downsides to used keirin framesets?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 77
Bikes: 1979-80? Gazelle Champion Mondial A Frame road bike with mix and match campy and shimano parts, Raleigh Rush Hour FG, Specialized Globe Roll FG, Trek 8500 MTB,
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
downsides to used keirin framesets?
After several seasons of xc mountain bike, cyclocross, and road racing, I decided to venture into the realm of track racing and it is an absolute blast. the thing is, my current bike is bombproof and weighs in at around 23 pounds. This thing was really built for the abuse of riding on the street, which it does phenomenally, not for racing. I have been checking out NJS Export, and have heard some good things about the guy who runs it. There are some framesets on there that are priced relatively reasonably. I think I want to build up a bike with one of his framesets.
What, if any, are the downsides to racing a used (but in good cosmetic shape) keirin frameset? I must imagine that the pros who have used these before they are exported put a huge amount of stress on these bikes, but since the framesets are lugged steel, they should hold up pretty well, right?
anyone have any experience with these?
What, if any, are the downsides to racing a used (but in good cosmetic shape) keirin frameset? I must imagine that the pros who have used these before they are exported put a huge amount of stress on these bikes, but since the framesets are lugged steel, they should hold up pretty well, right?
anyone have any experience with these?
#2
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
They should be fine. It's my understanding that one minor dent might render a Keirin bike unable to pass inspection.
That being said, NJS riders ride those bikes because they have to. By all accounts: If they had their pick, they would ride modern bikes.
Remember, NJS doesn't mean it's better than modern bikes. Actually, it's quite the contrary. It means that the bike and parts have been made to specifications that date back decades to ensure that no one competitor has an equipment advantage over another.
I raced at a local track weekly (when in season) and went to a couple of National events and I did not see ONE NJS bike all season. I *DID* however get to see an ex Keirin racer compete on an Anchor/Bridgestone...a carbon fiber one :-)
That being said, NJS riders ride those bikes because they have to. By all accounts: If they had their pick, they would ride modern bikes.
Remember, NJS doesn't mean it's better than modern bikes. Actually, it's quite the contrary. It means that the bike and parts have been made to specifications that date back decades to ensure that no one competitor has an equipment advantage over another.
I raced at a local track weekly (when in season) and went to a couple of National events and I did not see ONE NJS bike all season. I *DID* however get to see an ex Keirin racer compete on an Anchor/Bridgestone...a carbon fiber one :-)
#3
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
To get an idea of what regular folks race on locally, not just the world-class stuff, have a look here: https://www.flickr.com/groups/dlv/pool/
Some of those in the photos are pros, national, and world champs at the local races. They've got to be local somewhere, right?
Most bikes are off-the-shelf types in the $800 - $2,000 range. There are, of course, a few exceptions on either end of that range.
Some of those in the photos are pros, national, and world champs at the local races. They've got to be local somewhere, right?
Most bikes are off-the-shelf types in the $800 - $2,000 range. There are, of course, a few exceptions on either end of that range.
#4
Run What 'Ya Brung
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,694
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Keirin bikes themselves all start out great, but by the time you buy one, you should be examining the condition just as you would with any other new or used bicycle. They are not commonly raced in the US, probably because they are currently more expensive and usually harder to acquire than many mid-to-high end track bikes, bikes which are lighter, stiffer and generally more suited to today's racing. I still see plenty of people racing old and new steel frames, but like Carleton, few if any of those are NJS bikes.
There was a time, not more than a few years ago, when track bikes were exceedingly rare, and the least expensive quality "legit" track bike you could find was an old NJS frame from Japan or one of the handful of people who imported them. For a variety of reasons, demand has now outpaced supply, while at the same time, the whole bike industry went and dumped a thousand new track frames onto the market, so buying a used keirin bike is no longer a very good value (unless you find some insane deal, but those don't seem to come around much anymore).
There was a time, not more than a few years ago, when track bikes were exceedingly rare, and the least expensive quality "legit" track bike you could find was an old NJS frame from Japan or one of the handful of people who imported them. For a variety of reasons, demand has now outpaced supply, while at the same time, the whole bike industry went and dumped a thousand new track frames onto the market, so buying a used keirin bike is no longer a very good value (unless you find some insane deal, but those don't seem to come around much anymore).
#5
vexatious enigma
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sammamish WA
Posts: 17
Bikes: 90's Specialized Sirrus Pake Track
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The downside is that it's used and you don't know exactly where it's been. Assuming that it hasn't been in a major crash or something I'd say go for it. I would.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 77
Bikes: 1979-80? Gazelle Champion Mondial A Frame road bike with mix and match campy and shimano parts, Raleigh Rush Hour FG, Specialized Globe Roll FG, Trek 8500 MTB,
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
thanks for your opinions. I am well aware that there are good new bikes out there, one of my teammates has a pretty nice fuji pro. I am definitely still gonna go with a lugged steel frame, so I'll keep shopping around and see what I find. Honestly, I'm really not that much of a weight weenie, I just want something that is relatively light but will last me for many years to come, and I am very skeptic about aluminum and carbon, as aluminum bikes definitely feel pretty dead after several years of racing, and i have a friend who's carbon frameset broke, and I cant afford Ti. I guess I will just keep my eyes open for good deals. I just dont want to end up with a bike that is so beat up that it will fall apart when I ride it hard.
#7
Veteran Racer
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Posts: 11,757
Bikes: 32 frames + 80 wheels
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1331 Post(s)
Liked 764 Times
in
431 Posts
thanks for your opinions. I am well aware that there are good new bikes out there, one of my teammates has a pretty nice fuji pro. I am definitely still gonna go with a lugged steel frame, so I'll keep shopping around and see what I find. Honestly, I'm really not that much of a weight weenie, I just want something that is relatively light but will last me for many years to come, and I am very skeptic about aluminum and carbon, as aluminum bikes definitely feel pretty dead after several years of racing, and i have a friend who's carbon frameset broke, and I cant afford Ti. I guess I will just keep my eyes open for good deals. I just dont want to end up with a bike that is so beat up that it will fall apart when I ride it hard.
#9
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
Another thing, NJS bikes (and older bikes in general) are designed to different fitting methodologies which make the bikes handle differently.
Look at old photos and you see a large frame with a high TT, "a handful of seatpost" under the rider, and a down-sloping stem. Now bikes have lower TTs, longer seat posts, and up-sloping stems.
Modern bikes seem to be more nimble and easier to handle. I can't put my finger on exactly why, but that's how they compare in my humble opinion.
Look at old photos and you see a large frame with a high TT, "a handful of seatpost" under the rider, and a down-sloping stem. Now bikes have lower TTs, longer seat posts, and up-sloping stems.
Modern bikes seem to be more nimble and easier to handle. I can't put my finger on exactly why, but that's how they compare in my humble opinion.
#10
Senior Member
I've been racing an NJS steel frameset over here with some pretty good success against riders on bikes many, many times the price. It's not the bike. Anyhow, it isn't really much heavier than many of the new type bikes. My teammate has an Anchor carbon bike and it's HEAVIER than my steel bike! Weight really isn't much of an issue on the track. Buy what you like.
Anecdote: I have a friend over here who recently upgraded to a Teschner form an older steel keirin frame. His difference in times? Nothing. In fact, his fastest 200 and kilo are still on the old "inferior" bike. Make of that what you will.
Additionally, if you can find a fair vendor, an ex-keirin frame is a good value. Frames are often retired on a yearly basis on principle, even if they are un-crashed. If you can find one of these it's basically new. Good luck!
Anecdote: I have a friend over here who recently upgraded to a Teschner form an older steel keirin frame. His difference in times? Nothing. In fact, his fastest 200 and kilo are still on the old "inferior" bike. Make of that what you will.
Additionally, if you can find a fair vendor, an ex-keirin frame is a good value. Frames are often retired on a yearly basis on principle, even if they are un-crashed. If you can find one of these it's basically new. Good luck!
#11
Run What 'Ya Brung
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,694
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I moved from a twenty year old steel track bike to a modern aluminum one and my times and results improved dramatically. Pretty much every person I race with made this jump at one time or another, and nearly every one of them will comment on how much better their new bike is than their old one. Make of that what you will.
You're the only person to bring up weight in this conversation. The problem most people have with keirin frames is not weight, it's that they are highly flexible compared to a comparable bike made of aluminum or carbon, and that the geometry is generally designed for an event and a type of velodrome few of us encounter with any regularity (and even if you do keirin, international keirin is different from Japanese keirin). Your friend's Anchor may weigh more than your steel bike, but that's not the point - it's function is to be exceptionally stiff.
You're the only person to bring up weight in this conversation. The problem most people have with keirin frames is not weight, it's that they are highly flexible compared to a comparable bike made of aluminum or carbon, and that the geometry is generally designed for an event and a type of velodrome few of us encounter with any regularity (and even if you do keirin, international keirin is different from Japanese keirin). Your friend's Anchor may weigh more than your steel bike, but that's not the point - it's function is to be exceptionally stiff.
#12
Senior Member
Bonechilling wrote: "You're the only person to bring up weight in this conversation"
-Not true, check the OP's second post.
Yeah, that's fine- everyone's milage will vary. Perhaps someday I'll be upgrading to carbon, too-- I'm certainly not against it. Also, stiffness depends on the rider. I'm only 170 pounds, and mine is plenty stiff for me. I've also seen a number of NJS frames that have managed to get "creative" within the rules- massive tube diameters, unorthodox bottom bracket shell construction, etc. Mine is pretty garden variety, but it is still very possible to make a very stiff frame out of steel. Check out Yamaguchi, for example.
And on the bumpy tracks of the US, steel might actually be a blessing. I've only ridden two US tracks, but boy I sure would take my "flexible" steel bike over an ultra-stiff alloy bike there!
In my admittedly un-scientific experiences I've found that equipment changes are mostly psychological, at least in super-short sprint events. That means; if you think your equipment is fast, then it most certainly is.
In any case, my advice to the OP is the same: Buy what you like. If it's a quality track bike of whatever type, you'll be psyched. It's so much more fun than the road!
-Not true, check the OP's second post.
Yeah, that's fine- everyone's milage will vary. Perhaps someday I'll be upgrading to carbon, too-- I'm certainly not against it. Also, stiffness depends on the rider. I'm only 170 pounds, and mine is plenty stiff for me. I've also seen a number of NJS frames that have managed to get "creative" within the rules- massive tube diameters, unorthodox bottom bracket shell construction, etc. Mine is pretty garden variety, but it is still very possible to make a very stiff frame out of steel. Check out Yamaguchi, for example.
And on the bumpy tracks of the US, steel might actually be a blessing. I've only ridden two US tracks, but boy I sure would take my "flexible" steel bike over an ultra-stiff alloy bike there!
In my admittedly un-scientific experiences I've found that equipment changes are mostly psychological, at least in super-short sprint events. That means; if you think your equipment is fast, then it most certainly is.
In any case, my advice to the OP is the same: Buy what you like. If it's a quality track bike of whatever type, you'll be psyched. It's so much more fun than the road!
#13
Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Steel NJS vs. Aluminum Concept
Anyone reading this discussion should refer to the Blotto interview with Mike Hernandez here:
https://www.blottophotto.com/29:-samson-njs/
He clearly explains the difference in feel of the two styles of track frames. Having owned both styles myself I would have to completely agree with what he says concerning razor vs. sword.
https://www.blottophotto.com/29:-samson-njs/
He clearly explains the difference in feel of the two styles of track frames. Having owned both styles myself I would have to completely agree with what he says concerning razor vs. sword.
#14
Run What 'Ya Brung
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,694
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Anyone reading this discussion should refer to the Blotto interview with Mike Hernandez here:
https://www.blottophotto.com/29:-samson-njs/
He clearly explains the difference in feel of the two styles of track frames. Having owned both styles myself I would have to completely agree with what he says concerning razor vs. sword.
https://www.blottophotto.com/29:-samson-njs/
He clearly explains the difference in feel of the two styles of track frames. Having owned both styles myself I would have to completely agree with what he says concerning razor vs. sword.
#15
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Another thing, NJS bikes (and older bikes in general) are designed to different fitting methodologies which make the bikes handle differently.
Look at old photos and you see a large frame with a high TT, "a handful of seatpost" under the rider, and a down-sloping stem. Now bikes have lower TTs, longer seat posts, and up-sloping stems.
Look at old photos and you see a large frame with a high TT, "a handful of seatpost" under the rider, and a down-sloping stem. Now bikes have lower TTs, longer seat posts, and up-sloping stems.
njs bikes are very refined and extremely well built.. engineered w/ tight triangles and stability in mind. also the njs frames tend to accomodate japanese body dimensions and style... w/ lots of leaning over and lower saddles to leverage their downstroke. which is must since they dont allow clip ins.
Last edited by eoLithic; 03-25-11 at 04:30 PM.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Bikes are bikes, yes, they are put under a lot of stress but how much more powerful are you than a world class track racer? Your power shouldn't stress the bike enough to make it an issue
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
e17blade
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
32
12-21-21 06:42 AM
noglider
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
14
01-28-14 12:05 AM
shrinkboy
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
7
11-19-10 11:17 AM