Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Guide For Winter Bike Tires - Studded Tires and Fat Bikes

Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Guide For Winter Bike Tires - Studded Tires and Fat Bikes

Old 09-27-15, 10:26 PM
  #51  
Gresp15C
Senior Member
 
Gresp15C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,893
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1062 Post(s)
Liked 665 Times in 421 Posts
Last year I got a pair of Nokian W160's, to put on a mountain bike that I wasn't using for anything else. It was going to be my first full winter of bike commuting. The tires seem to be affordable and of decent quality. I haven't lost any studs.

But we were robbed. Madison got about 20 inches of snow all winter, half of normal. And I spent the coldest week of the year in bed with the flu. Most of my "winter" riding was on dry pavement with scattered patches of ice. Still, I worked out a number of useful things -- maintenance, clothing, lighting, etc. It helps me to have a place in the house for all of my gear, so I don't have to search for things in the morning.

It's hard to say how much the tires really slowed me down, since I was also encumbered by my ski jacket, snow pants, and boots. When it was well below zero, I wore my ski helmet with built-in ear flaps, and ski goggles. When it was warmer, I wore a wind proof beanie under my helmet.

The pleasure of being out in the brisk weather makes up for the extra time it takes to get around.
Gresp15C is offline  
Old 09-27-15, 11:06 PM
  #52  
noglider 
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,498

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7345 Post(s)
Liked 2,450 Times in 1,429 Posts
Ski helmet. Good idea.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 09-28-15, 08:03 AM
  #53  
Mr Pink57
Did I catch a niner?
 
Mr Pink57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: a van down by the river
Posts: 542

Bikes: Vassago Fisticuff/Surly Ogre/Surly Pugsley/Surly Pugsley 29+

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by wolfchild
My personal experience with Nokians 294's was that they are strictly off road tires and not commuting tires. They are very good on frozen trails with rutted ice or frozen lakes. I didn't really like them for commuting in traffic snow or in mixed conditions.
I have to agree the one I used on the rear was a absolute bear on the roads and did not handle the slushy snow any better then a non studded tire to me. I was using low low pressure on a 35mm rim.

Let's not also forget the Nokian Extreme is a BEAR to get on a rim, it took all I had to get that one tire on a Salsa Gordo, and took even more to get it on a Stans rim which uses a slightly larger ERTO.
Mr Pink57 is offline  
Old 09-28-15, 08:54 AM
  #54  
DogBoy
No one carries the DogBoy
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Upper Midwest USA
Posts: 2,320

Bikes: Roubaix Expert Di2, Jamis Renegade, Surly Disc Trucker, Cervelo P2, CoMotion Tandem

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
For what its worth, I've been very happy with my 32mm A10s. I don't expect to ride them in deep snow. I only ride them after the streets are plowed, and I have a very short portion of my commute on an MUP that isn't plowed at all. They are great on the streets even in occasional packed snow. When the weather gets worse, I use my other bike with 26" mount and grounds/ Also a good tire that isn't for totally extreme weather, but can handle more than the a10s. If I only had one bike, I would go to the W160 though.

Nokians tend to me hard to mount. I find that warming the tires in the sun does wonders for this process, but I'm also mounting them in November when there are still quite a few sunny days.

My riding has been in IA/MN & WI.
DogBoy is offline  
Old 09-28-15, 09:01 AM
  #55  
Daniel4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,501

Bikes: Sekine 1979 ten speed racer

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1480 Post(s)
Liked 639 Times in 437 Posts
I recently purchased a fat bike. KHS 4 season 1000. The KHS website shows that tires as Vee, which I read are terrible. But when I was at the shop, the markings on the tires just say KHS. So I'm not so sure what brand tires are really on there.

Anyways my commute is only 4.6km and the past winter was basically me going through a learning curve with a beater mountain bike on Continental spike claw 120s which were ok. The entire route isn’t that much of a challenge except for staying in the ruts cut out by pedestrians along the MUP.

So my fat bike has knobby tires and I’m wondering if it’s worth getting studs. As I was shopping I noticed some tires already had stud holes in them but mine did not.

A new set of quality studded tires would easily be another $200 or more.

At the bottom of this link shows spare studs you can buy for about $30 per 100 but they require existing stud holes already in your tires.
Components - Tires and Tubes - Fatbikes

And then there are grip studs where you can tap into the knobs of your tires. They are expensive at about $1 each stud.
Tire Studs | Grip Studs™ Screw-In Tire Studs | Traction in Ice, Snow and Dirt

Since I didn’t encounter a lot of challenging ice conditions last winter, I figure I should be ok with the knobby tires except that they may be Vee Mission.

Any thoughts?
Daniel4 is offline  
Old 09-28-15, 02:39 PM
  #56  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times in 1,577 Posts
Originally Posted by wolfchild
There are a lot weight weenie cyclists who exaggerate the weight and rolling resistance of studded tires... Yes it's true that studded tires weigh a little more then regular tires and they are a little bit slower but it's not as bad as some people make it sound. Winter riding will always be slower and harder not just because of the tires, but because of being dressed in heavier clothing, because of the air density and poor road conditions.
My 1.9" Nokian/Suomi W160 Mount and Grounds weigh exactly twice as much as the 1.75" Paselas I use in the other three seasons (946g vs 470g) and I'd consider both to be fairly middle-of-the-road in that regard. To say that studded tires weigh "a little more" or have "a little more" rolling resistance would be just as disingenuous as exaggerating the difference. I truly felt like I was on the verge of a heart attack the first time I rode studded tires and I'm not otherwise at high risk for one.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 09-28-15, 03:16 PM
  #57  
revcp 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 1,257

Bikes: 2017 Salsa Carbon Mukluk frame built with XT, 2018 Kona Rove NRB build with Sram Apex 1,2008 Salsa El Mariachi, 1986 Centurion Ironman

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 286 Post(s)
Liked 100 Times in 65 Posts
Originally Posted by Daniel4
I recently purchased a fat bike. KHS 4 season 1000. The KHS website shows that tires as Vee, which I read are terrible. But when I was at the shop, the markings on the tires just say KHS. So I'm not so sure what brand tires are really on there.

Anyways my commute is only 4.6km and the past winter was basically me going through a learning curve with a beater mountain bike on Continental spike claw 120s which were ok. The entire route isn’t that much of a challenge except for staying in the ruts cut out by pedestrians along the MUP.

So my fat bike has knobby tires and I’m wondering if it’s worth getting studs. As I was shopping I noticed some tires already had stud holes in them but mine did not.

A new set of quality studded tires would easily be another $200 or more.

At the bottom of this link shows spare studs you can buy for about $30 per 100 but they require existing stud holes already in your tires.
Components - Tires and Tubes - Fatbikes

And then there are grip studs where you can tap into the knobs of your tires. They are expensive at about $1 each stud.
Tire Studs | Grip Studs™ Screw-In Tire Studs | Traction in Ice, Snow and Dirt

Since I didn’t encounter a lot of challenging ice conditions last winter, I figure I should be ok with the knobby tires except that they may be Vee Mission.

Any thoughts?
The Vee Mission (made by Innova) are, well, not so good. With a lot of pressure they're good on MUPs. At 10-12 lbs they're okay on dry singletrack. At 6-8 lbs in snow they're not so good.
__________________
Don't complain about the weather and cower in fear. It's all good weather. Just different.
revcp is offline  
Old 09-28-15, 06:38 PM
  #58  
Gresp15C
Senior Member
 
Gresp15C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,893
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1062 Post(s)
Liked 665 Times in 421 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
Ski helmet. Good idea.
While on the subject, if you go with ski goggles as well, ones with clear lenses (as opposed to tinted) are harder to find, but better for night cycling. Ski goggles are designed to work with the helmet.
Gresp15C is offline  
Old 09-28-15, 07:47 PM
  #59  
Daniel4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,501

Bikes: Sekine 1979 ten speed racer

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1480 Post(s)
Liked 639 Times in 437 Posts
My KHS tires are actually ChaoYang 26x4.0 120tpi. The only review I can find is from mtbr.com which rated the 26x4.9 as passable. It noted the treads on the side could be taller for better turning.

Chaoyang/FatB 4.9 Initial Impressions/Review- Mtbr.com

Can anybody find any more reviews? I didn't get the fat bike as a sport but rather as a winter commuter. So I figure I may not be as demanding as those recreational riders even though it would be nice to have the flexibility and performance.
Daniel4 is offline  
Old 09-29-15, 10:49 AM
  #60  
PaulRivers
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 6,432
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 539 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by alan s
Thanks for the review. I have 26 x 1.75 Marathon Winters (great tires) on one bike and am thinking about adding studded 700c on another bike. Have you actually used this tire? Seems promising for everyday winter riding in the DC area. Also, it would be helpful to add tire weights to your review.
I'm afraid I have not actually used this tire. My Schwalbe Marathon Winter's are still in good shape, and still likely to be the fastest rolling on decently plowed pavement (they actually plow the bike path I use), so no need to replace them yet.

Originally Posted by ItsJustMe
I'm on Nokian W240s. Given how long they last, it'll probably be a good 10 years before I need to buy another pair. Kind of thinking about a fat bike. I saw Performance had one for $700.
w240's are decent tires, definitely no need to get rid of them if you already own them, the 45nrth Gravdals seemed like they'd be nicer tires but that's just from reading and looking at them online (if I needed to buy something new). I keep thinking about a Fat Bike to, it's just that it takes space to store it, and I'm not sure practically speaking how much I'd actually use it you know? I have a car, so the rarer bad days are generally handled either by that or by working from home. If I knew anyone else with a fat bike who did offroad stuff it would be a big incentive.

I'd definitely have a fat bike if it was 5 years ago, but now they plow our bike trails, so the skinnier studded tire is faster.

Originally Posted by Tim_Iowa
@PaulRivers Very nice summary of studded options. I concur with your assessments.

To add:
Nokian W160 (aka Mount & Ground) 26 x 1.95" tires (also mentioned by @fietsbob) = 2 rows of studs, so not as aggressive as the W240 or 294; they make a good commuting tire and are a better budget alternative than the Innovas. They are sure-footed but pretty heavy and slow. The tread is decent on snow.
Yeah, I know of those tires, my post just got really long and I didn't want it to get longer lol. I think 700c bikes are generally superior for winter riding because they roll over everything easier. Of course if you already own a 26" bike, I'm not saying the difference is so big as to require buying a new bike. Everything Nokian makes is a decent tire.

Originally Posted by Tim_Iowa
RE Fat bikes: I bought a fat bike (Spec Fatboy) last year to commute through the Iowa winters. Partially, at least; my commute is 8.5 miles and I rode it at least once a week last winter, sometimes more often. After the first snow, I immediately bought the studded Dillinger 5 tires. The slush melts during the day and re-freezes at night, so I vastly prefer studs to power over and through the frozen ruts on streets and bike paths.

The studs make the Dillingers much noisier than any non-studded tire on bare pavement. But, surprisingly, the Dillinger 5's (4.5", actually) were barely any slower or harder to pedal than the stock Ground Control 4.5" tires, which are known as a fast-ish tire (for a fat bike). Or, maybe my wallet was so much lighter after buying the Dillinger 5's that it counteracted the difference in effort.

Riding the fat bike definitely takes more effort than a MTB, which takes more effort than a touring bike, which takes more effort than a skinny road bike. I can rarely coast; I have to keep a good pedal effort going to maintain speed.

But, the fat bike kept me active last winter which kept me from gaining weight.

So, I'm very happy with the fat bike as a winter commuter. It also makes a great MTB; I haven't ridden my Cannondale 26er hardtail once since I bought the fattie. The extreme traction of the fat bike makes up for my pitiful skills on technical MTB trails, and the fat bike feels more "proportionate" to my 6' 225# frame.
Thanks for commenting on your experience with a fat bike. I've read people say that if you're not ice riding on a lake, it's better to buy the non-studded dillinger then have studs added, about half the studs you'd get on the fully studded version are plenty for almost any riding. Sounds nice. :-) Keep being on the fence about getting one myself, when fat bikes got popular they also started plowing the bike trails by me...

Originally Posted by noglider
I ordered Schwalbe Marathon Winter studded tires from Wiggle in England on Wednesday, and they arrived on Thursday. I didn't even know that was possible.
I'm very surprised it's possible for that to happen without paying a huge fee for overnight delivery! I've been getting some stuff really fast lately from amazon, which is really cool, but then I read about long and odd hours and working conditions and I start to feel kinda bad about it. :-/ I mean I live getting stuff I order in the next few days, but I'd wait an extra day for delivery if it meant some guy could work normal hours rather than some terrible 12am-8am shift. :-/

Originally Posted by TenGrainBread
Welp, well, I got it. It was pretty fun on the way home. Got a bit of time before the snow starts falling here but I'm excited.
Cool, would be interested to know how you like it after it's starts snowing and such. :-)

Originally Posted by Mr Pink57
All good stuff.

A fellow Minnesotan here who commutes all year. And has done it one a few different bikes a few different ways.

- 26in with mount and grounds; this was good and pretty easy to get around as long as there is not a ton of snow.
- 29er with fat front and studded rear tire; this did ok and was really nice when the snow got deep since the front would push the snow apart and let the rear Nokian Extreme ride in it's wake problem with this setup was ice.
- Fat bike; this was a ok option to, the snow I see on our roads is considerably different then what I see on our trails so it's not a 1:1. There is a lot more stable snow on a singletrack trail then there is on the road it all wants to brake loose. Plus was it pushed out all the ruts
- 29er with studs; this is my favorite option as of now it works for me and is most importantly predictable.

My biggest suggestion for all year commuters who are especially just starting out is yes get a studded tire for your winters the greenways here do not use salt so they just get scraped and become shear ice. But also get some pogies and leave them on all winter, I have two sets now one for the fatty and one for the commuter. I can now wear a thin 45nrth wool glove all the way down to about -35F and even then my hands just sweat if I push it too hard. And for goodness sake if you do not wear a helmet all year, wear one at least in the winter. Some many chances to randomly fall over.
Thanks for your thoughts, I'm surprised a fat tire didn't seem to work out better on the roads for you.

Originally Posted by wolfchild
My personal experience with Nokians 294's was that they are strictly off road tires and not commuting tires. They are very good on frozen trails with rutted ice or frozen lakes. I didn't really like them for commuting in traffic snow or in mixed conditions.

I agree. In my experience, 2 inch tires offer no advantages over 30-38mm tires for commuting on snow covered roads. In fact I have been able to ride through much deeper snow with narrower tires then with wider tires. Skinny tires cut through all the slush and traffic snow and wider tires just slide all over the place. Wider tires are better at very low pressure on frozen bumpy hardpack snow/ice.
Thanks for writing back, I see we've had the same experience. There was a theme that the fatter the tire for winter riding (on streets) the better, our experience does not agree. 30c-40c seems to be the optimum range for street riding, I thought 2" was worse than that range.

Originally Posted by PennyTheDog
I use two bikes with Schwalbe Marathon Winter tires for the Minnesota winter. 35 mm for a Surly Crosscheck and 2.1 inches by 26" for a mountain bike. They've worked great and been really durable.
Thanks for commenting, Schwalbe Marathon Winters have been great tires for me.

Originally Posted by unterhausen
I have studded fat tires, and they are really not that bad. They weigh less than the Nates I have, which aren't studded. Of course, that comes at a price, they are well over $300 for a set. I got one studded and one unstudded and moved some studs between them to save money. So neither tire is fully populated with studs.

We have a lot of ice, and it gets rutted right away, so a fat bike is a lot more comfortable ride for much of the winter. Hopefully this winter will not be quite as bad as the last two.
Thanks for commenting, I've assumed that Fat Bikes would be much better at simply deforming to roll over ruts.

Originally Posted by noglider
@unterhausen, how far do you ride on your fat bike? I'm thinking I may need to allocate a lot of time to riding the winter bike to work. I haven't weighed the new tires yet, but they feel extremely heavy. I know I might be very happy with them, considering they will make an impossible ride possible. I might even enjoy the sound they make.
Riding in the winter is definitely slower, even with skinnier studded tires. I do actually kinda enjoy the sound the Schwalbe Marathon's make personally - it's definitely not horribly loud or obtrusive or anything. It's like Rice Crispies when you add milk to them. The 2" Nokian's I had were much worse.

Originally Posted by wolfchild
There are a lot weight weenie cyclists who exaggerate the weight and rolling resistance of studded tires... Yes it's true that studded tires weigh a little more then regular tires and they are a little bit slower but it's not as bad as some people make it sound. Winter riding will always be slower and harder not just because of the tires, but because of being dressed in heavier clothing, because of the air density and poor road conditions.
Yeah, it's weird in the late fall before snow or ice - my skinny tire road bike gets slower. Your tire has less grip on your ground in winter with snow so it's a little slower to. I'd guess it's about 80% of the speed I get in the summer with very good road conditions in winter, the worse the road conditions the worse the speed gets. Really bad road conditions are walking speed. Road conditions are usually back to good a day after it snows, as long as you don't get one of those unfortunate events (it snows then deep freezes, that leads to some really nasty roads as salt and sand don't work below 15F or something).

Originally Posted by noglider
I normally ride the lightest tires I can. I don't care about flats. I'm adept at fixing them. I just want light tires. But I'm willing to try these tires. I better be willing, after all I spent on them. They are cutting edge technology, so they won't ride as badly as their shear weight implies.
I think the Schwalbe Marathon Winters are the fastest studded winter tires you could buy to handle regular ice on the road like you'd likely get in New York. Only the 45nrth Xerces would likely be any faster, but that's because they don't have studs in regular contact with the road. I run my Schwalbe's around 80psi when road conditions are good for speed (higher pressure keeps the outer row of studs off the ground when going straight).

Originally Posted by Gresp15C
Last year I got a pair of Nokian W160's, to put on a mountain bike that I wasn't using for anything else. It was going to be my first full winter of bike commuting. The tires seem to be affordable and of decent quality. I haven't lost any studs. But we were robbed. Madison got about 20 inches of snow all winter, half of normal. And I spent the coldest week of the year in bed with the flu. Most of my "winter" riding was on dry pavement with scattered patches of ice. Still, I worked out a number of useful things -- maintenance, clothing, lighting, etc. It helps me to have a place in the house for all of my gear, so I don't have to search for things in the morning.

It's hard to say how much the tires really slowed me down, since I was also encumbered by my ski jacket, snow pants, and boots. When it was well below zero, I wore my ski helmet with built-in ear flaps, and ski goggles. When it was warmer, I wore a wind proof beanie under my helmet.

The pleasure of being out in the brisk weather makes up for the extra time it takes to get around.
Ha, well studs are for ice not snow, so that part makes it sound like it was an even better winter for riding. If you got the flu the coldest week of the year is the one to get it - I have no problem riding between 15-25F, but around 0F you have to worry that any exposed skin will get frostbite. You really have to make absolutely sure your gear covers all of your skin for those conditions. I tend to just take the car when it's that cold.

If you ride regularly in the winter, and want to ride fast, it's a whole different wardrobe. Wearing regular ski jackets and pants can trap the moisture from sweat, making you colder. It's not such a big deal if you just ride slower to begin with, but if you ride faster the outfit is usually a wool/synthetic base layer, additional wool/synthetic base layers in the middle if needed for the temp, and a windproof but breathable (goretex, event fabric, or windstopper) outer shell.

Originally Posted by DogBoy
For what its worth, I've been very happy with my 32mm A10s. I don't expect to ride them in deep snow. I only ride them after the streets are plowed, and I have a very short portion of my commute on an MUP that isn't plowed at all. They are great on the streets even in occasional packed snow. When the weather gets worse, I use my other bike with 26" mount and grounds/ Also a good tire that isn't for totally extreme weather, but can handle more than the a10s. If I only had one bike, I would go to the W160 though. Nokians tend to me hard to mount. I find that warming the tires in the sun does wonders for this process, but I'm also mounting them in November when there are still quite a few sunny days. My riding has been in IA/MN & WI.
Thanks for commenting, I've heard of people warming them up with a hair dryer and mounting them inside the house. I bought a paint cloth from Home Depot so I could work on my bike in my apt when it was cold out indoors.

Originally Posted by Daniel4
I recently purchased a fat bike...Since I didn’t encounter a lot of challenging ice conditions last winter, I figure I should be ok with the knobby tires except that they may be Vee Mission. Any thoughts?
Anything smaller than fatbike tires, I personally think require studs for winter riding (well not winter in florida, but winter anywhere there's ice). Like I said, in my experience, actual fat bike tires slid on ice slow enough to get a foot down, so they should be ok for safety.

Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
My 1.9" Nokian/Suomi W160 Mount and Grounds weigh exactly twice as much as the 1.75" Paselas I use in the other three seasons (946g vs 470g) and I'd consider both to be fairly middle-of-the-road in that regard. To say that studded tires weigh "a little more" or have "a little more" rolling resistance would be just as disingenuous as exaggerating the difference. I truly felt like I was on the verge of a heart attack the first time I rode studded tires and I'm not otherwise at high risk for one.
A 1.9"/2" fat bike tires is much much slower. But a 35c marathon winter studded tire is not nearly as much slower. Opinions vary, even my own, it's no more than 20% slower at worst in my opinion (on the same road surface with no snow).
PaulRivers is offline  
Old 09-29-15, 11:46 AM
  #61  
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,964

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,529 Times in 1,042 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
I ordered Schwalbe Marathon Winter studded tires from Wiggle in England on Wednesday, and they arrived on Thursday. I didn't even know that was possible.
Was DHL the carrier? I shipped two foot lockers of personal goods from Afghanistan with DHL that arrived in the US two days later via Bahrain, Lepzig and Cincinnati, a week before I arrived home.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 09-29-15, 12:01 PM
  #62  
noglider 
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,498

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7345 Post(s)
Liked 2,450 Times in 1,429 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
Was DHL the carrier? I shipped two foot lockers of personal goods from Afghanistan with DHL that arrived in the US two days later via Bahrain, Lepzig and Cincinnati, a week before I arrived home.
Yes, it was DHL. Your story is even impressiver.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 09-29-15, 03:17 PM
  #63  
BobbyG
Senior Member
 
BobbyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 5,971

Bikes: 2015 Charge Plug, 2007 Dahon Boardwalk, 1997 Nishiki Blazer, 1984 Nishiki International, 2006 Felt F65, 1989 Dahon Getaway V

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1363 Post(s)
Liked 1,675 Times in 827 Posts
So the 2nd "Nokian" W106 tire came two days after the first. They are both branded as "Suomi". I did a quick google search and found this: FAQ / Nokian Tires and this: Home | Suomi Tyres
Apparently Nokian divested its bicycle tire division in 2004 which was bought by another Finnish company, Suomi,who have been making Nokian Tires since at least 2004. I guess they brand them as "Nokian" where they can or want and "Suomi" everywhere else. The instructions said to ride 'em 35km before attempting snow and ice. My commute is 18 miles round trip so that should suffice. I will post my experiences as winter progresses.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_20150929_090410b.jpg (88.5 KB, 55 views)
BobbyG is offline  
Old 09-29-15, 04:20 PM
  #64  
noglider 
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,498

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7345 Post(s)
Liked 2,450 Times in 1,429 Posts
Suomi is the Finnish word for Finnish.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 09-29-15, 04:54 PM
  #65  
Gresp15C
Senior Member
 
Gresp15C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,893
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1062 Post(s)
Liked 665 Times in 421 Posts
Originally Posted by PaulRivers
Ha, well studs are for ice not snow, so that part makes it sound like it was an even better winter for riding. If you got the flu the coldest week of the year is the one to get it - I have no problem riding between 15-25F, but around 0F you have to worry that any exposed skin will get frostbite. You really have to make absolutely sure your gear covers all of your skin for those conditions. I tend to just take the car when it's that cold.

If you ride regularly in the winter, and want to ride fast, it's a whole different wardrobe. Wearing regular ski jackets and pants can trap the moisture from sweat, making you colder. It's not such a big deal if you just ride slower to begin with, but if you ride faster the outfit is usually a wool/synthetic base layer, additional wool/synthetic base layers in the middle if needed for the temp, and a windproof but breathable (goretex, event fabric, or windstopper) outer shell.
Thanks for the advice!

Even aside from the week that I missed, there were several below 0F, getting down to -10 at worst. I was very well covered up. For better or worse, I ride pretty slow, and my commute is only 8 miles round trip on flat terrain. Also for whatever strange biological reason, I don't sweat a lot.

I imagine that if I have to slog through real snow, then I have to be more concerned about sweating, so I won't assume that I've yet found the optimal clothing. I was using stuff that I already had, since I've always been outdoorsy, but just haven't been outdoorsy in the winter on a bike yet. Now that I made it through one winter, I'm more willing to spend some money on appropriate gear.

Note: My tires were listed as "Nokian" by the retailer, but "Soumi" is molded into the rubber.
Gresp15C is offline  
Old 09-29-15, 05:23 PM
  #66  
BobbyG
Senior Member
 
BobbyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 5,971

Bikes: 2015 Charge Plug, 2007 Dahon Boardwalk, 1997 Nishiki Blazer, 1984 Nishiki International, 2006 Felt F65, 1989 Dahon Getaway V

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1363 Post(s)
Liked 1,675 Times in 827 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
Suomi is the Finnish word for Finnish.
BobbyG is offline  
Old 10-10-15, 06:06 PM
  #67  
Daniel4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,501

Bikes: Sekine 1979 ten speed racer

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1480 Post(s)
Liked 639 Times in 437 Posts
This thread should be a sticky in the Winter Cycling section.

As I was researching the tires I have and the Dillinger studded tires, I kept running across these other names: Lou/Bud, Nate and Ground Control.

The tires I have are Chaoyang Big Daddy 26x4, 120tpi. Mtbr has a post with a test for the 4.9in and said it was passable. I measured the knob height. It is 4mm (more about that next).

Chaoyang/FatB 4.9 Initial Impressions/Review- Mtbr.com

Mtbr also compared the Lou/Bud against the Dillinger 5 studded.

Bud/Lou versus Dillinger 5- Mtbr.com

Seems odd because the Lou/Buds aren’t studded so each type of tire would have its strengths and weaknesses. Of course you’d expect the Dillinger studded to excel on ice but surpassed by the Lou/Bud in deep snow. It seems each time someone else posted a review, the opinions keep changing. The knobs on the Dillinger were 5mm and the Lou/Bud’s were 7mm.

So if one were to put studs on the Lou/Bud tires, it would be the best all around tire wouldn’t it? Makes me wonder about the ability of my own Chaoyang Big Daddy tires which have only 4mm knobs.

Mind you, I’m probably not going to take the bike to the extremes like mountain bikers do as I am only using it to commute. The commute route takes me through 2km on a MUP which isn’t maintained in the winter. The tires would also have to take me through a plowed sidewalk with icy and snow chunks on it as well as plowed roads.

So what is the opinion of the Lou/Bud, the Nate and the Ground Control tires?

Last edited by Daniel4; 10-10-15 at 06:10 PM. Reason: correction to a typo
Daniel4 is offline  
Old 10-14-15, 08:31 AM
  #68  
Tim_Iowa
Senior Member
 
Tim_Iowa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 1,643

Bikes: 1997 Rivendell Road Standard 650b conversion (tourer), 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10 (gravel/tour), 2013 Foundry Auger disc (CX/gravel), 2016 Cannondale Fat CAAD 2 (MTB/winter), 2011 Cannondale Flash 29er Lefty (trail MTB)

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 167 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Daniel4
So if one were to put studs on the Lou/Bud tires, it would be the best all around tire wouldn’t it? Makes me wonder about the ability of my own Chaoyang Big Daddy tires which have only 4mm knobs.

So what is the opinion of the Lou/Bud, the Nate and the Ground Control tires?
Bud, Lou, and smaller Nate are Surly's most aggressive tread patterns and largest knobs. That gives them excellent traction on loose stuff but higher rolling resistance on smooth surfaces.

The Specialized Ground Control tires have a slightly less aggressive tread and smaller knobs, so they have slightly less traction but roll a little faster. Plus, they're a bit narrower than the Bud and Lou.


But, aggressive tread still doesn't help on ice, only studs do. I really like my Ground Control tires but I swap them for Dillinger 5's once it freezes. Surprisingly, they are pretty fast tires even on pavement. The studs are super noisy, though.

If your tire has stud pockets built into the tread (Dillinger, Escalator, some Vee Snowshoe tires), then you can buy inexpensive studs and just push them in. Get the studs with carbide tips, they last much longer.

If your tire doesn't have stud pockets, you have to use screw-in studs (Grip Studs). But, they're about $1 a stud, so that's an expensive option.

Some folks "redneck stud" their tire with common hardware (screws or bolts) through the tread, but they wear down quickly (they're not carbide steel), are heavy, and put a ton of holes through the tire.
Tim_Iowa is offline  
Old 10-14-15, 01:02 PM
  #69  
snow_echo_NY
Senior Member
 
snow_echo_NY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Montpelier VT
Posts: 855

Bikes: Scott Genius, Surly Crosscheck, Yuba Mundo cargo, Specialized Dolce Triple (stolen 5/8/15)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
cool thread! we have gotten Nokian w240s studded tires for the winter. if anyone has had experience am curious. otherwise i will come back and post my experience when we get snow later this season.
snow_echo_NY is offline  
Old 11-27-15, 12:42 PM
  #70  
jrickards
Senior Member
 
jrickards's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sudbury, ON, CA
Posts: 2,647

Bikes: 2012 Kona Sutra, 2002 Look AL 384, 2018 Moose Fat bike

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 133 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
Ski helmet. Good idea.
I had considered buying a e-bike helmet because they are much cheaper than motorcycle helmets but offer sufficient protection for a cyclist. Plus, the ones I was looking at had face shields that should provide protected and hopefully unfogging vision.
jrickards is offline  
Old 11-27-15, 12:48 PM
  #71  
jrickards
Senior Member
 
jrickards's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sudbury, ON, CA
Posts: 2,647

Bikes: 2012 Kona Sutra, 2002 Look AL 384, 2018 Moose Fat bike

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 133 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Daniel4
And then there are grip studs where you can tap into the knobs of your tires. They are expensive at about $1 each stud.
Tire Studs | Grip Studs™ Screw-In Tire Studs | Traction in Ice, Snow and Dirt
Given that the pointy end of these studs goes towards the tube, you might want to ensure that the knobby on the tire is sufficiently deep to prevent punctures. Otherwise, do what I and others have done, DIY studded tires with metal screws screwed from the inside out with an extra tube between the screw heads and the inflated tube.
jrickards is offline  
Old 11-27-15, 03:40 PM
  #72  
BikingZombie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 120

Bikes: Surly CC

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I ran with the schwalbe marathons for a few winters, but just purchased some 45Nrth Gravdals at 120tpi . The marathons were great (good control & good speed), but after a few winters I was interested to try something else, and wanted to try a higher threadcount / non-wired type. I gave the marathons to a neighbor kid that wants to try some winter biking. Looking forward to getting on these Gravdals
BikingZombie is offline  
Old 11-27-15, 05:34 PM
  #73  
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,386
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,686 Times in 2,509 Posts
I have studded dillingers on my fatbike. When we start getting snow, it immediately turns to ice. And when it gets rutted, it is a pain to ride on with 2" tires. So the fatbike gets ridden a lot. In out kind of weather, not much point in having non studded tires on the fatbike, in fact, it might be worse in a way. I'm hoping our winter isn't as extreme as it has been the last couple years. So far we are having an extremely warm winter
unterhausen is offline  
Old 11-27-15, 06:37 PM
  #74  
noglider 
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,498

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7345 Post(s)
Liked 2,450 Times in 1,429 Posts
Right, and I can't tell yet if my winter purchases are effective. Now I'm hoping for at least a short period of severe weather.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 11-28-15, 12:04 PM
  #75  
fietsbob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
FWIW Kala is Finnish For Fish

Lots of Finns setters here Swedes and Norwegians too.. ..


Back in the 90's I got bundles of bike Tires imported directly from Finland ..

still have my studded ones from then .. ready to roll once I Pump up the PSI
fietsbob is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.