Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

I Need FTP Test Help

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

I Need FTP Test Help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-08-18, 01:38 AM
  #1  
Oldsport
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 125
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I Need FTP Test Help

So I just received my power meter in the mail yesterday. I went out for a ride and elected to do an FTP test on my Garmin 1030. After a warm up, I was expecting to do a 20 min all out effort to get my FTP score. However, the Garmin put me on an interval test for the FTP. There were (I think) 5 four minute sections. During each section the instructions were to achieve a certain wattage range for 10 seconds. At the end of the test Garmin informed me that it could not determine my FTP.

I could not find any instructions as to how to do the test. Do I need to stay seated the whole time or can I stand? I had a very hard time staying in the 10 second zone. I could achieve the power, but I exceeded the upper limit. This is probably because I was standing during the harder intervals. Do I need to stay seated? Any instructions on how to do the test for the 1030 would be appreciated.
Oldsport is offline  
Old 06-08-18, 03:48 AM
  #2  
gregf83 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
If you’re new to using power it’s probably best to just ride normally and just observe for the next few weeks. If you wan to test yourself try riding some timed intervals of varying lengths. It takes some practice to pace a 20 min interval with a steady power output. If you can increase your power substantially in the final minute that’s an indication you weren’t going hard enough at the start. Conversely, if you can’t maintain power at the end you’ll need to adjust your target down for the next attempt.
gregf83 is offline  
Old 06-08-18, 04:03 AM
  #3  
macca33
Senior Member
 
macca33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: West Gippy, Australia
Posts: 607

Bikes: 2017 Ridley Noah SL - Candy Apple DA9000, 2011 CAAD10 Berzerker Ult6800, 2013 FOCUS Mares CX Ult6800

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
As gregf83 said, just ride around with it for a short period to assimilate yourself to power and understanding what it all means.

If you're using Garmin Express, or Strava, after a number of varied rides, they'll indicate your 'rough' FTP, which may assist when it comes time to do an FTP test, ie, gives you an indicator of the number you need to strive towards during your test.

Then, find a suitable piece of road (flat if possible), or a velodrome, do a good warm-up and ride as hard as you can for twenty minutes. No need to do an 'FTP test' on your Garmin, just ride for at least twenty minutes at a level where you'll be fully depleted at the end. There is no real 'secret' to an FTP test - apart from the fact that they always hurt.

Cheers
macca33 is offline  
Old 06-08-18, 06:03 AM
  #4  
firebird854
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 581

Bikes: 2016 Specialized Tarmac Expert

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 258 Post(s)
Liked 114 Times in 62 Posts
Hey, it seems that your garmin was trying to walk you through some warmups for the effort. Realistically, the formula is your best 20 minute power *.95, as this will give you an approximation of your hour power. You could of course just ride as hard as possible for an hour, then you will know your FTP.

Also, be wary of your "average" power for these efforts because unless the course is flat and your effort is 100% consistent, there is a good chance your weighted average power will be a better indicator, weighted average power is defined as follows: "When you ride with a power meter, you'll notice how your power jumps all over the place based on the terrain, grade, wind, and other factors. Weighted Average Power looks at all of this variation and provides an average power for your ride that is a better indicator of your effort than simply taking your average power. It is our best guess at your average power if you rode at the exact same wattage the entire ride." I believe Garmin shows this as "normalized power", I frankly recommend simply using strava for this value.

Also, if you're too lazy to do a 20 minute effort and multiple the weighted average power by .95, you could sign up for Xert, it autocalculates your FTP based off of your power history, you would need some history though...
firebird854 is offline  
Old 06-08-18, 06:34 AM
  #5  
rm -rf
don't try this at home.
 
rm -rf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,939
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 973 Post(s)
Liked 511 Times in 351 Posts
I like the free software Golden Cheetah. It's easy to get started, just import your ride recordings. There's a lot of standard charts and trends pages, and you can customize them quite easily. There's a huge amount of data available in GC, but most of it can be ignored if you just want to see how you are doing. Got a question about some of the calculated numbers? It's easy to google for definitions and discussions.


I don't do any formal training. My main uses of GC:

The Critical Power graph. This shows my best power for any time period from a few seconds to the longest ride I've done. The selected ride is overlaid so I can see how it compares to my other best efforts. The 60 minute Critical Power is quite similar to FTP. I like seeing how my current ride compares to my best efforts at short or longer time intervals. These numbers will be likely be somewhat lower than the real FTP if the data comes just from rides of various lengths that don't include a 20, 30 or 60 minute all-out effort to set FTP.

The ride map can show where my strongest efforts on the selected ride occurred.
Custom intervals can be selected from the map or from the charts.

The Trends pages show changing values over time of Critical Power and various aerobic and anaerobic time interval. And a selection of various training stress scores. I changed the pages to show a full year of trends. I felt unusually slow this spring, but now I can see I'm hitting the same numbers that I did last summer.

GC can calculate power numbers for different heart rate zones, too.

I have a customized ride chart showing Power, W' Balance, Heart rate, Speed, Cadence, Elevation, Grade, and Normalized Power. (W' Balance is sortof an estimate of the short term power reserves I'm using up that replenish during the ride. Normalized Power is more useful than average power especially when the power varies a lot.)

I have the ride summary configured to locate the best power interval of that ride in a list of time periods. 5, 10, 15, 20, 30 seconds, 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 45, 60 minutes.

I now have a good idea of the power levels I can maintain for 30 seconds, for 5 minutes, or for an hour, etc.

A Critical Power Graph example. The red shaded area is my best power at each time interval, selected from the last 12 months (or can be the current season). The red line is the selected ride, and the white line is an interval from that ride. You can see I matched or set my best efforts for the year at the 30-40 second range, and around 5-6 minutes. (I trimmed the edges of the graph page, cutting off my pitiful watt ranges.)

Last edited by rm -rf; 06-08-18 at 06:53 AM.
rm -rf is offline  
Old 06-08-18, 06:51 AM
  #6  
f4rrest
Farmer tan
 
f4rrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 7,986

Bikes: Allez, SuperSix Evo

Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2870 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 23 Posts
Originally Posted by rm -rf
I like the free software Golden Cheetah. It's easy to get started, just import your ride recordings. There's a lot of standard charts and trends pages, and you can customize them quite easily. There's a huge amount of data available in GC, but most of it can be ignored if you just want to see how you are doing. Got a question about some of the calculated numbers? It's easy to google for definitions and discussions.


I don't do any formal training. My main uses of GC:

The Critical Power graph. This shows my best power for any time period from a few seconds to the longest ride I've done. The selected ride is overlaid so I can see how it compares to my other best efforts. The 60 minute Critical Power is quite similar to FTP. I like seeing how my current ride compares to my best efforts at short or longer time intervals. These numbers will be likely be somewhat lower than the real FTP if the data comes just from rides of various lengths that don't include a 20, 30 or 60 minute all-out effort to set FTP.

The ride map can show where my strongest efforts on the selected ride occurred.
Custom intervals can be selected from the map or from the charts.

The Trends pages show Critical Power and various aerobic and anaerobic time interval trends. I changed them to show a full year of trends.

GC can calculate power numbers for different heart rate zones, too.

I have a customized ride chart showing Power, W' Balance, Heart rate, Speed, Cadence, Elevation, Grade, and Normalized Power. (W' Balance is sortof an estimate of the short term power reserves I'm using up that replenish during the ride. Normalized Power is more useful than average power especially when the power varies a lot.)

I have the ride summary configured to locate the best power interval of that ride in a list of time periods. 5, 10, 15, 20, 30 seconds, 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 45, 60 minutes.

I now have a good idea of the power levels I can maintain for 30 seconds, for 5 minutes, or for an hour, etc.

A Critical Power Graph example. The red shaded area is my best power at each time interval, selected from the last 12 months (or can be the current season). The red line is the selected ride, and the white line is an interval from that ride. You can see I matched or set my best efforts for the year at the 30-40 second range, and around 5-6 minutes. (I trimmed the edges of the graph page, cutting off my pitiful watt ranges.)
Strava premium also supplies a CP curve if you have a PM.
f4rrest is offline  
Old 06-08-18, 06:53 AM
  #7  
Riveting
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Highlands Ranch, CO
Posts: 1,221

Bikes: '13 Diamondback Hybrid Commuter, '17 Spec Roubaix Di2, '17 Spec Camber 29'er, '19 CDale Topstone Gravel

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 590 Post(s)
Liked 445 Times in 260 Posts
If you have a premium account with Strava (or any other software that compiles a power curve), just look at your Power Curve for a given ride, or for a specific date range, go to the 20 min. mark on the curve, get that wattage value, multiply that value by .95, and that's your "calculated" FTP.

The wattage value at the 60 min. mark on your power curve, is your "actual" FTP.
Riveting is offline  
Old 06-08-18, 07:03 AM
  #8  
wphamilton
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
Ride hard for an hour and see what the power is.
wphamilton is offline  
Old 06-08-18, 07:35 AM
  #9  
rubiksoval
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444

Bikes: bikes

Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times in 711 Posts
Just ride around with it for a while, as mentioned. Riding with a powermeter is a very revealing thing. Watch how much time you "waste" by not pedaling. It can be a shocking amount. Try various durations over the next few weeks. Try sprints, 1 min, 5 min, etc. Try standing and seated. Get used to what the numbers are showing you for a particular effort. Then you'll have a better idea of how to actually "test". Testing is a process that generally has quite the learning curve itself.

With all that said, 20 minutes is not an FTP test, anyway. It's a 20 minute test.

If you want to test FTP, shoot for 40-45 minutes all out. That'll give you a much more accurate representation of FTP.
rubiksoval is offline  
Old 06-08-18, 07:41 AM
  #10  
firebird854
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 581

Bikes: 2016 Specialized Tarmac Expert

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 258 Post(s)
Liked 114 Times in 62 Posts
Originally Posted by rm -rf
I like the free software Golden Cheetah. It's easy to get started, just import your ride recordings. There's a lot of standard charts and trends pages, and you can customize them quite easily. There's a huge amount of data available in GC, but most of it can be ignored if you just want to see how you are doing. Got a question about some of the calculated numbers? It's easy to google for definitions and discussions.


I don't do any formal training. My main uses of GC:

The Critical Power graph. This shows my best power for any time period from a few seconds to the longest ride I've done. The selected ride is overlaid so I can see how it compares to my other best efforts. The 60 minute Critical Power is quite similar to FTP. I like seeing how my current ride compares to my best efforts at short or longer time intervals. These numbers will be likely be somewhat lower than the real FTP if the data comes just from rides of various lengths that don't include a 20, 30 or 60 minute all-out effort to set FTP.

The ride map can show where my strongest efforts on the selected ride occurred.
Custom intervals can be selected from the map or from the charts.

The Trends pages show changing values over time of Critical Power and various aerobic and anaerobic time interval. And a selection of various training stress scores. I changed the pages to show a full year of trends. I felt unusually slow this spring, but now I can see I'm hitting the same numbers that I did last summer.

GC can calculate power numbers for different heart rate zones, too.

I have a customized ride chart showing Power, W' Balance, Heart rate, Speed, Cadence, Elevation, Grade, and Normalized Power. (W' Balance is sortof an estimate of the short term power reserves I'm using up that replenish during the ride. Normalized Power is more useful than average power especially when the power varies a lot.)

I have the ride summary configured to locate the best power interval of that ride in a list of time periods. 5, 10, 15, 20, 30 seconds, 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 45, 60 minutes.

I now have a good idea of the power levels I can maintain for 30 seconds, for 5 minutes, or for an hour, etc.

A Critical Power Graph example. The red shaded area is my best power at each time interval, selected from the last 12 months (or can be the current season). The red line is the selected ride, and the white line is an interval from that ride. You can see I matched or set my best efforts for the year at the 30-40 second range, and around 5-6 minutes. (I trimmed the edges of the graph page, cutting off my pitiful watt ranges.)
Umm... nice graph... I kind of wanted to see your power numbers though...
firebird854 is offline  
Old 06-08-18, 11:42 AM
  #11  
redlude97
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times in 173 Posts
Strava premium also has a power curve and estimated FTP function I found reasonably accurate for me compared to 20 min tests. Agrees with my CP chart from golden cheetah too.
redlude97 is offline  
Old 06-08-18, 02:53 PM
  #12  
Oldsport
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 125
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
There is some great information in this thread. Thank you for your help.

I will plan on riding around for the next few weeks and taking a look at some of the programs out there.
Oldsport is offline  
Old 06-08-18, 03:02 PM
  #13  
sdmc530
Heft On Wheels
 
sdmc530's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 3,123

Bikes: Specialized,Cannondale,Argon 18

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 887 Post(s)
Liked 560 Times in 346 Posts
Originally Posted by rubiksoval

If you want to test FTP, shoot for 40-45 minutes all out. That'll give you a much more accurate representation of FTP.
This is a great indication of your FTP...be warned though, it is a soul crushing test! I did this and I was shocked how weak I was.
sdmc530 is offline  
Old 06-08-18, 03:53 PM
  #14  
rubiksoval
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444

Bikes: bikes

Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times in 711 Posts
Originally Posted by sdmc530
This is a great indication of your FTP...be warned though, it is a soul crushing test! I did this and I was shocked how weak I was.
Precisely! 20 mins is not even in the same ballpark! Especially if you're a faster-twitch guy.
rubiksoval is offline  
Old 06-08-18, 04:54 PM
  #15  
colombo357
Senior Member
 
colombo357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Murica
Posts: 2,284
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 12 Posts
Try the TrainerRoad ramp test, which is live now on their app.

You've already got a PM, so all you need is a stationary trainer.
colombo357 is offline  
Old 06-08-18, 04:59 PM
  #16  
colombo357
Senior Member
 
colombo357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Murica
Posts: 2,284
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by rubiksoval
If you want to test FTP, shoot for 40-45 minutes all out. That'll give you a much more accurate representation of FTP.
FTP for most of us is a theoretical, physiological limit. We simply don't have the mental fortitude to hold FTP for an hour, or even 40-45 minutes, even if our bodies could.

Doing a 40-45 minute all-out test is going to be counterproductive for someone new to training because it's going to result in a massive under-assessment.
colombo357 is offline  
Old 06-08-18, 05:10 PM
  #17  
rubiksoval
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444

Bikes: bikes

Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times in 711 Posts
Originally Posted by colombo357
FTP for most of us is a theoretical, physiological limit. We simply don't have the mental fortitude to hold FTP for an hour, or even 40-45 minutes, even if our bodies could.

Doing a 40-45 minute all-out test is going to be counterproductive for someone new to training because it's going to result in a massive under-assessment.
How will it be an under-assessment? It'll be an accurate assessment. Your ftp is NOT 20 minutes. I don't even remotely understand your thinking, here.

This is exactly the issue with FTP. People want these ridiculous, inflated numbers to brag about on the internet, but then they can't do anywhere near the power they claim to be able to do. It's so silly.
rubiksoval is offline  
Old 06-08-18, 05:51 PM
  #18  
ddub
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 252
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 100 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by colombo357
Try the TrainerRoad ramp test, which is live now on their app.

You've already got a PM, so all you need is a stationary trainer.
Have you done the ramp test? If so, did it correspond to your current FTP done with the 20min test?
ddub is offline  
Old 06-08-18, 07:48 PM
  #19  
colombo357
Senior Member
 
colombo357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Murica
Posts: 2,284
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by rubiksoval
How will it be an under-assessment? It'll be an accurate assessment. Your ftp is NOT 20 minutes. I don't even remotely understand your thinking, here.

This is exactly the issue with FTP. People want these ridiculous, inflated numbers to brag about on the internet, but then they can't do anywhere near the power they claim to be able to do. It's so silly.
Under-assessment in terms of a baseline for training.

Follow some sweet spot intervals, e.g. 4x10, at an under assessed FTP, and you'll basically be doing tempo intervals with very little gains.

Last edited by colombo357; 06-08-18 at 08:03 PM.
colombo357 is offline  
Old 06-08-18, 08:02 PM
  #20  
colombo357
Senior Member
 
colombo357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Murica
Posts: 2,284
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by ddub
Have you done the ramp test? If so, did it correspond to your current FTP done with the 20min test?
Yes, it tested higher, but it's very repeatable and correction is a simple.

The ramp test basically finds your VO2 max power and estimates your FTP at 75%. For me, it's closer to 70%. YMMV.
colombo357 is offline  
Old 06-08-18, 08:20 PM
  #21  
rubiksoval
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444

Bikes: bikes

Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times in 711 Posts
Originally Posted by colombo357
Under-assessment in terms of a baseline for training.

Follow some sweet spot intervals, e.g. 4x10, at an under assessed FTP, and you'll basically be doing tempo intervals with very little gains.
So you want to make up an FTP and just train based on what you think it should be?

That's a pretty backwards way of training and not at all in line with pretty much anything that makes sense.

And having to break sweetspot into 4x10 means it's too hard, not too easy. You don't need to take breaks at a proper sweetspot pace. Your numbers are way all over the place.

Last edited by rubiksoval; 06-08-18 at 08:28 PM.
rubiksoval is offline  
Old 06-08-18, 08:21 PM
  #22  
Jazzguitar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Boston
Posts: 156
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 53 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times in 14 Posts
The Xert “What’s my FTP?” app for your Garmin 1030 can get you in the ballpark of your FTP without having to torture yourself with a typical test. I’ve been using it for the last year and it’s always been within a few watts of my tested FTP.
Jazzguitar is offline  
Old 06-08-18, 08:35 PM
  #23  
colombo357
Senior Member
 
colombo357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Murica
Posts: 2,284
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by rubiksoval
you don't need to take breaks at a proper sweetspot pace.
ok.
colombo357 is offline  
Old 06-08-18, 09:45 PM
  #24  
sdmc530
Heft On Wheels
 
sdmc530's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 3,123

Bikes: Specialized,Cannondale,Argon 18

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 887 Post(s)
Liked 560 Times in 346 Posts
Originally Posted by rubiksoval
How will it be an under-assessment? It'll be an accurate assessment. Your ftp is NOT 20 minutes. I don't even remotely understand your thinking, here.

This is exactly the issue with FTP. People want these ridiculous, inflated numbers to brag about on the internet, but then they can't do anywhere near the power they claim to be able to do. It's so silly.
While I am not an expert in the field at all but I couldn't agree more that this statement. I have played with these tests lately because I got a power meter finally. My 20 min FTP was 299 on my indoor trainer, 299!! I was like there is no way in heck I have a FTP that high. I went out doors on a pretty flat route and did it again, Garmin 520 said my 20 minute power for that run was 293. HOLY Crap,.....still in disbelief. I talked to my LBS buddy and he said now do the same test for 1 hour, indoor and out door. This was where the spam hit the fan and my soul was crushed. Indoor 1 hour FTP indoors was 273...I was still pretty proud of this number actually but still not exactly stellar really. The outdoors FTP test was much worse, was 256, not stellar at all. I am going to repeat the rounds of 4 test this fall just before the riding season ends for outdoor and see how it plays out. A true 1 hour test is such a difficult thing to do because of the toughness and the boredom actually, really hard to stay motivated for that long at full power.

Just wanted to put in my 2 cents.
sdmc530 is offline  
Old 06-08-18, 11:10 PM
  #25  
gregf83 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by sdmc530
A true 1 hour test is such a difficult thing to do because of the toughness and the boredom actually, really hard to stay motivated for that long at full power.
I find it easier to assess on a long hill. We have a decent hill that's around an hour to climb. It’s not a perfect FTP test as we have to ride for a couple of hours to get to the base but it's continuous with a fairly steady grade and spectacular scenery which makes it easier to take. Much harder to find the motivation to ride on the flats for an hour and more challenging to find roads without any stops.

Last edited by gregf83; 06-09-18 at 03:04 PM.
gregf83 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.