Heart Rate Monitor – Better Believe it
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,866
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1854 Post(s)
Liked 660 Times
in
503 Posts
I'm afraid you're missing the point.
Atrial fibrillation, a disruption of the heart's rhythm, can lead to blood clotting in the heart, stroke, and death. AFib, as it's colloquially known, can be treated to mitigate the risks. The symptom is an apparent acceleration in pulse.
What you put into your device should be your maximum pulse, whatever it is. My max pulse, for instance is in the low 160s, and I usually get pretty close to that a couple times a year.. If I develop AFib, the consumer grade HRM I wear on my bike will likely show a pulse in the 180-220 beats per minute range. That would be a warning, indicating I would need to call my cardiologist.
Atrial fibrillation, a disruption of the heart's rhythm, can lead to blood clotting in the heart, stroke, and death. AFib, as it's colloquially known, can be treated to mitigate the risks. The symptom is an apparent acceleration in pulse.
What you put into your device should be your maximum pulse, whatever it is. My max pulse, for instance is in the low 160s, and I usually get pretty close to that a couple times a year.. If I develop AFib, the consumer grade HRM I wear on my bike will likely show a pulse in the 180-220 beats per minute range. That would be a warning, indicating I would need to call my cardiologist.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,866
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1854 Post(s)
Liked 660 Times
in
503 Posts
I don’t think I used any “philosophy,” but it sure sounds like you are taking what I said in a pejorative sense. I said I find these threads sometimes confusing, and I tried to communicate why. I thought that might be better than just saying it stinks.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pinehurst, NC, US
Posts: 1,716
Bikes: 2020 Trek Emonda SL6, 90's Vintage EL-OS Steel Bianchi with 2014 Campy Chorus Upgrade
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 452 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times
in
110 Posts
"My Max rates jumped to as high as 197 with the average of these in the mid 180s. I did not notice any shortness of breath or fatigue or other indicators of heart issues so without the HRM I would not have known I had a heart issue."
Can you explain that for us? I can't fathom how your heartrate could be so high without noticing. I do believe you, just trying to make sense of it.
Glad you got care and are attentive to it now.
Can you explain that for us? I can't fathom how your heartrate could be so high without noticing. I do believe you, just trying to make sense of it.
Glad you got care and are attentive to it now.
dave
#30
2nd In Charge of My House
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 4
Bikes: Giant Defy Advanced 2, MEC 1971
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Hi gang,
I read these forums a lot.
I have been seriously cycling for almost 7 years. My distances vary. Pre-COVID, I would commute back and forth to work. A round trip of 40 km. Weekends I would get out for 70 km rides. COVID days would reduce my riding because of the lack of commuting. I would ride 35 km per day instead of 40 km and ride one day on the weekend to 80 km. I would augment with smart trainer for the days I couldn’t get on the road.
I turned 53 in December. My eating habits, I would classify as loosely healthy. The majority of the week, I would eat healthy but I would let loose when I felt like it.
I have a smart trainer, I am still going through the various Apps to figure out what one will work for me before I drop $$’s on one.
Less than a week ago, I suffered a heart attack while cycling on my trainer. The route was nothing out of the ordinary for me, and I didn’t have a heart monitor on. Generally, I can listen to my body. I spent 5 days in the hospital and had a stent put in. I was deemed a minor cardiac event. I believe that cycling helped me get through this relatively unscathed. But I was left concerned that my cycling career would come to a short end. My initial meeting with my cardiologist, he assured me that it doesn’t have to be that way.
I will be researching heart rate monitors now, try to figure out which one is good for recovering cardiac patients. Any suggestions will be appreciated. Also any stories of any cardiac survivors and continued cycling would be appreciated as well.
Sorry to have “hijacked” this, I thought this would be within topic.
I read these forums a lot.
I have been seriously cycling for almost 7 years. My distances vary. Pre-COVID, I would commute back and forth to work. A round trip of 40 km. Weekends I would get out for 70 km rides. COVID days would reduce my riding because of the lack of commuting. I would ride 35 km per day instead of 40 km and ride one day on the weekend to 80 km. I would augment with smart trainer for the days I couldn’t get on the road.
I turned 53 in December. My eating habits, I would classify as loosely healthy. The majority of the week, I would eat healthy but I would let loose when I felt like it.
I have a smart trainer, I am still going through the various Apps to figure out what one will work for me before I drop $$’s on one.
Less than a week ago, I suffered a heart attack while cycling on my trainer. The route was nothing out of the ordinary for me, and I didn’t have a heart monitor on. Generally, I can listen to my body. I spent 5 days in the hospital and had a stent put in. I was deemed a minor cardiac event. I believe that cycling helped me get through this relatively unscathed. But I was left concerned that my cycling career would come to a short end. My initial meeting with my cardiologist, he assured me that it doesn’t have to be that way.
I will be researching heart rate monitors now, try to figure out which one is good for recovering cardiac patients. Any suggestions will be appreciated. Also any stories of any cardiac survivors and continued cycling would be appreciated as well.
Sorry to have “hijacked” this, I thought this would be within topic.
Likes For groovykincaid:
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rural Missouri - mostly central and southeastern
Posts: 3,013
Bikes: 2003 LeMond -various other junk bikes
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 44 Times
in
35 Posts
Just to make sure everyone gets a little more confused - I wanted to make a point about "heart rate" and "heart beat" .....
Normal heart rates are recorded as a completion of a double pulsing of an atrial AND ventricle muscle. Typically the double-beat is picked by monitors up as a single muscle contraction.
In Afib - the first part of the heart contraction - the atria "beat" or contract prematurely - often in a multiple number of ventricle beats. Heart rate monitors pick up some or most of these beats and display accordingly. In in fact your entire heart starts beating or "fibrillating" - including the ventricles - your would be in pretty deep manure - and not likely to be upright very long.........
In any case - I am suspect of HR monitor displaying heart rates above 180 - either it is classic Afib - or an HR monitor misread - but not true complete rate of a true hear beat.
Having maxed out at 181 when I was 30 - any of you that go over 180 know how hard it is to get there..........
Normal heart rates are recorded as a completion of a double pulsing of an atrial AND ventricle muscle. Typically the double-beat is picked by monitors up as a single muscle contraction.
In Afib - the first part of the heart contraction - the atria "beat" or contract prematurely - often in a multiple number of ventricle beats. Heart rate monitors pick up some or most of these beats and display accordingly. In in fact your entire heart starts beating or "fibrillating" - including the ventricles - your would be in pretty deep manure - and not likely to be upright very long.........
In any case - I am suspect of HR monitor displaying heart rates above 180 - either it is classic Afib - or an HR monitor misread - but not true complete rate of a true hear beat.
Having maxed out at 181 when I was 30 - any of you that go over 180 know how hard it is to get there..........
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Are you saying you’re suspect of your HRM reading over 180, or any HRM reading over 180?
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,866
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1854 Post(s)
Liked 660 Times
in
503 Posts
I don't think I have "secret AFIB." My dad had several cardiovascular issues and I'm a former smoker so I have a few risk factors, but I get sent to cardiac screening and imaging every few years to make sure nothing bad is happening.
So treat the 220 reading as a sign to talk to the doctor, but not necessarily as a sign of serious cardiac problems. Let the docs do their jobs and check you out properly.
#34
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,945
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6173 Post(s)
Liked 4,790 Times
in
3,305 Posts
In any case - I am suspect of HR monitor displaying heart rates above 180 - either it is classic Afib - or an HR monitor misread - but not true complete rate of a true hear beat.
Having maxed out at 181 when I was 30 - any of you that go over 180 know how hard it is to get there..........
Having maxed out at 181 when I was 30 - any of you that go over 180 know how hard it is to get there..........
I'm not hitting 180 as much as I used to, but I think I still can surge to 180 briefly. But without knowing your history both health and exercise related, it'd be foolish to tell you that yours is mine, and nothing to bother getting checked.
Some will always have some error in their readings shown as spikes. Might just be static from their jersey in dry air. Usually you can tell and ignore those.
I've read that people that are very active in cardio exercise don't see the reduction in HR that 220 - age will have us believe. Don't ask me to prove it. Those were things I read over eight years ago.
If you are in this sub-forum, personally I don't see that you don't have any excuse not to begin a relationship with a cardiologist. Getting baseline information about you while you are healthy might go a long way to help find stuff when it is going awry.
Our HR monitors are only measuring the heart beat as 1 thing. But a heartbeat is actually composed of the contraction and relaxation of the chambers of the heart happening in a certain sequence for certain period of time along with valves opening and closing. That is why when you go for an EKG they put all those electrodes on you and sometimes do an echocardiogram. There is more to a properly functioning heart than just the start to finish cycle our cheapo or not so cheapo HR monitors provide us.
Likes For Iride01:
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
So is it well known that afib is the only risk factor? I don’t deny that it is critical, but there must be more that is also worth worrying about.
I don’t think I used any “philosophy,” but it sure sounds like you are taking what I said in a pejorative sense. I said I find these threads sometimes confusing, and I tried to communicate why. I thought that might be better than just saying it stinks.
I don’t think I used any “philosophy,” but it sure sounds like you are taking what I said in a pejorative sense. I said I find these threads sometimes confusing, and I tried to communicate why. I thought that might be better than just saying it stinks.
#36
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: far western MD
Posts: 98
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 39 Times
in
24 Posts
A heads up
1) my cardio doc told me the htm using a chest strap are by far the most accurate. I believe him however
2) last spring on some early cold fast rides I would get some high scary hr numbers, like 200
To make a long story short if the humidity is low,, it's cold so no sweat , you are wearing a "plastic" shirt and going fast enough that the shirt flutters the static elect created screws up the readings. A little water on the front of the shirt eliminates the issue. this is actually mentioned on Polars site
1) my cardio doc told me the htm using a chest strap are by far the most accurate. I believe him however
2) last spring on some early cold fast rides I would get some high scary hr numbers, like 200
To make a long story short if the humidity is low,, it's cold so no sweat , you are wearing a "plastic" shirt and going fast enough that the shirt flutters the static elect created screws up the readings. A little water on the front of the shirt eliminates the issue. this is actually mentioned on Polars site
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Land of Enchantment
Posts: 468
Bikes: Domane SLR7 Project One
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 152 Post(s)
Liked 173 Times
in
105 Posts
A heads up
1) my cardio doc told me the htm using a chest strap are by far the most accurate. I believe him however
2) last spring on some early cold fast rides I would get some high scary hr numbers, like 200
To make a long story short if the humidity is low,, it's cold so no sweat , you are wearing a "plastic" shirt and going fast enough that the shirt flutters the static elect created screws up the readings. A little water on the front of the shirt eliminates the issue. this is actually mentioned on Polars site
1) my cardio doc told me the htm using a chest strap are by far the most accurate. I believe him however
2) last spring on some early cold fast rides I would get some high scary hr numbers, like 200
To make a long story short if the humidity is low,, it's cold so no sweat , you are wearing a "plastic" shirt and going fast enough that the shirt flutters the static elect created screws up the readings. A little water on the front of the shirt eliminates the issue. this is actually mentioned on Polars site
And I agree the strap HRM's are pretty darn accurate. Every time I've checked it by counting beats it is right on. My Fenix 3 w/wrist HRM, not so much.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rural Missouri - mostly central and southeastern
Posts: 3,013
Bikes: 2003 LeMond -various other junk bikes
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 44 Times
in
35 Posts
Back to the original post - that creates as much confusion as enlightenment -
No your doctor put you on a portable EKG. The portable EKG is sensitive enough to detect Atrial and Ventricle contractions separately.
Clearly - HR monitors and their users will continue to speculate about "whats" what about pseudo Max HR- since I have worn portable EKGs for weeks at a time - and experienced AFib as well I have no clue about this subject.... sarcasm intended ......
I talked to a cardiologist, who is a bike rider and helped a friend/bike rider with AFib, who immediately put me on a heart rate monitor.
Clearly - HR monitors and their users will continue to speculate about "whats" what about pseudo Max HR- since I have worn portable EKGs for weeks at a time - and experienced AFib as well I have no clue about this subject.... sarcasm intended ......
Likes For Richard Cranium:
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,866
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1854 Post(s)
Liked 660 Times
in
503 Posts
Ok, I think I get it. But I do think it’s impossible to find your max with certainty. I have found a number that I have no desire to go above (it was really uncomfortable!). That is a maximum by choice not an absolute. I hope I’m not missing any training benefit by refusing to go there! I think if it’s gotten that hard, I shouldn’t have to do it.
#40
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,945
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6173 Post(s)
Liked 4,790 Times
in
3,305 Posts
Just FYI on those little portable EKG monitors that cardiologist like to give you. My total costs for 4 weeks on one of those things including what my insurance paid was more than my implanted cardiac monitor I now have will be after I carry it inside me for it's expected life of 3 years. And that includes the outpatient surgery costs to put it in.
Check your insurance before you walk out of the doctors office with an external monitor as I did not. If I'd gotten a external EKG monitor from the company my insurance recommends, I would have saved the cost of a reasonably nice bike in just the money I had to cover.
Every health insurance provider varies a lot on this. So just be ready and know what they cover.
Check your insurance before you walk out of the doctors office with an external monitor as I did not. If I'd gotten a external EKG monitor from the company my insurance recommends, I would have saved the cost of a reasonably nice bike in just the money I had to cover.
Every health insurance provider varies a lot on this. So just be ready and know what they cover.
Last edited by Iride01; 03-13-21 at 12:09 PM.
#41
Senior Member
It's one thing when you see a regular progression from a low HR to a high one. You'll see that sort of progression when you do intervals or ride uphill, for example. That probably isn't a cause for worry (but find out what your doc says). I also don't worry when my HR goes above my putative maximum rate of 144, assuming I feel OK when it happens. Late 2 seasons ago I got into the high 150s for several minutes at a time, breathing hard, thighs burning. I was good with that without mentioning it to my doc. Now I can get into the high 140s even with a beta blocker; my cardio is fine with that.
The episodes that I think are being talked about are going along in zone 3 and all of a sudden seeing a HR jump without speeding up or going uphill and without breathing hard. I don;t notice my episodes of afib; my Tickr Fit HR monitor was the first indication. I didn't mention it to my doc, because i though it was an equipment malfunction. Lats Spring he had me wearing a portable EKG machine for 2 weeks. I agreed only because I thought it would show nothing. I was wrong.
I think that's exactly the point of this thread, if you substitute 'unexpectedly high HR' for '220'.
The episodes that I think are being talked about are going along in zone 3 and all of a sudden seeing a HR jump without speeding up or going uphill and without breathing hard. I don;t notice my episodes of afib; my Tickr Fit HR monitor was the first indication. I didn't mention it to my doc, because i though it was an equipment malfunction. Lats Spring he had me wearing a portable EKG machine for 2 weeks. I agreed only because I thought it would show nothing. I was wrong.
So treat the 220 reading as a sign to talk to the doctor, but not necessarily as a sign of serious cardiac problems. Let the docs do their jobs and check you out properly.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Berkeley CA
Posts: 2,533
Bikes: 1981 Ron Cooper, 1974 Cinelli Speciale Corsa, 2000 Gary Fisher Sugar 1, 1986 Miyata 710, 1982 Raleigh "International"
Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 929 Post(s)
Liked 1,289 Times
in
486 Posts
Used standard calc: 220 - age = 145. I started serious riding again about 8 years ago after turning around from more than ten years so seriously declining health. Had a hard time doing 4 miles on flat roads before I turned it around. So I am using a more conservative 140 and riding around 90% + most of the time.
Likes For davester:
#43
It's MY mountain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,001
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4334 Post(s)
Liked 2,977 Times
in
1,614 Posts
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
I am continuously surprised that people still use this virtually worthless calculation. There is so much information out there showing that this is a terrible way to estimate MHR and is particularly incorrect for older people. It is based on no real science a tiny data set based on young men. It greatly underestimates MHR for most people.