Gear Ratio Question for Road Bike
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Gear Ratio Question for Road Bike
I'm currently planning on switching my gearing on my road bike. I've got a 53/42 front ring and a 7 speed 13-21 freewheel. I am upgrading to an 8 speed with a 53/39 front and possibly a 13-23 cassette (its a C&V bike and I want to keep components from the era). I'm just wondering if that will be enough. I've got some 12+% grade hills around - they are fairly short but steep - and I can't spin fast enough and I've got more lung capacity on these hills than leg strength.
I looked up Gear Ratios on Sheldon Brown's wonderful website and I've got these ratios:
- Lowest Ratio Gear with 53/42 - 13-21: 3.9
- Lowest RatioGear with 53/39 - 13-23: 3.3 (with 3.6 and 4.0 incremental gear ratios).
So basically I will get two lower ratio gears with this new setup. I'd like to keep a 16T in the mix. Does anyone have any experience with this? Should I go for a bigger rear cassette or do you think the 13-23 will be enough.
I may just need to bite the bullet and go without a 16T and get a 12-25?
[Note that I was editing my post to correct wording about Lowest Gear (it originally said highest gear) when Scott was posting his reply.]
Thanks in advance.
I looked up Gear Ratios on Sheldon Brown's wonderful website and I've got these ratios:
- Lowest Ratio Gear with 53/42 - 13-21: 3.9
- Lowest RatioGear with 53/39 - 13-23: 3.3 (with 3.6 and 4.0 incremental gear ratios).
So basically I will get two lower ratio gears with this new setup. I'd like to keep a 16T in the mix. Does anyone have any experience with this? Should I go for a bigger rear cassette or do you think the 13-23 will be enough.
I may just need to bite the bullet and go without a 16T and get a 12-25?
[Note that I was editing my post to correct wording about Lowest Gear (it originally said highest gear) when Scott was posting his reply.]
Thanks in advance.
Last edited by SellOut; 10-01-12 at 03:24 PM.
#2
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
I think your math is off -- your high gear stays the same (53/13). You gain a lower low with the 39/23, which should help climbing hills. Only you can tell what will be enough, though.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,547
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1529 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
I think you're on the money; bugger losing the 16t.
Still, it's more like a 17t when you swap the 42t for a 39t.
Scott, I don't see any mention of top gear.
Still, it's more like a 17t when you swap the 42t for a 39t.
Scott, I don't see any mention of top gear.
#4
It's MY mountain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,002
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4338 Post(s)
Liked 2,980 Times
in
1,617 Posts
I've got a 53/42 front ring and a 7 speed 13-21 freewheel. I am upgrading to an 8 speed with a 53/39 front and possibly a 13-23 cassette (its a C&V bike and I want to keep components from the era). I'm just wondering if that will be enough. I've got some 12+% grade hills around - they are fairly short but steep - and I can't spin fast enough and I've got more lung capacity on these hills than leg strength.
You could always go 11x28 8-speed, that one has a 16t.
42/16=2.625
39/15=2.600
39/16=2.438
Last edited by DiabloScott; 10-01-12 at 03:37 PM.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,547
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1529 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
OP said the hills are only short... my low gear is 42x23, and that's low enough to get up some pretty steep stuff if it doesn't go on for long.
Guess it depends what you weigh. Modern stiffness features help a bit too (31.8mm, 1.125", 24/30mm).
Pretty sure there's nothing special about the 16t per se, especially when changing the chainring size. More a question of unwanted gaps, in which case advocating a cassette going to 11t will fall on deaf ears.
Guess it depends what you weigh. Modern stiffness features help a bit too (31.8mm, 1.125", 24/30mm).
Pretty sure there's nothing special about the 16t per se, especially when changing the chainring size. More a question of unwanted gaps, in which case advocating a cassette going to 11t will fall on deaf ears.
Last edited by Kimmo; 10-01-12 at 03:40 PM.
#6
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
Neither do I, now.
Anyways, the OP could use a 13-26 7-speed cassette if his 39/23 isn't low enough. It loses the nice 13-14-15 at the top, but yields a solid 40" low gear.
Anyways, the OP could use a 13-26 7-speed cassette if his 39/23 isn't low enough. It loses the nice 13-14-15 at the top, but yields a solid 40" low gear.
#7
Banned
Not mentioned was the RD.. classics like N Record work with a 26t
26)39 = 1.5:1..
S Record later cage was OK for 2 more teeth
28)39 = 1.392..
26)39 = 1.5:1..
S Record later cage was OK for 2 more teeth
28)39 = 1.392..
#8
Mechanic/Tourist
It is indeed hard to know as a 3rd party what will be low enough, but you could try this if possible. If you can locate a 12% grade and a 10% grade. If you lower your lowest gear as you've proposed the 12% now should feel like the 10% when you have changed, going purely by percentage gear ratio change (3.3/3.9*12).
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
All - thanks for the great responses. I will be upgrading to either Chorus or C-Record - I believe they both support 26T. I think given all the feedback, it may not be a bad idea to try out a 13-26 or 12-25 8 Speed Cassette. I've got a bad knee and my lungs are usually in decent shape so its better for me to spin. There are many points that I had not considered. In particular, I did not consider that the ratio of my 16T will change when I change out my 42T front for a 39T - so the feedback was great.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341
Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
226 Posts
All - thanks for the great responses. I will be upgrading to either Chorus or C-Record - I believe they both support 26T. I think given all the feedback, it may not be a bad idea to try out a 13-26 or 12-25 8 Speed Cassette. I've got a bad knee and my lungs are usually in decent shape so its better for me to spin. There are many points that I had not considered. In particular, I did not consider that the ratio of my 16T will change when I change out my 42T front for a 39T - so the feedback was great.
30x21 is the same low gear as 39x27 or a hypothetical 42x29 and with 8 cogs allows for 13-14-15-16-17-18-19-21 so you get one set of gears which are smaller than 42x28 for the mountains but act as a 7-speed corncob for flat rides; although you'd need to run something other than a Campagnolo cassette since they quickly discontinued all but three combinations after introducing 9 cogs.
I did that when I moved beyond 52-42 with six speed free wheels and never regretted the move.
#11
Advisor
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 544
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Your strong pushing that gear ratio. I run a 26t with a 50/34, use to be a 52/42/30 and I wish it had been a 50/39/30. I've done 17% grades with the 34/26t. I'm 60 yrs old, 200 lbs.