Will you ever go disc?
#151
What happened?
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Around here somewhere
Posts: 7,927
Bikes: 3 Rollfasts, 3 Schwinns, a Shelby and a Higgins Flightliner in a pear tree!
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
255 Posts
I come in wanting work on a coaster brake bike. Dude's closing next month too.
__________________
I don't know nothing, and I memorized it in school and got this here paper I'm proud of to show it.
#152
∏
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Willamette Valley
Posts: 335
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, 2011 and 2017
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 165 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Bought my “forever” wheelset in 2017, and I would never have done so if the wheel were a wear item. With discs, I can forego the worry.
As for wheel swaps, I’m confused by how they complicate things. 160mm rotors on every wheel here, and they go from bike to bike to bike with nary a complaint.
And none of the rims show any signs of brake wear.
As for wheel swaps, I’m confused by how they complicate things. 160mm rotors on every wheel here, and they go from bike to bike to bike with nary a complaint.
And none of the rims show any signs of brake wear.
#153
∏
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Willamette Valley
Posts: 335
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, 2011 and 2017
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 165 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#154
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: VA
Posts: 1,437
Bikes: SuperSix Evo | Revolt
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 733 Post(s)
Liked 815 Times
in
414 Posts
Maybe it's just a maintenance thing? I've noticed a lot of people don't seem to be as particular with maintenance, a lot of noisy drivetrains, etc.
#155
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 20
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I got a new roadie last year, it came with Ultegra R8000 rim brakes. They aren't quite disc brake level performance, but they are a huge improvement over any rim brake I've ever had in the past. I haven't been caught in the rain with it yet but wouldn't expect them to help too much with wet rims, but I'm sure I'll find out.
#156
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times
in
998 Posts
Poor drivetrain maintenance drives me crazy, but that's a different issue.
#157
Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Marietta, GA - just north of Atlanta
Posts: 2
Bikes: A 1988 "3 Rensho" (San Rensho) Katana and an Surly Long Haul Trucker.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
You're right in that you may not have the stopping problem. I wish I had the budget (read spousal approval) to purchase the frame, disc brakes, and wheels for a "modern" touring bicycle. Loaded touring bikes coming through the Appalachians in the rain made me want more stopping power. As to discs being a fad, I'm not sure. We follow the technology and trends of motorcycles and cars to some extent - of course not all is applicable. I'll not go back to drum brakes given the choice, but you're right I'm not planning my next used truck purchase based on disc vs drum brakes.
Being a fan of British bikes, I've always wanted to compare the stopping power of those old tourers with three speeds (maybe), and what looks-like push-rod brakes. To those vintage riders, the center-pull rim brakes would be the fad.
Thanks,
bicyforev
Being a fan of British bikes, I've always wanted to compare the stopping power of those old tourers with three speeds (maybe), and what looks-like push-rod brakes. To those vintage riders, the center-pull rim brakes would be the fad.
Thanks,
bicyforev
#158
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
#159
Junior Member
There are only two really compelling reasons for discs on road bikes 1) long mountain descents 2) carbon rims. If those don't apply to you, too bad because the mainstream bike brands are not going to offer new high-end road bikes with rim brakes any more. And thru axles will come along with discs, so you're stuck with those, too. The industry is desperate for new tech to talk about on road bikes, and it's relatively easy to borrow already-developed mtn bike tech like these and put them on road bikes, even if some roadies don't want them. Lastly, in a liability lawsuit where the guy didn't stop in time, or got hurt because he didn't close his wheel QR properly, the bike companies that changed to discs and thru axles have their butts covered, but the ones that keep selling "dangerous" bikes with rim brakes and QR axles will suffer.
#160
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Mountains and Plains of Colorado
Posts: 241
Bikes: 2005 Seven Odonata (DuraAce /Reynolds),1983 Trek 950 (Mavic/Suntour/Regina), 1986 Stumpjumper Shimano/Suntour/Regina), 1986 MASI 3V, (Campy/Mavic/Regina) 1995 Schwinn LeTour (Suntour/Wienmann/Phil/Shimano/Regina): All Brooks Saddles
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Seeing as most makers now make road bikes with discs I wonder if most people will transition to discs or simply continue to run rim brakes until the end of time.
Personally I've been on discs since 2008. And I kinda like them. I only have one bike with rim brakes and I pretty much only use it when its dry and sunny outside so I have no problems with them. They work just as good as discs in those conditions.
Personally I've been on discs since 2008. And I kinda like them. I only have one bike with rim brakes and I pretty much only use it when its dry and sunny outside so I have no problems with them. They work just as good as discs in those conditions.
#161
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Basle, BS
Posts: 21
Bikes: Atala (racer) OK, Schrade (racer) OK, Mittelholzer (tourer) not yet, Künsting (city-bike) OK, Huffy (winter-bike [spikes]) OK, Graziella (tandem) not yet.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Seeing as most makers now make road bikes with discs I wonder if most people will transition to discs or simply continue to run rim brakes until the end of time.
Personally I've been on discs since 2008. And I kinda like them. I only have one bike with rim brakes and I pretty much only use it when its dry and sunny outside so I have no problems with them. They work just as good as discs in those conditions.
Personally I've been on discs since 2008. And I kinda like them. I only have one bike with rim brakes and I pretty much only use it when its dry and sunny outside so I have no problems with them. They work just as good as discs in those conditions.
Hi!! Yes, I wouldn't mind discs, but only with four-fingers cross-style brake-levers, to keep the weight at the back! (It's a matter of weight-distribution!!)
#162
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,891
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4791 Post(s)
Liked 3,918 Times
in
2,548 Posts
A serious question from a guy who has never done discs. How much work is it to "swap cockpits" on a bike, ie fully setup handlebars, stem and levers. How long would the swap take? I do this often. With quill stems, it takes 5 minutes and I can do it immediately before I rode with no worries at all. (It's fun. That quick change turns the bike into a completely different animal, from a classic road bike to a bike that shines going up all-day climbs and the following descents.)
On the bike I have been doing this on for the past 8 years, the calipers stay with the cockpit. Front stays hooked up. On the rear, I have to disconnect the cable to pull through the braze-ons. All very quick and easy as is installing the other cockpit and brakes.
Ben
On the bike I have been doing this on for the past 8 years, the calipers stay with the cockpit. Front stays hooked up. On the rear, I have to disconnect the cable to pull through the braze-ons. All very quick and easy as is installing the other cockpit and brakes.
Ben
#163
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 4,770
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 630 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 369 Times
in
206 Posts
A serious question from a guy who has never done discs. How much work is it to "swap cockpits" on a bike, ie fully setup handlebars, stem and levers. How long would the swap take? I do this often. With quill stems, it takes 5 minutes and I can do it immediately before I rode with no worries at all. (It's fun. That quick change turns the bike into a completely different animal, from a classic road bike to a bike that shines going up all-day climbs and the following descents.)
On the bike I have been doing this on for the past 8 years, the calipers stay with the cockpit. Front stays hooked up. On the rear, I have to disconnect the cable to pull through the braze-ons. All very quick and easy as is installing the other cockpit and brakes.
Ben
On the bike I have been doing this on for the past 8 years, the calipers stay with the cockpit. Front stays hooked up. On the rear, I have to disconnect the cable to pull through the braze-ons. All very quick and easy as is installing the other cockpit and brakes.
Ben
#164
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
A serious question from a guy who has never done discs. How much work is it to "swap cockpits" on a bike, ie fully setup handlebars, stem and levers. How long would the swap take? I do this often. With quill stems, it takes 5 minutes and I can do it immediately before I rode with no worries at all. (It's fun. That quick change turns the bike into a completely different animal, from a classic road bike to a bike that shines going up all-day climbs and the following descents.)
On the bike I have been doing this on for the past 8 years, the calipers stay with the cockpit. Front stays hooked up. On the rear, I have to disconnect the cable to pull through the braze-ons. All very quick and easy as is installing the other cockpit and brakes.
Ben
On the bike I have been doing this on for the past 8 years, the calipers stay with the cockpit. Front stays hooked up. On the rear, I have to disconnect the cable to pull through the braze-ons. All very quick and easy as is installing the other cockpit and brakes.
Ben
#165
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Sure. But that's 2 compelling reasons more than there are to ride rim brakes. I mean, being ok with inferior performance is fine, but it's not a compelling reason to ride rim brakes.
Likes For Seattle Forrest:
#166
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: location location
Posts: 3,035
Bikes: MBK Super Mirage 1991, CAAD10, Yuba Mundo Lux, and a Cannondale Criterium Single Speed
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 297 Times
in
207 Posts
I just bought my first disc brake bike; a (used) Yuba Mondo for school runs, grocery runs, and family rides. There was no question when researching cargo bikes that I wanted the stopping power of discs.
Up to now I’ve been towing the kids around in a Burley trailer hooked to the back of my CAAD10, with dual pivot tektros. It’s been safe, it’s fine. But there’s nothing wrong with more safety.
I dont don’t know if I’ll ever (voluntarily) replace the CAAD10 as my main road bike, though. So it’s possible I’ll still be riding rim brakes for a long time to come. But I’m aware that the next road bike I buy will more than likely have discs. And it’s possible my kids (they’re 3 now, and are great on their Striders) may never own a rim brake bike.
Up to now I’ve been towing the kids around in a Burley trailer hooked to the back of my CAAD10, with dual pivot tektros. It’s been safe, it’s fine. But there’s nothing wrong with more safety.
I dont don’t know if I’ll ever (voluntarily) replace the CAAD10 as my main road bike, though. So it’s possible I’ll still be riding rim brakes for a long time to come. But I’m aware that the next road bike I buy will more than likely have discs. And it’s possible my kids (they’re 3 now, and are great on their Striders) may never own a rim brake bike.
#167
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 659
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 195 Post(s)
Liked 207 Times
in
126 Posts
Nope. I never had an issue even with loaded touring. Stopping in the rain is best done gently so why change something that works. If I was still racing I might be looking for an edge so I get it but it's not for me.
Likes For Cycle Tourist:
#168
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,181
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1562 Post(s)
Liked 1,287 Times
in
858 Posts
It's called "backlash", in response to the obvious bias that all of the magazines and talking heads try to force on road riders.
What is so obvious about it is how low weight has always been the primary cost-driver, the variable that is so hard to fake at the lower price-points, and the variable that the press has always emphasized UNLESS there was/is a new "thing" (like the early, very-heavy STI levers, or the whole disc-brake "package-deal").
So suddenly, bikes that were still available in both rim- and disc-braked versions can/must not be compared in a heads-up way, i.e. the added 2 pounds (at equivalent price level) HAS to be "swept under the rug" and it's just "you gotta buy one of these new DISC-braked bikes"!
Face it, lots of us hesitant-to-buy riders are ALL FOR letting the best technology evolve itself into the market, we're just less enthusiastic about hearing/reading over and over how a new DISC-Braked road bike is automatically better than any other kind of road bike.
In truth though, we don't quite pay for our magazines and other reporting anymore, it's the advertisers who pay the lions share of the costs, so why do we expect to be told the un-varnished truth?
Maybe we should be HAPPY to be fed free hogwash, and then go out and buy new disc-braked bikes to support all of those advertisers.
It's only fair after all.
Likes For dddd:
#169
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,181
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1562 Post(s)
Liked 1,287 Times
in
858 Posts
They can either add a pivoted lever to the sides of the existing levers, or develop a simple check-valve equipped auxiliary master cylinder for each brake line, but they really should have had this sorted out a good couple of years ago imo.
I just got my first gravel wheelset, tubeless tires on wide rims woo-hoo! But I got a deal on the rim-braked version and used an older 'cross bike having auxiliary levers with canti-brakes that was ridiculously affordable on the used market (big thanks here to all of the "disc-is-always-better" marketing).
No regrets I can tell you, the aux levers are worth their weight in gold.
Last edited by dddd; 04-29-19 at 05:26 PM.
#170
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
Ever go disc? I'm still on discs......and radio. I haven't made the jump to MP3 or streaming. A true Luddite.
That being said, I don't have any plans to jump to discs. I am satisfied with the current system. I have a ride in mid May each year with lots of descending, some of it hard and steep. No problems with the current system. I have no plans for carbon wheels or a new bike. I am happy with what I have now.
That being said, I don't have any plans to jump to discs. I am satisfied with the current system. I have a ride in mid May each year with lots of descending, some of it hard and steep. No problems with the current system. I have no plans for carbon wheels or a new bike. I am happy with what I have now.
#171
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times
in
153 Posts
You're so right about this, I really can't believe that the industry has yet to offer some sort of auxiliary brake levers for the so-popular gravel bikes. The several-inch reduction of reach to the bars when descending steeper sections off road is just huge in terms of what you can and can't do safely.
Control is not better on the tops. Anything you think is gained by the shorter reach is certainly lost with the narrow hand position.
#172
☢
Ever go disc? I'm still on discs......and radio. I haven't made the jump to MP3 or streaming. A true Luddite.
That being said, I don't have any plans to jump to discs. I am satisfied with the current system. I have a ride in mid May each year with lots of descending, some of it hard and steep. No problems with the current system. I have no plans for carbon wheels or a new bike. I am happy with what I have now.
That being said, I don't have any plans to jump to discs. I am satisfied with the current system. I have a ride in mid May each year with lots of descending, some of it hard and steep. No problems with the current system. I have no plans for carbon wheels or a new bike. I am happy with what I have now.
You see an obstacle and you apply the brakes. If you stop before you hit it, that's good enough. If you don't stop before you reach it, we can steer around or just lean to avoid hitting it. Those alternative dilute the importance of a shorter stopping distance.
With an automobile the advantage is a lot easier to see, and to measure. We just have trouble applying that safety margin to the bicycle -- except when its raining. Carbon rims notwithstanding, few could argue the advantages under those conditions.
#173
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6
Bikes: Trek 9.8, Basso Astra (Custom build), GT Road Bike (Custom build)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
After a wheel-failure-related crash that resulted in a fractured pelvis, I did a lot of research on wheels and braking systems.
In the end, I came to the conclusion that disc brakes were a better option than rim brakes, at least for me.
Here's why:
The brake pads on rim brakes sit about 1/16" or so away from the wheel rim. A simple failure like a broken spoke will result
in the wheel jamming in the calipers. If it happens in the front wheel, the rider is going to go over the handle bars. Injury is almost certain.
Rim brake wheels use fewer spokes than disc brake wheels. Sometimes as few as 16 spokes in the front wheel.
The fewer the spokes, the more out-of-true the wheel will go if a spoke breaks.
Rim brakes limit the tire-width choices. It may be difficult to go up one size in tire width, say from 23 mm to 25 mm.
Never mind two sizes, say from 23 mm to 28 mm.
Disc brake wheels, out of necessity of design, typically will have a minimum of 20 spokes in the front wheel and 24 spokes in the back wheel.
24 front and back is common, and sometimes 28. The spokes are cross-laced, never radial. Again, this is mandated by the braking forces
transferred through the spokes to the outside diameter of the tire.
As a result, more spokes mean less wheel out-of-true if a spoke breaks.
Also, disc brake bikes typically have generous clearance between the fork/frame and the wheels. If a spoke does break, there is less chance
that the wheel is going to jam against the frame.
The additional clearance between the wheel and the frame also allows more choices in tire width. On my Gravel bike I have used widths from 25 mm to 32 mm.
There is room for even 35 mm tires.
The performance of disc brakes is consistent in all weather conditions. And there is none of the black muck all over the wheel and frame
that is common on rim brake bikes after a ride in the rain.
I have four bikes (Mountain, Fat, Gravel, Road) and they all have disc brakes. The Gravel Bike uses mechanical disc brakes and the rest use hydraulic disc brakes.
The hydraulic brakes work best. But the mechanical brakes work well too.
In the end, I came to the conclusion that disc brakes were a better option than rim brakes, at least for me.
Here's why:
The brake pads on rim brakes sit about 1/16" or so away from the wheel rim. A simple failure like a broken spoke will result
in the wheel jamming in the calipers. If it happens in the front wheel, the rider is going to go over the handle bars. Injury is almost certain.
Rim brake wheels use fewer spokes than disc brake wheels. Sometimes as few as 16 spokes in the front wheel.
The fewer the spokes, the more out-of-true the wheel will go if a spoke breaks.
Rim brakes limit the tire-width choices. It may be difficult to go up one size in tire width, say from 23 mm to 25 mm.
Never mind two sizes, say from 23 mm to 28 mm.
Disc brake wheels, out of necessity of design, typically will have a minimum of 20 spokes in the front wheel and 24 spokes in the back wheel.
24 front and back is common, and sometimes 28. The spokes are cross-laced, never radial. Again, this is mandated by the braking forces
transferred through the spokes to the outside diameter of the tire.
As a result, more spokes mean less wheel out-of-true if a spoke breaks.
Also, disc brake bikes typically have generous clearance between the fork/frame and the wheels. If a spoke does break, there is less chance
that the wheel is going to jam against the frame.
The additional clearance between the wheel and the frame also allows more choices in tire width. On my Gravel bike I have used widths from 25 mm to 32 mm.
There is room for even 35 mm tires.
The performance of disc brakes is consistent in all weather conditions. And there is none of the black muck all over the wheel and frame
that is common on rim brake bikes after a ride in the rain.
I have four bikes (Mountain, Fat, Gravel, Road) and they all have disc brakes. The Gravel Bike uses mechanical disc brakes and the rest use hydraulic disc brakes.
The hydraulic brakes work best. But the mechanical brakes work well too.
#174
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Basle, BS
Posts: 21
Bikes: Atala (racer) OK, Schrade (racer) OK, Mittelholzer (tourer) not yet, Künsting (city-bike) OK, Huffy (winter-bike [spikes]) OK, Graziella (tandem) not yet.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You're so right about this, I really can't believe that the industry has yet to offer some sort of auxiliary brake levers for the so-popular gravel bikes. The several-inch reduction of reach to the bars when descending steeper sections off road is just huge in terms of what you can and can't do safely.
They can either add a pivoted lever to the sides of the existing levers, or develop a simple check-valve equipped auxiliary master cylinder for each brake line, but they really should have had this sorted out a good couple of years ago imo.
I just got my first gravel wheelset, tubeless tires on wide rims woo-hoo! But I got a deal on the rim-braked version and used an older 'cross bike having auxiliary levers with canti-brakes that was ridiculously affordable on the used market (big thanks here to all of the "disc-is-always-better" marketing).
No regrets I can tell you, the aux levers are worth their weight in gold.
They can either add a pivoted lever to the sides of the existing levers, or develop a simple check-valve equipped auxiliary master cylinder for each brake line, but they really should have had this sorted out a good couple of years ago imo.
I just got my first gravel wheelset, tubeless tires on wide rims woo-hoo! But I got a deal on the rim-braked version and used an older 'cross bike having auxiliary levers with canti-brakes that was ridiculously affordable on the used market (big thanks here to all of the "disc-is-always-better" marketing).
No regrets I can tell you, the aux levers are worth their weight in gold.
#175
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
Aka, you don't know any better? Don't feel bad, that's the defense of most here in opposition to the application to disc brakes. On a bike the advantage takes time and still is not always easy to determine.
You see an obstacle and you apply the brakes. If you stop before you hit it, that's good enough. If you don't stop before you reach it, we can steer around or just lean to avoid hitting it. Those alternative dilute the importance of a shorter stopping distance.
With an automobile the advantage is a lot easier to see, and to measure. We just have trouble applying that safety margin to the bicycle -- except when its raining. Carbon rims notwithstanding, few could argue the advantages under those conditions.
You see an obstacle and you apply the brakes. If you stop before you hit it, that's good enough. If you don't stop before you reach it, we can steer around or just lean to avoid hitting it. Those alternative dilute the importance of a shorter stopping distance.
With an automobile the advantage is a lot easier to see, and to measure. We just have trouble applying that safety margin to the bicycle -- except when its raining. Carbon rims notwithstanding, few could argue the advantages under those conditions.
Last edited by seypat; 04-29-19 at 08:14 PM.