Separate but Equal is the Only Way To Ensure Bike Safety
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 919
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Separate but Equal is the Only Way To Ensure Bike Safety
I've ridden a bike for two decades in the USA and have done extensive touring and/or lived for extended periods in England, France, Germany, Netherlands etc.
I've come to the conclusion that the only way going forward to maintain tolerable safety of riders is to have separate by equal bike and car lanes. Now I don't mean a line painted on a road to separate the bike lane from cars giving the bikes four feet. Rather I mean a raised divider which a car cannot and is not allowed to cross.
I've come to this conclusion because of many reasons such as those listed below but there are of course others:
i) A 2+ tonne automobile with hard shells and a 200 pound soft machine are just incompatible to operate together without a significant risk to the later.
ii) The belief ingrained in society that the roads were created for use by cars and bicyclist use them at their own peril
iii) The refusal of the courts to hold drivers liable for culpable behavior no mater how egrigous and dangerous. A driver just needs a plausible execuse and they are given a free pass.
In France they have a win/win situation. They have separate bus lanes separated from cars by a 10 cm raised divider that bikes are permitted to use. It works doubly great at reducing cars from the road because people like to take public transportation (its faster than cars due to the dedicated lanes) and people like to ride their bikes because its safe.
See attached photo in Paris.
What do you think? I just see no way for bikes and cars to co-exist (to our satisfaction) on the same space.
I've come to the conclusion that the only way going forward to maintain tolerable safety of riders is to have separate by equal bike and car lanes. Now I don't mean a line painted on a road to separate the bike lane from cars giving the bikes four feet. Rather I mean a raised divider which a car cannot and is not allowed to cross.
I've come to this conclusion because of many reasons such as those listed below but there are of course others:
i) A 2+ tonne automobile with hard shells and a 200 pound soft machine are just incompatible to operate together without a significant risk to the later.
ii) The belief ingrained in society that the roads were created for use by cars and bicyclist use them at their own peril
iii) The refusal of the courts to hold drivers liable for culpable behavior no mater how egrigous and dangerous. A driver just needs a plausible execuse and they are given a free pass.
In France they have a win/win situation. They have separate bus lanes separated from cars by a 10 cm raised divider that bikes are permitted to use. It works doubly great at reducing cars from the road because people like to take public transportation (its faster than cars due to the dedicated lanes) and people like to ride their bikes because its safe.
See attached photo in Paris.
What do you think? I just see no way for bikes and cars to co-exist (to our satisfaction) on the same space.
Last edited by raria; 05-19-18 at 06:57 AM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: 961' 42.28° N, 83.78° W (A2)
Posts: 2,344
Bikes: Mongoose Selous, Trek DS
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 941 Post(s)
Liked 319 Times
in
189 Posts
The laws of physics would support your conclusion. However, the laws of reality, at least here in the U.S., make this unlikely due to the infrastructure modifications and costs. We can't even properly maintain what we have.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 919
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Exactly.
I partially agree. . . . if we don't make drastic changes like separate but equal pathways there will always many fatalities of cyclists.
I disagree with the cost issue you raise. It does requires a mindset change to priortize bus and public transit over cars. These bus lanes take away 1.5 car lanes.
I disagree with the cost issue you raise. It does requires a mindset change to priortize bus and public transit over cars. These bus lanes take away 1.5 car lanes.
Last edited by BillyD; 05-19-18 at 10:48 AM. Reason: gun talk
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,505
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5877 Post(s)
Liked 3,445 Times
in
2,066 Posts
I'd like to live in the nirvana you describe.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,505
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5877 Post(s)
Liked 3,445 Times
in
2,066 Posts
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 919
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
No al all.
My point was not supposed to be political. Just pragmatic.
If we want to really stop all these killings we need major changes. Not just these piddly 3 foot passing laws or painitng bike lanes in brighter colorers. We need real fundamental changes like separate paths for bikes.
If we want to really stop all these killings we need major changes. Not just these piddly 3 foot passing laws or painitng bike lanes in brighter colorers. We need real fundamental changes like separate paths for bikes.
Last edited by BillyD; 05-19-18 at 10:50 AM. Reason: Removed gun talk
#7
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
Sorry, I just assumed it was a ploy (and I still do). Cars aren't designed to be weapons, so it is a false equivalency.
How about universal enforcement of currently-existing laws and vigorous prosecution of the offenders?
How about universal enforcement of currently-existing laws and vigorous prosecution of the offenders?
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 919
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
But this entire forum is about existing laws.
That's my third point in the OP. This entire forum is about existing laws and vigorous prosecution as you put it.
But lets be honest. Whose happy with: i) the existing laws, and ii) how vigorous the prosecution of offenders is?
I would say (and that's been generous) that for every thread about a fair prosecutions there are 10+ threads where the person has gotten away with just a slap on the wrists.
But lets be honest. Whose happy with: i) the existing laws, and ii) how vigorous the prosecution of offenders is?
I would say (and that's been generous) that for every thread about a fair prosecutions there are 10+ threads where the person has gotten away with just a slap on the wrists.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 919
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Fair point. Ignore my comment about Guns
I just wanted to point out that the current status quo in both situations is not working. But if the comparison is too politically charged then lets just drop it.
I really do believe that the only way to stop all these cyclists deaths is to have separate bike lanes which cars cannot go on.
I really do believe that the only way to stop all these cyclists deaths is to have separate bike lanes which cars cannot go on.
#11
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
Does that mean only 1/10 cases are prosecuted fairly, or that the unfair ones attract disproportionate attention? Your metric is indirect, and not a reliable indicator of the actual statistics.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 2,201
Bikes: Old Stuff
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 912 Post(s)
Liked 514 Times
in
343 Posts
Actually, this does seem doable in a very old city like Manhattan, a place I will never willingly go again, make car driving less convenient. But mass transit and food/goods delivery will have to share.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
I thing that our local drivers would just slide over that little hump and start honking at anyone in their way. Add some bollards and then we're talking.
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 919
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Should have been clearer
The lane is *only* for buses and bikes. Cars can't enter them. The hump is just to put a physical barrier so that the car's don't drift into the bike lane while the drivers are texting, arguing or by mistake.
It's great idea the French have. You see loads of adults, kids and families using the bike/bus lanes. You just have to be careful that when a bus comes up you pull to the side to let them pass. But buses are not that frequent and you'd be lucky to encounter one on a 10 minute trip.
It's great idea the French have. You see loads of adults, kids and families using the bike/bus lanes. You just have to be careful that when a bus comes up you pull to the side to let them pass. But buses are not that frequent and you'd be lucky to encounter one on a 10 minute trip.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 919
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
it would work in any city with dedicated bus lanes
Since mass bus transit is a way of life here, most cities have dedicated bus lanes. So making them bike/bus lanes is not a challenge. It's wonderful on the weekend when buses are minimal. Then they become default bike lanes.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
The lane is *only* for buses and bikes. Cars can't enter them. The hump is just to put a physical barrier so that the car's don't drift into the bike lane while the drivers are texting, arguing or by mistake.
It's great idea the French have. You see loads of adults, kids and families using the bike/bus lanes. You just have to be careful that when a bus comes up you pull to the side to let them pass. But buses are not that frequent and you'd be lucky to encounter one on a 10 minute trip.
It's great idea the French have. You see loads of adults, kids and families using the bike/bus lanes. You just have to be careful that when a bus comes up you pull to the side to let them pass. But buses are not that frequent and you'd be lucky to encounter one on a 10 minute trip.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Stephenville TX
Posts: 3,697
Bikes: 2010 Trek 7100
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 697 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Oh yeah; reasonable training requirements for the person controlling the larger vehicle, and serious penalties if they do so carelessly.
#18
Senior Member
Motorcyclists in general feel more safe in traffic than cyclists because they can keep up with cars and claim an entire lane habitually, and thus don't have to deal with cars constantly passing them too closely. Otherwise, the inherent risks are mostly the same.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Stephenville TX
Posts: 3,697
Bikes: 2010 Trek 7100
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 697 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Not necessarily; we've got plenty of little old ladies locally who drive their tiny cars as if they're on a 30mph residential at all times. They'll go 30 down a stretch of 60mph highway connecting the city proper with a couple of outlying housing developments "because I'm just going a couple miles" and yet the big rigs manage to not flatten them in spite of a speed differential double that of a 15mph cyclist in 30mph traffic. Same for the RV hillbillies in their self-propelled singlewides; I've been stuck behind one for 14 miles on a two-lane 75mph highway going 40. While there were some unsafe pass attempts by other cars, nobody got rear ended because of the speed differential.
#20
Senior Member
Not necessarily; we've got plenty of little old ladies locally who drive their tiny cars as if they're on a 30mph residential at all times. They'll go 30 down a stretch of 60mph highway connecting the city proper with a couple of outlying housing developments "because I'm just going a couple miles" and yet the big rigs manage to not flatten them in spite of a speed differential double that of a 15mph cyclist in 30mph traffic. Same for the RV hillbillies in their self-propelled singlewides; I've been stuck behind one for 14 miles on a two-lane 75mph highway going 40. While there were some unsafe pass attempts by other cars, nobody got rear ended because of the speed differential.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Stephenville TX
Posts: 3,697
Bikes: 2010 Trek 7100
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 697 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
No, it's not, for the simple reason that people very rarely try to punish pass a car, tractor or RV the way they will a cyclist, regardless of speed.
#22
Senior Member
Just as many people get annoyed at greyhairs holding up traffic as they do at cyclists.
#23
Banned
Big difference NL bike riders are a huge number of Voters.
And so they get infrastructure.. Spending..
more than just paint and stencils.
..
And so they get infrastructure.. Spending..
more than just paint and stencils.
..
#25
Senior Member
Cars will readily pass any person or vehicle that is obstructing traffic significantly, with whatever space is perceived as available.
Also, I literally quoted your original post with "try to punish pass"