Why do you think Froome is dirty but Sagan is clean?
07-30-18, 02:38 PM
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
204 Posts
I have no idea how you got that from my post. In both situations described in the quoted post, 'in-depth investigation by experts' was performed by the UCI and/or WADA. They ultimately decided to state that Sagan shouldn't be punished and that Froome's result was not conclusive enough to punish him.
08-04-18, 09:19 AM
#52
Senior Member
I have no idea how you got that from my post. In both situations described in the quoted post, 'in-depth investigation by experts' was performed by the UCI and/or WADA. They ultimately decided to state that Sagan shouldn't be punished and that Froome's result was not conclusive enough to punish him.
08-04-18, 09:53 AM
#53
Heretic
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 2,246
Bikes: Specialized Sirrus, Giant OCR3, Giant CRS3
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2827 Post(s)
Liked 561 Times
in
429 Posts
And Sagan was punished by being thrown out of the 2017 TdF, not on the basis of an in-depth expert investigation. If it was 'obvious to most' then why wasn't it obvious to the race officials?
08-04-18, 11:12 AM
#54
Senior Member
08-04-18, 01:45 PM
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
204 Posts
And once a proper investigation was conducted, the powers that be admitted they made a mistake and apologized yet some people still think he was in the wrong. Hence my post.
08-04-18, 01:48 PM
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
204 Posts
Froome certainly benefited from having a high priced legal/scientific team backing him, but what makes you think the result was political? Did the lead scientist who developed the test not say there were problems? Why do you think the ruling isn't based on the science?
