Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Sizing quess - help me help others

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Sizing quess - help me help others

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-08, 08:01 PM
  #1  
mkeller234
Rustbelt Rider
Thread Starter
 
mkeller234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 9,104

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1420 - 1978 Raleigh Professional - 1973 Schwinn Collegiate - 1974 Schwinn Suburban

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Liked 372 Times in 177 Posts
Sizing quess - help me help others

I have a bike up on the local craigslist and have gotten tons of questions about fit. Every other time people just showed up and tried it out, but I have had 3 or 4 people who wanted a fit guess before making the trek.

It's a mixte frame and measures 19.5 inches c-t. I know fit is a very unique and specific topic, but is there a general range that I could use to help potential buyers before they actually try it out? I have suggested that they be fitted at a lbs for proper fit. I know this is a vague question and I can expect equally vague answers but I could use some help. Please don't answer "have them ride it and see if it fits" because I have tried that and met resistance.

I am trying to be a responsible seller and want to give the best answers I can to potential buyers.

Thanks
Matt
__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
mkeller234 is offline  
Old 12-30-08, 08:05 PM
  #2  
kpug505
Senior Member
 
kpug505's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Puyallup Washington
Posts: 1,846

Bikes: Motobecane Mirage fixed gear, Nashbar Alpha Road 5000, Bianchi Grizzly, Coppi Fiorelli, , Schwinn Trike, , GT All Terra, Old Peugeot, Nishiki 3 speed, Bugatti, Cannondale Black Lightning, Dura All, Bianchi Touring, Bridgestone T700 & more

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Someone really short......Maybe around 5'2" or so?
__________________
Originally Posted by CardiacKid
We don't cotton to people who cut things off their bikes in these here parts.

Check out my bike blog!
kpug505 is offline  
Old 12-30-08, 08:11 PM
  #3  
leweee 
aspiring bike mechanic
 
leweee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ontario. Canada
Posts: 59

Bikes: 80's Marin mtb, 70's Raliegh mixte

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
mixte fit everyone....right.

"have them fit it and see if it rides."
__________________
Derailleur!!!! Hell, I just meet her.

Last edited by leweee; 12-30-08 at 08:15 PM.
leweee is offline  
Old 12-30-08, 08:11 PM
  #4  
tatfiend 
Gear Hub fan
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 2,829

Bikes: Civia Hyland Rohloff, Swobo Dixon, Colnago, Univega

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I would suggest listing the seat post length of 19.5" and the horizontal distance from near the top of the head tube to the top of the seat tube, the equivalent of top tube length on a standard mens frame. Based on seat tube length it looks like a 49cm to 50cm frame size, pretty small. I am no expert on Mixte frame dimensions though.
tatfiend is offline  
Old 12-30-08, 08:18 PM
  #5  
mkeller234
Rustbelt Rider
Thread Starter
 
mkeller234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 9,104

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1420 - 1978 Raleigh Professional - 1973 Schwinn Collegiate - 1974 Schwinn Suburban

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Liked 372 Times in 177 Posts
Here are the catalog pages of the frame I am talking about. Looks like it only came in 19.5 in and 22 in frames.

https://bp1.blogger.com/_whtVpXkKwlQ/...0-h/img010.jpg

https://bp1.blogger.com/_whtVpXkKwlQ/...0-h/img014.jpg
__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
mkeller234 is offline  
Old 12-30-08, 08:20 PM
  #6  
wrk101
Thrifty Bill
 
wrk101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,526

Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more

Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 964 Times in 628 Posts
I too avoid sizing recommendations, but that is a very common question. I have started to catalog past sales and rider sizes. I then can honestly say: "I sold a bike this size to a woman that was 5-2 and she thought it fit great". I also have referred various buyers to websites on sizing (but most are too lazy to look).

Interesting on the sizing, my mixte experience has been with either 17 inch or 19 inch bikes. (But I don't have a lot of experience with mixtes).

Last edited by wrk101; 12-30-08 at 08:22 PM. Reason: typo
wrk101 is offline  
Old 12-30-08, 08:28 PM
  #7  
mkeller234
Rustbelt Rider
Thread Starter
 
mkeller234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 9,104

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1420 - 1978 Raleigh Professional - 1973 Schwinn Collegiate - 1974 Schwinn Suburban

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Liked 372 Times in 177 Posts
Yeah, I am not thrilled to get the question either. I had a women who was 5'7" interested, she had a long way to drive and wanted to know before she made the trip. I told her it was probably too small, but who knows since it really is a preference thing.

It's not too small....it's the competitive fit
__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
mkeller234 is offline  
Old 12-30-08, 08:46 PM
  #8  
Grand Bois
Senior Member
 
Grand Bois's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Posts: 17,392
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 443 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 25 Posts
Measure the distance from the center of the BB spindle to the center of an imaginary level top tube. Measuring the length of the seat tube does not work because many mixtes have short seat tubes. This Raleigh for example:


Last edited by Grand Bois; 12-30-08 at 08:49 PM.
Grand Bois is offline  
Old 12-30-08, 08:52 PM
  #9  
mkeller234
Rustbelt Rider
Thread Starter
 
mkeller234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 9,104

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1420 - 1978 Raleigh Professional - 1973 Schwinn Collegiate - 1974 Schwinn Suburban

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Liked 372 Times in 177 Posts
^ measuring that way added about 1 inch. (20.5in - 52cm)
__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
mkeller234 is offline  
Old 12-30-08, 09:36 PM
  #10  
Gary Fountain
Senior Member
 
Gary Fountain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hervey Bay, Qld, Australia.
Posts: 2,928

Bikes: Colnago (82, 85, 89, 90, 91, 96, 03), 85 Cinelli, 90 Rossin, 83 Alan, 82 Bianchi, 78 Fountain, 2 x Pinarello, Malvern Star (37), Hillman (70's), 80's Beretto Lo-Pro Track, 80's Kenevans Lo-Pro, Columbus Max (95), DeGrandi (80's) Track.

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 179 Post(s)
Liked 198 Times in 124 Posts
As the 19 1/2 inch frame size is the smaller of the 2 frame sizes listed I would guess that it would be more suited to smaller women - I would guess at 5' 2" as well.

Then again, my wife, and through observation, many other women would like the security of being able to put 2 feet on the ground and still be able to sit on the saddle. They would rather ride with their knees bent in a very 'compact' style than raise the seat to give themselves a more powerful position.

I think you could stretch the frame's 'target demographic' to women to a height of 5' 4" to 5' 5".
Gary Fountain is offline  
Old 12-30-08, 10:08 PM
  #11  
wrk101
Thrifty Bill
 
wrk101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,526

Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more

Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 964 Times in 628 Posts
Originally Posted by Gary Fountain
Then again, my wife, and through observation, many other women would like the security of being able to put 2 feet on the ground and still be able to sit on the saddle. They would rather ride with their knees bent in a very 'compact' style than raise the seat to give themselves a more powerful position.
+1 I have had several women expect to be able to sit on the seat while both feet are on the ground. I have tried to explain that seat height/position should be based on the distance to the pedals, not the ground. So you might try it that way: Ask the potential buyer, are you looking to have both feet on the ground when seated? If so, this bike will fit you. But if you want your legs fully extended when pedalling, this bike is probably too small. At the same time, for a woman 5-7, this bike does sound too small.

Speaking from my years of motorcycle experience, there is a certain comfort to be able to have both feet flat on the ground while seated. I have tried to explain that bicycling and motorcycling is not performed Fred Flintstone style, but I have not succeeded with that explanation (I am a part time motorcycle riding instructor).

Last edited by wrk101; 12-30-08 at 10:14 PM. Reason: typo
wrk101 is offline  
Old 12-30-08, 10:12 PM
  #12  
mkeller234
Rustbelt Rider
Thread Starter
 
mkeller234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 9,104

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1420 - 1978 Raleigh Professional - 1973 Schwinn Collegiate - 1974 Schwinn Suburban

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Liked 372 Times in 177 Posts
Thats a good point, my wife falls into that column also. Thanks for the all the help with this.

-Matt
__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
mkeller234 is offline  
Old 12-31-08, 05:01 AM
  #13  
purevl
CroMosexual
 
purevl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Murray, Ky
Posts: 658
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It's a shame that you don't have one of the 210 mixtes that came with cantilever posts, I'm on the hunt for one of those.

As for sizing: In the best of situations the seat tube is a poor sizing guide, on a mixte it is worse than useless. Definitely measure the virtual top tube length. Due to it's design anyone can stand over it and because of readily available long seatposts anyone can get the saddle high enough. Reach and riding style are the only important parameters for fitting a bike like this. The bike could easily provide an agressive fit for a short person or a relaxed upright "city bike" fit for a taller person. This versatility is the beauty of the mixte design, and likely the very reason Miyata built only 2 mixte sizes and 5 standard sizes for the same model.
purevl is offline  
Old 12-31-08, 11:26 AM
  #14  
Trakhak
Senior Member
 
Trakhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,374
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2483 Post(s)
Liked 2,955 Times in 1,678 Posts
Mixtes also almost always have a shorter virtual top tube and, more importantly, a taller headtube and a shorter reach stem compared to the men's model of the same seat tube length, thus getting the bars higher and closer to the seat. This is a simple and seldom understood design decision for sizing bikes for women with long legs and a short torso. Manufacturers produced only one or two mixte sizes because each size could fit women over a wide range of heights. The 22" mixtes were intended for women over about 5' 8" or so, and 19" mixtes were for shorter women, but both sizes are surprisingly accomodating to taller or shorter women.
Trakhak is offline  
Old 12-31-08, 02:21 PM
  #15  
mkeller234
Rustbelt Rider
Thread Starter
 
mkeller234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 9,104

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1420 - 1978 Raleigh Professional - 1973 Schwinn Collegiate - 1974 Schwinn Suburban

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Liked 372 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by purevl
It's a shame that you don't have one of the 210 mixtes that came with cantilever posts, I'm on the hunt for one of those.
Yeah, my 210 also has steel rims too, kind of a bummer. Thanks for all the info, it's been very helpful.

Matt
__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
mkeller234 is offline  
Old 12-31-08, 03:43 PM
  #16  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,880

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
Originally Posted by wrk101
+1


Speaking from my years of motorcycle experience, there is a certain comfort to be able to have both feet flat on the ground while seated. I have tried to explain that bicycling and motorcycling is not performed Fred Flintstone style, but I have not succeeded with that explanation (I am a part time motorcycle riding instructor).

Big difference: if a motorcycle falls over, it weighs 500 to 600 #, and lifting it back upright takes strength, skill, and a technique. Bicycles weigh from 15# (!!!!! Weight Weenie!!!!!!) to say 40#.

Granted it's more comforting, but also point out please the effect on knee joint health and longevity, as the trade-off against comfort.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 12-31-08, 10:50 PM
  #17  
sailorbenjamin
Senior Member
 
sailorbenjamin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rhode Island (an obscure suburb of Connecticut)
Posts: 5,630

Bikes: one of each

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 12 Posts
There's a chart on this web page;
https://www.rivbike.com/article/bike_...g_a_frame_size
I've also heard that you take your inseam, barefoot, floor to pubic bone and multiply that by 109% and that should be the distance between the seat and the Bottom pedal. You can figure the range of seat adjustment and work out the formula and give an approximate range based on inseam.
sailorbenjamin is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.