Raising the seatpost past the limit?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Raising the seatpost past the limit?
I have a 25 year old eighteen speed. In order to get the seat high enough to keep my legs comfortable, I need to raise it so the "Max Limit" line on the post is about a half centimeter above the seat post.
A bike mechanic said that it was okay, as long as the bottom of the post was at or under the bottom lug on the seat tube, which I'm pretty sure it is.
Do you agree with this guy, or am I flirting with disaster? What could go wrong?
A bike mechanic said that it was okay, as long as the bottom of the post was at or under the bottom lug on the seat tube, which I'm pretty sure it is.
Do you agree with this guy, or am I flirting with disaster? What could go wrong?
#2
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,923
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,090 Times
in
638 Posts
I'd get a longer post, or a larger frame - but then I'm allergic to broken bones.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
Likes For USAZorro:
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Can you explain what exactly could go wrong with my set-up?
I know that old bikes usually were designed for the seat to sit really low toward the top tube. The mechanic seemed to be referencing this fact when he said the height limit was "conservative".
#4
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,784
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
Well, I took it out for a 20 mile ride today, and nothing happened.
Can you explain what exactly could go wrong with my set-up?
I know that old bikes usually were designed for the seat to sit really low toward the top tube. The mechanic seemed to be referencing this fact when he said the height limit was "conservative".
Can you explain what exactly could go wrong with my set-up?
I know that old bikes usually were designed for the seat to sit really low toward the top tube. The mechanic seemed to be referencing this fact when he said the height limit was "conservative".
The the pre-CPSC "rule of thumb" for safely clamping seat posts was to have at least twice the diameter of the post inserted into the seat tube. Thus, for a 27.2mm diameter seat post typical for a 25 year old steel frame you would want about 54mm of post inside the seat tube. That's a little over 2 inches. But if your post was marked by the manufacturer with a specific limit, you should not go above that limit. Buy a longer post or you may find yourself singing soprano later...
#5
Bianchi Goddess
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Shady Pines Retirement Fort Wayne, In
Posts: 27,858
Bikes: Too many to list here check my signature.
Mentioned: 192 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2930 Post(s)
Liked 2,923 Times
in
1,491 Posts
well bikeslob, we have no way of knowing how long you post has been like that however, on just a short 20 mile trip nothing is likely to happen. however bicycle parts are designed to work in certain ways. a min insert mark on a seat post is to insure that there is enough seatpost in the seattube to disperse the forces over a larger area and prevent frame damage. perhaps someone can explain it better than I. I do think that mechanic was dumb and misinformed you. he should never allow a customer to walk out with a seat or stem raised past the max mark.
__________________
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
At least 2 things could go wrong: first, the seat post could break suddenly, causing you to sit down, hard, on a jagged piece of broken off seat post projecting out of your frame. Or the top of the seat tube could fail (though probably not as suddenly as a post failure, at least if your frame is steel), ruining the frame.
#7
Rustbelt Rider
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 9,104
Bikes: 1990 Trek 1420 - 1978 Raleigh Professional - 1973 Schwinn Collegiate - 1974 Schwinn Suburban
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Liked 372 Times
in
177 Posts
Kalloy makes very inexpensive seat posts. Just make sure that you get the correct diameter. Also make sure you get one that works with your saddle, either with the rails or one of those seat clamps.
__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
#8
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,923
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,090 Times
in
638 Posts
Kalloy makes just about every size possible. They are inexpensive as a rule, and most look ok on an older bike.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Washington County, Vermont, USA
Posts: 3,778
Bikes: 1966 Dawes Double Blue, 1976 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1975 Raleigh Sprite 27, 1980 Univega Viva Sport, 1971 Gitane Tour de France, 1984 Lotus Classique, 1976 Motobecane Grand Record
Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 765 Post(s)
Liked 660 Times
in
351 Posts
I tend to agree with everyone who says it's a bad idea to ride with the post above the limit line, for the reasons already mentioned. On the other hand, 5 mm--half a centimeter--isn't much. Relative to the other dangers of riding a bike on a road among cars, the danger of the post breaking is probably slight.
The bigger issue, I think, is that the fact that you have to raise the post that high indicates that your frame is too small. You don't need a new seatpost, you probably need a new bike. How much clearance do you have between your crotch and the top tube? If it's more than two inches, I'd advise you to trade in your current ride for one with a larger frame. You'll be happier and more comfortable in the long run--possibly even a little safer, too.
The bigger issue, I think, is that the fact that you have to raise the post that high indicates that your frame is too small. You don't need a new seatpost, you probably need a new bike. How much clearance do you have between your crotch and the top tube? If it's more than two inches, I'd advise you to trade in your current ride for one with a larger frame. You'll be happier and more comfortable in the long run--possibly even a little safer, too.
Likes For jonwvara:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Posts: 159
Bikes: A few
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Don't know what sort of saddle you are using. But you will find that some saddles have a much bigger distance between the top where your butt rests, and the rails. Try maybe looking in that direction. Worst comes to worst, put on a horrible leather saddle of the older generation, that could give you a few cm's diference.
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I tend to agree with everyone who says it's a bad idea to ride with the post above the limit line, for the reasons already mentioned. On the other hand, 5 mm--half a centimeter--isn't much. Relative to the other dangers of riding a bike on a road among cars, the danger of the post breaking is probably slight.
The bigger issue, I think, is that the fact that you have to raise the post that high indicates that your frame is too small. You don't need a new seatpost, you probably need a new bike. How much clearance do you have between your crotch and the top tube? If it's more than two inches, I'd advise you to trade in your current ride for one with a larger frame. You'll be happier and more comfortable in the long run--possibly even a little safer, too.
The bigger issue, I think, is that the fact that you have to raise the post that high indicates that your frame is too small. You don't need a new seatpost, you probably need a new bike. How much clearance do you have between your crotch and the top tube? If it's more than two inches, I'd advise you to trade in your current ride for one with a larger frame. You'll be happier and more comfortable in the long run--possibly even a little safer, too.
The frame may be a bit small, but it's fun to ride, and I haven't experienced any significant discomfort either during or after my rides on it. Maybe that will change as time goes on. I hope not.
I haven't measured the stand-over clearance, but it feels pretty similar to the last bike I rode.
I don't have a whole lot of spending money now, and it apparently has some pretty good components, so if I can make this bike work just by purchasing a 15 dollar seat post, I'd like to do that.
Should I worry about the frame, even if I get a new, longer seat post? Could a taller post give too much leverage to my weight or something, and damage the seat tube? I'm about 190.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Washington County, Vermont, USA
Posts: 3,778
Bikes: 1966 Dawes Double Blue, 1976 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1975 Raleigh Sprite 27, 1980 Univega Viva Sport, 1971 Gitane Tour de France, 1984 Lotus Classique, 1976 Motobecane Grand Record
Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 765 Post(s)
Liked 660 Times
in
351 Posts
Sure, if you like the way the bike fits just scrape up the 15 bucks for a longer seatpost and be done with it. You're probably okay with the one you have, but a new longer one will quiet the in-the-back-of-your-mind anxieties that we've raised here. That's worth the 15 bucks.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,973
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 32 Times
in
22 Posts
I have a 25 year old eighteen speed. In order to get the seat high enough to keep my legs comfortable, I need to raise it so the "Max Limit" line on the post is about a half centimeter above the seat post.
A bike mechanic said that it was okay, as long as the bottom of the post was at or under the bottom lug on the seat tube, which I'm pretty sure it is.
Do you agree with this guy, or am I flirting with disaster? What could go wrong?
A bike mechanic said that it was okay, as long as the bottom of the post was at or under the bottom lug on the seat tube, which I'm pretty sure it is.
Do you agree with this guy, or am I flirting with disaster? What could go wrong?
#14
)) <> ((
it's fine.
since you are bringing this question up now, i'm assuming you just raised it. you might even find that in a week or two it is too high...or maybe even too low. or maybe it's just right and you'll have the confidence of riding on it for two weeks.
don't sweat it.
since you are bringing this question up now, i'm assuming you just raised it. you might even find that in a week or two it is too high...or maybe even too low. or maybe it's just right and you'll have the confidence of riding on it for two weeks.
don't sweat it.
#16
Passista
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,597
Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaña pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 866 Post(s)
Liked 721 Times
in
396 Posts
I'd have no problem at all with using a seatpost 5 mm (about 3/16") past the limit, if its bottom is past the seatlug. But that's just me.
#17
Senior Member
alloy seatpins are hugely over engineered so that a single casting can be turned down to suit a very wide range of seatube diameters. his only remote concern would be for leverage damage to the seatube below the seatcluster .
the op is reporting that he needs to secure the seatpin at approx. 1/2 centimeter over the mark- ie- 1/8th inch!. no manufacturer is going to cut their safety margins so close that a 1/8" (or even a full inch) overshoot would expose themselves to liability.
the op is reporting that he needs to secure the seatpin at approx. 1/2 centimeter over the mark- ie- 1/8th inch!. no manufacturer is going to cut their safety margins so close that a 1/8" (or even a full inch) overshoot would expose themselves to liability.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,674
Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma
Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1372 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,751 Times
in
938 Posts
Be careful...
The top of the seat post lug becomes the fulcrum. The more seat post that sticks into the seat tube, the lower the mechanical advantage and the less stress placed on the post or tube. However, the shallow inserting increased mechanical advantage, dramatically as the lever to fulcrum length shortens. I have seen at least one high end bike with a slightly stretched seat tube lug and a small bump just under the front of the seat tube lug.
My recommendation is minimum insertion line. There is an alternative, actually. Thinner bike shoe soles
My recommendation is minimum insertion line. There is an alternative, actually. Thinner bike shoe soles
#19
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,784
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
#20
Senior Member
I need to raise it so the "Max Limit" line on the post is about a half centimeter above the seat post.
A bike mechanic said that it was okay, as long as the bottom of the post was at or under the bottom lug on the seat tube, which I'm pretty sure it is.
Do you agree with this guy..?
A bike mechanic said that it was okay, as long as the bottom of the post was at or under the bottom lug on the seat tube, which I'm pretty sure it is.
Do you agree with this guy..?
#22
You gonna eat that?
Likes For Doohickie:
#23
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Like I said, I'm pretty heavy, and my seat is set back a ways. What are the chances the seat tube could be damaged? How do those chances change with the current seatpost versus a longer seat post?
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
Nobody can state for certain if you will damage your frame, or how long it will take, not even the frame manufacturer.
If you are heavy and your saddle is set back, you are creating a greater bending stress where the seatpost enters the frame, that would a 120 pounder with a forward saddle position. Are you close to a stress limit inherent in the frame? Who knows?
The stress tends to torque the seat lug open, and it's worse if the post doesn't extend all the way through the seat post. Whether having say, 5 inches extra is better than say, just the minimum insertion, is a matter of seat TUBE design. If it's not a buttted tube then the seat tube contacts the seat post all the way down the enclosed length of the post. This decreases the tendency to torque out the seat lug. Are you heavy enough to damage your frame even if you do get a 330 millimeter seat post? We can't know.
So there are risks and uncertainties. Considering the downside risk is a destroyed frame and possible personal injury, and the upside risk is a cost of $15 to $100 dollars for a new longer seatpost that fits the seat tube properly, you are better off spending these few bucks to get a longer seat post. The probability of the downside is unknown but not high (I can't remember seeing such a frame failure). Have I not seen such a failure because frames are stronger than we think? Is it because the scare stories are yet another load of crap? Is it because I don't have enough exposure to frame failures?
I don't know that either. But the thing you can do to minimize your risk at low $$ cost is to get a longer seatpost. If you don't and you have no problems, great! If you don't and you do end up needing a new frame, well, you've been informed by many people.
#25
You gonna eat that?