chainstay to crankarm clearance solutions?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,395
Bikes: Too many to list
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1765 Post(s)
Liked 1,124 Times
in
746 Posts
chainstay to crankarm clearance solutions?
Uggghhhh ----
Close to new bike time but a potential issue has cropped up ------ crankarm clearance at chainstay looks pretty tight with Campagnolo Record Pista chainset and bottom bracket
Not sure how tight is too tight, but that looks like its very close ---- chainstays are pretty large
Anybody know of any crankset/bottom bracket combos with a little wider Q factor?
I had thought of a little wider bottom bracket, but this picture is of the non drive side -- wider bb would impact the drive side primarily I think
Close to new bike time but a potential issue has cropped up ------ crankarm clearance at chainstay looks pretty tight with Campagnolo Record Pista chainset and bottom bracket
Not sure how tight is too tight, but that looks like its very close ---- chainstays are pretty large
Anybody know of any crankset/bottom bracket combos with a little wider Q factor?
I had thought of a little wider bottom bracket, but this picture is of the non drive side -- wider bb would impact the drive side primarily I think
#2
Blast from the Past
Don’t know if it’s wider. Measured a 170mm Omnium. From inside of arm to inside of opposite arm 113mm.
#3
Senior Member
Is the clearance the same on the drive side? I'm assuming the BB is the kind that you can adjust where it sits in the BB? If not, a wider BB may be an option.
Also worth testing the flex to see how much the clearance might change through the pedal stroke. If there's flex, generally while you're stomping on one pedal, you're pushing the BB across from that side, which therefore means that a little extra clearance will be gained on the opposite side as the pedal passes the chainstay.
Also worth testing the flex to see how much the clearance might change through the pedal stroke. If there's flex, generally while you're stomping on one pedal, you're pushing the BB across from that side, which therefore means that a little extra clearance will be gained on the opposite side as the pedal passes the chainstay.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18373 Post(s)
Liked 4,507 Times
in
3,350 Posts
Have you tried the bike yet? Experienced rub? Do the pedals mount flush?
I'd probably add a little tape to the chainstays, then try it out. I'm doubting that it will actually rub.
Hmmm.... thinking of cycling dynamics (standing). When you push down on the pedals, you pull up on the bars, and push the frame away from the pushing pedal, and towards the pulling pedal.
That should mean that any frame flex should flex away from the pulling pedal, but at the same time one might be pulling at an angle slightly towards the stay.
Anyway, I think it may still be a wash.
If you're too concerned, you could dimple the frame, or have it dimpled. It wouldn't take much since you already have positive clearance.
I'd probably add a little tape to the chainstays, then try it out. I'm doubting that it will actually rub.
Hmmm.... thinking of cycling dynamics (standing). When you push down on the pedals, you pull up on the bars, and push the frame away from the pushing pedal, and towards the pulling pedal.
That should mean that any frame flex should flex away from the pulling pedal, but at the same time one might be pulling at an angle slightly towards the stay.
Anyway, I think it may still be a wash.
If you're too concerned, you could dimple the frame, or have it dimpled. It wouldn't take much since you already have positive clearance.
#5
Banned
A , BB spindle longer on the left end*, or B another crank-arm that is not so straight
get the ones from Campag's newer.. square taper Road cranksets perhaps?
*Phil Wood press fits the spindle in the bearings , its adjustable... I have Pulled the axle thru , and so changed the centering..
get the ones from Campag's newer.. square taper Road cranksets perhaps?
*Phil Wood press fits the spindle in the bearings , its adjustable... I have Pulled the axle thru , and so changed the centering..
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,395
Bikes: Too many to list
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1765 Post(s)
Liked 1,124 Times
in
746 Posts
The bottom bracket is a cartridge bottom bracket, --- a spacer may be able to be added to it , but that would just pull it in tighter on the opposite side
Have you tried the bike yet? Experienced rub? Do the pedals mount flush?
I'd probably add a little tape to the chainstays, then try it out. I'm doubting that it will actually rub.
Hmmm.... thinking of cycling dynamics (standing). When you push down on the pedals, you pull up on the bars, and push the frame away from the pushing pedal, and towards the pulling pedal.
That should mean that any frame flex should flex away from the pulling pedal, but at the same time one might be pulling at an angle slightly towards the stay.
Anyway, I think it may still be a wash.
If you're too concerned, you could dimple the frame, or have it dimpled. It wouldn't take much since you already have positive clearance.
I'd probably add a little tape to the chainstays, then try it out. I'm doubting that it will actually rub.
Hmmm.... thinking of cycling dynamics (standing). When you push down on the pedals, you pull up on the bars, and push the frame away from the pushing pedal, and towards the pulling pedal.
That should mean that any frame flex should flex away from the pulling pedal, but at the same time one might be pulling at an angle slightly towards the stay.
Anyway, I think it may still be a wash.
If you're too concerned, you could dimple the frame, or have it dimpled. It wouldn't take much since you already have positive clearance.
Actually haven't tried it yet --- was almost afraid to, --- but wrapping it with tape may be the trick to see how close it is actually getting
---- The framebuilder mentioned dimpling it ---- Its already dimpled for chainring clearance , --- but I do recall the days of oversize aluminum tubing, seeing bikes from Cannondale and Klein with dimples both at the chainring and the crankarm, so its definitely not unheard of
A , BB spindle longer on the left end*, or B another crank-arm that is not so straight
get the ones from Campag's newer.. square taper Road cranksets perhaps?
*Phil Wood press fits the spindle in the bearings , its adjustable... I have Pulled the axle thru , and so changed the centering..
get the ones from Campag's newer.. square taper Road cranksets perhaps?
*Phil Wood press fits the spindle in the bearings , its adjustable... I have Pulled the axle thru , and so changed the centering..
Last edited by DMC707; 02-05-18 at 07:43 PM.
#7
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
If I recall correctly, the Campy Pista BB is 109mm. I think there is also a 111mm Chorus (?) BB available as well. That may be the cleanest solution. There are also some non-Campy options as well that are like $25. Try Ben's Cycle's website to see options. Or Retro-Gression's website.
Also, this issue comes up on some LOOK 496 using Dura Ace cranks. I had to use 1mm spacer on the drive side BB cup during installation. That might work for Campy as well.
But, that being said. If it clears, it clears. You'll know if it's gonna nick the frame or not.
Then there's always a file to the cranks or a ball peen hammer to the frame
Also, this issue comes up on some LOOK 496 using Dura Ace cranks. I had to use 1mm spacer on the drive side BB cup during installation. That might work for Campy as well.
But, that being said. If it clears, it clears. You'll know if it's gonna nick the frame or not.
Then there's always a file to the cranks or a ball peen hammer to the frame
#8
Senior Member
111mm long axle? If positive, buy a 115mm Campy and be happy.
Already 115mm?.. hard to solve.. FSA Carbon track with wider ISIS axle is the biggest Qfactor solution available. Had to use it on a Cobra carbon frame.
Already 115mm?.. hard to solve.. FSA Carbon track with wider ISIS axle is the biggest Qfactor solution available. Had to use it on a Cobra carbon frame.
#9
Senior Member
Uggghhhh ----
Close to new bike time but a potential issue has cropped up ------ crankarm clearance at chainstay looks pretty tight with Campagnolo Record Pista chainset and bottom bracket
Not sure how tight is too tight, but that looks like its very close ---- chainstays are pretty large
Anybody know of any crankset/bottom bracket combos with a little wider Q factor?
I had thought of a little wider bottom bracket, but this picture is of the non drive side -- wider bb would impact the drive side primarily I think
...............................
Close to new bike time but a potential issue has cropped up ------ crankarm clearance at chainstay looks pretty tight with Campagnolo Record Pista chainset and bottom bracket
Not sure how tight is too tight, but that looks like its very close ---- chainstays are pretty large
Anybody know of any crankset/bottom bracket combos with a little wider Q factor?
I had thought of a little wider bottom bracket, but this picture is of the non drive side -- wider bb would impact the drive side primarily I think
...............................
If you do buy different cranks check the the Q distance minus twice the local crank thickness to ensure more clearance.
I've also seen bikes where the chain ring interfered with the chainstay.
* I liked the leader except it had aluminum alloy rear drop-outs which the track nuts gouged up. It rode very well on the LA Velodrome.
Last edited by 700wheel; 02-05-18 at 09:49 PM.
#10
Senior Member
Phil Wood can do custom BB spindle lengths.
#12
Banned
Pulling spindle. 2 lock-ring spline mounting tools stacked on 1 end, washer across ,
crank arm fixing bolt turned , does the pulling , spindle rotation resisted with an adjustable wrench on opposite end..
I used hand tools .. to recenter mine.
Goal: drive side chain line unchanged , non drive side , longer..
....
crank arm fixing bolt turned , does the pulling , spindle rotation resisted with an adjustable wrench on opposite end..
I used hand tools .. to recenter mine.
Goal: drive side chain line unchanged , non drive side , longer..
....
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,395
Bikes: Too many to list
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1765 Post(s)
Liked 1,124 Times
in
746 Posts
Update: Crisis averted
Sugino 75 crank/bottom bracket combo is wider than Campy! With the downside of course being that it doesnt look like Campy .
I robbed the Sugino off of my old Waterford for test purposes, and reinstalled the campagnolo crankset/ BB on the Waterford and it is equally as tight on that frame.
I guess the Italians really like slim chainstays
Sugino 75 crank/bottom bracket combo is wider than Campy! With the downside of course being that it doesnt look like Campy .
I robbed the Sugino off of my old Waterford for test purposes, and reinstalled the campagnolo crankset/ BB on the Waterford and it is equally as tight on that frame.
I guess the Italians really like slim chainstays
#14
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
Update: Crisis averted
Sugino 75 crank/bottom bracket combo is wider than Campy! With the downside of course being that it doesnt look like Campy .
I robbed the Sugino off of my old Waterford for test purposes, and reinstalled the campagnolo crankset/ BB on the Waterford and it is equally as tight on that frame.
I guess the Italians really like slim chainstays
Sugino 75 crank/bottom bracket combo is wider than Campy! With the downside of course being that it doesnt look like Campy .
I robbed the Sugino off of my old Waterford for test purposes, and reinstalled the campagnolo crankset/ BB on the Waterford and it is equally as tight on that frame.
I guess the Italians really like slim chainstays
Pics?
#15
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 134
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
I had this same issue with my self built steel frame and record cranks. The short chainstay length and straight chainstays had very little clearance. I tried a Chorus BB and it didn't help things at all so I suspect the pista BB is 111mm.
As far as I can tell the record pista cranks and BB are the narrowest out there when it comes to off the shelf track cranks.
As far as I can tell the record pista cranks and BB are the narrowest out there when it comes to off the shelf track cranks.
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,395
Bikes: Too many to list
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1765 Post(s)
Liked 1,124 Times
in
746 Posts
After obsessing over chainlines and crank clearances for the better part of the day, the only pics I thought to take were of the schooner of pilsner from the local German pub I quaffed afterwards
This is the Yin and the Yang of being a Clydesdale sized athlete I'll get some pics up in the new track bike thread when this baby is ready to roll out though ------ Since the closing of the Superdrome, - I will be travelling to St Louis to try this out on their track I think pretty soon -- besides Houston it is the next closest , --- then from St Louis, Major Taylor is within striking distance if I have enough time on my hands !
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Micah87
Bicycle Mechanics
4
09-03-14 03:30 PM
RubeRad
Bicycle Mechanics
28
10-29-12 03:15 PM