47.5 versus 50mm chainline
10-20-09, 05:05 PM
#1
Older than dirt
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,342
Bikes: Too darn many.. latest count is 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
47.5 versus 50mm chainline
Looking to replace a cheapo Shimano M191 crankset that spec's at a 47.5mm chainline with a Shimano LX that spec's at a 50mm chainline. The M191 uses a JIS BB versus the Hollowtech II on the LX, so I really don't have the option of different BB widths. Is that 2.5 mm of chainline going to cause me issues and if so what should I anticipate?
I'm swapping from 8 speed to 9 speed including shifters (LX Dual Control) and Front (XT) and rear (Ultegra) derailers at the same time if that matters.
Thanks..
I'm swapping from 8 speed to 9 speed including shifters (LX Dual Control) and Front (XT) and rear (Ultegra) derailers at the same time if that matters.
Thanks..
10-20-09, 06:21 PM
#2
Low car diet
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Corvallis, OR, USA
Posts: 2,407
Bikes: 2006 Windsor Dover w/105, 2007 GT Avalanche w/XT, 1995 Trek 820 setup for touring, 201? Yeah single-speed folder, 199? Huffy tandem.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
See "Chainline Measurement" : https://sheldonbrown.com/gloss_ch.html#chainline
MTB Triple is generally 47.5mm, but may be larger at 50.0mm if necessary to clear oversized seat tubes.
According to Sheldon, 47.5 is preferred if the frame can handle it. In this case, Shimano has mandated a 50.0 chainline; I assume so it can be more universally compatible.
Every other bike that has this--and similar--crank and bottom bracket combo work fine, so I imagine yours will, too. I doubt you'll notice anything.
All that will happen is that each chainring will now be moved out just over one-half of a cog's worth (the center-to-center spacing between 9-speed cogs is 4.34mm) https://sheldonbrown.com/k7.html#spacing
MTB Triple is generally 47.5mm, but may be larger at 50.0mm if necessary to clear oversized seat tubes.
According to Sheldon, 47.5 is preferred if the frame can handle it. In this case, Shimano has mandated a 50.0 chainline; I assume so it can be more universally compatible.
Every other bike that has this--and similar--crank and bottom bracket combo work fine, so I imagine yours will, too. I doubt you'll notice anything.
All that will happen is that each chainring will now be moved out just over one-half of a cog's worth (the center-to-center spacing between 9-speed cogs is 4.34mm) https://sheldonbrown.com/k7.html#spacing
10-21-09, 05:47 AM
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Right where I'm supposed to be
Posts: 1,633
Bikes: Franklin Frames Custom, Rivendell Bombadil
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 116 Post(s)
Liked 209 Times
in
127 Posts
Looking to replace a cheapo Shimano M191 crankset that spec's at a 47.5mm chainline with a Shimano LX that spec's at a 50mm chainline. The M191 uses a JIS BB versus the Hollowtech II on the LX, so I really don't have the option of different BB widths. Is that 2.5 mm of chainline going to cause me issues and if so what should I anticipate?
I'm swapping from 8 speed to 9 speed including shifters (LX Dual Control) and Front (XT) and rear (Ultegra) derailers at the same time if that matters.
Thanks..
I'm swapping from 8 speed to 9 speed including shifters (LX Dual Control) and Front (XT) and rear (Ultegra) derailers at the same time if that matters.
Thanks..
The only real issue ..... Depending on which rings you ride on most, a 50mm chainline may be better, or worse for drivetrain wear due to the angles of the chain.
10-21-09, 06:16 AM
#4
afraid of whales
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Front Range, CO
Posts: 4,306
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Because the external LX BB is made for both 68mm and 73mm, you can play with the washers to set the chainline to either 50mm or 47.5mm. If you have measuring calipers it's not hard to figure it out the correct combo.
10-21-09, 05:53 PM
#5
Older than dirt
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,342
Bikes: Too darn many.. latest count is 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
10-21-09, 06:46 PM
#6
Low car diet
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Corvallis, OR, USA
Posts: 2,407
Bikes: 2006 Windsor Dover w/105, 2007 GT Avalanche w/XT, 1995 Trek 820 setup for touring, 201? Yeah single-speed folder, 199? Huffy tandem.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
If re-arranging washers does make the whole assembly off-center, I'd want to weigh that against getting the desired chainline.
10-21-09, 07:25 PM
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: san leandro
Posts: 1,344
Bikes: enough bikes to qualify for Hoarders......
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I just installed a Truvative Stylo on my Bergamont, the chainline required me to tighten the fd cable and adjust the stops a little to compensate, but it works excellent. I did not want the cranks offset to one side.
10-22-09, 07:47 AM
#8
afraid of whales
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Front Range, CO
Posts: 4,306
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
With a 2.5mm shift/offset and a seat height of 30" above the pedal, what's the angluar difference?...Using HS trig I get a angular difference of 0.4 degrees (87* on non-drive, 87.4* on drive side). I don't have an issues with high Q cranks, I suppose this is why the 0.4* isn't noticed at all by me (it is less than 0.5% difference).
