Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Tubulars for JRA

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Tubulars for JRA

Old 07-05-19, 01:51 AM
  #1  
jideta
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 262
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 94 Post(s)
Liked 139 Times in 74 Posts
Tubulars for JRA

Seems like a lot of folks here selling their tubular wheels.
Based on what I've read here, not sure its something I wanna try.
Tires are also kinda expensive.
I have two road bikes running 25s, but lately I've riding my other bike with 32s.
I ride a mix of pavement, sidewalk and MUP with some park grass mixed in.
Tubulars, yay or nay?
jideta is offline  
Old 07-05-19, 06:13 AM
  #2  
jamesdak 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,823

Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,

Mentioned: 154 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2300 Post(s)
Liked 4,764 Times in 1,725 Posts
Yay
jamesdak is offline  
Old 07-05-19, 06:16 AM
  #3  
datlas 
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 42,952

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22505 Post(s)
Liked 8,829 Times in 4,110 Posts
You could, but honestly I think more pain in the butt than they are worth.

Nay.

p.s. there is a REASON why novices sell/unload their barely used tubular wheels. Think about it. The answer should become quite obvious.
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is offline  
Likes For datlas:
Old 07-05-19, 06:30 AM
  #4  
rubiksoval
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444

Bikes: bikes

Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times in 711 Posts
Definitely not.
rubiksoval is offline  
Old 07-05-19, 06:43 AM
  #5  
MSchott
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Posts: 375

Bikes: 2017 Specialized Roubaix Sport SL4

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 94 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times in 33 Posts
What does JRA mean? Just riding around?
MSchott is offline  
Old 07-05-19, 06:46 AM
  #6  
datlas 
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 42,952

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22505 Post(s)
Liked 8,829 Times in 4,110 Posts
Originally Posted by MSchott
What does JRA mean? Just riding around?
Yes. It's a bit of a cliche in some circles.
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is offline  
Old 07-05-19, 06:51 AM
  #7  
MoAlpha
• —
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 12,151

Bikes: Shmikes

Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10101 Post(s)
Liked 5,781 Times in 3,111 Posts
Not worth the hassle and expense for juvenile rheumatoid arthritis either.
MoAlpha is offline  
Old 07-05-19, 06:58 AM
  #8  
Jasper Storm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 538
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 7 Posts
Not worth the hassle and expense.

They still have their place in cyclocross, where certain course conditions may require ultra-low psi, and high-level road or track racing.

I do have a nice set of ENVE tubulars that I purchased 6 or so years back when full-carbon clincher technology was new and not really safe due to brake track failures. Now, I'd trade them in a second for some carbon clinchers.

I gave up on Vittoria tubulars due to puncture frequency and switched to Continentals, which have butyl inners and are BRUTAL to install cleanly.

Anybody who wants to run tubulars recreationally should definitely take advantage of pre-owned deals and not waste money on brand new wheels.
Jasper Storm is offline  
Old 07-05-19, 06:59 AM
  #9  
f4rrest
Farmer tan
 
f4rrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 7,986

Bikes: Allez, SuperSix Evo

Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2870 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 23 Posts
I ride 25mm tubulars about 70% of the time, including commutes, which are pretty much jra.

Not a problem, but I'm comfortable with gluing.

I use the bike with clinchers in bad weather or dark rides.
f4rrest is offline  
Old 07-05-19, 07:05 AM
  #10  
dmanthree
Senior Member
 
dmanthree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Northeastern MA, USA
Posts: 1,678

Bikes: Garmin/Tacx Bike Smart

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 191 Posts
Nay. Road clinchers are just too damned good and easy.
dmanthree is offline  
Old 07-05-19, 10:12 AM
  #11  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,645 Times in 6,054 Posts
Flats get really expensive. And can stop a ride.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 07-05-19, 11:22 AM
  #12  
woodcraft
Senior Member
 
woodcraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times in 569 Posts
Yay.

My JRA rig has 30mm tubulars on Mavic SL wheels.

Wheelset- $100. Tires $35 each? Don't remember exactly. Flats?- none. Ride quality?- excellent.

Dirt, curbs, potholes, etc.? no problem. Bike riding weight- 18.5 lbs.
woodcraft is offline  
Old 07-05-19, 11:38 AM
  #13  
79pmooney
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,825

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 128 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4741 Post(s)
Liked 3,860 Times in 2,509 Posts
I feel like a broken record, There is one place tubulars rule. Your JRA may never encounter that condition, but depending on where you live and ride, it might. Fast downhills. Tubulars are the tires you want to be on if you ever lose pressure suddenly going really fast. A well glued tubular doesn't come off - at any speed. Even in a full, catastrophic blowout. In my racing days I blew tubulars at least once at 40+. Just rolled to a stop and changed the tire. By contrast, I blew a clincher several years ago. First, I was riding "on ice", aluminum rim on pavement, then go tossed hard at 20+ when the tire jammed in tte chainstays, hitting my helmet hard, breaking collarbone, cracking rib(s) - skipped the X-rays, and an acre of road rash.

There's that, and - good tubulars are magic carpets, a ride you will not see anywhere else. (And like magic carpets, only those who have actually ridden them know. Also like magic carpets, they all have defects since they are handmade, the tires in Asia, the carpets in Persia.)

Ben
79pmooney is offline  
Old 07-05-19, 01:25 PM
  #14  
cycledogg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,163
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by jideta
Seems like a lot of folks here selling their tubular wheels.
Based on what I've read here, not sure its something I wanna try.
Tires are also kinda expensive.
I have two road bikes running 25s, but lately I've riding my other bike with 32s.
I ride a mix of pavement, sidewalk and MUP with some park grass mixed in.
Tubulars, yay or nay?
If you have to ask, then you don't really want to ride tubs.
cycledogg is offline  
Old 07-05-19, 03:41 PM
  #15  
bikebreak
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 878
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 129 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
JRA naw, but riding fast with smooth rubber, sure

tubular tires are marginally more expensive (but you don't pay for a separate tube, it's built in), wheels are lighter, tires may be lighter, and are typically a nicer cushier ride at same pressure.
Also you can run tubular tires at very high PSI for very smooth roads, or really low PSI for rough roads, without pinch flats or blow off.

With latex sealant you can avoid most flats, or repair without removing tire.
The effeto mariposa two sided tape is much easier and faster than gluing
bikebreak is offline  
Old 07-05-19, 05:59 PM
  #16  
Doge
Senior Member
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times in 253 Posts
Like anything - buy the right ones. Then yes. I buy ones for racing (kid) and ones for riding - me. I'm 40+ years of using them. I think they are worth the hassle.
If you live in a bad flat area - no. If you might flat every 1,000 miles or so, you may flat less using the correct tubular.

That is all I ride on the tandem (I have clinchers too) - I'll let you know when I get a flat. That is all my kid road a whole season in CO - no spares, no worries, no flats.

If you like a ready to ride (glued with skewers) 900g tire that will take 360# it can be a great choice.
Goat head season I then to ride clinchers, as I have no hope of avoiding a flat. But stans will typically seal a goat head puncture good for 130PSI.

If you want to race, the selection is different.
Doge is offline  
Old 07-05-19, 06:17 PM
  #17  
Doge
Senior Member
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times in 253 Posts
@rubiksoval is a racer. What he races on, or sees raced on is not what you should ride on. You can buy a 28mm tubular (and bigger) that will take more than any tubeless, or clincher will. They ARE somewhat of a hassle to change and glue. When I want to avoid hassles, I drive the car, maybe ride the scooter.
The performance and feel is far above a clincher of similar spec and esp when getting to the 27mm-30mm range. Knock ~1# off your bike vs similar in clinchers. Because the rims are lighter, there are lighter rim choices, tread is finer and tubes are lighter.

These are racing tubulars. Don't use these. They get old. I replace them. Some may have had leaks. I save them for no particular reason.



These are a mix of racing and very robust (lighter than clinchers) tubulars. Suitable for JRA - cobbles. They will take a hit that will shatter your rim and not flat (ask how I know).



The heavy load bike (of some 20 or so) are on tubulars. The beaters are not.
Tandem - tubulars.
Doge is offline  
Old 07-06-19, 02:55 AM
  #18  
jideta
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 262
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 94 Post(s)
Liked 139 Times in 74 Posts
Well, I was thinking about doing it just so I could expand my bicycle IQ.

I guess its something I don't really need to learn.

Like how to adjust the dwell on my points.
jideta is offline  
Old 07-06-19, 01:01 PM
  #19  
L134 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: San Diego
Posts: 704

Bikes: 1978 Bruce Gordon, 1977 Lippy, 199? Lippy tandem, Bike Friday NWT, 1982 Trek 720, 2012 Rivendell Atlantis, 1983 Bianchi Specialissima?

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 345 Post(s)
Liked 170 Times in 105 Posts
Originally Posted by jideta
Well, I was thinking about doing it just so I could expand my bicycle IQ.
Exactly the reason I started around 7 months ago. I love them. Regret that I let myself be intimidated by them for so long.
L134 is offline  
Old 07-06-19, 01:54 PM
  #20  
topflightpro
Senior Member
 
topflightpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,567
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1851 Post(s)
Liked 675 Times in 427 Posts
It's fine. Gluing them is not as tedious as many people say. There are also a few tutorials online for how to address flats on a ride. And you can find decent tubulars are a reasonable price. Conti Sprinters, for example, can easily be bought for $35.
topflightpro is offline  
Old 07-06-19, 04:23 PM
  #21  
Doge
Senior Member
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times in 253 Posts
There are different ways to glue them depending on what you want. That is fun too.

A "Belgium glue job" is heavy in the center. It should have a tacky glue that re-bonds. Idea is that the seal will break, then re-bond. A cobble thing. This is also the typical (lazy/busy) Euro-pro mechanic glue job.

A road/track needs a tight bond at the edges. Some tires seat better on some rims than others. American designed rims tend to contact on the outer edges. I glue mostly this way as kid and I don't do USA cobbles. But have done both and in-between.
It is not that big a deal, but another fun thing to mess around with, and you can certainly tell between extremes.

IMO most over glue, and don't glue the edges. But that take more time.

Weight Weenie (I am one) notes (If you are a disc brake person - never-mind, these things do not matter to you.):
-Glue on weighs about 2X what dried glue does.
-You save a bit of mass in air (yea, I typed that) over clinchers as all the air is above the rim and use-able vs between the tracks. Air at the rim is extra mass at the rim.
We are putting 5-8bar in the tires. Air does contribute a few grams to the rotating mass.
Doge is offline  
Old 07-06-19, 04:55 PM
  #22  
rubiksoval
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444

Bikes: bikes

Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times in 711 Posts
Originally Posted by Doge

IMO most over glue, and don't glue the edges. But that take more time.
But not overgluing leads to worse rolling resistance. And if that's the case, it's probably better to just stick with a fast clincher or tubeless setup.
rubiksoval is offline  
Old 07-06-19, 05:28 PM
  #23  
Doge
Senior Member
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times in 253 Posts
Originally Posted by rubiksoval
But not overgluing leads to worse rolling resistance. And if that's the case, it's probably better to just stick with a fast clincher or tubeless setup.
Me thinks you need me to glue you up some race wheels - or borrow juniors. Center glue does nothing but adds weight and makes a mess if the sides are glued well.

Side are not often over glued.


I have seen some super smooth roads where I can see that advantage is a well seated tubeless or clincher. Just that I don't see many.


Junior can race on an <800g set, under 1,400g tires, cassette and skewers that have the air and resilience of any 25mm tubeless.

A 50mm profile with FMB silks 25mm are ~300g more and they stick like nothing else.

My tandem front is over 28mm wide, DT 240 hub, 970g glued, with skewer. It has air under it like a 32mm clincher.



You often point out the talent card junior has that I don't play, there is an equipment advantage too. He's riding wheels that are 30% lighter than what anyone else has and ride better.


I have both/many. The 25mm clincher is less supple than a 23 tubular and much heavier. That 23 ax @550g will take a hit few 25-30mm clinchers will.















Clincher
Doge is offline  
Old 07-06-19, 05:57 PM
  #24  
Doge
Senior Member
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times in 253 Posts
Super hard to do this within 500g more in any clincher or tubeless and if you want the pothole worthy-ness more likely 2# more.
Doge is offline  
Old 07-06-19, 06:03 PM
  #25  
Kimmo 
bike whisperer
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,533

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1520 Post(s)
Liked 716 Times in 508 Posts
Hmm... I have this 45mm deep carbon tubular front I scored from the co-op... It's pretty sweet, 475g. Been gathering dust though cause I'm a tad leery of how the old-school profile will fare in crosswinds - the point of the foil has just over a 3mm radius, and that brake track is the widest point at 19mm.

Am I right to worry, or might it be worth a shot?
Kimmo is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.