like 98 lb weaklings, and during years like that, I care a lot less about which of the lookalike emaciated stick men ends up wearing the yellow jersey in Paris. When the eventual winner can at least pass on the street as a normal person, I think that's a good thing.

Great champions like Merckx, Hinualt, Lemond, Indurain, and Armstrong did not look like freaks while off the bike, and I think that counts for something with fans, to have a hero they can relate to, not some alien creature like Marco Pantani. And that to me is one reason not to tilt the race so that only a climber can win.
Yeah Lemond had a hulk like upper body.

https://images.app.goo.gl/QaG48VjJnQRT9yYBA
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 08-06-19, 06:20 AM
  #36  
Lemond1985
Sophomore Member
 
Lemond1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,531
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1628 Post(s)
Liked 1,057 Times in 631 Posts
He does now ... look at those big meaty hands!

Lemond1985 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
copperfind
Professional Cycling For the Fans
42
07-25-17 02:48 PM
luxroadie
Professional Cycling For the Fans
13
10-01-11 02:29 AM
TommyL
Professional Cycling For the Fans
10
07-16-11 05:10 PM
NOS88
Fifty Plus (50+)
13
06-21-11 06:13 PM
JoeOxfordCT
Professional Cycling For the Fans
22
03-19-10 05:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.