The Water Cooler, Scuttlebutt, Chit Chat Thread
#426
Senior Member
I classify racers as the following:
1. Want to win and good enough to win locally. Will continue racing as long as this is the case, and I figure for a decent talent racer that'll go on forever.
2. Identify as a racer (usually at a social level, like a dad or mom or promoter etc). Will continue racing although many of their races may only last 1-2 miles before they're shelled.
3. Races to beat others. Will quit racing after being spectacular for a while. A lot of the incredibly strong riders get to their tipping point then quit because, well, they're not beating the next level of racer as a whole. Even World Tour riders have to target races.
4. Strives to race as well as possible, regardless of form/fitness. Will continue racing because the race itself is the goal, not the result.
All racers must have limited distractions, meaning other hobbies or time sucking activities.
__________________
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
#427
Senior Member
The 50% in the first 2 years makes total sense. People are trying something out for fun. Lots of people try all sorts of stuff and don't stick it out very long.
After that it seems to me the biggest reason to quit is it just takes over all of life.
Everyone tapers. I'd been a 3 for 25 years when I upgraded to 2, and then I promptly downgraded back to 3 the following year.
I classify racers as the following:
1. Want to win and good enough to win locally. Will continue racing as long as this is the case, and I figure for a decent talent racer that'll go on forever.
2. Identify as a racer (usually at a social level, like a dad or mom or promoter etc). Will continue racing although many of their races may only last 1-2 miles before they're shelled.
3. Races to beat others. Will quit racing after being spectacular for a while. A lot of the incredibly strong riders get to their tipping point then quit because, well, they're not beating the next level of racer as a whole. Even World Tour riders have to target races.
4. Strives to race as well as possible, regardless of form/fitness. Will continue racing because the race itself is the goal, not the result.
All racers must have limited distractions, meaning other hobbies or time sucking activities.
I classify racers as the following:
1. Want to win and good enough to win locally. Will continue racing as long as this is the case, and I figure for a decent talent racer that'll go on forever.
2. Identify as a racer (usually at a social level, like a dad or mom or promoter etc). Will continue racing although many of their races may only last 1-2 miles before they're shelled.
3. Races to beat others. Will quit racing after being spectacular for a while. A lot of the incredibly strong riders get to their tipping point then quit because, well, they're not beating the next level of racer as a whole. Even World Tour riders have to target races.
4. Strives to race as well as possible, regardless of form/fitness. Will continue racing because the race itself is the goal, not the result.
All racers must have limited distractions, meaning other hobbies or time sucking activities.
Me, I may not race into my late 30s. For me it kinda suffocates any social life. But OTOH since I'm not very social by nature it's kind of a nice distraction.
Last edited by aaronmcd; 06-12-17 at 02:22 PM.
#428
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Posts: 13,089
Mentioned: 158 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 349 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
6 Posts
MV of CRCA continues his interesting (to me) series of articles on the health status of bicycle racing:
https://www.tobedetermined.cc/journa...ics-of-cycling
The interesting graph shows a representative group of new racing members and how they are extremely not retained over a short period of time:
There is some proxy data and assumptions in here but in short, the graph suggests that half of new racers are out of the sport within 2 years, and 90% are out within 7 years.
https://www.tobedetermined.cc/journa...ics-of-cycling
The interesting graph shows a representative group of new racing members and how they are extremely not retained over a short period of time:
There is some proxy data and assumptions in here but in short, the graph suggests that half of new racers are out of the sport within 2 years, and 90% are out within 7 years.
Worth noting that other "high risk" sports that require you to attain basic competency retain a much higher percentage of participants, with a much lower carnage level.
It's quite easy to die SCUBA diving. Back in the "bad old days" people just grabbed a tank and jumped in the water. Unsurprisingly, a high percentage of participants got hurt or died. The sport created certification agencies, and that number dropped to tiny, and mostly on the fringe (cave diving, mixed gas deep diving, Etc). The sport grew exponentially.
By it's nature cycling will always have crashes. People fall down in their driveway. Just as a few people still die SCUBA diving. But we no longer just hand people who ask SCUBA tanks, while we hand out racing licenses to ANYONE with $10. That's just nuts and inexcusable. Hope is not a strategy and in the long run it's a crappy training program. But that's what we run on.
But we can put a lot of resources to stopping doping because that's been so obviously effective and it's why Cat 5's do one or two races and go "eff this".
Oke doke.
I've been around two wheel sport almost my entire life. I've seen how training and certification programs improve both the quality of the participants, and lessens the number of incidents. You keep people off the ground and they will hang around longer. Same if you improve the level of riding. If you lose 10% of the people who think taking a class or two and having to be approved is too much hassle, you'll more than pick that up in retention.
In 650 races, give or take, I've been down 5 times, four of those were solo things where I could have been out training. Crashing can be a minimal part of the sport if you have knowledge and skills.
Training was a good place to start, that should have happened a long time ago. 3 years ago I sent a petition to USAC about this. DBH publicly stated they were working on a program. Crickets.
That we can't make things perfect seems to be one incredibly lame excuse. The other biggest push back against requiring training seems to come from people who end up on the ground a lot. "You crash if you race". There's a lot of Dunning-Kruger right there.
#429
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,441
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4221 Post(s)
Liked 2,942 Times
in
1,801 Posts
MV of CRCA continues his interesting (to me) series of articles on the health status of bicycle racing:
https://www.tobedetermined.cc/journa...ics-of-cycling
The interesting graph shows a representative group of new racing members and how they are extremely not retained over a short period of time:
There is some proxy data and assumptions in here but in short, the graph suggests that half of new racers are out of the sport within 2 years, and 90% are out within 7 years.
https://www.tobedetermined.cc/journa...ics-of-cycling
The interesting graph shows a representative group of new racing members and how they are extremely not retained over a short period of time:
There is some proxy data and assumptions in here but in short, the graph suggests that half of new racers are out of the sport within 2 years, and 90% are out within 7 years.
#431
**** that
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Posts: 15,402
Mentioned: 151 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1099 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times
in
30 Posts
Been saying this for years.
Worth noting that other "high risk" sports that require you to attain basic competency retain a much higher percentage of participants, with a much lower carnage level.
It's quite easy to die SCUBA diving. Back in the "bad old days" people just grabbed a tank and jumped in the water. Unsurprisingly, a high percentage of participants got hurt or died. The sport created certification agencies, and that number dropped to tiny, and mostly on the fringe (cave diving, mixed gas deep diving, Etc). The sport grew exponentially.
By it's nature cycling will always have crashes. People fall down in their driveway. Just as a few people still die SCUBA diving. But we no longer just hand people who ask SCUBA tanks, while we hand out racing licenses to ANYONE with $10. That's just nuts and inexcusable. Hope is not a strategy and in the long run it's a crappy training program. But that's what we run on.
But we can put a lot of resources to stopping doping because that's been so obviously effective and it's why Cat 5's do one or two races and go "eff this".
Oke doke.
I've been around two wheel sport almost my entire life. I've seen how training and certification programs improve both the quality of the participants, and lessens the number of incidents. You keep people off the ground and they will hang around longer. Same if you improve the level of riding. If you lose 10% of the people who think taking a class or two and having to be approved is too much hassle, you'll more than pick that up in retention.
In 650 races, give or take, I've been down 5 times, four of those were solo things where I could have been out training. Crashing can be a minimal part of the sport if you have knowledge and skills.
Training was a good place to start, that should have happened a long time ago. 3 years ago I sent a petition to USAC about this. DBH publicly stated they were working on a program. Crickets.
That we can't make things perfect seems to be one incredibly lame excuse. The other biggest push back against requiring training seems to come from people who end up on the ground a lot. "You crash if you race". There's a lot of Dunning-Kruger right there.
Worth noting that other "high risk" sports that require you to attain basic competency retain a much higher percentage of participants, with a much lower carnage level.
It's quite easy to die SCUBA diving. Back in the "bad old days" people just grabbed a tank and jumped in the water. Unsurprisingly, a high percentage of participants got hurt or died. The sport created certification agencies, and that number dropped to tiny, and mostly on the fringe (cave diving, mixed gas deep diving, Etc). The sport grew exponentially.
By it's nature cycling will always have crashes. People fall down in their driveway. Just as a few people still die SCUBA diving. But we no longer just hand people who ask SCUBA tanks, while we hand out racing licenses to ANYONE with $10. That's just nuts and inexcusable. Hope is not a strategy and in the long run it's a crappy training program. But that's what we run on.
But we can put a lot of resources to stopping doping because that's been so obviously effective and it's why Cat 5's do one or two races and go "eff this".
Oke doke.
I've been around two wheel sport almost my entire life. I've seen how training and certification programs improve both the quality of the participants, and lessens the number of incidents. You keep people off the ground and they will hang around longer. Same if you improve the level of riding. If you lose 10% of the people who think taking a class or two and having to be approved is too much hassle, you'll more than pick that up in retention.
In 650 races, give or take, I've been down 5 times, four of those were solo things where I could have been out training. Crashing can be a minimal part of the sport if you have knowledge and skills.
Training was a good place to start, that should have happened a long time ago. 3 years ago I sent a petition to USAC about this. DBH publicly stated they were working on a program. Crickets.
That we can't make things perfect seems to be one incredibly lame excuse. The other biggest push back against requiring training seems to come from people who end up on the ground a lot. "You crash if you race". There's a lot of Dunning-Kruger right there.
I'm sure it's part of the reason for a lot of people, but the people I know that gave up on the sport was because it was a) too hard or b) too time consuming, or both, for the most part.
#432
Senior Member
Been saying this for years.
Worth noting that other "high risk" sports that require you to attain basic competency retain a much higher percentage of participants, with a much lower carnage level.
It's quite easy to die SCUBA diving. Back in the "bad old days" people just grabbed a tank and jumped in the water. Unsurprisingly, a high percentage of participants got hurt or died. The sport created certification agencies, and that number dropped to tiny, and mostly on the fringe (cave diving, mixed gas deep diving, Etc). The sport grew exponentially.
By it's nature cycling will always have crashes. People fall down in their driveway. Just as a few people still die SCUBA diving. But we no longer just hand people who ask SCUBA tanks, while we hand out racing licenses to ANYONE with $10. That's just nuts and inexcusable. Hope is not a strategy and in the long run it's a crappy training program. But that's what we run on.
But we can put a lot of resources to stopping doping because that's been so obviously effective and it's why Cat 5's do one or two races and go "eff this".
Oke doke.
I've been around two wheel sport almost my entire life. I've seen how training and certification programs improve both the quality of the participants, and lessens the number of incidents. You keep people off the ground and they will hang around longer. Same if you improve the level of riding. If you lose 10% of the people who think taking a class or two and having to be approved is too much hassle, you'll more than pick that up in retention.
In 650 races, give or take, I've been down 5 times, four of those were solo things where I could have been out training. Crashing can be a minimal part of the sport if you have knowledge and skills.
Training was a good place to start, that should have happened a long time ago. 3 years ago I sent a petition to USAC about this. DBH publicly stated they were working on a program. Crickets.
That we can't make things perfect seems to be one incredibly lame excuse. The other biggest push back against requiring training seems to come from people who end up on the ground a lot. "You crash if you race". There's a lot of Dunning-Kruger right there.
Worth noting that other "high risk" sports that require you to attain basic competency retain a much higher percentage of participants, with a much lower carnage level.
It's quite easy to die SCUBA diving. Back in the "bad old days" people just grabbed a tank and jumped in the water. Unsurprisingly, a high percentage of participants got hurt or died. The sport created certification agencies, and that number dropped to tiny, and mostly on the fringe (cave diving, mixed gas deep diving, Etc). The sport grew exponentially.
By it's nature cycling will always have crashes. People fall down in their driveway. Just as a few people still die SCUBA diving. But we no longer just hand people who ask SCUBA tanks, while we hand out racing licenses to ANYONE with $10. That's just nuts and inexcusable. Hope is not a strategy and in the long run it's a crappy training program. But that's what we run on.
But we can put a lot of resources to stopping doping because that's been so obviously effective and it's why Cat 5's do one or two races and go "eff this".
Oke doke.
I've been around two wheel sport almost my entire life. I've seen how training and certification programs improve both the quality of the participants, and lessens the number of incidents. You keep people off the ground and they will hang around longer. Same if you improve the level of riding. If you lose 10% of the people who think taking a class or two and having to be approved is too much hassle, you'll more than pick that up in retention.
In 650 races, give or take, I've been down 5 times, four of those were solo things where I could have been out training. Crashing can be a minimal part of the sport if you have knowledge and skills.
Training was a good place to start, that should have happened a long time ago. 3 years ago I sent a petition to USAC about this. DBH publicly stated they were working on a program. Crickets.
That we can't make things perfect seems to be one incredibly lame excuse. The other biggest push back against requiring training seems to come from people who end up on the ground a lot. "You crash if you race". There's a lot of Dunning-Kruger right there.
I guess I'm one of those 10% People are hesitant to try racing AS IS. If it was gonna require a bunch of BS I likely would never have tried it. It's not that dangerous. There's no license required to enter the skate park for crying out loud. There's no license required to go get hit by a driver in a road rage incident either. But you want barriers to entry for a few guys to ride bikes in circles.
#433
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Posts: 13,089
Mentioned: 158 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 349 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
6 Posts
I think that assumes people are giving up on racing mostly due to the risk factor/crashes - is that a true assumption?
I'm sure it's part of the reason for a lot of people, but the people I know that gave up on the sport was because it was a) too hard or b) too time consuming, or both, for the most part.
I'm sure it's part of the reason for a lot of people, but the people I know that gave up on the sport was because it was a) too hard or b) too time consuming, or both, for the most part.
In my experience time does come into play for some people, but often when you hear "too hard, too much time" that sort of falls by the wayside when the same people take up "easy/very little time" things like triathlon or marathons. Or golf. It's a lot like "my wife won't let me". At least on the male side most guys aren't going to say that they were scared ****less in casual conversation.
I can tell you that, having crashed into a concrete wall at over 100 MPH, having been lifted out of the water by a 700 pound shark, and having seen more than my share of bike racing injuries, it's not always the one incident or the one friend you lost that makes people question participation in certain risky sports, but often an accumulation of incidents. Tipping points happen.
Hard and time consuming are only nominally controllable in bike racing, beyond course selection. But hard and time consuming seems to work just fine elsewhere. What we can control to improve safety and create a positive participant experience we should. That's just intelligent business. We don't.
#434
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,182
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 243 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
@racerEx for USAC president!
I wonder if he would ever consider taking on a Lord Buckethead persona dressed as Racer Ex?
#436
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Posts: 13,089
Mentioned: 158 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 349 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
6 Posts
Yeah. I was just sending a guy in ICU a note about getting well. Hope his brain stops bleeding.
I might have missed the part where 60 skaters line up and all head down the ramp at the same time hoping one of them doesn't do anything stupid. Work on those analogies.
No, I want want to see more than 1 out of 10 people return to racing, and for racing to be a bit safer and improve the quality of riding. As I pointed out, that's been pretty successful in other sports. There are virtually no barriers beyond $10 to racing now. Your way isn't working.
If you don't understand what losing 9 out 10 people means, go cut off 9 of your toes. Now try walking with the one that's left.
You've probably never mentored a field of new racers, or heard their comments after a pretty short info session. I have. You may be one of those people that just yell and never take people aside to make them better/safer. Or introduced people into the sport. Or contributed money to junior programs. Or bought bikes for high school programs. I have actually done all those things. Care about the sport. Been in a bunch of high risk things over the years and know what works and what doesn't.
I even taught my 6 y/o niece to ride when her Dad gave her up as hopeless.
Pre entry in a 1/2 race I looked at recently was 4 two days before the close. There you have it.
The other reality we have is a myopic approach to bringing people into the sport. Especially now when every kid doesn't have a stingray or cruiser in the garage. But I don't think it's worth stepping that up if we're still at ultra low retention. We squandered the Lance boom.
And yeah, enough graft and I'm up for any elected position.
I might have missed the part where 60 skaters line up and all head down the ramp at the same time hoping one of them doesn't do anything stupid. Work on those analogies.
If you don't understand what losing 9 out 10 people means, go cut off 9 of your toes. Now try walking with the one that's left.
You've probably never mentored a field of new racers, or heard their comments after a pretty short info session. I have. You may be one of those people that just yell and never take people aside to make them better/safer. Or introduced people into the sport. Or contributed money to junior programs. Or bought bikes for high school programs. I have actually done all those things. Care about the sport. Been in a bunch of high risk things over the years and know what works and what doesn't.
I even taught my 6 y/o niece to ride when her Dad gave her up as hopeless.
Pre entry in a 1/2 race I looked at recently was 4 two days before the close. There you have it.
The other reality we have is a myopic approach to bringing people into the sport. Especially now when every kid doesn't have a stingray or cruiser in the garage. But I don't think it's worth stepping that up if we're still at ultra low retention. We squandered the Lance boom.
And yeah, enough graft and I'm up for any elected position.
#437
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 3,888
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 417 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Interesting data. Shared it on the ncnca page. Curious if they've looked at retention numbers. The meeting minutes are usually a bit bare bones for that topic.
#438
Ninny
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The Gunks
Posts: 5,295
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 686 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Harlem Skyscraper Classic is the highest profile crit in NYC. I was going to write "arguably" but I can't think of any argument against it. It's the only summer crit in the 5 boroughs, the only non-predawn race, the only closed-road race, etc. The event is this Sunday. Current pre-registration is 49 guys. Total, all fields.
#439
Senior Member
No, I want want to see more than 1 out of 10 people return to racing, and for racing to be a bit safer and improve the quality of riding. As I pointed out, that's been pretty successful in other sports. There are virtually no barriers beyond $10 to racing now. Your way isn't working.
Second, How many people who join a sportsball league on a whim continue for more than 7 years?
Third, which sport restricted access and got more participants, and what are the numbers before and after?
Fourth, my way worked for me. Your way wouldn't have worked for me. Thank god you didn't get your way a few years ago.
You've probably never mentored a field of new racers, or heard their comments after a pretty short info session. I have. You may be one of those people that just yell and never take people aside to make them better/safer. Or introduced people into the sport. Or contributed money to junior programs. Or bought bikes for high school programs. I have actually done all those things. Care about the sport. Been in a bunch of high risk things over the years and know what works and what doesn't.
I even taught my 6 y/o niece to ride when her Dad gave her up as hopeless.
I even taught my 6 y/o niece to ride when her Dad gave her up as hopeless.
The other reality we have is a myopic approach to bringing people into the sport. Especially now when every kid doesn't have a stingray or cruiser in the garage. But I don't think it's worth stepping that up if we're still at ultra low retention. We squandered the Lance boom.
And yeah, enough graft and I'm up for any elected position.
And yeah, enough graft and I'm up for any elected position.
#440
Senior Member
Harlem Skyscraper Classic is the highest profile crit in NYC. I was going to write "arguably" but I can't think of any argument against it. It's the only summer crit in the 5 boroughs, the only non-predawn race, the only closed-road race, etc. The event is this Sunday. Current pre-registration is 49 guys. Total, all fields.
I remember getting on the waiting list there one year. I was like #3 on the waiting list.
FOR A 250 RIDER CAT 3 FIELD!
I was psyched because I was so close to racing. Then I thought about the absolute stupidity of doing a 250 rider Cat 3 crit and withdrew my name from the list. I left because I didn't even want to be around for all the crashes.
__________________
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
#441
Senior Member
I was almost indoctrinated into racing. I started thinking about racing at 14, started racing at 15, and all my free time was spent either riding, playing violin, or frantically catching up with homework. I worked at the bike shop, raced, got involved in the team.
All my friends were a bit older, in their 20s and 30s. I pretty much had zero high school friends, just a couple. Everyone knew I rode bikes and that was it. I traveled a lot to races with a "veteran" racer, which is what the M35+ racers were named. I think nowadays there'd be suspicion on his motives, but they were pure, he drove us Juniors to all the races for years.
I naturally fell into a leadership role at UCONN, leading bike handling clinics and the like. It was "natural" because no one else had been involved in cycling as long. Since a few of my club teammates went to school there (except they were much older, even grad students) we remained pretty close knit.
Then after I was handed the Bethel Spring Series folder (about a quarter-inch thick) and told I was the last hope for the race as the guys who started it were moving or quitting.
That bought me 20-odd years of duty/commitment, including a solid 6 or 8 or so years where I absolutely hated promoting the races. I just hated it, but at the same time I felt like I had to do it. Absolutely the worst. It's like doing intervals but they last 7 weeks per rep and you have to do sets a year apart.
Now that the Series is over, as of 2016, I feel much less tied to the scene. I feel like I could walk away and nothing would change, and that's sort of a good feeling.
I think a huge part of retention is social, at least for the pack fodder like myself. If you meet cool/fun/sane people you'll hang out. Meet some of those obnoxious officials (not you @shovelhd) or wacky bike racers, you'll be inclined to find a little more socially rounded thing to do. Back in the day cyclists were the weirdos and therefore attracted a lot of weirdos. Probably still does, but it's definitely more mainstream now.
The serious racers, the ones that almost always inevitably quit, don't really care about the social stuff. They just show up and wreck dreams, until their dream explodes in horrifying reality.
All my friends were a bit older, in their 20s and 30s. I pretty much had zero high school friends, just a couple. Everyone knew I rode bikes and that was it. I traveled a lot to races with a "veteran" racer, which is what the M35+ racers were named. I think nowadays there'd be suspicion on his motives, but they were pure, he drove us Juniors to all the races for years.
I naturally fell into a leadership role at UCONN, leading bike handling clinics and the like. It was "natural" because no one else had been involved in cycling as long. Since a few of my club teammates went to school there (except they were much older, even grad students) we remained pretty close knit.
Then after I was handed the Bethel Spring Series folder (about a quarter-inch thick) and told I was the last hope for the race as the guys who started it were moving or quitting.
That bought me 20-odd years of duty/commitment, including a solid 6 or 8 or so years where I absolutely hated promoting the races. I just hated it, but at the same time I felt like I had to do it. Absolutely the worst. It's like doing intervals but they last 7 weeks per rep and you have to do sets a year apart.
Now that the Series is over, as of 2016, I feel much less tied to the scene. I feel like I could walk away and nothing would change, and that's sort of a good feeling.
I think a huge part of retention is social, at least for the pack fodder like myself. If you meet cool/fun/sane people you'll hang out. Meet some of those obnoxious officials (not you @shovelhd) or wacky bike racers, you'll be inclined to find a little more socially rounded thing to do. Back in the day cyclists were the weirdos and therefore attracted a lot of weirdos. Probably still does, but it's definitely more mainstream now.
The serious racers, the ones that almost always inevitably quit, don't really care about the social stuff. They just show up and wreck dreams, until their dream explodes in horrifying reality.
__________________
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
#443
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Posts: 13,089
Mentioned: 158 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 349 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
6 Posts
I had to take a safety course to get a hunting license. Drivers licenses for both motorcycles and cars (go drive in the third world and you'll see the value of education and licensing, as bad as the driving here is). Courses and testing to get my aviation mechanics license, and my water treatment certifications. The common thread here is that if I eff'd up any of the things listed, I could kill someone OTHER than myself.
You don't believe there's value to people knowing a bit about what they are doing if it's inherently dangerous to other people. I do. I believe education can provide skill and confidence, which make people more likely to stick to something. You don't. You have the right to an opinion but I would argue that you've not marshaled many facts to support this.
What would be an interesting comparison though, would be our race:crash ratio.
On of the things you're missing is that you're lucky to race in a district which has a pretty stout mentoring program, along with an educational early bird series. So you're reaping the benefit of the very thing you seem to think is so awful.
Which is you still missing the meat of this, which is retention.
Last edited by Racer Ex; 06-12-17 at 08:00 PM.
#444
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,170
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Me too.
He came and visited in the trauma center after racing was done when one of my best friends had her face ripped off and fractured a couple vertebrae and helped a lot in keeping her spirits up while we waited around for the various medical imaging to come back. A bunch of people came by and they actually let them all in to hang out and everybody told ER stories while we waited. Almost everybody had at least one.
That incident is probably why I stopped racing, though I had already been burned out on it for a while. I promoted and officiated for a while after that, but I think I only raced a few more times. I might get back to it, but the one you're referring to reminded me how dangerous it can be.
It's also a like a second full time job if you want to stay competitive, and these days I mostly just want to go out for a nice ride.
He came and visited in the trauma center after racing was done when one of my best friends had her face ripped off and fractured a couple vertebrae and helped a lot in keeping her spirits up while we waited around for the various medical imaging to come back. A bunch of people came by and they actually let them all in to hang out and everybody told ER stories while we waited. Almost everybody had at least one.
That incident is probably why I stopped racing, though I had already been burned out on it for a while. I promoted and officiated for a while after that, but I think I only raced a few more times. I might get back to it, but the one you're referring to reminded me how dangerous it can be.
It's also a like a second full time job if you want to stay competitive, and these days I mostly just want to go out for a nice ride.
#445
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,294
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1441 Post(s)
Liked 710 Times
in
364 Posts
It's not nuts, it's the only sane thing to do.
I guess I'm one of those 10% People are hesitant to try racing AS IS. If it was gonna require a bunch of BS I likely would never have tried it. It's not that dangerous. There's no license required to enter the skate park for crying out loud. There's no license required to go get hit by a driver in a road rage incident either. But you want barriers to entry for a few guys to ride bikes in circles.
I guess I'm one of those 10% People are hesitant to try racing AS IS. If it was gonna require a bunch of BS I likely would never have tried it. It's not that dangerous. There's no license required to enter the skate park for crying out loud. There's no license required to go get hit by a driver in a road rage incident either. But you want barriers to entry for a few guys to ride bikes in circles.
More people might give racing a shot if they knew they'd have some help getting started in a low pressure situation.
Thus, I think, on balance a well designed program would decrease the hesitancy to try racing.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#446
Senior Member
I agree. How many threads do we get of someone asking if he/she is ready to try racing? A clinic would make you ready. I reckon more people would give it a go if some help getting started was available.
#447
Has a magic bike
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 12,590
Bikes: 2018 Scott Spark, 2015 Fuji Norcom Straight, 2014 BMC GF01, 2013 Trek Madone
Mentioned: 699 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4456 Post(s)
Liked 425 Times
in
157 Posts
And this is the issue 1000%. A great many people in bike racing feel this way. Reach a hand out to someone outside your peer group to help him/her find success the sport? F that, if it means I ever have to compromise in what I'm doing for my self. I'm gonna race my bike.
This attitude is completely utterly foreign to me. You have something you love to do? You achieve some kind of success doing it? If that kind of good fortune strikes, it's almost an obligation IMO to share it and to cultivate the thing you love.
Making bike racing work for more types of people would make the sport more robust. I roll my eyes every time someone here pontificates as to why the other guy isn't racing crits or road races. Delusional, the idea that it's all about the need for participation trophies or that women just aren't competitive.
Whatever.
This attitude is completely utterly foreign to me. You have something you love to do? You achieve some kind of success doing it? If that kind of good fortune strikes, it's almost an obligation IMO to share it and to cultivate the thing you love.
Making bike racing work for more types of people would make the sport more robust. I roll my eyes every time someone here pontificates as to why the other guy isn't racing crits or road races. Delusional, the idea that it's all about the need for participation trophies or that women just aren't competitive.
Whatever.
#448
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
And this is the issue 1000%. A great many people in bike racing feel this way. Reach a hand out to someone outside your peer group to help him/her find success the sport? F that, if it means I ever have to compromise in what I'm doing for my self. I'm gonna race my bike.
This attitude is completely utterly foreign to me. You have something you love to do? You achieve some kind of success doing it? If that kind of good fortune strikes, it's almost an obligation IMO to share it and to cultivate the thing you love.
...
Whatever.
This attitude is completely utterly foreign to me. You have something you love to do? You achieve some kind of success doing it? If that kind of good fortune strikes, it's almost an obligation IMO to share it and to cultivate the thing you love.
...
Whatever.
Whatever.
#449
**** that
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Posts: 15,402
Mentioned: 151 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1099 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times
in
30 Posts
Re: the decline of bike racing - instead of postulating, guessing, estimating, why don't we ask people that have quit the sport?
In some cases they are long gone from the scene, so it's hard/impossible to even ask them; but there are plenty people here in the 33 (+ lurkers) that could surely chime in on why they quit the sport.
I bet what you'll find is that it's not just one thing - danger, money, travel, difficulty, etc - it's a mix of all of them. Trying to solve the problem by tackling only one of those things is a bad idea, I think.
In some cases they are long gone from the scene, so it's hard/impossible to even ask them; but there are plenty people here in the 33 (+ lurkers) that could surely chime in on why they quit the sport.
I bet what you'll find is that it's not just one thing - danger, money, travel, difficulty, etc - it's a mix of all of them. Trying to solve the problem by tackling only one of those things is a bad idea, I think.
#450
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,170
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I bet what you'll find is that it's not just one thing - danger, money, travel, difficulty, etc - it's a mix of all of them. Trying to solve the problem by tackling only one of those things is a bad idea, I think.