Go Back  Bike Forums > The Racer's Forum > Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
Reload this Page >

Ask your small, random, track-related questions here

Search
Notices
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area Looking to enter into the realm of track racing? Want to share your experiences and tactics for riding on a velodrome? The Track Cycling forums is for you! Come in and discuss training/racing, equipment, and current track cycling events.

Ask your small, random, track-related questions here

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-15-16, 03:02 PM
  #3501  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by Pole Line Stand
Hi All,

I'm investigating timing systems to invest in for training purposes. Perhaps the most prevalent use of the timing system would be short velodrome trials, i.e. 200 meters and standing laps. I know how exorbitant some electronic timing systems can be. I did look into the Free Lap System etc. The advantages here are reasonably priced and simple to use. The disadvantages are the necessity to use a watch on the handlebar and the need to be within a short distance of the transmitter at the start. I was hoping that there is a system that uses a tape that is triggered by the wheel hitting at the start and finish.

Also, I thought I read somewhere that there is a method for timing via video recorder. However, the timer would need to be manually started.

Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks
Tape strip systems take a lot of prep and breakdown. Not sure if a track will allow you to install them. The benefits are small.

If this is truly for training purposes and not hosting a tournament or something, then realize that for shorter events, top speed is directly related to your finishing time. This means, if you are training for a flying 200, if you hit 42mph, that means your flying 200M time will be faster than if you hit 41mph.

For longer efforts, you can put a stopwatch on your aerobars and mark your splits yourself.

The best timing tool is a head unit that records the entire effort where you can download and review later. You don't need power (it's nice to have). You can do some in-depth analysis using speed, cadence, heart rate, and distance data all plotted over time. You can get a system like that for a couple hundred bucks. Adding Power costs a lot more.
carleton is offline  
Old 05-15-16, 04:47 PM
  #3502  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Also be wary of radio signal systems. These are usually made for timing distance runners in training. They work by the runner (wearing a transmitter) entering within x meters of the receiver. I think the margin of error can be significant. Not to mention radio signals (i.e. Bluetooth) being finicky.

Progression/regression in a flying 200M is measured within tenths of a second. If the margin of error is higher than that, then the system is useless.

Last edited by carleton; 05-15-16 at 04:52 PM.
carleton is offline  
Old 05-15-16, 06:19 PM
  #3503  
Pole Line Stand
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 22
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by carleton
Also be wary of radio signal systems. These are usually made for timing distance runners in training. They work by the runner (wearing a transmitter) entering within x meters of the receiver. I think the margin of error can be significant. Not to mention radio signals (i.e. Bluetooth) being finicky.

Progression/regression in a flying 200M is measured within tenths of a second. If the margin of error is higher than that, then the system is useless.
Yes, I guess that's what I'm really trying to ascertain. I remember (I'll look up) a Free Lap tutorial on YT showcasing the unit with BMX bikes. Their advertising accuracy within hundredths of a second. To me I thought it would make a good backup for hand timers. We want it for training trials legitimacy. If the margin of error is significant then I don't think it would be very useful.
Thanks for your input. Also, I wish I could hit 42.5 mph.
Pole Line Stand is offline  
Old 05-15-16, 09:06 PM
  #3504  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by Pole Line Stand
Yes, I guess that's what I'm really trying to ascertain. I remember (I'll look up) a Free Lap tutorial on YT showcasing the unit with BMX bikes. Their advertising accuracy within hundredths of a second. To me I thought it would make a good backup for hand timers. We want it for training trials legitimacy. If the margin of error is significant then I don't think it would be very useful.
Thanks for your input. Also, I wish I could hit 42.5 mph.
I'm not saying it's not possible. I guess I'm saying verify and test (if possible) before you buy.

The only electronic timing systems that I have direct experience with (that weren't handheld) were DIY systems made by engineers in their free time. One of which I was very familiar with. It involved a custom programming, an Arduino board, and a Ditch Witch to run electronic wires underground to various points of the track. Not for the faint of heart

BTW, I've made an iOS app that does this. It's more sophisticated than a normal stopwatch. It's designed for track training and racing. Search for "track cycling time trial stopwatch" in the Apple App Store.

I'm trying to be careful and not advertise it but more so offer it as a possible solution to your problem. If you want, I can give you a free promo code to use it.
carleton is offline  
Old 05-16-16, 09:40 AM
  #3505  
Quinn8it
Senior Member
 
Quinn8it's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 956

Bikes: Bianchi Pista, Bianchi Vigorelli

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Quinn8it
That system gives you real time lap times and 200m times- so you can log in between efforts and check your times..

Pretty cool stuff- might still be in the testing phase- not sure it's available to everyone yet
i wasn't clear-
meant that the one in place at the Velodrome in Los Angeles may not be available to everyone.. When I tried to get one a few months back that was the case..
Quinn8it is offline  
Old 05-16-16, 08:31 PM
  #3506  
700wheel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 645
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 144 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Pole Line Stand
Hi All,

I'm investigating timing systems to invest in for training purposes. Perhaps the most prevalent use of the timing system would be short velodrome trials, i.e. 200 meters and standing laps. I know how exorbitant some electronic timing systems can be. I did look into the Free Lap System etc. The advantages here are reasonably priced and simple to use. The disadvantages are the necessity to use a watch on the handlebar and the need to be within a short distance of the transmitter at the start. I was hoping that there is a system that uses a tape that is triggered by the wheel hitting at the start and finish.

Also, I thought I read somewhere that there is a method for timing via video recorder. However, the timer would need to be manually started.

Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks
One method to obtain lap times is to set up a video camera/cell phone/Go Pro facing the pursuit line, set it recording, mount your bike and start riding (if a flying lap give a hand signal prior to your first lap). After your ride, dismount, stop the camera, sit down with a stop watch, then rerun the video and time each lap starting from your hand signal.
Not a great method but better than nothing.

It just occurred to me that it might be possible to mount a Go Pro facing the track so you could use it to obtain 200m times in a manner similar to the above (I would try this but do not have a Gp Pro).
700wheel is offline  
Old 05-17-16, 06:27 PM
  #3507  
gycho77
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Delaware, USA
Posts: 607

Bikes: Serotta steel track bike, Specialized MTB

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 99 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
https://punainenparooni.com/2013/04/...bars-compared/
I was reading this post, and found this "With the Scatto my setup looks like this. I do not need to use spacers nor flip the stem upwards to make the bike UCI legal, like I did with Alpina bars (I have the 3T Arx Team stem, 6 degrees, 120mm). I can still do that if the position feels too aggressive. So I thing the Scatto gives me a bit more wiggle room to modify my setup"
What kind of uci rule is he talking about?

And do I have to set back my saddle 5cm for match sprint races?

Last edited by gycho77; 05-17-16 at 06:34 PM.
gycho77 is offline  
Old 05-17-16, 09:36 PM
  #3508  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by gycho77
https://punainenparooni.com/2013/04/...bars-compared/
I was reading this post, and found this "With the Scatto my setup looks like this. I do not need to use spacers nor flip the stem upwards to make the bike UCI legal, like I did with Alpina bars (I have the 3T Arx Team stem, 6 degrees, 120mm). I can still do that if the position feels too aggressive. So I thing the Scatto gives me a bit more wiggle room to modify my setup"
What kind of uci rule is he talking about?
The grip area of the handlebars cannot be lower than the top of the tire.

Scattos are shallow drop bars. If he has a stem in the negative (down) position and use deep drop bars like the Dolan/Alpina Sprint bars, then they would be so low that the grip area will be under the tire line. So, he had to flip the stem to the upward position to raise the bars.

Originally Posted by gycho77
And do I have to set back my saddle 5cm for match sprint races?
I honestly forgot. Maybe someone else knows and will answer?
carleton is offline  
Old 05-17-16, 09:49 PM
  #3509  
gycho77
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Delaware, USA
Posts: 607

Bikes: Serotta steel track bike, Specialized MTB

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 99 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by carleton
The grip area of the handlebars cannot be lower than the top of the tire.

Scattos are shallow drop bars. If he has a stem in the negative (down) position and use deep drop bars like the Dolan/Alpina Sprint bars, then they would be so low that the grip area will be under the tire line. So, he had to flip the stem to the upward position to raise the bars.



I honestly forgot. Maybe someone else knows and will answer?

Thank you

And it's not fair that my handlebar has to be higher than tire
because if you are short like me(5'8"), you cannot lower your handlebar like tall people.
gycho77 is offline  
Old 05-17-16, 11:12 PM
  #3510  
Bulldogsprinter
Senior Member
 
Bulldogsprinter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Finland
Posts: 81
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gycho77
https://punainenparooni.com/2013/04/...bars-compared/
I was reading this post, and found this "With the Scatto my setup looks like this. I do not need to use spacers nor flip the stem upwards to make the bike UCI legal, like I did with Alpina bars (I have the 3T Arx Team stem, 6 degrees, 120mm). I can still do that if the position feels too aggressive. So I thing the Scatto gives me a bit more wiggle room to modify my setup"
What kind of uci rule is he talking about?

And do I have to set back my saddle 5cm for match sprint races?
  1. 1.3.013 The peak of the saddle shall be a minimum of 5 cm to the rear of a vertical plane passingthrough the bottom bracket spindle. This restriction shall not be applied to the bicycleridden by a rider in a sprint event on track (flying 200 m, flying lap, sprint, team sprint,keirin, 500 metres and 1 kilometre).



    so in short, no.

Bulldogsprinter is offline  
Old 05-18-16, 04:42 AM
  #3511  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by gycho77
Thank you

And it's not fair that my handlebar has to be higher than tire
because if you are short like me(5'8"), you cannot lower your handlebar like tall people.
True...but it's a safety precaution. If the grip area is at or below the tire line, then that means your fingers will be, too. If you rub the rear tire of someone beside you with your handlebars, it will injure your fingers.

Of course, if you are riding a legal 650c bike in a race with 700c bikes, then you will probably be in the danger I mentioned above
carleton is offline  
Old 05-18-16, 10:09 AM
  #3512  
MarkWW
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 485

Bikes: A little of each

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
1.3.022 In competitions other than those covered by article 1.3.023, only the traditional type of
handlebars (see diagram «structure 1») may be used. The handlebars must be
positioned in an area defined as follows: above, by the horizontal plane of the point of
support of the saddle (B); below, by the horizontal line passing 10 cm below the highest
point of the two wheels (these being of equal diameter)
(C); at the rear by the axis of the
steerer tube (D) and at the front by a vertical line passing through the front wheel spindle
with a 5 cm tolerance (see diagram «Structure (1A)»). The distance referred to in point
(A) is not applicable to the bicycle of a rider who takes part in a sprint event on track
(flying 200 m, flying lap, sprint, team sprint, keirin, 500 metres and 1 kilometre), but must
not exceed 10 cm in relation to the vertical line passing through the front wheel spindle.
Looks like the UCI rules have changed. I thought it used to be no lower than top of tire, except for sprint events.
MarkWW is offline  
Old 05-18-16, 12:15 PM
  #3513  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by MarkWW
Looks like the UCI rules have changed. I thought it used to be no lower than top of tire, except for sprint events.
Good catch. It looks like the rule has changed.

Gycho, it appears that you can go 10cm below the top of your tire based on the rule listed above.
carleton is offline  
Old 05-18-16, 05:59 PM
  #3514  
Koogar
Senior Member
 
Koogar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 125
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by carleton
Gycho, it appears that you can go 10cm below the top of your tire based on the rule listed above.
...But im guessing that probably nowhere near that amount of drop is going to be an optimal setup if your frame fits, even for someone who is 5'8". You have to be able to apply power in that position and it's no fun when your hands go numb during the warmup....
Koogar is offline  
Old 05-18-16, 06:52 PM
  #3515  
Godsight
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Qc,Canada
Posts: 159

Bikes: Felt TK FRD

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 59 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
“The peak of the saddle shall be a minimum of 5 cm to the rear of a vertical planepassing through the bottom bracket spindle. This restriction shall not be applied to thebicycle ridden by a rider in a sprint event on track (flying 200 m, flying lap, sprint,team sprint, keirin, 500 metres and 1 kilometre); however, in no circumstances shallthe peak of the saddle extend in front of a vertical line passing through the bottombracket spindle.The peak of the saddle can be moved forward until the vertical line passing throughthe bottom bracket spindle where that is necessary for morphological reasons. Bymorphological reasons should be understood everything to do with the size and limblength of the rider.Any rider who, for these reasons, considers that he needs to use a bicycle of lesserdimensions than those given shall inform the commissaires' panel to that effect at thetime of the bike check.Only one exemption for morphological reasons may be requested; either the peak ofthe saddle can be moved forward or the handlebar extensions can be movedforward, in accordance with Article 1.3.023”

is the full article on the saddle setback. So track sprinter can go past the 5 cm limit but not have the front of the saddle ahead of the bottom bracket center.

https://www.uci.ch/mm/Document/News/R...NG_English.PDF is the full UCI equipment rule guide with explanations.
Godsight is offline  
Old 05-18-16, 09:14 PM
  #3516  
gycho77
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Delaware, USA
Posts: 607

Bikes: Serotta steel track bike, Specialized MTB

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 99 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Thank you everyone for all your help.
I think I could set up my bike what I wanted and worry about nothing.
It's good to hear that most of uci rules do not bother me at all haha
gycho77 is offline  
Old 05-18-16, 10:13 PM
  #3517  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by Koogar
...But im guessing that probably nowhere near that amount of drop is going to be an optimal setup if your frame fits, even for someone who is 5'8". You have to be able to apply power in that position and it's no fun when your hands go numb during the warmup....
Yeah, I totally agree.

Gycho, lower isn't always better. The lower you go, the less power you are able to make.

You can test this on trainer (or even a spin bike in a gym). Set the resistance at a moderate level and turn the cranks. As you continue to pedal, slowly bend your elbows and lower your back and you will eventually hit a point where your leg muscles can't produce the power they were just making.

So, while you may be flexible enough to go very low, your muscles lose effectiveness after a certain point.
carleton is offline  
Old 05-18-16, 10:32 PM
  #3518  
gycho77
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Delaware, USA
Posts: 607

Bikes: Serotta steel track bike, Specialized MTB

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 99 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by carleton
Yeah, I totally agree.

Gycho, lower isn't always better. The lower you go, the less power you are able to make.

You can test this on trainer (or even a spin bike in a gym). Set the resistance at a moderate level and turn the cranks. As you continue to pedal, slowly bend your elbows and lower your back and you will eventually hit a point where your leg muscles can't produce the power they were just making.

So, while you may be flexible enough to go very low, your muscles lose effectiveness after a certain point.
Thank you for the tip, but I'm not going to lower my handlebar a lot.
Maybe I will lower my handlebar half an inch and try other position.
and this is my apartment gym, if you are interested. When I move to LA, I'm going to get a gym membership so I have more equipments

and here is a picture of myself.

I have been training in gym for about four months now, but I started proper training(upupup) a month ago.
I think I shouldn't be a sprinter because of my body.....
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
image.jpg (95.2 KB, 62 views)
File Type: jpg
image.jpg (93.2 KB, 63 views)
File Type: jpg
image.jpg (97.4 KB, 73 views)
gycho77 is offline  
Old 05-19-16, 02:44 AM
  #3519  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
That's plenty of good equipment to help you train.

Race a few races before you decide if you are a "sprinter" or not. Ask people that watch you train/race what they think. Remember, your beginning races will suck. Everybody does in the beginning.

carleton is offline  
Old 05-19-16, 05:57 PM
  #3520  
700wheel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 645
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 144 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by carleton
Good catch. It looks like the rule has changed.

Gycho, it appears that you can go 10cm below the top of your tire based on the rule listed above.
Today I looked at around 100 track bikes from small to large and belonging to a cyclists from world class to beginners. Only one bike had its bars level with the top of the front wheel.

Last edited by 700wheel; 05-19-16 at 06:50 PM. Reason: update
700wheel is offline  
Old 05-19-16, 09:26 PM
  #3521  
brawlo
Senior Member
 
brawlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,210
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 288 Post(s)
Liked 76 Times in 57 Posts
Possibly scouring the net for pictures of juniors may give a better result. The rule allowing a lower bar position is relatively new so a lot of seniors are just too big to worry or already happy with where they are. The juniors are affected by the same rules as us so you might see some lower bar positions in junior competition.
brawlo is offline  
Old 05-19-16, 10:34 PM
  #3522  
Koogar
Senior Member
 
Koogar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 125
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by carleton

Great, in addition to still being 5 lbs overweight, now I want to be makin' bacon pancakes....
Koogar is offline  
Old 05-20-16, 02:10 AM
  #3523  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by Koogar
Great, in addition to still being 5 lbs overweight, now I want to be makin' bacon pancakes....
Think of that 5lbs as "Strategic Energy Storage" and bacon pancakes are morale boosters.

(My fat guy logic)
carleton is offline  
Old 05-20-16, 11:59 AM
  #3524  
gycho77
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Delaware, USA
Posts: 607

Bikes: Serotta steel track bike, Specialized MTB

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 99 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Does anyone use this wingnuts for training?
I think this nuts will be helpful when you are training.
I'm not going to buy this. I just want to hear your opinions on this
Wing Nuts

Last edited by gycho77; 05-20-16 at 12:06 PM.
gycho77 is offline  
Old 05-20-16, 12:06 PM
  #3525  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by gycho77
Does anyone use this wingnuts for training?
I think this nuts will be helpful when you are training, because it helps us swap the cog faster.
I'm not going to buy this. I just want to hear your opinions on this
Wing Nuts
No. Those are decorative. For show bikes.

Roadies used those before Mr. Campagnolo invented the quick release. That's why a quick release lever is in their logo:

carleton is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.