Cycling Is A Poor Form of Exercise :-(
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Cycling Is A Poor Form of Exercise :-(
I've gone to two local meetups with road cycling clubs. One was a social meet up, and the members seemed far more fit than the average person of their ages (most were older). At the second meet, everyone was ready for a ride in their gear. I was shocked by their appearance. In full lycra kit, they had comically oversized pot bellies, but with skinny noodly arms and legs.
Basically, cycling is just sitting. It is not weight bearing. Your bones become weaker as you sweat away minerals over long miles. Your muscles and bones don't become any stronger because they don't have to bear any weight. As a matter of fact, any additional weight is a liability, so additional muscle mass only penalizes you on climbs.
Even when I was riding many miles a week, I never lost any significant weight. In the past couple of weeks, I've been walking and hiking instead. I've lost more weight in these past couple of weeks than I did when I was riding upwards of 200 miles a week cycling!
Cycling for me is more about fun and recreation rather than "physical fitness." You become fit when you become stronger, and cycling may actually lead to the opposite.
Basically, cycling is just sitting. It is not weight bearing. Your bones become weaker as you sweat away minerals over long miles. Your muscles and bones don't become any stronger because they don't have to bear any weight. As a matter of fact, any additional weight is a liability, so additional muscle mass only penalizes you on climbs.
Even when I was riding many miles a week, I never lost any significant weight. In the past couple of weeks, I've been walking and hiking instead. I've lost more weight in these past couple of weeks than I did when I was riding upwards of 200 miles a week cycling!
Cycling for me is more about fun and recreation rather than "physical fitness." You become fit when you become stronger, and cycling may actually lead to the opposite.
Likes For djcookie:
#2
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,026
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,115 Times
in
1,045 Posts
Unplug the battery and try it again.
Likes For wgscott:
2cam16, AlexZ, AMGwagon, Astroboy, Astrozombie, atwl77, Berg417448, blacknbluebikes, BobsPoprad, Branko D, Camilo, CAT7RDR, CeeDotA, Clipped_in, Danhedonia, Digger Goreman, dkatz1, Drk, Ferrouscious, FiftySix, Fixit, GAtkins, GeezyRider, gios, GrainBrain, grumpyoldguy, guachi, Helderberg, hsuBM, Hypno Toad, jay4usc, jjankie, John_V, Koyote, livedarklions, LV2TNDM, Milton Keynes, oldukbkr, Pop N Wood, Prodigy4299, ririder, rosefarts, rossiny, SpinnerPC, TheLizard, tomato coupe, wipekitty
#4
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,330
Bikes: Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100, Schwinn Circuit, Sante
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1969 Post(s)
Liked 1,920 Times
in
988 Posts
I've gone to two local meetups with road cycling clubs. One was a social meet up, and the members seemed far more fit than the average person of their ages (most were older). At the second meet, everyone was ready for a ride in their gear. I was shocked by their appearance. In full lycra kit, they had comically oversized pot bellies, but with skinny noodly arms and legs.
Basically, cycling is just sitting. It is not weight bearing. Your bones become weaker as you sweat away minerals over long miles. Your muscles and bones don't become any stronger because they don't have to bear any weight. As a matter of fact, any additional weight is a liability, so additional muscle mass only penalizes you on climbs.
Even when I was riding many miles a week, I never lost any significant weight. In the past couple of weeks, I've been walking and hiking instead. I've lost more weight in these past couple of weeks than I did when I was riding upwards of 200 miles a week cycling!
Cycling for me is more about fun and recreation rather than "physical fitness." You become fit when you become stronger, and cycling may actually lead to the opposite.
Basically, cycling is just sitting. It is not weight bearing. Your bones become weaker as you sweat away minerals over long miles. Your muscles and bones don't become any stronger because they don't have to bear any weight. As a matter of fact, any additional weight is a liability, so additional muscle mass only penalizes you on climbs.
Even when I was riding many miles a week, I never lost any significant weight. In the past couple of weeks, I've been walking and hiking instead. I've lost more weight in these past couple of weeks than I did when I was riding upwards of 200 miles a week cycling!
Cycling for me is more about fun and recreation rather than "physical fitness." You become fit when you become stronger, and cycling may actually lead to the opposite.
Likes For genejockey:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hacienda Hgts
Posts: 1,074
Bikes: 1999 Schwinn Peloton Ultegra 10, Kestrel RT-1000 Ultegra, Trek Marlin 6 Deore 29'er
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 381 Post(s)
Liked 738 Times
in
403 Posts
To the OP: Funny, I was going on more hilly hikes and dog walks due to extreme heat and smoke. Rode 38 miles and climbed 5K ft for my first ride in two weeks and it was a damn struggle. I now realize how hikes really were far lower on the aerobic rating than hilly bike rides.
#6
Live Healthy
I've gone to two local meetups with road cycling clubs. One was a social meet up, and the members seemed far more fit than the average person of their ages (most were older). At the second meet, everyone was ready for a ride in their gear. I was shocked by their appearance. In full lycra kit, they had comically oversized pot bellies, but with skinny noodly arms and legs.
Basically, cycling is just sitting. It is not weight bearing. Your bones become weaker as you sweat away minerals over long miles. Your muscles and bones don't become any stronger because they don't have to bear any weight. As a matter of fact, any additional weight is a liability, so additional muscle mass only penalizes you on climbs.
Even when I was riding many miles a week, I never lost any significant weight. In the past couple of weeks, I've been walking and hiking instead. I've lost more weight in these past couple of weeks than I did when I was riding upwards of 200 miles a week cycling!
Cycling for me is more about fun and recreation rather than "physical fitness." You become fit when you become stronger, and cycling may actually lead to the opposite.
Basically, cycling is just sitting. It is not weight bearing. Your bones become weaker as you sweat away minerals over long miles. Your muscles and bones don't become any stronger because they don't have to bear any weight. As a matter of fact, any additional weight is a liability, so additional muscle mass only penalizes you on climbs.
Even when I was riding many miles a week, I never lost any significant weight. In the past couple of weeks, I've been walking and hiking instead. I've lost more weight in these past couple of weeks than I did when I was riding upwards of 200 miles a week cycling!
Cycling for me is more about fun and recreation rather than "physical fitness." You become fit when you become stronger, and cycling may actually lead to the opposite.
Likes For jay4usc:
#7
Senior Member
I've gone to two local meetups with road cycling clubs. One was a social meet up, and the members seemed far more fit than the average person of their ages (most were older). At the second meet, everyone was ready for a ride in their gear. I was shocked by their appearance. In full lycra kit, they had comically oversized pot bellies, but with skinny noodly arms and legs.
Basically, cycling is just sitting. It is not weight bearing. Your bones become weaker as you sweat away minerals over long miles. Your muscles and bones don't become any stronger because they don't have to bear any weight. As a matter of fact, any additional weight is a liability, so additional muscle mass only penalizes you on climbs.
Even when I was riding many miles a week, I never lost any significant weight. In the past couple of weeks, I've been walking and hiking instead. I've lost more weight in these past couple of weeks than I did when I was riding upwards of 200 miles a week cycling!
Cycling for me is more about fun and recreation rather than "physical fitness." You become fit when you become stronger, and cycling may actually lead to the opposite.
Basically, cycling is just sitting. It is not weight bearing. Your bones become weaker as you sweat away minerals over long miles. Your muscles and bones don't become any stronger because they don't have to bear any weight. As a matter of fact, any additional weight is a liability, so additional muscle mass only penalizes you on climbs.
Even when I was riding many miles a week, I never lost any significant weight. In the past couple of weeks, I've been walking and hiking instead. I've lost more weight in these past couple of weeks than I did when I was riding upwards of 200 miles a week cycling!
Cycling for me is more about fun and recreation rather than "physical fitness." You become fit when you become stronger, and cycling may actually lead to the opposite.
Likes For wolfchild:
#8
Senior Member
Personally, I think people overestimate the calories required to cycle and so they probably end up eating in excess of what they burn. If you're burning 300-500 calories per hour and then loading up on pastries and such, then no, the weight isn't going to come off.
As for cycling not being good exercise, I'd challenge some folks to do 10-12hrs a week of structured workouts like I and many more fitness/competitive minded cyclists do and then reassess whether they think it's good exercise or not.
As for cycling not being good exercise, I'd challenge some folks to do 10-12hrs a week of structured workouts like I and many more fitness/competitive minded cyclists do and then reassess whether they think it's good exercise or not.
Likes For hubcyclist:
Likes For BobbyG:
257 roberts, AlexZ, AlmostTrick, a_d_a_m, banjaboy, Berg417448, Ferrouscious, Fixit, GeezyRider, guachi, Hypno Toad, indyfabz, jjankie, Just Mark, Jv_247, livedarklions, LV2TNDM, Milton Keynes, nomadmax, oldlady62, phughes, Reynolds, skier, smashndash, stephr1, surak, SurferRosa, tomato coupe, Trsnrtr, wgscott, WhyFi
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 39,872
Bikes: Ridley Excalibur, Gazelle Champion Mondial, On-One Pompino, Specialized Rock Hopper
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2537 Post(s)
Liked 1,783 Times
in
881 Posts
There are many kinds of cycling clubs, some are more social than others. If you went to a race or a race-oriented group ride, you'd see some very fit riders. Even the older ones.
Likes For caloso:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,316
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 545 Post(s)
Liked 368 Times
in
206 Posts
What a sweeping, oversimplified statement. Within months of changing nothing in my routine except adding some bike commuting trips each week, I went from an already light BMI of a shade over 21, which I'd kept for over a decade, to under 20, and my waist slimmed down to narrower than my smallest belt size. My legs went from looking like sticks barely wider than my biceps to, well, normal sized.

#12
Senior Member
Calorie counting is unnecessary. I don't even count how many calories I burn... I eat by feel and can eat quite a lot on most days and have never been overweight yet.
#13
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 12,268
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5008 Post(s)
Liked 2,317 Times
in
1,361 Posts
Perhaps reality is not on the extreme ends of the spectrum.
Maybe cycling is good exercise, but it should be supplemented with other forms of exercise if you want a full body workout.
...and to be clear, mountain biking can use a lot more than just your legs. There can be a lot of core work thru balancing and throwing the bike around singletrack. Core, arms, legs- thats about everything.
But yeah, to have overall balanced strength and fitness, you should target more than just one area.
whoda thunk?
Maybe cycling is good exercise, but it should be supplemented with other forms of exercise if you want a full body workout.
...and to be clear, mountain biking can use a lot more than just your legs. There can be a lot of core work thru balancing and throwing the bike around singletrack. Core, arms, legs- thats about everything.
But yeah, to have overall balanced strength and fitness, you should target more than just one area.
whoda thunk?
Likes For mstateglfr:
#14
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 12,268
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5008 Post(s)
Liked 2,317 Times
in
1,361 Posts
Personally, I think people overestimate the calories required to cycle and so they probably end up eating in excess of what they burn. If you're burning 300-500 calories per hour and then loading up on pastries and such, then no, the weight isn't going to come off.
As for cycling not being good exercise, I'd challenge some folks to do 10-12hrs a week of structured workouts like I and many more fitness/competitive minded cyclists do and then reassess whether they think it's good exercise or not.
As for cycling not being good exercise, I'd challenge some folks to do 10-12hrs a week of structured workouts like I and many more fitness/competitive minded cyclists do and then reassess whether they think it's good exercise or not.
My burn range is a lot higher.
#15
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,330
Bikes: Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100, Schwinn Circuit, Sante
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1969 Post(s)
Liked 1,920 Times
in
988 Posts
Then it's more accurate to say calorie counting is unnecessary FOR YOU. Not everyone is so fortunate. Trust me on this.
#16
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 12,268
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5008 Post(s)
Liked 2,317 Times
in
1,361 Posts
Everyone has different ways to find and maintain healthy bodies and weight.
I religiously count calories, to the point that it is exhausting. But it is also what has worked to allow me to maintain a healthy weight as well as healthy body.
Religiously track calories in and religiously track calories burned. I'd love to not track and eat 'by feel', but that hasn't been a recipe for success so far.
In case you haven't heard, there are also multiple ways people learn best. Crazy, right?! I'm sure you figure your learning style is the only necessary way.
Likes For mstateglfr:
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: In the south but from North
Posts: 338
Bikes: Turner 5-Spot Burner converted; IBIS Ripley, Specialized Crave, Tommasini Sintesi, Cinelli Superstar
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 161 Post(s)
Liked 148 Times
in
76 Posts
Why do people respond to these absolutely asinine posts?
Likes For vespasianus:
257 roberts, AlexZ, AMGwagon, badger1, biglmbass, BlackMambaNYC, BrazAd, daviddavieboy, dedhed, downhillmaster, F308, GeezyRider, Gundo, indyfabz, Jean_TX, John_V, Just Mark, kaos joe, koenbro, MNHarv, nomadmax, ofajen, Pop N Wood, Princess_Allez, Rolla, ScottRiqui, Senior Ryder 00, SurferRosa, suttonjp, tomato coupe
#18
Senior Member
Well, just basing it on my own power. endurance watts for me (~200w) is about 750/hr (my 100 mile ride a few weeks ago was 3750 over 5:14). Going around the neighborhood with my 9y/o at 12ish mph at 275 cal/hr (we have a flat .25 mile loop we ride around for an hour). So the 300-500 is what I'd consider somewhere average folks would be.
#20
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 21,114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 1,001 Times
in
738 Posts
I never quite understood how cycling can be considered not to be weight-bearing. Sure, nothing in your upper body gets much of a workout.
Likes For unterhausen:
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 29,146
Mentioned: 198 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12717 Post(s)
Liked 4,981 Times
in
2,569 Posts
Personally, while cycling across the country unsupported I managed to put on fat pounds because in the Midwest I was still eating like I had been in the mountains of the west. Also, we ate out more often because of the horrible heat and humidity. Food choices at restaurants were often calorie ladened. When I realized what was happening I dialed it back and lost the weight in the mountains of NY and New England.
Over the years I have lowered my calories while touring without sacrificing performance. This past Sunday I finished a 9 day trip. 64 miles with some pretty good hills in the first 40 miles. For breakfast I had a bottled juice drink and a muffin from a c-store. On the road I had 3 Cliff bars and a package of Truvita crackers. Never one felt fatigued despite a headwind much of the way.
Last edited by indyfabz; 09-22-20 at 05:50 PM.
Likes For indyfabz:
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 29,146
Mentioned: 198 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12717 Post(s)
Liked 4,981 Times
in
2,569 Posts
Likes For indyfabz:
Likes For HD3andMe:
#25
Senior Member
I've learned that generalizations are as helpful as, well, dog excrement.