Power tripper
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: vermont
Posts: 3,091
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
Power tripper
I started with a powertap hub in the fall and added a used computrainer when the hard winter hit around January. I relegated my trusty Schwinn spin bike for a Cyclops 400P indoor bike when an attractive CL ad popped up. I guess the short story is I collect digital information, tons of it on every ride I do. Many of us have these devices, how many save and try to make sense of it? I have a lot of buttons to push and files to upload but I am getting stronger and look forward to seeing how my body reacted to the work displayed on the screen. It's a slippery slope, I am on it. Digital performer following a virtual peloton.
Weird.
Anyone else?
Weird.
Anyone else?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Springfield, MA
Posts: 1,060
Bikes: 2012 Motobecane Fantom CXX, 2012 Motobecane Fantom CX, 1997 Bianchi Nyala, 200? Burley Rock 'n Roll
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I decided to go the other way and see if I could train effectively with relatively simple electronics that don't generate a whole lot of data. I got a fairly cheap/simple Polar FT7 HR monitor, a wired Cateye Strada bike computer with cadence, a Kurt Kinetic trainer, and a simple digital watch with stopwatch function. I use the stopwatch and a cue sheet to let me know when to start and stop intervals. I can convert trainer speed to power using Kurt's published power curve/formula. So I predetermine what speed range corresponds to the power range I want to hit in the intervals (that goes on the cue sheet too). I write down just a few data points in a paper log after each session: time of session/ride, distance, ave speed, max speed, ave HR, max HR, calories (which are of dubious accuracy and value).
I decided I would use this system for a year (I'm just a few weeks in now) and see how it goes before deciding to upgrade, and if so, what to upgrades to do. I'll be reading other replies to this thread with interest!
I decided I would use this system for a year (I'm just a few weeks in now) and see how it goes before deciding to upgrade, and if so, what to upgrades to do. I'll be reading other replies to this thread with interest!
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,700
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
Golden Cheetah. It's good and it's free.
Training Peaks is also good but it isn't free.
Don't bother paying for any of the online sites like Strava, where you have to pay to get almost-useless power data.
Training Peaks is also good but it isn't free.
Don't bother paying for any of the online sites like Strava, where you have to pay to get almost-useless power data.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ellensburg,WA
Posts: 3,175
Bikes: Schwinn Broadway, Specialized Secteur Sport(crashed) Spec. Roubaix Sport, Spec. Crux
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 178 Post(s)
Liked 161 Times
in
80 Posts
Yeah just use free services. The best policy is to get something for nothing and expect more. Us that are paying members of Strava and the like don't mind paying for the freeloaders out there. @ $59 a year Strava may or may not be worth it to you. If the power data is "almost-useless" so be it. Might it be better to simply state that in your opinion the power data presentation on Strava was not worth it for you?
__________________
Sir Mark, Knight of Sufferlandria
Sir Mark, Knight of Sufferlandria
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,700
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
Yeah just use free services. The best policy is to get something for nothing and expect more. Us that are paying members of Strava and the like don't mind paying for the freeloaders out there. @ $59 a year Strava may or may not be worth it to you. If the power data is "almost-useless" so be it. Might it be better to simply state that in your opinion the power data presentation on Strava was not worth it for you?
Strava power provides nothing like NP, TSS, TSB, TRIMP, AWC, CP, or or CTL. And a whole lot more. If you don't know what those mean you have no business getting into a discussion where you make recommendations regarding the use of power meters in cycling and are just spouting off in ignorance.
Paid-for Strava power is a waste of time compared to what free Golden Cheetah provides. Find your best 5-minute power intervals for all of your rides in Strava. How is that trending over the course of your training? Are you better now than you were last year? How about cadence? How long can you hold 120+ RPM without stopping? What's your VI on your 20-minute threshold intervals? Did you do a good job holding steady power during your last time trial? What is your AWC? Oh, wait. You can't use Strava for any of that.
Yet you paid for it?
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ellensburg,WA
Posts: 3,175
Bikes: Schwinn Broadway, Specialized Secteur Sport(crashed) Spec. Roubaix Sport, Spec. Crux
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 178 Post(s)
Liked 161 Times
in
80 Posts
If someone wants to give away a product for free, that's their decision. The fact that it has significantly more features than a product that someone else charges money for isn't my problem.
Strava power provides nothing like NP, TSS, TSB, TRIMP, AWC, CP, or or CTL. And a whole lot more. If you don't know what those mean you have no business getting into a discussion where you make recommendations regarding the use of power meters in cycling and are just spouting off in ignorance.
Paid-for Strava power is a waste of time compared to what free Golden Cheetah provides. Find your best 5-minute power intervals for all of your rides in Strava. How is that trending over the course of your training? Are you better now than you were last year? How about cadence? How long can you hold 120+ RPM without stopping? What's your VI on your 20-minute threshold intervals? Did you do a good job holding steady power during your last time trial? What is your AWC? Oh, wait. You can't use Strava for any of that.
Yet you paid for it?
Strava power provides nothing like NP, TSS, TSB, TRIMP, AWC, CP, or or CTL. And a whole lot more. If you don't know what those mean you have no business getting into a discussion where you make recommendations regarding the use of power meters in cycling and are just spouting off in ignorance.
Paid-for Strava power is a waste of time compared to what free Golden Cheetah provides. Find your best 5-minute power intervals for all of your rides in Strava. How is that trending over the course of your training? Are you better now than you were last year? How about cadence? How long can you hold 120+ RPM without stopping? What's your VI on your 20-minute threshold intervals? Did you do a good job holding steady power during your last time trial? What is your AWC? Oh, wait. You can't use Strava for any of that.
Yet you paid for it?
__________________
Sir Mark, Knight of Sufferlandria
Sir Mark, Knight of Sufferlandria
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,700
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
The pointless personal attack aside had you posted this first I would not have taken offense at your blanket don't pay for strava comment. Pardon me for replying into a thread about power where only those invited must know everything, Oh wait you are not the OP. I'm not making recommendations on the use of power meter. I am pointedly asking you to back up why you say to not make a purchasing decision.
"Oh wait you're not the OP"? Wut? Then why did you respond to my post? And call me a "freeloader" in the process? You attack me from a position of ignorance, and now you complain?
I backed up my post already. Strava is not a serious training tool. It doesn't provide enough detail nor any of the information that can be calculated from power inputs from rides. It provides no real ability to track progress outside of paging through ride after ride and trying to collate the data yourself - things that a computer is designed to do, yet Strava doesn't do it. Hell, free RWGPS is a better training tool than paid Strava - at least there you can get your NP for not only an entire ride, but for segments of your ride.
Why pay for a tool when someone else provides a better tool for free? Paid Strava power provides almost none of the capabilities of free Golden Cheetah.
The only thing Strava provides that Golden Cheetah doesn't is a way to easily measure yourself against other riders. And they do the only one that matters - how fast you go - for free.
Power is a tool used to go faster. It's not an end unto itself.
And even then, if you really cared to measure yourself against the truly fast, you get a license, pin on a number, and race. Because the really fast riders tend not to play on Strava. Strava is playing "Who's the biggest fish" in a tidal pond while over the dune is the ocean where the sharks and whales swim.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,079
Bikes: Roubaix SL4 Expert , Cervelo S2
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 85 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Strava power provides nothing like NP, TSS, TSB, TRIMP, AWC, CP, or or CTL. And a whole lot more. If you don't know what those mean you have no business getting into a discussion where you make recommendations regarding the use of power meters in cycling and are just spouting off in ignorance.
Weighted Average Power is close to NP
Training Load is almost identical to TSS
Fitness/Freshness/Form are almost identical to CTL/ATL/TSB
Best Efforts Power Curve is virtually identical to CP curve
Zone/HR distribution and 25w power distribution are pretty cool as well. In addition, if you use a Garmin cycling computer paired to a power meter (and upload to Garmin Connect) you'll also have access to TSS, IF and NP. The lap function on a Garmin will allow you to evaluate a lot of parameters during a set period of time like during an interval (as long as you remember to start/stop the lap timer.)
Last edited by Dunbar; 03-27-14 at 05:45 PM.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ellensburg,WA
Posts: 3,175
Bikes: Schwinn Broadway, Specialized Secteur Sport(crashed) Spec. Roubaix Sport, Spec. Crux
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 178 Post(s)
Liked 161 Times
in
80 Posts
Don't act offended after you post pejoratives phrases such ase "Yeah just use free services. The best policy is to get something for nothing and expect more" and "paying for the freeloaders out there."
"Oh wait you're not the OP"? Wut? Then why did you respond to my post? And call me a "freeloader" in the process? You attack me from a position of ignorance, and now you complain?
I backed up my post already. Strava is not a serious training tool. It doesn't provide enough detail nor any of the information that can be calculated from power inputs from rides. It provides no real ability to track progress outside of paging through ride after ride and trying to collate the data yourself - things that a computer is designed to do, yet Strava doesn't do it. Hell, free RWGPS is a better training tool than paid Strava - at least there you can get your NP for not only an entire ride, but for segments of your ride.
Why pay for a tool when someone else provides a better tool for free? Paid Strava power provides almost none of the capabilities of free Golden Cheetah.
The only thing Strava provides that Golden Cheetah doesn't is a way to easily measure yourself against other riders. And they do the only one that matters - how fast you go - for free.
Power is a tool used to go faster. It's not an end unto itself.
And even then, if you really cared to measure yourself against the truly fast, you get a license, pin on a number, and race. Because the really fast riders tend not to play on Strava. Strava is playing "Who's the biggest fish" in a tidal pond while over the dune is the ocean where the sharks and whales swim.
"Oh wait you're not the OP"? Wut? Then why did you respond to my post? And call me a "freeloader" in the process? You attack me from a position of ignorance, and now you complain?
I backed up my post already. Strava is not a serious training tool. It doesn't provide enough detail nor any of the information that can be calculated from power inputs from rides. It provides no real ability to track progress outside of paging through ride after ride and trying to collate the data yourself - things that a computer is designed to do, yet Strava doesn't do it. Hell, free RWGPS is a better training tool than paid Strava - at least there you can get your NP for not only an entire ride, but for segments of your ride.
Why pay for a tool when someone else provides a better tool for free? Paid Strava power provides almost none of the capabilities of free Golden Cheetah.
The only thing Strava provides that Golden Cheetah doesn't is a way to easily measure yourself against other riders. And they do the only one that matters - how fast you go - for free.
Power is a tool used to go faster. It's not an end unto itself.
And even then, if you really cared to measure yourself against the truly fast, you get a license, pin on a number, and race. Because the really fast riders tend not to play on Strava. Strava is playing "Who's the biggest fish" in a tidal pond while over the dune is the ocean where the sharks and whales swim.
Back the hell up pilgrim! Qualify your comments a little better and objectively read what you are posting with another's perspective. A reading of your post is You like FREE, FREE, and OH don't spend money on this. I like free resources as well but I do not ever advocate for someone to not buy a subscription to support what they find useful. Someday I'll buy a powermeter but only because I want to know what i can do, I really could care less how others are doing. I won enough races in my youth, now I only want to beat myself.
__________________
Sir Mark, Knight of Sufferlandria
Sir Mark, Knight of Sufferlandria
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
177 Posts
Yeah just use free services. The best policy is to get something for nothing and expect more. Us that are paying members of Strava and the like don't mind paying for the freeloaders out there. @ $59 a year Strava may or may not be worth it to you. If the power data is "almost-useless" so be it. Might it be better to simply state that in your opinion the power data presentation on Strava was not worth it for you?
I agree that Strava is a poor substitute for Golden Cheetah as far as managing power.
#12
Senior Member
I'm an innocent bystander. I have Strava Premium. I get it for the social aspects.
I did power training this winter on my Kurt Kinetic. I generated a bunch of numbers and rode a lot. I think I improved, at least when repeated my field test.
What exactly did I miss? I do not understand the alphabet soup that was tossed out a few posts ago.
I did power training this winter on my Kurt Kinetic. I generated a bunch of numbers and rode a lot. I think I improved, at least when repeated my field test.
What exactly did I miss? I do not understand the alphabet soup that was tossed out a few posts ago.
__________________
Momento mori, amor fati.
Momento mori, amor fati.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,700
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
Yes I questioned your charcter
and you opened that can of worms by posting in such shorthand opinion only without substance BS.
You seem to think your thoughts and opinions are facts and yet they are just subjective opinion,
Golden Cheetah does that for free - both facts. Nothing subjective about it.
You want subjective? Strava is merely an e-wang tool for cat 6 racers that gets them to pay money by pandering to overly competitive impulses. It's like paying someone to give you a trophies for playing in sandlot football games or pickup basketball games.
and it seems poorly informed at that. For you and perhaps others Strava is not a serious training tool, yeah whatever.
I came to this thread seeking knowledge about power and how it might help me.
You sir on the other hand get all defensive when called on your assertions without any intellectual credibility
and then call others ignorant.
You do not know me or what I know!
Your first reply to this thread is not directed towards the OP,
FWIW, you're wrong.
perhaps it is directed towards the second post that just happens to say that he is not using power
What
The
Hell?
and yet you think I have no place in this forum
Does that have a place?
if I do not know what a list of trademarked acronyms are, seriously.
And if you don't know what they mean, you have no business making a recommendation on what tool to use when training with power. That's like a clam telling a bird how to fly.
Hence my claim you're posting from ignorance. Glad you admit it.
Back the hell up pilgrim! Qualify your comments a little better and objectively read what you are posting with another's perspective.
A reading of your post is You like FREE, FREE, and OH don't spend money on this.
And you post in a mocking tone, trying to make fun of me - a form of purely personal attack.
I like free resources as well but I do not ever advocate for someone to not buy a subscription to support what they find useful.
The fact that there are some people who like it because it does what they want? Fine. Others who have posted here don't seem to be offended by my pointing out that there are serious free tools that objectively provide a lot more features than paid Strava.
You're the only one getting into a snit over that statement.
Someday I'll buy a powermeter but only because I want to know what i can do,
Yet here you are attacking me over my recommendations? I have this image in my mind of a person born without legs screaming from the sidelines at a bunch of soccer players that they're playing the game all wrong.
I really could care less how others are doing.
I won enough races in my youth, now I only want to beat myself.
Last edited by achoo; 03-28-14 at 09:23 AM.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,700
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
Strava doesn't want to pay to license those terms from Training Peaks but you get very similar info with Strava Premium. I wouldn't say Strava Premium is worthless if (like me) you use it to track mileage.
Weighted Average Power is close to NP
Training Load is almost identical to TSS
Fitness/Freshness/Form are almost identical to CTL/ATL/TSB
Best Efforts Power Curve is virtually identical to CP curve
Zone/HR distribution and 25w power distribution are pretty cool as well. In addition, if you use a Garmin cycling computer paired to a power meter (and upload to Garmin Connect) you'll also have access to TSS, IF and NP. The lap function on a Garmin will allow you to evaluate a lot of parameters during a set period of time like during an interval (as long as you remember to start/stop the lap timer.)
Weighted Average Power is close to NP
Training Load is almost identical to TSS
Fitness/Freshness/Form are almost identical to CTL/ATL/TSB
Best Efforts Power Curve is virtually identical to CP curve
Zone/HR distribution and 25w power distribution are pretty cool as well. In addition, if you use a Garmin cycling computer paired to a power meter (and upload to Garmin Connect) you'll also have access to TSS, IF and NP. The lap function on a Garmin will allow you to evaluate a lot of parameters during a set period of time like during an interval (as long as you remember to start/stop the lap timer.)
But tracking mileage? Doesn't Strava do that for a free account too?
And if you really get into training with power, you'll start worrying more about time than distance. Especially if you ever wind up riding a trainer a lot, where "distance" is a made-up number.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,079
Bikes: Roubaix SL4 Expert , Cervelo S2
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 85 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Yes, but my point is if you're *already* uploading rides to Strava to track mileage the premium service is convenient. You don't have to upload rides into yet another program. I'm planning to buy WKO 4 if they ever release it but Strava Premium with Garmin Connect gives you access to quite a bit of power based training info.
#16
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,500
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3872 Post(s)
Liked 1,920 Times
in
1,369 Posts
I don't have a power meter, but I have 15 years of HR and course data. I find having data on past performance is invaluable for assessing and planning. I recently paid TP the $120 to go premium and I'm glad that I did. HRTSS isn't the same as TSS, though in some cases it's better. I've been on Strava for free for a while and recently upgraded to premium. I don't think it was worth it. However for those without a power meter, the combination of free Strava and TP premium is very nice. Did TP correctly predict your collection of Strava PRs? As your CTL and TSB go up do your segment watts increase also? Looking back over the past year's training, I find quite a good correlation, which gives me confidence in TP's algorithms.
A superior thing about TP is that I've been uploading data from my Polar watch to Polar software for 15 years. I use the Polar for my not on-the-road activities: rollers, spin class, weights, hiking, DH and XC skiing, even core workouts. I capture everything, because without everything, CTL and TSB aren't worth much. And TP will upload Polar data through Device Agent. Bingo.
So, an honorable mention for those who collect HR and ride data but can't afford or don't want to bother with a PM. And a question to the PMers: so how do you input the data which I collect with my Polar to get your CTL and TSB?
A superior thing about TP is that I've been uploading data from my Polar watch to Polar software for 15 years. I use the Polar for my not on-the-road activities: rollers, spin class, weights, hiking, DH and XC skiing, even core workouts. I capture everything, because without everything, CTL and TSB aren't worth much. And TP will upload Polar data through Device Agent. Bingo.
So, an honorable mention for those who collect HR and ride data but can't afford or don't want to bother with a PM. And a question to the PMers: so how do you input the data which I collect with my Polar to get your CTL and TSB?
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ellensburg,WA
Posts: 3,175
Bikes: Schwinn Broadway, Specialized Secteur Sport(crashed) Spec. Roubaix Sport, Spec. Crux
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 178 Post(s)
Liked 161 Times
in
80 Posts
I get plenty of data without power. Sure power would be nice but it is a bit on the expensive side now. Training without power but with HRM has helped me improve on the road and on the trainer. Strava works just fine for me and is a good training tool in that it offers data that I need.
__________________
Sir Mark, Knight of Sufferlandria
Sir Mark, Knight of Sufferlandria
#18
Version 7.0
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 13,097
Bikes: Too Many
Mentioned: 297 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 2,438 Times
in
1,425 Posts
I have power measurement on all my bikes including the track. I use Cycling Analytics which is a cloud based service similar to WKO. I use a Mac so WKO will not run work and I do not like running PC simulation software to run PC programs. I am a data junkie and like the on the bike power measurement as well as post ride analysis. I used GC for awhile but prefer CA.
I have found that the construct proposed in Training and Racing with a Power Meter and the performance manager in training peaks as proposed by Coggan not applicable to me and probably not applicable to the track. I can do a very fatiguing track workout - high cadence, high power short duration efforts. The TSS for that effort will be low. Likewise, I am very good at high power shorter duration efforts but my FTP is low. I can do a hard road group ride which will indicate a very high TSS showing a lot of anaerobic threshold efforts and I will recover from it quite easily. IMO, for those athletes that are younger road racers with "traditional" FTP numbers, the construct will work and the TSB readings indicative of fatigue. However, for older athletes that are specialists, it seems off.
IMO, the other problem with the FTP model is that it focuses athletes on FTP that IMO, is applicable for time trialists who do 40 ITTs. So an athlete does an FTP test and scores low and becomes demotivated. Well, he/she may not be good at constant torque, constant power work. He/she may be more bursty and do well where there are shorter accelerations and faster efforts.
IMO, power measurement training is excellent but focus on FTP and the Coggan construct may be counter productive to improving cycling and finding what type of cycling best suits an individual.
I have found that the construct proposed in Training and Racing with a Power Meter and the performance manager in training peaks as proposed by Coggan not applicable to me and probably not applicable to the track. I can do a very fatiguing track workout - high cadence, high power short duration efforts. The TSS for that effort will be low. Likewise, I am very good at high power shorter duration efforts but my FTP is low. I can do a hard road group ride which will indicate a very high TSS showing a lot of anaerobic threshold efforts and I will recover from it quite easily. IMO, for those athletes that are younger road racers with "traditional" FTP numbers, the construct will work and the TSB readings indicative of fatigue. However, for older athletes that are specialists, it seems off.
IMO, the other problem with the FTP model is that it focuses athletes on FTP that IMO, is applicable for time trialists who do 40 ITTs. So an athlete does an FTP test and scores low and becomes demotivated. Well, he/she may not be good at constant torque, constant power work. He/she may be more bursty and do well where there are shorter accelerations and faster efforts.
IMO, power measurement training is excellent but focus on FTP and the Coggan construct may be counter productive to improving cycling and finding what type of cycling best suits an individual.
Last edited by Hermes; 03-28-14 at 12:49 PM.
#19
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,500
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3872 Post(s)
Liked 1,920 Times
in
1,369 Posts
I have power measurement on all my bikes including the track. I use Cycling Analytics which is a cloud based service similar to WKO. I use a Mac so WKO will not run work and I do not like running PC simulation software to run PC programs. I am a data junkie and like the on the bike power measurement as well as post ride analysis. I used GC for awhile but prefer CA.
I have found that the construct proposed in Training and Racing with a Power Meter and the performance manager in training peaks as proposed by Coggan not applicable to me and probably not applicable to the track. I can do a very fatiguing track workout - high cadence, high power short duration efforts. The TSS for that effort will be low. Likewise, I am very good at high power shorter duration efforts but my FTP is low. I can do a hard road group ride which will indicate a very high TSS showing a lot of anaerobic threshold efforts and I will recover from it quite easily. IMO, for those athletes that are younger road racers with "traditional" FTP numbers, the construct will work and the TSB readings indicative of fatigue. However, for older athletes that are specialists, it seems off.
IMO, the other problem with the FTP model is that it focuses athletes on FTP that IMO, is applicable for time trialists who do 40 ITTs. So an athlete does an FTP test and scores low and becomes demotivated. Well, he/she may not be good at constant torque, constant power work. He/she may be more bursty and do well where there are shorter accelerations and faster efforts.
IMO, power measurement training is excellent but focus on FTP and the Coggan construct may be counter productive to improving cycling and finding what type of cycling best suits an individual.
I have found that the construct proposed in Training and Racing with a Power Meter and the performance manager in training peaks as proposed by Coggan not applicable to me and probably not applicable to the track. I can do a very fatiguing track workout - high cadence, high power short duration efforts. The TSS for that effort will be low. Likewise, I am very good at high power shorter duration efforts but my FTP is low. I can do a hard road group ride which will indicate a very high TSS showing a lot of anaerobic threshold efforts and I will recover from it quite easily. IMO, for those athletes that are younger road racers with "traditional" FTP numbers, the construct will work and the TSB readings indicative of fatigue. However, for older athletes that are specialists, it seems off.
IMO, the other problem with the FTP model is that it focuses athletes on FTP that IMO, is applicable for time trialists who do 40 ITTs. So an athlete does an FTP test and scores low and becomes demotivated. Well, he/she may not be good at constant torque, constant power work. He/she may be more bursty and do well where there are shorter accelerations and faster efforts.
IMO, power measurement training is excellent but focus on FTP and the Coggan construct may be counter productive to improving cycling and finding what type of cycling best suits an individual.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,079
Bikes: Roubaix SL4 Expert , Cervelo S2
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 85 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
IMO, the other problem with the FTP model is that it focuses athletes on FTP that IMO, is applicable for time trialists who do 40 ITTs. So an athlete does an FTP test and scores low and becomes demotivated. Well, he/she may not be good at constant torque, constant power work. He/she may be more bursty and do well where there are shorter accelerations and faster efforts.
#21
Version 7.0
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 13,097
Bikes: Too Many
Mentioned: 297 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 2,438 Times
in
1,425 Posts
Very interesting. I'm an older guy with crummy FTP (not that I use power). I can get around that somewhat by being bursty as you say, and hurting folks until they don't want to hurt anymore. Do you use the Performance Management Chart, and thus note your CTL, ATL, and TSB? And note that the chart does not predict performance, at least to some degree? I find that if I've been running a high (for me) CTL for a while, I recover easily from low TSS workouts, even though they may feel fatiguing at the time, while a series of high TSS workouts or one over-400 TSS ride will have me doing recovery rides for a few days, exactly as predicted by the chart.
As avid a cyclist as you seem to be, my suggestion is to get a power meter. I have the Vector and it is working great and I plan on using it on the tandem. You can easily more the Vector around from bike to bike.
#22
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,500
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3872 Post(s)
Liked 1,920 Times
in
1,369 Posts
Cycling Analytics, like WKO and GC, has a performance manager based upon Coggan's formulation and FTP construct. I look at it but it has not been very helpful with my trainer/roller workouts that I have been doing since November. And I have been doing a lot of leg plyometrics 2 to 3 times per week. The leg plyos are very fatiguing on the legs. I find the rollers/trainer much harder than riding on the road or track. Unless I assign a TSS to the plyometric work and fudge the indoor TSS, the performance manager is not going to mean much.
As avid a cyclist as you seem to be, my suggestion is to get a power meter. I have the Vector and it is working great and I plan on using it on the tandem. You can easily more the Vector around from bike to bike.
As avid a cyclist as you seem to be, my suggestion is to get a power meter. I have the Vector and it is working great and I plan on using it on the tandem. You can easily more the Vector around from bike to bike.
I have thought (briefly) about a hub, but needing a 36H 145mm, not going to happen even if I had the change.
I just jumped in here to say that the data examination/navel gazing works well even if you're using HRMs, as long as you can upload the data. Using HRTSS, PM may not track the legs perfectly, as you say, but it does track aerobic performance potential. If my heart will go, I can go, as long as I didn't do something silly like heavy weights the night before.
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: vermont
Posts: 3,091
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
I have been uploading all my data from the various devices and spend time looking at it and identifying features on the charts that show changes in tempo and the result in HR and power output. The plan I am following has me doing a lot of intervals and all types of hill/power repeats and notice my power in those situations is improving quite a bit. I want to do track and crit type events as I think I am more suited. BTW, I am doing my second FTP test after six weeks of hard work and I am looking forward after resting/light duty for a week.
People are upgrading their stuff and selling off older devices. That was how I ended up with most of it.
People are upgrading their stuff and selling off older devices. That was how I ended up with most of it.