Polarized training (PT)...Good for low volume rider?
#101
Senior Member
#103
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
204 Posts
If I go from being able to hold x watts for 1 minute to being able to hold x watts for 2 minutes, there's absolutely no way I can't do > x watts for 1 minute. At the very least, I could sprint all out for the last 10 seconds and marginally improve my average power.
#104
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
What about 10 minute power for 20 minutes?
#105
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
The more I think about this, the more silly of a comment I think it is.
If I go from being able to hold x watts for 1 minute to being able to hold x watts for 2 minutes, there's absolutely no way I can't do > x watts for 1 minute. At the very least, I could sprint all out for the last 10 seconds and marginally improve my average power.
If I go from being able to hold x watts for 1 minute to being able to hold x watts for 2 minutes, there's absolutely no way I can't do > x watts for 1 minute. At the very least, I could sprint all out for the last 10 seconds and marginally improve my average power.
#107
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Posts: 877
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 528 Post(s)
Liked 230 Times
in
161 Posts
Maybe, but for sure not for the reasons you think. You try skiing even 2km while putting in max force on every push because you apparently don't know how to control the force when skiing and would need a gear to do that for you. Good luck.
#108
Senior Member
It's a bad analogy, but you've completely misinterpreted it. In cycling, the rider can reduce the force needed to move forward up a steep grade by choosing an appropriate gear. In skiing, lacking gears as you say, the skier must produce a certain minimum force or else they won't move up the steep grade at all. Thus it might make sense for the skier to train to increase maximum force.
#110
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 786
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 338 Post(s)
Liked 408 Times
in
252 Posts
The science is still unclear on whether the ancillary benefits of strength training actually improve endurance performance or not and the issue is, if they do, training interventions which work on average might not give a positive impact on everyone (which is depressingly common with all sorts of workout interventions, where you get some who respond extremely well, some who respond negatively and all sorts of responses in between) so there's still a question of what works or doesn't work for you specifically.
Personally, I find doing a bit of strength training worthwhile, but while I did become able to move more weight I just don't see that it did anything for my 10s / 1 minute / etc power on the bike where you'd be expecting to see gains, hence I'd be quite reluctant to say that it was the weights which helped with 10, 20 or 60 minute power as opposed to simply riding more. I do feel stronger in a practical sense, that my durability improved and I get less aches and pains after running. I am inclined to attribute being able to maintain a lower position on the bike for longer as well to it, but that could be just due to more training.
That said, I typically only do about half a hour of weighs per week so it doesn't take away much from riding / running - I have weights setup and ready to go in my living room so I can do a quick session after an easy ride or run which acts as a warm up, without spending time going to the gym. If you're going to spend a hour driving to the gym and back and faffing about, that cuts a big chunk off available training time which is probably going to impact performance negatively as opposed to spending a couple of hours extra on the bike.
My training "budget" time wise is typically about 10 to 12 hours per week (a good chunk of it being the weekend ride which I find just to be enjoyable on it's own merits) so trying something quite close to polarized or pyramidal (like polarized except with more Z2 work near threshold and less Z3) works out for me and I can fit in some strength work in there on top. If I could do more hours I'd do more Z1, but also if I could only do six then probably I'd try for two interval sessions plus two longer easy rides and let the training time distribution land where it does.
Personally, I find doing a bit of strength training worthwhile, but while I did become able to move more weight I just don't see that it did anything for my 10s / 1 minute / etc power on the bike where you'd be expecting to see gains, hence I'd be quite reluctant to say that it was the weights which helped with 10, 20 or 60 minute power as opposed to simply riding more. I do feel stronger in a practical sense, that my durability improved and I get less aches and pains after running. I am inclined to attribute being able to maintain a lower position on the bike for longer as well to it, but that could be just due to more training.
That said, I typically only do about half a hour of weighs per week so it doesn't take away much from riding / running - I have weights setup and ready to go in my living room so I can do a quick session after an easy ride or run which acts as a warm up, without spending time going to the gym. If you're going to spend a hour driving to the gym and back and faffing about, that cuts a big chunk off available training time which is probably going to impact performance negatively as opposed to spending a couple of hours extra on the bike.
My training "budget" time wise is typically about 10 to 12 hours per week (a good chunk of it being the weekend ride which I find just to be enjoyable on it's own merits) so trying something quite close to polarized or pyramidal (like polarized except with more Z2 work near threshold and less Z3) works out for me and I can fit in some strength work in there on top. If I could do more hours I'd do more Z1, but also if I could only do six then probably I'd try for two interval sessions plus two longer easy rides and let the training time distribution land where it does.
Last edited by Branko D; 02-09-21 at 03:59 AM.
#111
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,534
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
Here's a 10 year old Slowtwitch thread you may enjoy. Has quite a few people in it who know what they're talking about, with quite a few who don't.
I don't know if this has the specific bit asgelle is referring to as I haven't read through this entire thread yet, but there's a lot in there that goes along with stuff that's been posted on this site for a few years. The stuff from Alex Simmons is very interesting.
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/forum/S...61939/?page=-1
I don't know if this has the specific bit asgelle is referring to as I haven't read through this entire thread yet, but there's a lot in there that goes along with stuff that's been posted on this site for a few years. The stuff from Alex Simmons is very interesting.
https://forum.slowtwitch.com/forum/S...61939/?page=-1
I see the same thing here, too many people arguing opinion, those opinions formed 20 years ago before much at all was known about how to apply strength training to cycling. It's a niche subject, seldom studied, and even more seldom studied without researcher bias. What rather gripes at me is the people arguing the other side simply don't read the papers to which I publish links. That makes them not useful as interlocutors. It's like a parental ego relationship where that parent says, "I know how the world works and you don't, so do what I say." Except that's how it worked 20 years ago. Not that way anymore, folks. If you don't keep up, you fall behind. On top of that, you sneer at a penniless rider who has figured it out, has applied the science and found that it worked as predicted even though he doesn't have a gym or the latest equipment and makes do with what he has. That kind of nonsense just drive me nuts.
If anyone wants to discuss strength work further, I'll only discuss this with people who give enough of a crap to actually do the work. I've spent a couple decades studying and applying what I learned. It works like a charm if you do it right.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#113
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Posts: 877
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 528 Post(s)
Liked 230 Times
in
161 Posts
It's a bad analogy, but you've completely misinterpreted it. In cycling, the rider can reduce the force needed to move forward up a steep grade by choosing an appropriate gear. In skiing, lacking gears as you say, the skier must produce a certain minimum force or else they won't move up the steep grade at all. Thus it might make sense for the skier to train to increase maximum force.
#114
Senior Member
*excepting perhaps some highly exceptional cases over 25-28%.
#115
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
Just because it's not published in a peer-reviewed paper, doesn't mean it's not legitimate. Those papers are produced by academics, not the actual coaches doing the work.
Last edited by rubiksoval; 02-08-21 at 06:55 PM.
#116
Senior Member
And then there's Frank Day
#119
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,534
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
Maybe you're not familiar with the "people". Some world-renowned scientists and coaches are in that thread. I.e., the people that get paid a lot of money to ensure that the most talented individuals in the world are successful. And they've got quite a track record.
Just because it's not published in a peer-reviewed paper, doesn't mean it's not legitimate. Those papers are produced by academics, not the actual coaches doing the work.
Just because it's not published in a peer-reviewed paper, doesn't mean it's not legitimate. Those papers are produced by academics, not the actual coaches doing the work.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#120
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
Like I said, academics in universities write research papers, not coaches in a lab or on the road testing and training their riders. Would you tell Shane Sutton or Tim Cusick that because their work isn't published, it isn't legitimate or worthy of replication?
#121
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Posts: 877
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 528 Post(s)
Liked 230 Times
in
161 Posts
Don't you think this is biased? Shifting goalposts?
Then you might as well call the endless base miles "general fitness", too, given as the season starts volume goes down and intensity goes up. You said above something along the lines of "what do the pros do", well, apparently they do do gym, at least some. This isn't a question of "should you do squats the day before a TT to get faster", but whether you should do gym at all.
Nor does your argument "the question is not what is your max power but how long can you hold x power" necessarily imply that doing gym isn't beneficial in that regard. I am not saying it is. I am wondering if it is. [One idea being that if you can lift 100kg then 50kg will feel easy. But if you can only lift 60kg then 50kg will feel a lot harder. Obviously at some point in cycling endurance becomes dominant but no one here has linked a study or a physiological analysis of when this happens and how and to what extent or if strength training in the off season can keep your legs strong]. But you, despite of any real evidence, seem pretty set that the answer is no. That all you need is bike work. And yet when giving your reason for that (what pros do) and I give you a counter example you shift it to "general fitness".
Then you might as well call the endless base miles "general fitness", too, given as the season starts volume goes down and intensity goes up. You said above something along the lines of "what do the pros do", well, apparently they do do gym, at least some. This isn't a question of "should you do squats the day before a TT to get faster", but whether you should do gym at all.
Nor does your argument "the question is not what is your max power but how long can you hold x power" necessarily imply that doing gym isn't beneficial in that regard. I am not saying it is. I am wondering if it is. [One idea being that if you can lift 100kg then 50kg will feel easy. But if you can only lift 60kg then 50kg will feel a lot harder. Obviously at some point in cycling endurance becomes dominant but no one here has linked a study or a physiological analysis of when this happens and how and to what extent or if strength training in the off season can keep your legs strong]. But you, despite of any real evidence, seem pretty set that the answer is no. That all you need is bike work. And yet when giving your reason for that (what pros do) and I give you a counter example you shift it to "general fitness".
#122
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
204 Posts
Basic human physiology.
I mean come on. You're a smart guy. I'm sure you've noticed that events that are significantly anaerobic in nature tend to feature bigger stronger athletes than ones that are longer in duration. One only needs to compare 400m runners with 10k runners to see this (or track sprinters with pursuit riders with grand tour riders).
This seems nonsensical to me. If I could hold my one minute power for 1.5 minutes, then it wouldn't be my one minute power would it?
I mean come on. You're a smart guy. I'm sure you've noticed that events that are significantly anaerobic in nature tend to feature bigger stronger athletes than ones that are longer in duration. One only needs to compare 400m runners with 10k runners to see this (or track sprinters with pursuit riders with grand tour riders).
This seems nonsensical to me. If I could hold my one minute power for 1.5 minutes, then it wouldn't be my one minute power would it?
#123
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 786
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 338 Post(s)
Liked 408 Times
in
252 Posts
Well, in the last 10 years most published research has shown there is some benefit of strength training for endurance performance in well trained endurance athletes (cyclists and runners both). This is not yet definitive, especially as most studies are published by a handful of researchers (Ronnestad being one of the prolific ones: his lectures are certainly interesting). I haven't seen one study which claims that benefits to endurance performance come from an improvement in maximum strength - I don't know why people beat that horse anymore; it's dead.
So, in doubt I would do it and see if it helps you - but training interventions which are helpful on average do not have to be helpful for every subject. One more reason that different approaches to coaching can all be valid with an athlete who is a good fit for the coach.
Ultimately, if you try and aren't getting faster, it doesn't work for you. That's the best test there is when it comes to how to coach yourself.
So, in doubt I would do it and see if it helps you - but training interventions which are helpful on average do not have to be helpful for every subject. One more reason that different approaches to coaching can all be valid with an athlete who is a good fit for the coach.
Ultimately, if you try and aren't getting faster, it doesn't work for you. That's the best test there is when it comes to how to coach yourself.
Last edited by Branko D; 02-09-21 at 08:40 AM.
#124
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
204 Posts
Looking at it in a non-literal way: here endurance improved far more than here high end power. This happens when you get old, and as per the professor of sport science in the video I posted, a loss of muscle mass is on of the reasons we see this in older athletes. Wouldn't it have been cool if she had been able to improve both?
#125
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
204 Posts
The science is still unclear on whether the ancillary benefits of strength training actually improve endurance performance or not and the issue is, if they do, training interventions which work on average might not give a positive impact on everyone (which is depressingly common with all sorts of workout interventions, where you get some who respond extremely well, some who respond negatively and all sorts of responses in between) so there's still a question of what works or doesn't work for you specifically.
Personally, I find doing a bit of strength training worthwhile, but while I did become able to move more weight I just don't see that it did anything for my 10s / 1 minute / etc power on the bike where you'd be expecting to see gains, hence I'd be quite reluctant to say that it was the weights which helped with 10, 20 or 60 minute power as opposed to simply riding more. I do feel stronger in a practical sense, that my durability improved and I get less aches and pains after running. I am inclined to attribute being able to maintain a lower position on the bike for longer as well to it, but that could be just due to more training.
That said, I typically only do about half a hour of weighs per week so it doesn't take away much from riding / running - I have weights setup and ready to go in my living room so I can do a quick session after an easy ride or run which acts as a warm up, without spending time going to the gym. If you're going to spend a hour driving to the gym and back and faffing about, that cuts a big chunk off available training time which is probably going to impact performance negatively as opposed to spending a couple of hours extra on the bike.
My training "budget" time wise is typically about 10 to 12 hours per week (a good chunk of it being the weekend ride which I find just to be enjoyable on it's own merits) so trying something quite close to polarized or pyramidal (like polarized except with more Z2 work near threshold and less Z3) works out for me and I can fit in some strength work in there on top. If I could do more hours I'd do more Z1, but also if I could only do six then probably I'd try for two interval sessions plus two longer easy rides and let the training time distribution land where it does.
Personally, I find doing a bit of strength training worthwhile, but while I did become able to move more weight I just don't see that it did anything for my 10s / 1 minute / etc power on the bike where you'd be expecting to see gains, hence I'd be quite reluctant to say that it was the weights which helped with 10, 20 or 60 minute power as opposed to simply riding more. I do feel stronger in a practical sense, that my durability improved and I get less aches and pains after running. I am inclined to attribute being able to maintain a lower position on the bike for longer as well to it, but that could be just due to more training.
That said, I typically only do about half a hour of weighs per week so it doesn't take away much from riding / running - I have weights setup and ready to go in my living room so I can do a quick session after an easy ride or run which acts as a warm up, without spending time going to the gym. If you're going to spend a hour driving to the gym and back and faffing about, that cuts a big chunk off available training time which is probably going to impact performance negatively as opposed to spending a couple of hours extra on the bike.
My training "budget" time wise is typically about 10 to 12 hours per week (a good chunk of it being the weekend ride which I find just to be enjoyable on it's own merits) so trying something quite close to polarized or pyramidal (like polarized except with more Z2 work near threshold and less Z3) works out for me and I can fit in some strength work in there on top. If I could do more hours I'd do more Z1, but also if I could only do six then probably I'd try for two interval sessions plus two longer easy rides and let the training time distribution land where it does.
At longer durations, the correlation between strength and power decreases. At some point, it likely goes to 0, at least from a practical sense.
I doubt lifting would make you noticeably faster at the intervals you care about. But it probably is a good idea for general health. Increased bone density and increased muscle mass are both pretty important wrt being functional as we age.
Of course, doing what you enjoy is also important. I doubt more Z1 would make much of a difference for you, but if that's what you enjoy... well being happy is a pretty important thing.